USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Write a response about the topic in the reading (see attached) and make sure you include the following:
1. Brief summary of the reading
2. What was intersting?
3. The main points highlighted and what do you think of the reading?
( 2 page response)
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
This article was downloaded by: [Bates, Marlin]
On: 24 February 2009
Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 908943728]
Publisher Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Quarterly Review of Film and Video
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713648686
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds: The Mutability of the Self in Massively
Multiplayer
Online Role-Playing Games
Marlin C. Bates IV a
a University of the Pacific,
Online Publication Date: 01 March 2009
To cite this Article Bates IV, Marlin C.(2009)’Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds: The Mutability of the Self in Massively
Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games’,Quarterly Review of Film and Video,26:2,102 — 117
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/10509200600737770
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10509200600737770
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713648686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10509200600737770
http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access
Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 26: 102–117, 2009
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1050-9208 print / 1543-5326 online
DOI: 10.1080/10509200600737770
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds:
The Mutability of the Self in Massively Multiplayer
Online Role-Playing Games
MARLIN C. BATES, IV
Employing a grounded theory approach to implicit identity theory, this essay seeks to argue
that humans create both the product of identity and the process of identity through rhetorical
actions in two massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG). Specifically,
this essay builds on a prior investigation into Ultima Online by comparing it to a relative
newcomer, the MMORPG World Of Warcraft in order to demonstrate how rhetorical forms
are persistent across these two games. The essay examines how player-characters in Ultima
Online and World of Warcraft follow an implicit schema of character and, thus, identity
development. Players use the site of the MMORPG in order to create identities in a manner
that is implicitly recognized by all players. Player-characters then perform those identities
in web sites.
Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss argue that too often we are concerned with proving
that a theory works, rather than discovering the theories already present within a given
situation.1 Glaser and Strauss argue that when the process of grounded theory is properly
completed, the theory discovered will be “readily understandable to sociologists of any
viewpoint, to students and to significant laymen.”2 Also, the users of the theory do not
necessarily recognize it as a theory. What the participants do recognize is that there are
certain ways that they must or may act in a given situation. Much akin to norms within
small group communication theory, these rules develop through continuous interaction and
are adopted and adapted to the needs of the situation.
The MMORPG players present not only an identity, but also a method of performing
and altering that identity. The identity is created using guidelines presented by the software
itself, web pages, and other users. Identity is then performed by the users within the
game and on related web pages. The creation of identity occurs as users choose what
they wish to be in the game. Users further refine the performance of their identity within
web pages related to the particular MMORPG. Although the in-game performance allows
users to perform the identity to a certain extent, time and space constrain the number of
other player-characters that are able to witness that performance. The player-characters
also use the web pages to further expand the professions and personalities available for
performance. However, the newly expanded professions are still constrained by the identity
process created within the game.
Current communication theory concerning computer mediated communication (CMC)
argues that there are “at least five sources of impact on CMC” and that “each of those
Marlin C. Bates, IV has been involved in playing and studying video games since his parents
bought him an Atari 2600 in 1978. He firmly believes that online video games are the next rhetorical
frontier. In his free time, he is the Director of Forensics for University of the Pacific.
102
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 103
sources—external contexts, temporal structure, system infrastructure, group purposes, and
participant characteristics—is itself comprised of variables.” This belief is then used to
support a theory that CMC reacts to these variables by “appropriating rules and resources
from pre-existing sources of influence through social interaction.”3 However, I would argue
that this theory is false. Online community is not created as mimicry of the “real” world.
Rather, it is a creation of the individuals themselves; that roles and behaviors are fulfilled as
users motivate towards one of the identity schemas available inside of the game. MMORPG
players have already differentiated themselves from the mass of society; they do not need to
replicate the society they leave when they enter the MMORPG. Members of the community
can gain membership into the group only by playing the game itself. However, Stephen
Doheny-Farina writes that,
A community is bound by place, which always includes complex social and
environmental necessities. It is not something you can easily join. You can’t
subscribe to a community as you subscribe to a discussion group on the net. It
must be lived. It is entwined, contradictory, and involves all our senses.4
Neither Ultima Online nor World of Warcraft is a physical location. The discovery of my
work, however, expands the definition of “place.” Player-characters in MMORPGs form
complex relationships with each other. Some player-characters join large guilds that are
formed on the basis of craft or personality. Others get married to other player-characters
in and out of the game. Furthermore, the joining of the MMORPG community is not
a simple act. A person desiring to engage in this community must first purchase the
software and then sign up for the service on a continuing basis. The player-character
must also pay a monthly fee in order to maintain their existence in the game. With the
research that follows, we will come to see that a person is able to subscribe to a commu-
nity. It is not the place that bounds community, but the identities that are formed within
it.
The following analysis will attempt to prove that five rhetorical forms, or identity
schemas, are present within both UO and WoW. In my previous work, I identified these
schemas as “new player,” “role player,” “gamer,” “player,” and “independent.”5 The names
tend to describe how the player-character will interact with others and what language will
be used to conduct that interaction.
The first identity is one that all players start from. It is often a source of derision
by other, more established, players through the use of the epithet, “noob.”6 However, that
does not negate its existence. Indeed, the disdain other players have for this identity only
further serves to prove its existence. The second identity is the “role-player.” The player-
character employing such an identity seems to go to some length to maintain the illusion
of the game fiction. In order to recognize and be recognized as a member of the “role
player” identity group, player-characters within the web pages use language that contains
a great deal of abstract detail. “Role players” also realize that they must use first person
references to describe themselves and their activities. When these player-characters attempt
commerce, that attempt will also align with the role being portrayed. Finally, there will
be little, if any, attempt to distinguish statements between in-game references and real-life
references.
The third identity is the “gamer” schema. Like the “role-player” this identity is derived
from the “new player” schema. However, this identity arrangement is not concerned with
the game beyond the fact that it is a game to be mastered. Indeed, there are really no
restraints as to what “gamers” will or will not do to prove their prowess within and
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
104 Marlin C. Bates, IV
without the confines of the game program. “Gamers” also realize that they must use third
person references to describe their character and its activities. Moreover, those descriptions
concerning the player-character’s abilities will be in the numeric equivalents. When these
player-characters attempt commerce, that attempt will focus on the statistical data and not
the narrative descriptions. Finally, there will be continued reminders to themselves and
other players that this is a game and that they have mastered the game.
We can recognize “player” identity by its employment of elements from both the
“role-player” and the “gamer” identities. The “player” users will freely borrow from both
identities, as the player-character deems necessary. Other Ultima Online player-characters
can recognize the “player” identity adherent when they see the combination of game fiction
narratives alongside numerical statistics, a reference to out-game instances while using
in-game fiction descriptions and a free use of both commerce styles as deemed suitable to
the player-character.
The “independent” identity follows no discernable pattern that is replicated amongst
other gamers. Indeed, the only coherent theory to this identity is that employers of this
identity will be unlike either the “role-player” or “gamer” identities. “Independent” player-
characters do not seek to be recognized by their fellow gamers, nor do they wish to be
identified with a group of other players.
The beginnings of identity in MMORPGs are as modest as those in real life. We
start out as blank slates that are inscribed upon by our experiences and the world around
us. As Maurice Charland tells us, “our first subject positions are modest, linked to our
name, our family, and our sex.” Such is the case with Ultima Online and the World of
Warcraft. However, as Charland further states, “as we enter the adult world, [our subject
positions] become more complex.” As the player progresses in the game, the player-
characters recognize themselves “as the subject in a text.” The identity adopted by player-
characters allows them to step beyond the boundaries of where they may be physically or
temporally. As Charland reminds us, “it is to be a subject which exists beyond one’s body
and life span.”7 Moreover, it is the recognition of other players that allows individual player-
characters to recognize that they are part of a “rhetoric of socialization”8 and can thus be a
“model of what the rhetor would have his real auditor become.”9 This recognition is further
shaped by the mode of communication in which the rhetoric is transmitted. Carey reminds
us rhetors are not attempting to acquire information from other players, but are trying to
confirm how to portray themselves within the world that is that particular MMORPG.10
Player-characters read the web pages and garner from them a sense of what it means to be
other characters. From that sense of Being, player-characters construct what it means to be
themselves. That mode of being is then transmitted to others for reception and justification.
The profile is the rhetorical discourse of being within Ultima Online. As Edwin Black
states, the “best evidence in the discourse” of a link between an implied auditor and an
ideology “will be in the form of stylistic tokens.”11 The web page performances are the
“stylistic tokens” that Black speaks of. By discovering there are implicit categories within
the web pages, we can assign value to the stylistic tokens. Each rhetorical form represents
a stylistic token and is adopted or rejected by auditors as player-characters seek to build
their identity. Most importantly, there is no arbitrary construction of these tokens. Rather,
players are interpellated into a sense of whom they are by implicitly recognizing which
tokens to adopt. It is the use of certain tokens that allow the critic to recognize which group
a particular rhetor belongs to. Moreover, it allows the critic to determine what changes
can be wrought by individual player-characters and by groups of player-characters. For
example, if a group of rhetor-players had adopted a habit of selling items by telling other
players what numeric attributes each item had, we would be able to conclude that that
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 105
group was adhering to the “gamer” identity schema. If that same group of players then
starts to describe their items for sale in another manner, we would recognize an attempt at
changing the overarching identity schema was being made. Furthermore, by constructing
the identity schemas, we know which group of player-characters accepts which tokens
for each member’s use. The identity schemas represent the beginnings of how we can
recognize the rhetoric of other members of the group. We will know, for example, that if
players use the stylistic token of “numeric skill description” in either their web sites that
they are part of the “gamer” identity. We do not know this because of a priori knowledge
or even the arbitrary determination of the critic. We have this knowledge because the
members of the group under study use particular tokens that express a particular “vector
of influence”12 that shapes how they respond to other rhetoric inside and outside of the
game.
In the web pages, we begin to see how Charland’s “rhetoric of socialization” begins to
be structured. Charland argues that auditors begin to see the calls, or hails, from other rhetors
as an attempt to situate us within a particular frame of reference or rhetoric of socialization.
The game software creates one instance of hailing the auditors, the web pages creates yet
another. The web pages allow for the player-characters to more clearly shape their identities
by allowing each user or group to refine further their subject position within the text/context.
The web pages, therefore, are the instance of the auditors answering the hails of both the
call from the software to create a character that adheres to an identity and to the call from
the web pages to perform that identity. Additionally, the web pages are the player-character
further entering the worlds of Ultima Online and Warcraft. Thus, their subject positions
acquire and require more depth, more complexity. Some examples of further complexity
are in how player-characters adopt specific roles within the fabric of Ultima Online’s and
World of Warcraft’s fiction. The player-characters are no longer just ordinary individuals
in the game; they have taken on unique performances. These performances fall within the
identity schema, but they differentiate themselves through the adoption of the schema. In
other words, the rhetorical form provides the foundation and frame on top of which the
uniqueness is built. The process is similar to what Burke explains as identification and
differentiation. Burke tells us that as human actors we are constantly striving to belong
to a group (identification) and yet still be different from the individuals within the group
(differentiation).13 It is the tension between these two modes that the individuals within
the MMORPG must deal with. In order to reduce the tension, player-characters attend
to the clues of how to perform that are present within the game and the web pages. In
doing so, the player-characters become part of the group but still maintain their unique
selves.
Because the web authors are no longer constrained by the software engine, web pages
allow their creators a great deal of flexibility in how content concerning the MMORPG is
presented. Moreover, there are fewer limitations as to what may be presented within the
web pages. In examining web pages that echo the identities created within the MMORPGs,
we are able to discern a more complete picture of the identities. Specifically, the rhetor
can create whatever images and text necessary to the task, whereas, within the game, the
player-character is constrained in word and deed somewhat: text is transitory, graphics
must be created with the game engine, and there is no place to universally access or display
information. Therefore, the identities discovered within the web pages are less susceptible
to artificial constraints such as the limitations of a game.
Ultima Online’s official websites present information in a manner that would seem to
contradict itself. The first portion of official web pages dedicates itself to explaining how
to play the game itself. However, the web pages do so in a way that ascribes a reality to
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
106 Marlin C. Bates, IV
the game’s fiction. For example, the web page that explains to new players how to get
ahead in the game does not explain the process in terms of game mechanics, but in terms
of the game’s fiction. Even the sub-titles of the web page tend to support a role-playing
interpretation: “Getting Money,” “Banking,” and “Safe Deposit Boxes.” The sub-titles
are active references to real-life actions, while simultaneously pointing the reader toward
the in-game simulacrums. As the web page unfolds, the rhetoric of the page forces its
reader into accepting the game fiction as reality in order to understand the game itself.
Specifically, “the simplest way to earning an income is to start trading” and “do not try to
steal anything unless you have the appropriate Thieving skills—you’re unlikely to survive
the experience.”14 The web page does not state that players should not attempt to steal
unless they have xx.x percent in thieving. The web site seeks to disseminate information,
but it intentionally does not violate the willing suspension of disbelief amongst a portion
of its player base.
However, there are exceptions to this unwritten rule. In explaining the “Charac-
ter Window,” the web page states, “your backpack may also be accessed by clicking
the Inventory button on your character window, or by holding ALT key and pressing
‘I’.”15 The phrasing used here reminds the reader that a computer game is being dis-
cussed (for example, “ALT key”) and, thus, could spoil the suspension of disbelief. How-
ever, even in this exception there is an attempt to keep the player enmeshed within the
game fiction. By using the phrasing “your backpack” and “your character” the web page
ameliorates the use of computer terminology and maintains the suspension of disbe-
lief. Other informational pages place any text that does not align with game fiction in
italics.
The official web pages increase their reality prescription when they focus on the game
fiction specifically. As described by the company itself,
The Britannia News Network is the official news site for Ultima Online. All
articles are written by our Interest staff and are based on actual events and
situations in the game. From time to time, fictional stories may be provided by
the developers, expanding upon the lore of Britannia.
The sites are not simply web pages, but rather they are “official news sites” and expand on
the “lore of Britannia.” Additionally, any information that does not align even peripherally
with the game fiction is referred to sites not included within the main pages. For example,
there is a newsletter that describes “the most recent changes in the game and on the Web
Site.” However, this newsletter is not found within the official site. Rather, the newsletter
is sent to individuals via electronic mail. Moreover, the web site refers players to guild
web sites that contain “over 23,000 player-run organizations, or guilds, [and] permeate the
landscape of UO.” Again, there is a separation between what is game fiction and what
might potentially distinguish fact from fiction.16
The “Role Player” identity adherents specifically seek out situations that allow them to
become more enmeshed within the game fiction. The “Information” section of the official
web sites allows the player-character to continue this pattern. Information contained within
this section of the website is not presented in a straightforward manner. Indeed, the web
pages take extreme pains to couch all information, whether it is beginning or ongoing, in
terms of the game fiction. Specifically, it the rhetor’s choice of “person” that places the
auditors of these web pages within certain identity schemas. In language, the first person is
used to distinguish the speaker; the second person is used to address the individual being
spoken to, and the third person is used to speak of an object or a party separate from the
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 107
speaker or the auditor. The official web sites avoid separating the character from the player
by avoiding the second person groups of pronouns and referring to the character and the
player as one and the same.
The play guide section of the website is perhaps the best example of this tendency.
Although the play guide attempts to present information to new players as if they were
simply playing a game, the web pages in this area slip into the language of the role-player
identity. One section starts out stating, “Your Character Window displays your character’s
full name, including profession, and any titles you may have.”17 This statement is an attempt
to differentiate the player from the character. But, the statement contradicts itself. At the
end of the sentence, the phrase “any titles you may have” implies that the character no
longer possesses the title, rather the player himself does. This conclusion is reinforced by
the sentence directly following, “Your name will also reflect your reputation.”18 Again, the
distinction between the player and character is no longer present because the name is the
player’s, the reputation is the player’s, and the player is the auditor being addressed by
the page. The web page is not discussing a separate person or object; it is discussing the
auditor. Had the web authors wanted to separate the player and character, they could have
continued the third person references used in the beginning of the sentence by saying, for
example, “your character’s reputation will be reflected in its name.” This is not an isolated
example. The next section on the same page tells the reader that “the Character Window
shows a close-up view of your character, including the clothing and armor you’re currently
wearing, or any weapons or tools you’re currently wielding.”19 The initial use of the third
person reference is an attempt to draw all readers into the role player persona. Indeed, this
use of the third person allows even the skeptical player entrée into the “role player” schema
because there are no barriers to the use of the schema. The auditor is led from game, to the
persona objectified, to the persona as auditor. If anything, these web pages add to the “role
player” identity in that it provides further justification of the perception of real. If we are
constantly seeking for instances of stable, coherent identities, then there must be an opening
for the auditor-player to enter accept this instance as an acceptable identity schema. In the
official web pages of Ultima Online, it is the subtle movement from third party (“Your
character’s reputation”) to the second person (“Your name” and “Your reputation”). This
fugue state of sorts is present within almost all elements of the information pages. Even
the italicized side notes, which are ostensibly present to separate the game from the gamer,
contain these subtle movements.20
To finalize the analysis of the official information web pages, let us apply the identity
elements of the role player to these pages. To begin, there tends to be a large range in
the amount of data employed to describe a player-character by persons adhering to the
“role player” identity schema. The information web pages present information in a middle
ground type of detail. Although there is a good deal of information present, it is up to
the player to discern the implication of most of the information. Furthermore, the web
pages do not present computer-related specifics unless absolutely necessary. Even when
this information must be presented, it is accompanied by ameliorating statements. All
three types of game character titles are treated by the web pages as belonging to an entity
that is neither player nor character alone. Rather, these titles are “your name” and “your
reputation.”
The web pages are also used to present the identity elements of the “role player” in
the first person. The official information web pages explain commerce within the game as
aligning with the role being portrayed by the player-character in such a way as to minimize
any differentiation between in-game and real-life references. This is best portrayed by the
following statement from the official Ultima Online web pages:
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
108 Marlin C. Bates, IV
For very large purchases of 2000 gold or more (a house or ship deed for exam-
ple), or for purchases from a vendor where it would be difficult or impossible to
carry sufficient cash on your person, the vendor architect, shipwright or other
tradesman can transfer funds directly from your bank account, even without a
banker present, once the deal is agreed upon.21
The specific use of first person statements creates a sense of reality. The player-character is
not interacting with a game; he is agreeing to make a deal with an architect or a shipwright.
The power of these words allows those seeking some stable, coherent identity to maintain
the identity schema of the “role player.”
These web pages do not “prove” that the “role player” identity exists. Rather, these
pages independently allow a “role player” identity to be performed. It is an identity that
aligns with one present within the game itself. The web pages do not explicate a method
of playing the game. Rather, they entrap players into a mode of thinking that allows them
to discover the “role player” schema for themselves. Additionally, the web pages allow the
auditors to see how their individual employment of the identity schema would interact in
the world created in Ultima Online. The performance occurs mentally as the auditors read
the web pages and imagine how “their reputation” may be affected by in-game events or
how they might do their banking.
The World of Warcraft official site does Ultima Online one better in terms of presenting
a stage for the identities to be performed. Unlike Ultima Online, Blizzard’s World of
Warcraft site separates the areas for identity performance. The “New player” is presented
with a large variety of information to choose from. There are discrete areas to find “Role-
playing discussions” as well as “PvP [Gamer] discussions.” The “Player” identities can
then pick and choose what information they need and desire.
Specifically, the side frame of the World of Warcraft site lists information in groups.
The visitor to the site can find “Game Info” as well as “Forums” for discussion. However,
the information, much like that found in the Ultima Online web sites is couched in a neutral
language that can be construed—by the player-character—as to be in support of any of the
rhetorical identity schemas. If one were to go to the “Info—Basics—World of Warcraft
Guide” page, the reader is presented with the following opening paragraph
As a massively multiplayer online game, World of Warcraft enables thousands
of players to come together online and battle against the world and each other.
Players from across the globe can leave the real world behind and undertake
grand quests and heroic exploits in a land of fantastic adventure. At long
last, the world of Azeroth, first glimpsed in Warcraft I and further enhanced
in subsequent strategy games, is realized in glorious detail and ready for the
arrival of millions of prospective players. So step upon the hallowed shores of
this embattled world, and see what journeys await for those who would plumb
this ancient realm’s many secrets.22
Just as in the Ultima Online pages, Blizzard seeks to shift the player from one realm to
another. The reader is invited to “step up upon the hallowed shores.” The player is hailed
to join the world known as Warcraft. It is not a world created for this “game.” Rather, it is
a world that has been in existence and was “first glimpsed” in a long-past time.
Just like the UO pages, however, these pages not only offer the rules to be followed, but
also the stage on which to demonstrate the identities behind the rules. In the forum section
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 109
of the WoW web pages, there are discussion areas for “Role-playing,” “PvP Discussion,”
“Professions,” Quests,” “Code of Conduct,” and more.
The “Role-playing” forum allows player-characters to act out their characters in such
posts as
Stareye wearily dismounted the gryphon and walked through Astrannar. The
beautiful purple and green forest was a welcome sight from the arid Barrens.
He walked into the inn and bought a room and meal for 50 silver. Stareye had
been called to Ashenvale to help the Sentinels regain the forest. For many years,
he had battled the Horde with many other Alliance forces. The upcoming battle
may be his hardest yet.23
The forums give the players an opportunity to reach out and display their characters and
how such characters would act. Such messages exist for all of the rhetorical schemas. Addi-
tionally, by placing such explicit divisions on the web site, Blizzard does what EA/OSI does
not: explicitly recognizes that there are different types of players within their “community.”
Indeed, Blizzard even goes so far as to have certain servers dedicated to certain identity
types.
Blizzard created three different types of “realms” or servers on which a player-character
can engage in the game’s world. Blizzard calls these server types “Normal,” “Role-playing,”
and “Player vs. Player [PvP].” There is also a combination of the last two: “Role-playing
PvP.” The description that Blizzard gives them further cements the theory that the rhetorical
forms found in Ultima Online have been replicated in World of Warcraft.
For the “Normal” realm, Blizzard sums up the realm with a “Sentence to remember:
On a Normal realm, I will never be attacked by other players if I don’t want to be, except if I
enter an enemy capital or a Battleground.”24 In other words, this could be the playground for
the “Player” identity, the player-character who seeks to gather something from everything.
The “sentence to remember” for the “Role-Playing realm” is equally fitting: “If I choose to
play on a Role-Playing realm, I will act and speak as my character should in the World of
Warcraft setting.”25 Again, as was discovered in UO, the role-player rhetorical identity seeks
to immerse themselves in the ur-Real world within the game. The realm and the web site
forums go hand in hand to allow that identity to be performed. The “Player vs. Player” realm
also allows for the “Gamer” to demonstrate his or her dominance of the game by joining a
realm that places player-characters in situations described by this “sentence to remember”:
“On a Player vs. Player realm, I may be attacked by other players everywhere at any time,
except in friendly (green) territories and in dungeons (instances).”26 In conjunction with
this type of realm there is a ranking page that shows how each player-character is doing in
terms of body count and player kills.27
The rhetorical forms found within Ultima Online have not only been replicated in
the World of Warcraft, they have been further refined so that identities may be performed
even more closely to the rules promulgated from other, earlier, MMORPGs. In our further
discussion, we can begin to see what impacts will arise from this persistency in persistent
worlds.
The conclusion to this analysis of the Ultima Online and World of Warcraft web pages
brings forth a number of new additions to the identity schemas in play within MMORPGs.
The web pages force the reader/audience into further accepting, and therefore adhering
to, the schemas in play. This further support results in the broadening of the implicit
identity theory to include three new facets of the rhetoric of these MMORPGs to consider:
understanding, meaning, and identity.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
110 Marlin C. Bates, IV
The web sites foster the creation of understanding in that the pages allow some entrée
for new players into the game by allowing new players to view the performance of the
identity schemas present within the game. Moreover, those “gamers,” “players,” and “role
players” who wish to understand more about the world in which they play and live are able
to view those other personas who seem to be similar to them on the web pages. By sharing
information in the manner each identity user is accustomed to receiving it, each group of
identity users begins to share an understanding of how the game and their new “lives” work.
The web pages are ascribed an authority on par with the game itself because the web pages
seek to describe the game and the identity creation found therein. The web page’s author,
therefore, has a great deal of influence in controlling information and, as Kermode reminds
us, “once a text is credited with high authority, it is studied intensely; once it is so studied,
it acquires mystery or secrecy.”28
With the exposition or maintenance of the mystery, the web sites also engender un-
derstanding in that the web pages allow the adherents of each identity schema to further
differentiate themselves. The web pages represent player-characters who not only have
faith in MMORPGs as a place for identity, but also player-characters who know how
the ur-Real world works. These player-characters—be they “role-player,” “gamer,” or
“player”—profess knowledge on their web sites. The knowledge they posses must, in order
to be fully understood by the web site’s audience, be translated into a language of action
or of implementation. Each identity schema’s adherents use the web pages, therefore, to
dictate what is acceptable in terms of identity creation and performance. In discussing
how “the texts of disclosure . . . confer suasory power on the translator,” Black posits that
“anything at all that may have a latent meaning in addition to its manifest one is susceptible
to translation and so is a potential vehicle for the enhancement of the translator’s ethos.” In
completing the translation of the game’s fiction into acceptable modes of action, the player-
characters become more than just players, they become “initiates, possessors of privileged
knowledge.” In other words, the player turned initiate is now elevated to something more
than one of the crowd. Along with that elevated status comes the ability to dictate which
configuration of identity and identity performance is acceptable for those that aspire to
be like the translator. The web pages become the connective tissue between the bones of
the identity schema. In translating the game, the web pages allow performance to more
accurately reflect the intended identity as it allows a greater range of movement, much like
the difference between an angle and a curve. The game’s software allows the rough angle
to be constructed with crude implements, but the web pages with the exchange or retention
of secret information allows the angle to be shaped into a curve.29
With the creation of the more appropriate curve, there comes a creation of meaning. The
information ceases to just be instructions on how to play or live, and becomes something of
more substance. The translator’s information becomes, as Burke states, consubstantiation.
Burke posited that consubstantiation can only come after identification. The process of
establishing rhetorical identity schemas and the process of translating the information
surrounding these identities creates the identification situation. From this, the aspects of
the identity become even stronger. As the identity schemas are strengthened, the player-
characters are able to find fellow characters that are of the same identity type and begin to
re-tribalize. With the re-tribalization, the player-characters accomplish the establishment
of stable, coherent identities or consubstantiation.
Finally, we have discovered that the web presents a stage for identity schemas to be
performed by each identity rhetor. Although the web pages do allow for expansion of the
identity schemas created within the game, their main purpose is to present an exposition
of the player-characters. The “gamer” persona, perhaps more so than any other identity
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 111
schema, requires the performance, as player-characters cannot simply state that they are
proficient in the game. They must demonstrate it through knowledge and actions. The
game allows player-characters to create a certain amount of that identity in that they can
demonstrate some knowledge. However, due to the real time nature of the game, gamers
cannot display that knowledge all in one moment. The “role players” can display their
identity by maintaining the role and “becoming” more real. Thus, the web pages allow
gamers, players, and their guilds to display all of that knowledge in a stable location and,
therefore, to re-tribalize.
The web pages explain why tokens are ascribed to “role player” rhetorical form. The
web pages allow certain members of the identity group to be elevated to the status of
translator. This status carries with it the ability to specify what is correct behavior in terms
of identity creation and performance. It is that elevation that also dictates why “role players”
describe themselves only in terms of the language of the game’s fiction. These adherents
do so because they value the secrecy of the game. As Black describes it, secrecy is not only
in terms of the unknown, but also the mystique. Specifically, “the mediator of revelation
became distanced into mystery.”30 In keeping with the language of the game’s fiction, “role
players” continue the tradition of the façade, the tradition of secrecy. In order to maintain
that veil of secrecy and mystique, minor deviations from the language of the game fiction
can and will be ignored in order to maintain the identity façade.
Additionally, since outright disagreement with the companies that create these ur-
Real worlds would be tantamount to a drawing away of the veil, disagreement with the
game, designers, or the company is done only in game fiction terms. If the “role players”
admitted that there was a company behind the creation of the world, the secret would be
“out,” the world would be “a computer game” and, therefore, accessible to all. Instead, by
disagreeing with the company in terms of the game’s fiction, the veil is maintained and
only the translators may allow access.
It is for similar reasons that guilds can and will be described outside of the game,
but player-characters cannot be described outside of the game. The translator can reveal
information about a guild because it maintains the translator’s status as disseminator of
information that needs to be understood by the masses. The members of the role player
group need to understand how guilds function within the mystery that is the particular
MMORPG’s universe. However, to describe an individual is to reveal the person behind the
curtain. Individual players may give information about themselves to the translator, but that
knowledge is kept secret so that the mystery is maintained; the translator remains superior.
If the “role player” adherent uses the translation aspect of the web pages to maintain the
mystery, the “gamer” uses the role to expose it. “Gamers” revel in the ability to understand
how the game works but not in order to maintain a façade, but to display their place within
the mystery. Since the game fiction does not allow objective representation of skill, the
gamer resorts to the use of numeric equivalents. The entire identity schema is created
to demonstrate prowess and technical abilities, thus the “gamer” uses the web pages to
translate the game’s language in such a way that all readers may become initiates to the
belief. Unlike a priest who seeks to maintain the secrets of the confessor, the gamer wishes
to reveal all knowledge in the most efficient way as possible. The web pages allow the gamer
to disseminate information in such a way as to let people become better at the game and,
through that, better at performing the gamer identity schema. Thus, even though there will
sometimes be elements of the role player presented, the vast majority of the information
presented will be in the language of the gamer. For example, when the gamer presents web
pages that “interview” other player-characters, there may be some game fiction language,
but that language is used in order to expose the mysteries, not to confound them.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
112 Marlin C. Bates, IV
The “player” schema is, again, the middle ground between the role player and the
gamer. “Player” web sites also employ the translator mode to explain the game. However,
whether the translator deepens the mystery or solves the mystery depends on what identity
group the player-character wishes to become consubstantiated with at the moment. As
discussed earlier, the “player” schema adherents tend to pick and choose what stylistic
tokens they adopt. Those choices will vary depending on the end state that the “player”
wishes to achieve; either “role player” or “gamer.” As such, the choice of translator role
must also vary. However, we can conclude that if a “player” tends toward adopting the
stylistic tokens of a particular group (for example, “role player”), then the “player” will
also adopt the translator mode that aligns with that same group (for example, one that seeks
to maintain the mystery of World of Warcraft or Ultima Online).
The web pages not only allow the player-characters to display the choice of stylistic
tokens they have adopted through the identity creation process, but the web pages also
allow the player-characters to deem how to display and understand those tokens in such a
way as to either maintain or expose the secrets of the world.
Implications
The users of the MMORPG and the implicit identities created do not recognize how they
construct their player-characters as a theory, per se. Rather, through their performances in
the web, the player-characters recognize that in order to create and perform a certain identity
schema, they must adhere to certain rules. Those rules are found within the five distinct
identities revealed: “new player,” “role player,” “gamer,” “player,” and “independent.” The
player-characters then perform those identities in the game and in the World Wide Web.
In performing the identity schemas, the users present a coherent whole to the auditors
within the game and are thus recognized by their peers. Problems within the framework
of the MMORPG that do not allow the player-character to perform an identity in an
acceptable manner are addressed in a variety of contexts. Collective identities are formed
by the combination of player-characters into guilds and other associations found within
the game and also reinforced through web sites.
Those associations and identities are what Burke would term a “community of ways.”
Burke tells us “from the standpoint of “identification,” what we call “competition” is better
described as men’s [and women’s] attempt to out-imitate one another.”31 This imitation
causes consubstantiality “by a community of ways (identification’).”32 From this identifi-
cation, the players find not only their identity, but also how they fit within the community as
a whole. Therefore, if there is a need to emulate those around them in the game, the players
will naturally tend towards competition in order to fulfill that need. It is the conscious
use of imitation/competition by the player-characters that draws them together as a whole.
A player-character seeking to become more involved with a group of gamers begins to
see the need to “beat the game” in order to be more accepted by the group. Role-players
must find new and different ways to be more involved in the game fiction in order to be
accepted by role-playing guilds. It is an interesting conundrum that player-characters must
actively seek out different ways to become more the same. However, the conundrum is
solved when we understand that the player-characters must not just seek to imitate, but
imitate the hierarchy of the imitation. Burke posits that imitation is, perhaps, a crude way
to get at consubstantiality. In order for true identification to exist, there must be hierarchy.
Specifically, the player must “imitate not its mere insignia, but the principle behind the
ordering of those insignias.”33 When player-characters seek out similar professional titles
possessed by other player-characters, they do so not just to be like the other player-character.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 113
Rather, they do so in order to be part of the hierarchy of insignias mentioned by Burke. The
player-characters, whether they are gamers or role-players, imitate in order to be the best
and, thus, be accepted by the group as a whole.
MMORPGs provide further support for their sense of real by providing insight into how
identities maintain membership and community cohesion. It is the web sites that provide
us with information as to how the group is maintained over time. Black posited that an
auditor could not employ a rhetor’s terms without also adopting the ideology behind those
terms. MMORPGs not only provide support for this thought, but also advance it one step
further in that they uses the theory to maintain membership. Those performance rules either
allowed each player-character to fully demonstrate an identity or the player-character was
given the ability to withdraw from the membership. Those adoption of the performance
rules are the “fallible sign” that the player-characters have adopted “not just a position,
but an ideology.”34 Acceptance of the performance rules, and the ideologies behind them,
means that all of the player-characters have sufficient reasons to continue in the activity.
Promulgating the performance rules and, thus, the identity schemas themselves, to other
auditors allows the community to expand. Those that choose to leave the membership do
so not because they have forsaken the ideologies behind the identity performances, but
because they believe that identity performance, for them, is no longer possible. Indeed,
when there is a change to the game that allows former player-characters to believe that
their identity performance is once again possible, then they return to the game. Thus the
player-characters not only have the basis for accepting rhetorical identities, but also a way
to maintain and promote membership.
Charland explains this on-going process when he discusses the Peuple Quebecois. Ul-
tima Online is constantly calling its members to be a part of the situation. More importantly,
the constant hailing occurring reminds the other player-characters on how to act in game
in terms of their chosen identity. If those identities are shifted from acceptable norms, then
the web pages remind the player-character how to act. These player-characters become
part of the fabric of the game. When the player-character guilds form a player-run town,
they do so not because it allows them any special rewards, but because it affirms their
discursive position. No longer is their identity outside of the rhetoric, it IS the rhetoric.
These players do not exist simply because they wish to play a game, they exist because they
need to re-tribalize, re-form communities whilst still maintaining an identity that is stable
and coherent. The websites allow for that creation, they also allow for other auditor/rhetors
to affirm the identity as “acceptable.” Moreover, the web pages give the player-characters
a primer on acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. The player-character has broken out
of the constraints of the game engine and has accepted behaviors, which allow him/her
to demonstrate being different within the game. It is a rhetorical act that demonstrates
knowledge of identity as well as hailing other players to move beyond just the identity
creation and into identity use. The game allows certain identity schemas to be employed.
The player-characters have created those schemas to either explicitly follow or not follow
game-based fiction. By stepping outside the confines of the game engine with that identity,
player-characters make a statement that they are rhetorically “real.” The player-character
has substance beyond that which the companies have allowed them. Moreover, by creat-
ing and displaying items that are outside of the explicit game engine, the player-character
becomes rhetorically “real” WITHIN the game engine. The creation of non-software manu-
factured items is one of the ways that player-characters interpellate others into the rhetorical
situation, it is the rhetorical invitation to BE.
One of the questions this research sought to answer was how player-characters rec-
ognized each identity schema. Donath argued that it was the use of “assessment” and
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
114 Marlin C. Bates, IV
“conventional” signals that allowed others to recognize and be recognized. Ultima Online’s
and World of Warcraft’s identity schemas certainly contain a bit of the Batesian35 mimicry
being revealed, but it is the focus on how those signals are used “in accordance with
prevailing cultural scripts.”36 The player-characters unconsciously ask themselves whether
another, allegedly role-player, player-character is acting like a regular role-player would.
Do the rhetors in question use the language of the game’s fiction to describe their situation
or is it the speech that is best ascribed to players or gamers? Questions like these are the
prevailing scripts being enacted. Determining whether the enactment is good or poor al-
lows auditors to also align with a prevailing script. The player-characters constantly dance
around each other acting and RE-acting, making sure that the identities being performed
are recognizable and correct and therefore the identity is complete and stable. There is no
director for this script save those who are acting the parts, who are becoming and performing
that which is real. It is the epitome of “identification through action.”37
MMORPGs are more than game and yet less than life. It is certainly something that
stimulates the senses and engenders more communication than most any other individual
activity. That is to say, MMORPGs such as UO and WoW are very close to a life in that
it engages the senses: player-characters who are lost are mourned, people come together
and marry, professions obtained, and wealth is gained and lost. It is, in a word, real. The
communication crafted within its virtual borders follows similar rules and expectations
as the communication crafted outside of the activity. The creation of virtual worlds is a
fascinating one, but it is the study of how the populations of those worlds communicate
that is the richest area of all. People masked behind a virtual avatar function no less real
than those in a tête-à-tête. Indeed, it could be argued that the rhetorical representations
within a virtual world are more pure because there is no fear of communication: rhetors
are indirectly communicating to their auditors and, thus, feel freer to communicate their
intentions. This research does not even begin to discuss these conclusions, but it is a fine
thought to conclude on.
Notes
1. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for
Qualitative Research (Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967).
2. Glaser & Strauss, 3.
3. Nancy K. Baym, “The Emergence of On-Line Community” in Cybersociety 2.0: Revisting
Computer-mediated communication and Community edited by Steven G. Jones (Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications, 1998), 49.
4. Stephen Doheny-Farina, The Wired Neighborhood (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
1996), 37.
5. Marlin C. Bates, IV, “Implicit Identity Theory In The Rhetoric Of The Massively Multiplayer On-
line Role-Playing Game (MMORPG), Ultima Online.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, (State
College, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, 2005).
6. Literally, a new person. Pronounced “newbee.”
7. Maurice Charland, “Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Pueple Quebecois.” In Landmark
Essays on Rhetorical Criticism, edited by Thomas W. Benson (Davis, Ca: Hermagoras Press,
1993), 143.
8. Charland, “Constitutive Rhetoric,” 138
9. Edwin Black, “The Second Persona.” In Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Criticism, edited by
Thomas W. Benson (Davis, Ca: Hermagoras Press, 1993), 113.
10. James W. Carey, Communication as Culture (New York: Routledge, 1992), 21.
11. Black, “Second Persona,” 112.
12. Black, “Second Persona,” 113.
13. Kenneth Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969, 21.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 115
14. Electronics Arts, Inc., “Money and Banking,” (Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.),
15. Electronics Arts, Inc., “Character Window,” (Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.),
16. All quotations in paragraph: Electronics Arts, Inc., “Community,” (Redwood City: Electronics
Arts, Inc., n.d.),
17. Electronics Arts, Inc., “Character Window,” (Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.),
18. “Character Window,” 2004.
19. “Character Window,” 2004.
20. From the web site: “Note Certain items and actions may require that you have one or both hands
empty. Check your paper doll if you have difficulty equipping or using an item” (“Playguide:
Character Window: Clothing/Armor/Weapons”).
21. Electronics Arts, Inc., “Money and Banking,” (Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.),
22. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., “World of Warcraft Community Site–Info—Basics—World of War-
craft Guide,” (Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment., n.d.),
2, 2006.
23. Stareye, “WoW Role-Playing—” (Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.),
24. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., “World of Warcraft Community Site–Info—Realmtypes,”
(Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment., n.d.),
25. Blizzard, “Realmtypes.”
26. Blizzard, “Realmtypes.”
27. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., “World of Warcraft Community Site–Info—Basics—World of War-
craft Guide,” (Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment., n.d.),
2, 2006.
28. Frank Kermode, The Genesis of Secrecy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979), 144.
29. Quotations in paragraph are from Edwin Black, “Secrecy and Disclosure as Rhetorical Forms,”
Quarterly Journal of Speech 88 (1988): 135.
30. Black, “Secrecy and Disclosure,” 135.
31. Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives, 131.
32. Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives, 131.
33. Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives, 131.
34. Black, “Second Persona,” 165.
35. “Batesian mimicry” is where a prey species adopts the coloring of a similar species in order to
avoid being eaten. The most well known example is the monarch and viceroy butterflies. The
monarch is not palatable to most predators. The viceroy has, through evolution, adopted similar
identity traits (color, markings).
36. Jodi O’Brien, “Writing in the Body: Gender (Re)Production in Online Interaction.” In Com-
munities in Cyberspace, edited by Marc A. Smith & Peter Kollock (London: Routledge, 1999),
22.
37. Sherry Turkle, The Second Self (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984), 83.
Works Cited
Bates, Marlin C. IV. “Implicit Identity Theory In The Rhetoric Of The Massively Multiplayer On-
line Role-Playing Game (MMORPG), Ultima Online.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, State
College, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, 2005.
Baym, Nancy K. “The Emergence of On-Line Community,” Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-
mediated Communication and Community. Steven G. Jones, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, 1998: 35–68.
Benson, Thomas W. “Poisoned Minds.” Southern Speech Journal 34 (1968): 54–61.
. “Rhetoric as a Way of Being.” American Rhetoric: Context and Criticism. Thomas W.
Benson, ed. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989: 293–322.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
B
y
:
[
B
a
t
e
s
,
M
a
r
l
i
n
]
A
t
:
0
2
:
3
6
2
4
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
116 Marlin C. Bates, IV
Black, Edwin. “The Second Persona,” Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Criticism. Thomas W. Benson,
ed. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1993: 161–172.
. “Secrecy and Disclosure as Rhetorical Forms.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 88 (1988):
133–150.
Browne, Stephen H. “Encountering Angelina Grimke: Violence, Identity, and the Creation of Radical
Community.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 82 (1996): 55–73.
Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1966.
Burke, Kenneth. Counter-statement. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
. Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
. Permanence & Change, An Anatomy of Purpose, Third Edition, Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1984.
Burkhalter, Byron. “Reading Race Online: Discovering Racial Identity in Usenet Discussions.” In
Communities in Cyberspace. Marc A. Smith & Peter Kollock, eds. London: Routledge, 1999):
60–75.
Carey, James W. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New York: Routledge,
1992.
Charland, Maurice. “Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Pueple Québécois.” In Landmark Essays
on Rhetorical Criticism, Thomas W. Benson, ed. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press, 1993: 213–
234.
Chrystan, Admin. “Fractured Shard Rules.” Kentucky: n.p., n.d.
Doheny-Farina Stephen. The Wired Neighborhood. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1996.
Donath, Judith S. “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community,“ Communities in Cyberspace,
Marc A. Smith & Peter Kollock, eds. London: Routledge, 1999: 29–59.
Electronic Arts Inc., Ultima Online: Age of Shadows. Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts, Inc., 2003.
. “Character Window.” Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.
. “Money and Banking.” Redwood City: Electronics Arts, Inc., n.d.
. “Spotlight.” Redwood City, CA: Electronics Arts, Inc., 2004.
Farrell, Thomas B. “Social Knowledge,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 62 (1976): 1–14.
Fitzpatrick, Mary Anne & Indvik, Julie. “Implicit Theories in Enduring Relationships: Differences
in Perceptions of One’s Mate,” Western Journal of Communication 46 (1982): 311–325.
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, Inc, 1973.
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Quali-
tative Research. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
Grice, Ryan. “Pre-T2A Server.” Santa Clara, CA: Google.com, 2004. Xref: num-
ber1.nntpash.giganews.com rec.games.computer.ultima.online: 472496. February 22, 2006.
Hart, Roderick. “Rhetoric,“ Handbook of Rhetorical and Communication Theory. Carroll C. Arnold
& John W. Bowers, eds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1984: 749–791.
Heider, Fritz. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Johnson, Bonnie Jean M. “Implicit Communication Theory in Images of Organized Countergroups.”
Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, State University New York at Buffalo, 1972. uols.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19386&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=>. Kucer, Stephen B. Dimensions of Literacy: A Conceptual Base for Teaching Reading and Writing in D B [ M A 0 2 F 2 Persistent Rhetoric for Persistent Worlds 117
Lady Malynn. “How EM’s View Their Status [sic].” (Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2004). MacArthur, Shane. “Overconfident Fools.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., n.d, McKay, Darrell. “Ambush the Caravan.” Dayton, OH: Bloodrock.org, 2004. McKay, Darrell. “Bloodrock Clan—Arcodia.” Dayton, OH: Bloodrock.org, n.d. Moraes, Mark. “What is Usenet?” Santa Clara, CA: FAQs.com, 1999. Nothstine, William L. “‘Topics’ as Ontological Metaphor in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory and O’Brien, Jodi. “Writing in the Body: Gender (Re)Production in Online Interaction,” Communities in Oakstride. “Smithcalc.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2004. Palmer, Bob. “Terethan Invasion of Our Cities.” Tampa: Clann Marrach Faol, 2004. Peaches. “Dragons-LLTS.” Newport News, VA: Ianstorm.com, 2003. Reddic, Leonard. “Ultima Online Finest.” Stitch. “The Tailor Essay.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2004. Strafford, Erica. “Ultima Online Addicts Anonymous.” Stratics, Inc. “Alchemy & Poisoning Guide.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc, 2004. . “The Darkside of Ultima Online.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2004. . “The Second Age.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2004. . “This Scenario Set-up for the Future.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., 2002. Turkle, Sherry. The Second Self. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984. & Katinka Matson, eds. New York: William Morrow, 1995: 223–230. guardiansofdestiny.net/destiny new/>. April 25, 2004. net/destiny new/>. May 22, 2004. net/destiny new/>. May 22, 2004. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. ultima/profiles/pp4.aspx>. May 18, 2004. Sociometry 40 (1977): 234–46. darkside/stories/xav-notor.shtml>. May 18, 2004.
D B [ M A 0 2 F 2
Kermode, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.
KnightHawke, Galen. “Official announcement of charges.” Internet: uols.net, 2004.
May 16, 2004.
School Settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
y
:
B
a
t
e
s
,
a
r
l
i
n
]
t
:
2
:
3
6
4
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
0
0
9
2004.
Criticism,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 88 (1988): 151–163.
Cyberspace, Marc A. Smith & Peter Kollock, eds. London: Routledge, 1999: 76–106.
. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
. “Identity in the Internet.” How Things Are: A Science Tool-kit for the Mind. John Brockman
Van der Borst, Peter. “Guardians of Destiny (Main Page).” Hoeven, NB, Netherlands: 2004.
. “Not So UO (no UO here).” Hoeven, NB, Netherlands: 2004.
. “Richard Garriot . . . who?” Hoeven, NB, Netherlands: 2004.
Wegner, Daniel M. and Robin R. Vallacher. Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition.
Willow. “Xenai-Pacific.” Newport News, VA: Ianstorm.com, 2002.
Wish, Myron & Kaplan, Suzan J. “Toward an Implicit Theory of Interpersonal Communication.”
Xavori. “Notoriety Hunters.” Sacramento, CA: Stratics, Inc., n.d.
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
y
:
B
a
t
e
s
,
a
r
l
i
n
]
t
:
2
:
3
6
4
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
0
0
9
