writing journals

have to write journals by observing the lectures 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

MKTG-6018 Rubric for Journal Writing
Task Description:

Criteria
w

ei
gh

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

t Exemplary
Yes (4-5)

Accomplished
Yes, but (2-3)

Developing
No, but (1)

Beginning
No (0)

Retelling of
Experience

20%

 Detailed explanation of
experience

 Specific descriptors of
observations during
experience

 Writing is highly
organized with logical
sequence

 Clear explanation of
experience

 Objective observation of
experience

 Organization is clear and
easy to follow

 Somewhat clear
explanation of
experience

 Somewhat objective
observation of
experience

 Minimal organization

 Vague explanation of
experience

 Non-objective
observation of
experience

 No organization evident;
confusing

Reflections/
Personal
Response

20%

 Reflects well on own
work

 Provides many
examples

 Reflects on own work
 Provides examples

 Some reflection on own
work

 Provides few examples

 Little reflection on own
work

 Provides very few or no
examples

Relevance
to Course
Concepts or
Personal
Experience

20%

 Student listens well in
different contexts;
relates observations to
classroom concepts
and/or personal
experiences

 Student ; relates some
observations to
classroom concepts
and/or personal
experiences

 Makes minimal
reference to what is said
in class or to personal
experience

 Makes no reference to
what is heard in class or
personal experiences

Analysis of
Experience

20%

 Makes many inferences
 Comprehends deeper

meanings
 High level of critical

thinking expressed

 Makes inferences most
of the time

 Usually comprehends
deeper meanings

 Some critical thinking
expressed

 Some inferences are
made

 Comprehends surface
level meaning

 Minimal critical thinking
expressed

 Few or no inferences are
made

 No comprehension or
reflection on assignment

 Little or no evidence of
critical thinking

Effort on
Assignment

20%
 Obvious, detailed effort

on assignment
 Neat, legible handwriting

 Acceptable effort on all
parts of the assignment

 Legible handwriting

 Some effort on
assignment

 Readable handwriting

 Little or no effort on
assignment

 Illegible handwriting

Assignment Score __________/25____ + Holistic score __________/10____ = Final Score

MKTG-6018

1

OBSERVATION JOURNAL (15%)
V I A

D I S C U S S I O N B O A R D

What is it?

• An academic journal is a place for self-examination, speculation, and discussion of ideas—your
own and those of others. It is an opportunity for dialogue with yourself. Your academic journal
should be focused toward this course.

• Use the journal to record responses to reading and preparation for class each week. Make
summaries or analyze some specific texts. Try making connections between the ideas from
class/readings and related experiences.

• The point of keeping a journal in a college course is to find a way to engage the subject matter
of the course over the progress of the semester—in essence, to build on your own encounters
with subject matter over an extended period of time.

What and when to write

• You should write on a regular basis (at least once a week) and as preparation for class each
week.

• Field observations should be clearly labeled with the date, the location, and the focus of the
observation.

• Include your experiences, list in this journal — including people’s name, location of observation,
and date of observation.

• Be ambitious! Ponder thoughtfully; then write.
• You may include sketches, photos, interviews, etc.

Writing style

• I will be concerned with your ability to explain and present your ideas rather than with the
formality or technical precision of your writing.

• Entries should be legible (at minimum)
• Develop your thoughts as fully as possible.
• And remember class members will read your observations and you might have an impact upon

their lives.

2

Evaluation

• Entries will be evaluated for their quality of communication.
• If you deal regularly and effectively with the materials for class in the journal (including the

assigned topics), you will receive a B on the journal. If entries show strong evidence of grappling
with issues, of a quest for understanding, and/or of effort to develop and support views, you will
receive an A on the journal.

• Journals will be collected and evaluated throughout the semester.
o Completeness on an ongoing basis
o Quality of presentation
o Depth of observation and insight
o Evidence of reflection on class topics

  • Via Discussion Board

© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 2
  • Motivation
  • , Ability, and
    Opportunity

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Show how motivation influences high-effort
    behavior, high-effort information processing and
    decision-making, and felt involvement

    2. Discuss the four types of influences that
    determine the consumer’s motivation to process
    information, make a decision, or take an action

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives (continued)
  • 3. Explain how financial, cognitive, emotional,
    physical, and social and cultural resources, plus
    age and education, can affect the individual’s
    ability to engage in consumer behaviors

    4. Identify the three main types of influences on
    the consumer’s opportunity to process
    information and acquire, consume, or dispose of
    products

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Motivation

    Inner state of activation that provides energy
    needed to achieve a goal
    Consumers can be motivated to acquire, use,
    or dispose of an offering

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Motivation
    and Effects

    High-effort behavior
    – Drives that bring a goal closer and creates a

    willingness to spend time and money
    High-effort information processing and
    decision-making

    Motivated reasoning: Processing
    information in a way that allows consumers to
    reach the conclusion they want to reach

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Motivation
    and Effects (continued 1)

    Felt involvement
    – Consumer’s experience of being motivated

    with respect to products or services, or
    decisions and actions regarding these

    – Types of involvement
    • Enduring
    • Situational (temporary)
    • Cognitive
    • Affective
    • Response

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Motivation
    and Effects (continued 2)

    Objects of involvement
    – Product or retail category
    – Experiences
    – Brands
    – Ads
    – Medium

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Drivers of Motivation
  • • Something that has direct bearing on self that has
    potentially significant consequence or implication

    Personal relevance

    • Mental view of who one is

    Self-concept

    • Abstract, enduring beliefs about what is right or wrong,
    important, or good or bad

    Values

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    • Internal state of tension experienced as a
    discrepancy between current and ideal state
    (physical or psychological)

    Need

    • Outcome one would like to achieve
    • Can be concrete or abstract and promotion-

    focused or prevention-focused

    Goal

    Drivers of Motivation (continued)

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Exhibit 2.3 – Maslow’s
    Hierarchy of Needs

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Exhibit 2.4 – Categorizing Needs
  • © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Types of Need Conflicts
  • • About acquiring or consuming an offering that fulfills one need
    but fails to fulfill another

    Approach-avoidance conflict

    • About which offering to acquire when each can satisfy an
    important but different need

    Approach-approach conflict

    • About which offering to acquire when neither can satisfy an
    important and different need

    Avoidance-avoidance conflict

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Goals and Emotion
  • Appraisal theory
    – Proposes that emotions are based on individuals’

    assessment of a situation or an outcome and its
    relevance to his or her goals

    – Posits that emotions are affected by the
    normative or moral compatibility, certainty, and
    agency

    Positive and negative emotions experienced
    during or after consuming a product or
    service change in time or get satiated

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Goals and Emotion (continued)
  • Self-control conflicts arise when individuals
    face decisions about actions related to goals
    that are in conflict
    – Self-control: Regulates feelings, thoughts,

    and behavior in line with long-term goals
    – Ego depletion: Outcome of decision-making

    effort that results in mental resources being
    exhausted

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Marketing Implications
    of Needs and Goals

    Enhancing motivation to process
    communications
    Product development and positioning
    Encouraging specific behaviors

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Perceived Risk
  • Extent to which the consumer anticipates:
    – Negative consequences of an action to emerge
    – Positive consequences to not emerge

    Tends to be high because of:
    – New offering
    – High price
    – Complex technology
    – Brand differentiation
    – Little confidence or experience in evaluation
    – Opinions of others and fear of judgment

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Types of Perceived Risk
  • Performance
    Financial
    Physical or safety
    Social
    Psychological
    Time

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Inconsistency with Attitudes
  • Motivation to process information is:
    – High when information is moderately

    inconsistent with one’s attitude
    – Low when information is highly inconsistent

    with one’s prior attitude

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Ability and
    Opportunity

    Ability
    – Factors that affect consumers’ ability to

    process information and make decision
    • Financial, cognitive, emotional, physical, social,

    cultural resources, education, and age
    Key influences in consumer opportunity
    – Lack of time, distraction, and the amount,

    complexity, repetition, and control of
    information

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Marketing Implication of
    Enhancing Information Processing

    Repeating marketing communications
    Reducing time pressure
    Reducing time needed for purchase and learn
    about a product or service
    Providing information

      Chapter 2
      Learning Objectives
      Learning Objectives (continued)
      Motivation

    • Consumer Motivation �and Effects
    • Consumer Motivation �and Effects (continued 1)
    • Consumer Motivation �and Effects (continued 2)
    • Drivers of Motivation

    • Slide Number 9
    • Exhibit 2.3 – Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
    • Exhibit 2.4 – Categorizing Needs
      Types of Need Conflicts
      Goals and Emotion
      Goals and Emotion (continued)

    • Marketing Implications �of Needs and Goals
    • Perceived Risk
      Types of Perceived Risk
      Inconsistency with Attitudes

    • Consumer Ability and Opportunity
    • Marketing Implication of Enhancing Information Processing

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 3
  • From

  • Exposure
  • to Comprehension

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Discuss why marketers are concerned about
    consumers’ exposure to marketing stimuli and what
    tactics they use to enhance exposure

    2. Explain the characteristics of attention and how
    marketers can try to attract and sustain consumers’
    attention with products and marketing messages

    3. Describe the major senses that are part of perception
    and outline why marketers are concerned about
    consumers’ sensory perceptions

    4. Discuss the process of comprehension, and outline how
    marketing-mix elements can affect consumer inferences
    about products and brands

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Exposure

    Consumer comes into physical contact with a
    stimulus
    Marketing stimuli: Information about
    offerings communicated by the marketer or
    by nonmarketing sources
    Factors of influence
    – Position of an ad within a medium
    – Product distribution
    – Shelf placement

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Selective Exposure
  • Zipping: Fast-forwarding through
    commercials on a program recorded earlier
    Zapping: Switching channels during
    commercial breaks
    Cord-cutting – Choosing streaming services
    over cable television

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Focal and Nonfocal Attention
  • Focal attention – Consumers focus on a
    stimulus
    Nonfocal attention – Consumers are
    simultaneously exposed to other stimuli
    Preattentive processing: Non-conscious
    processing of stimuli
    – Leads to liking a brand name

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    • Appealing to one’s needs, values, emotions, or goals

    Personal relevance

    • Using attractive models, music, and humor

    Pleasantness

    Characteristics of Stimulus That
    Attract Consumer Attention

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    • Using novelty, unexpectedness, and puzzles

    Element of surprise

    • Prominence and concreteness of stimuli
    • Limited number of competing stimuli
    • Contrast with competing stimuli

    Easy to process

    Characteristics of Stimulus That
    Attract Consumer Attention (continued)

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Perception
  • Determining the properties of stimuli using
    vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch
    Factors in visual perception
    – Size and shape
    – Lettering
    – Image location on package
    – Color
    – Appearance of being new or worn

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumers’ Stimuli
    Perception

    • Minimal level of stimulus intensity needed to detect stimulus

    Absolute thresholds

    • Intensity difference needed between two stimuli before they are
    perceived to be different

    • Weber’s law: Stronger the initial stimulus, greater the additional
    intensity needed for the second stimulus to be perceived as different

    Differential thresholds (just noticeable difference)

    • Activation of sensory receptors by stimuli presented below the
    perceptual threshold

    Subliminal perception

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Perceptual Organization
  • Process by which stimuli are organized into
    meaningful units
    Figure and ground: People interpret stimuli
    in the context of a background
    Closure: Individuals’ need to organize
    perceptions so that they form a meaningful
    whole

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Perceptual Organization
    (continued)

    Grouping: Tendency to group stimuli to form
    a unified picture or impression
    Preference for the whole: Perceiving more
    value in a whole than in combined parts that
    make a whole
    – Even if the parts have the same objective

    value as the whole

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Knowledge to Understand:
    Comprehension

    Extracting higher-order meaning from what
    individuals have perceived in context of what
    is already known
    Source identification: Determining what
    perceived stimulus actually is and what
    category it belongs to

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Knowledge to Understand:
    Comprehension (continued 1)

    • Extent to which the consumer accurately
    understands the message the sender intends
    to communicate

    Objective comprehension

    • What the consumer understands from the
    message, regardless of whether it is accurate

    Subjective comprehension

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Consumer Inference
  • Brand names and symbols
    – Create subjective comprehension and

    inferences
    Product features and packaging
    − Product attributes
    − Country of origin
    − Package design

    © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Consumer Inference (continued)
  • Price
    – Culture can influence perceptions of price

    and quality
    Message wording
    Retail atmospherics, display, and distribution

      Chapter 3
      Learning Objectives
      Exposure
      Selective Exposure
      Focal and Nonfocal Attention

    • Characteristics of Stimulus That Attract Consumer Attention
    • Characteristics of Stimulus That Attract Consumer Attention (continued)
    • Perception

    • Consumers’ Stimuli Perception
    • Perceptual Organization

    • Perceptual Organization (continued)
    • Knowledge to Understand: Comprehension
    • Knowledge to Understand: Comprehension (continued 1)
    • Consumer Inference
      Consumer Inference (continued)

    1

    Chapter 3

    How Under Armour Gets Noticed

    The Nike [http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/306325?u=tlearn_trl] swoosh may be one

    of the most recognized logos in the world of sports, but the Under Armour

    [http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/956606?u=tlearn_trl] logo (an interlocking U and

    A) is increasingly in the spotlight as the company gets noticed on and off the field. Founded in

    1996 by Kevin Plank, once a member of the University of Maryland’s football team, Under

    Armour designs apparel and gear to help athletes feel and do their best in hot or cold weather, in

    sports arenas or on the track. How can a latecomer to a fast-growing industry dominated by

    global giants such as Nike get noticed?

    A little-known brand name was only one of Under Armour’s early challenges. Another was

    that many of its first products (such as undershirts that wick away moisture) were not actually

    visible to onlookers. In contrast, the logos of competing brands were visible and often prominent

    on athletic shoes, shirts, and caps. So the company initially positioned itself as “a brand for the

    next generation of athletes.” Whereas Nike was sponsoring well-known, established athletes,

    Under Armour’s sponsorships went to up-and-comers known for their dedication and athleticism.

    Its first endorsement deal was with a Dallas Cowboys football player who had been at University

    of Maryland with Under Armour’s founder. More recently, the company’s performance apparel

    has been spotted on endorsers such as Heather Mitts (soccer), Cam Newtown (football), and

    Derrick Williams (basketball).

    As its sponsored athletes do well, and their teams win games and even championships, Under

    Armour’s brand gains attention and visibility. Although not every rising star becomes a sports

    http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/306325?u=tlearn_trl

    http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/956606?u=tlearn_trl

    2

    legend, the brand still gets exposure as these athletes receive media coverage, become

    established in their sports, and appear in Under Armour ads. Now that the company rings up

    more than $1 billion in yearly revenue from the sale of clothing, footwear, and accessories for

    men, women, and children, it can also afford some high-profile deals, such as being endorsed by

    Tom Brady of the New England Patriots.

    The Under Armour website features the brand mission—“Make all athletes better”—and

    puts its “Universal guarantee of performance” in a conspicuous position, offering a full refund if

    customers are ever dissatisfied with a product for any reason. The diversity of models and

    athletes on the Under Armour site and in its ads, often shown participating in a sport, invites a

    broad range of consumers to identify with the brand.

    The close ties between Under Armour and the University of Maryland have led to additional

    opportunities for brand and product exposure. To grab attention and sell more team merchandise,

    college and professional football teams are switching to more fashionable uniforms and gear,

    with flashier colors and styles. As part of this trend, Under Armour has designed 32 different

    items for football players at the University of Maryland to wear. Fans, competing teams, and the

    media can’t help but notice the eye-catching combinations of shirts, pants, and helmets worn by

    team members on different days—with Under Armour’s now-familiar logo on each item.

    What’s ahead for Under Armour? The company is expanding into Europe and beyond, relying

    on distribution and marketing communications to reach more consumers, both casual and serious

    athletes. It is using social media such as YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/user/underarmour],

    Twitter [https://twitter.com/UnderArmour], and Facebook

    [https://www.facebook.com/Underarmour/] to engage consumers, showcase its sports endorsers,

    https://www.youtube.com/user/underarmour

    https://www.facebook.com/Underarmour/

    3

    and increase brand and product visibility. Just as important, new products are in the pipeline,

    along with new technology that enhances Under Armour’s differentiation.i

    i Chris Sorenson, “An Underdog with Attitude,” Maclean’s, September 12, 2011, p. 46; Rosemary
    Feitelberg, “Under Armour’s Unofficial All-Star Team,” WWD, December 1, 2011, p. 12c;
    Andrea K. Walker, “Under Armour’s Rookie Strategy for Endorsement Deals,” Baltimore Sun, July
    25, 2011, www.baltimoresun.com; and “Football or Fashion Show?” New York Times, October
    24, 2011, p. 4.

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 5
  • Attitudes
  • Based on
    High Consumer Effort

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Discuss how marketers can apply various
    cognitive models to understand consumers’
    attitudes based on high-effort thought processes

    2. Describe some of the methods for using the
    communication source and the message to
    favorably influence consumers’ attitudes in high-
    effort situations

    3. Identify the emotional foundations of attitudes
    when consumers’ processing effort is high

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives (continued)
  • 4. Explain how and why a company might try to
    change consumers’ attitudes by influencing their
    feelings

    5. Outline the three main factors that lead to a
    positive overall consumer attitude toward an
    advertisement

    6. Discuss the various elements that can affect
    whether a consumer’s attitudes will influence his
    or her behavior

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Attitudes

    Relatively global and enduring evaluation of
    an object, issue, person, or action
    Influences thoughts, feelings, and behavior
    – Cognitive function
    – Affective function
    – Connative function

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Characteristics of Attitudes
  • Favorability Accessibility Confidence

    Persistence Resistance Ambivalence

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Exhibit 5.1 – Approaches to
    Attitude Formation and Change

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Cognitive Foundations
    of Attitudes

    Direct or imagined experience
    Reasoning by analogy or category
    Values-driven attitudes
    Social identity-based attitude generation
    Analytic processes of attitude construction

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Cognitive Responses to
    Communication

    Cognitive response: Thought individuals have
    in response to a communication
    − Counterargument (CA): Thought that

    disagrees with the message
    − Support arguments (SA): Thought that agrees

    with the message
    − Source derogations (SD): Thought that

    discounts or attacks the source of the message

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Expectancy-Value Models
  • Explain how consumer attitudes form and
    change based on:
    – Beliefs or knowledge about an object or action
    – Evaluations of these particular beliefs

    Theory of reasoned action (TORA): Model
    that provides an explanation of how, when, and
    why attitudes predict behavior
    – Normative influences play a significant role in

    how people behave

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Components of the TORA
    Model

    Behavior (B): What one does
    Behavioral intention (BI): What one intends to
    do
    – Determined by:

    • Attitude toward the act (Aact): How one feels
    about doing something

    • Subjective norms (SN): How others feel about
    another person doing something

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Marketing Implications on
    Changing Consumer Attitudes

    Strategies for changing attitudes, intentions,
    and behavior
    – Changing beliefs
    – Changing evaluations
    – Adding a new belief
    – Encouraging attitude formation based on

    imagined experience
    – Targeting normative beliefs

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    • Source credibility – Trustworthiness, expertise, and status
    • Company reputation
    • Sleeper effect: Consumers forget the source of a

    message faster than the message

    Communication source

    • Strong argument: Features the central merits of an
    offering in a convincing manner

    • One-sided messages: Only positive information
    • Two-sided messages: Positive and negative information
    • Comparative message: Direct comparisons with

    competitors

    Message

    How Cognitively Based
    Attitudes Are Influenced

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Affective (Emotional)
    Foundations of Attitudes

    High affective involvement leads to
    emotional engagement with a stimulus
    Affective response: Generation of
    feelings and images in response to a
    message
    Emotional appeal: Message designed to
    elicit an emotional response

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    How Affectively Based
    Attitudes Are Influenced

    Source
    – Attractiveness: Evokes favorable attitudes if a

    source is physically attractive, likable, familiar,
    or similar to the consumer

    – Match-up hypothesis: Idea that the source
    must match the product or service

    Message
    – Emotional appeals – Elicit emotions that

    attract consumers

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    How Affectively Based
    Attitudes Are Influenced (continued)
    – Emotional contagion: Message designed to

    induce consumers to vicariously experience an
    emotion

    – Fear appeals: Stress negative consequences
    • Terror management theory (TMT): Deals with

    how individuals cope with threat of death by
    defending their worldview of values and beliefs

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Attitude Toward the Ad (Aad)

    Whether the consumer likes or dislikes an ad
    Dimensions
    – Utilitarian (functional): When an ad provides

    information
    – Hedonic: When an ad creates positive or

    negative feelings

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    What Do Attitudes Predict
    Behavior
    Factors

    Level of involvement or elaboration

    Knowledge and experience

    Analysis of reasons

    Accessibility of attitudes

    Attitude confidence

    Specificity of attitudes

    Attitude-behavior relationship over time

    Emotional attachment

    Situational factors

    Normative factors

    Personality variables

      Chapter 5
      Learning Objectives
      Learning Objectives (continued)
      Attitudes
      Characteristics of Attitudes

    • Exhibit 5.1 – Approaches to Attitude Formation and Change
    • Cognitive Foundations �of Attitudes
    • Cognitive Responses to Communication
    • Expectancy-Value Models

    • Components of the TORA Model
    • Marketing Implications on Changing Consumer Attitudes
    • How Cognitively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced
    • Affective (Emotional) Foundations of Attitudes
    • How Affectively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced
    • How Affectively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced (continued)
    • Attitude Toward the Ad (Aad)
    • What Do Attitudes Predict Behavior

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 7
  • Problem Recognition
  • and
    Information Search

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Describe how consumers recognize a consumption
    problem and show why marketers must understand
    this part of the decision-making process

    2. Discuss what happens when consumers conduct an
    internal search to solve a consumption problem and
    identify some of the ways in which marketers can
    affect internal searches

    3. Explain why and how consumers conduct an
    external search to solve a consumption problem,
    and highlight the main implications for marketing
    strategy

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Problem Recognition

    Ideal state
    – Where individuals

    want to be

    Actual state
    – Where individuals

    are now

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Internal Search
  • Searching for information from memory
    Degree of internal search varies
    Kinds of information recalled
    – Brands
    – Attributes
    – Evaluations
    – Experiences

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Brand Recall
  • Consideration or evoked set: Subset of top-of-
    mind brands evaluated when making a choice
    – Varies in terms of:

    • Size
    • Stability
    • Variety
    • Preference dispersion

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Brand Recall (continued)
  • Factors that increase the possibility of
    consumers’ recalling a particular brand
    – Prototypicality
    – Brand familiarity
    – Goals and usage situations
    – Brand preference
    – Retrieval cues

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Attribute Recall
  • Accessibility/availability
    Diagnosticity
    Salience
    Vividness
    Goals

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Is Internal
    Search Accurate?

    Confirmation bias
    – Drawing attention to negatives of competition

    Inhibition
    – Consumers do not always consider key aspects
    – Consumers recall other attributes that are more

    accessible
    – Mood

    • Enhancing the recall of positive attribute
    information through the use of humor or
    attractive visuals

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Sources of External
    Information

    Retailer Media and social media

    Interpersonal Independent

    Experiential Internet

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Information Processing
  • Influenced by:
    – Motivation
    – Ability
    – Opportunity

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Motivation to Process
    Information

    Involvement and perceived risk
    Perceived costs and benefits
    Consideration set
    Relative brand uncertainty
    Attitudes toward search
    Discrepancy of information

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Ability to Process Information
  • Consumer knowledge
    Cognitive abilities
    Consumer affect
    Demographics

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Opportunity to
    Process Information

    Amount of information available
    Information format
    Time availability
    Number of items being chosen

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Information Acquired
    in External Search

    Brand name
    Price
    Other attributes that are salient and
    diagnostic

      Chapter 7
      Learning Objectives
      Problem Recognition
      Internal Search
      Brand Recall
      Brand Recall (continued)
      Attribute Recall

    • Is Internal �Search Accurate?
    • Sources of External Information
    • Information Processing

    • Motivation to Process Information
    • Ability to Process Information

    • Opportunity to �Process Information
    • Information Acquired �in External Search

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 8
  • Judgment and Decision-Making
    Based on High Effort

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Distinguish between judgment and decision-
    making, and indicate why both processes are
    important to marketers

    2. Describe the types of decisions consumers face in
    situations where motivation, ability, and
    opportunity to process are high

    3. Identify two types of cognitive decision-making
    models and understand how consumers make
    decisions based on brands, product attributes,
    and gains and losses

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives (continued)
  • 4. Explain how affective decision-making models
    differ from cognitive decision-making models, and
    discuss the role of appraisals and feelings,
    affective forecasting, and imagery in high-effort
    decisions

    5. Discuss why, in a high-effort situation, consumers
    may delay a decision, and show how they make
    decisions when alternatives cannot be compared

    6. Outline the ways that consumer characteristics,
    decision characteristics, and other people can
    influence high-effort decisions

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    High-Effort Judgment
    Processes

    Judgment: Evaluation of an object or
    estimation of likelihood of an outcome or
    event
    Decision-making: Making a selection among
    options or activities
    – Estimation of likelihood
    – Judgment of goodness or badness

    • Anchoring and adjustment: Starting with
    initial evaluation and adjusting it with additional
    information

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • High-Effort Judgment Processes
  • (continued)

    • Imagery: Imagining an event in order to make
    judgments

    – Mental accounting: Categorizing spending
    and saving decisions into accounts mentally
    designated for specific consumption
    transactions, goal, or situations

    – Emotional accounting: Intensity of positive or
    negative feelings associated with each mental
    account for saving or spending

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Biases in Judgment Processes
  • Confirmation

    Self-positivity

    Negativity

    Mood

    Prior brand evaluations

    Prior experience

    Difficulty of mental calculations

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • High-Effort Consumer Decisions
  • Deciding which brands to consider
    – Options fall under inept set, inert set, and

    consideration set
    • Attraction effect: Addition of inferior brands to a

    consideration set increases the attractiveness of
    dominant brands

    Deciding what is important to the choice
    – Goals
    – Time
    – Decision framing

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    High-Effort Consumer Decisions
    (continued)

    Deciding what brand to choose
    – Cognitive decision-making model

    • Consumers combine items of information about
    attributes to reach a decision

    – Affective decision-making model
    • Consumers base their decision on feelings and

    emotions
    Deciding whether to make a decision now
    Deciding when alternatives cannot be
    compared

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Exhibit 8.5 – Types of Cognitive
    Choice Models

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Brand versus Attribute Models
  • Brand processing Attribute processing

    Multiattribute expectancy-value
    model: Type of brand-based
    compensatory model

    Additive difference model: Brands
    are compared by attribute, two
    brands at a time

    Conjunctive model: Sets minimum
    cutoffs to reject bad options

    Lexicographic model: Compares
    brands by attributes, one at a time in
    order of importance

    Disjunctive model: Sets acceptable
    cutoffs to find options that are good

    Elimination-by-aspects model:
    Similar to lexicographic model but
    adds the notion of acceptable cutoffs

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Decisions Based on Gains and
    Losses

    Prospect theory
    – Losses have more influence than gains
    – Endowment effect: Ownership increases the

    value of an item
    – Consumers have stronger reaction to price

    increases than price decreases

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    High-Effort
    Feeling-Based Decisions

    Consumers tend to be more satisfied after
    making a feeling-based decision
    Emotions aid thought-based decisions
    Brands can be associated with positive or
    negative emotions

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Affective Decision-Making
  • Appraisal theory explains:
    – How one’s emotions are determined by how one

    appraises the situation
    – How and why certain emotions can affect future

    judgments and choices
    Affective forecasting: Predicts how one will
    feel in the future
    Imagery: Consumer imagines consuming a
    product or service
    – Plays a key role in emotional decision-making

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Additional
    High-Effort Decisions

    Decision delay occurs if the decision is risky,
    uncertain, or involves an unpleasant task
    Noncomparable decision: Making decisions
    about products or services from different
    categories
    – Alternative-based strategy: Choice based on

    overall evaluation
    – Attribute-based strategy: Choice based on

    abstract representations of comparable
    attributes

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Characteristics and
    Decisions

    Expertise
    – Detailed consumption vocabularies

    Good mood
    – Allows one to process information and more

    time to make a decision
    Time pressure
    – Leads to consumers’ failure to make intended

    purchases

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Consumer Characteristics and
    Decisions (continued)

    Extremeness aversion: Options extreme on
    some attributes are less attractive than those
    with a moderate level of those attributes

    • Compromise effect: Brand gains share as it is
    an intermediate than an extreme option

    • Attribute balancing: Picking a brand because
    it scores equally well on certain attributes

    Metacognitive experiences: How
    information is processed beyond content of
    the decision

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Decision Characteristics
    Affecting Decision Making

    Information availability

    Information format

    Trivial attributes

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Group Decision Making
  • Individual-alone goals – Goals attained by an
    individual’s action alone
    Individual-group goals – Goals achieved based
    on actions of an individual and a group

      Chapter 8
      Learning Objectives
      Learning Objectives (continued)
      High-Effort Judgment Processes

    • High-Effort Judgment Processes (continued)
    • Biases in Judgment Processes
      High-Effort Consumer Decisions

    • High-Effort Consumer Decisions (continued)
    • Exhibit 8.5 – Types of Cognitive �Choice Models
    • Brand versus Attribute Models

    • Decisions Based on Gains and Losses
    • High-Effort �Feeling-Based Decisions
    • Affective Decision-Making

    • Additional� High-Effort Decisions
    • Consumer Characteristics and Decisions
    • Consumer Characteristics and Decisions (continued)
    • Decision Characteristics �Affecting Decision Making
    • Group Decision Making

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Chapter 10
  • Post-Decision Processes

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. Distinguish between the dissonance and the regret
    that consumers may experience after acquisition,
    consumption, or disposition

    2. Explain how consumers can learn from experience
    and why marketers need to understand this post-
    decision process

    3. Discuss what happens when consumers experience
    satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their decisions
    about acquisition, consumption, or disposition

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Learning Objectives (continued)
  • 4. Outline the ways in which consumers may respond
    to dissatisfaction, and highlight the importance to
    marketers

    5. Discuss whether customer satisfaction alone is
    enough to maintain customer loyalty

    6. Describe how consumers may dispose of something,
    why this process is more complex for meaningful
    objects, and what influences consumer recycling
    behavior

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Post-Decision Dissonance
    and Regret

    • Feeling of discomfort about whether or not the
    correct decision was made

    Post-decision dissonance

    • Negative feeling that one should have made
    another purchase, consumption, or disposition
    decision than one actually did

    Post-decision regret

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Factors Affecting
    Learning from Experience

    Motivation

    Prior knowledge or ability

    Ambiguity of information or lack of opportunity

    Processing biases

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Marketing Implication of
    Processing Bias

    Top dog strategies Underdog strategies
    Market leader or brand with a
    large market share

    Lower-share brand

    Limitation on learning new
    information during low motivation
    is beneficial

    Instigating learning through
    comparison during low motivation

    Blocking exposure to evidence to
    avoid consumers from getting
    new information

    Creating expectations and using
    promotion to provide actual
    experience for consumers

    Explaining experience by
    reinforcing the messages and
    encouraging consumers to try the
    brand

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Consumer Judgments
  • Consumers evaluate the outcomes after
    making acquisition, consumption, or
    disposition decisions
    – Satisfaction: Decision meets or exceeds

    one’s expectations
    – Dissatisfaction: Decision falls short of one’s

    expectations
    Utilitarian and hedonic
    – Dimensions on which consumers are satisfied

    or dissatisfied

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Thought-Based Judgments of
    Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction

    Can relate to:
    – Whether consumers’ beliefs and expectations

    about the offering are confirmed or
    disconfirmed by its actual performance

    – Thoughts about:
    • Causality and blame
    • Fairness and equity

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Attribution Theory
  • Describes how individuals find explanations
    for events
    Based on stability, focus, and controllability
    Ways to increase consumers’ positive post-
    decision feelings
    – Providing value-added services
    – Using promotions and special deals

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Equity Theory
  • Concerns about the fairness of exchanges
    between individuals
    Helps in understanding consumer satisfaction
    and dissatisfaction
    Perception of inputs and outputs are
    exchanged between consumers and sellers
    – Fairness in exchange: Perception that the inputs

    and outputs of people involved in an exchange are
    equal

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

    Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
    Based on Feelings

    Post-decision emotions: Emotions
    experienced while using or disposing of the
    acquired brands, products, or services
    Dissatisfied consumers need to cope with
    feelings of stress
    Affective forecasting – Consumers tend to be
    more dissatisfied when a product:
    – Fails to perform as they thought it

    would

    – Makes them feel worse than they forecasted it

    would

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Responses to Dissatisfaction
  • Complaining
    Responding to service recovery
    Engaging in negative word-of-mouth
    communication

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Steps to Retain Customers
  • Caring about customers
    Remembering customers between sales
    Building trusting relationships
    Monitoring service-delivery process
    Providing extra effort

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Disposing of Meaningful Objects
  • • Physical disposal of an item

    Physical detachment

    • Emotional disposal of a possession

    Emotional detachment

    © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

  • Recycling Behavior
  • Depends on:
    – Motivation
    – Ability
    – Opportunity

      Chapter 10
      Learning Objectives
      Learning Objectives (continued)

    • � Post-Decision Dissonance and Regret
    • Factors Affecting �Learning from Experience
    • Marketing Implication of Processing Bias
    • Consumer Judgments

    • Thought-Based Judgments of Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
    • Attribution Theory
      Equity Theory

    • Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction �Based on Feelings
    • Responses to Dissatisfaction
      Steps to Retain Customers
      Disposing of Meaningful Objects
      Recycling Behavior

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER