have to write journals by observing the lectures
MKTG-6018 Rubric for Journal Writing
Task Description:
Criteria
w
ei
gh
t Exemplary
Yes (4-5)
Accomplished
Yes, but (2-3)
Developing
No, but (1)
Beginning
No (0)
Retelling of
Experience
20%
Detailed explanation of
experience
Specific descriptors of
observations during
experience
Writing is highly
organized with logical
sequence
Clear explanation of
experience
Objective observation of
experience
Organization is clear and
easy to follow
Somewhat clear
explanation of
experience
Somewhat objective
observation of
experience
Minimal organization
Vague explanation of
experience
Non-objective
observation of
experience
No organization evident;
confusing
Reflections/
Personal
Response
20%
Reflects well on own
work
Provides many
examples
Reflects on own work
Provides examples
Some reflection on own
work
Provides few examples
Little reflection on own
work
Provides very few or no
examples
Relevance
to Course
Concepts or
Personal
Experience
20%
Student listens well in
different contexts;
relates observations to
classroom concepts
and/or personal
experiences
Student ; relates some
observations to
classroom concepts
and/or personal
experiences
Makes minimal
reference to what is said
in class or to personal
experience
Makes no reference to
what is heard in class or
personal experiences
Analysis of
Experience
20%
Makes many inferences
Comprehends deeper
meanings
High level of critical
thinking expressed
Makes inferences most
of the time
Usually comprehends
deeper meanings
Some critical thinking
expressed
Some inferences are
made
Comprehends surface
level meaning
Minimal critical thinking
expressed
Few or no inferences are
made
No comprehension or
reflection on assignment
Little or no evidence of
critical thinking
Effort on
Assignment
20%
Obvious, detailed effort
on assignment
Neat, legible handwriting
Acceptable effort on all
parts of the assignment
Legible handwriting
Some effort on
assignment
Readable handwriting
Little or no effort on
assignment
Illegible handwriting
Assignment Score __________/25____ + Holistic score __________/10____ = Final Score
MKTG-6018
1
OBSERVATION JOURNAL (15%)
V I A
D I S C U S S I O N B O A R D
What is it?
• An academic journal is a place for self-examination, speculation, and discussion of ideas—your
own and those of others. It is an opportunity for dialogue with yourself. Your academic journal
should be focused toward this course.
• Use the journal to record responses to reading and preparation for class each week. Make
summaries or analyze some specific texts. Try making connections between the ideas from
class/readings and related experiences.
• The point of keeping a journal in a college course is to find a way to engage the subject matter
of the course over the progress of the semester—in essence, to build on your own encounters
with subject matter over an extended period of time.
What and when to write
• You should write on a regular basis (at least once a week) and as preparation for class each
week.
• Field observations should be clearly labeled with the date, the location, and the focus of the
observation.
• Include your experiences, list in this journal — including people’s name, location of observation,
and date of observation.
• Be ambitious! Ponder thoughtfully; then write.
• You may include sketches, photos, interviews, etc.
Writing style
• I will be concerned with your ability to explain and present your ideas rather than with the
formality or technical precision of your writing.
• Entries should be legible (at minimum)
• Develop your thoughts as fully as possible.
• And remember class members will read your observations and you might have an impact upon
their lives.
2
Evaluation
• Entries will be evaluated for their quality of communication.
• If you deal regularly and effectively with the materials for class in the journal (including the
assigned topics), you will receive a B on the journal. If entries show strong evidence of grappling
with issues, of a quest for understanding, and/or of effort to develop and support views, you will
receive an A on the journal.
• Journals will be collected and evaluated throughout the semester.
o Completeness on an ongoing basis
o Quality of presentation
o Depth of observation and insight
o Evidence of reflection on class topics
- Via Discussion Board
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
, Ability, and
Opportunity
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Show how motivation influences high-effort
behavior, high-effort information processing and
decision-making, and felt involvement
2. Discuss the four types of influences that
determine the consumer’s motivation to process
information, make a decision, or take an action
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
3. Explain how financial, cognitive, emotional,
physical, and social and cultural resources, plus
age and education, can affect the individual’s
ability to engage in consumer behaviors
4. Identify the three main types of influences on
the consumer’s opportunity to process
information and acquire, consume, or dispose of
products
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Motivation
Inner state of activation that provides energy
needed to achieve a goal
Consumers can be motivated to acquire, use,
or dispose of an offering
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Motivation
and Effects
High-effort behavior
– Drives that bring a goal closer and creates a
willingness to spend time and money
High-effort information processing and
decision-making
Motivated reasoning: Processing
information in a way that allows consumers to
reach the conclusion they want to reach
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Motivation
and Effects (continued 1)
Felt involvement
– Consumer’s experience of being motivated
with respect to products or services, or
decisions and actions regarding these
– Types of involvement
• Enduring
• Situational (temporary)
• Cognitive
• Affective
• Response
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Motivation
and Effects (continued 2)
Objects of involvement
– Product or retail category
– Experiences
– Brands
– Ads
– Medium
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Something that has direct bearing on self that has
potentially significant consequence or implication
Personal relevance
• Mental view of who one is
Self-concept
• Abstract, enduring beliefs about what is right or wrong,
important, or good or bad
Values
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Internal state of tension experienced as a
discrepancy between current and ideal state
(physical or psychological)
Need
• Outcome one would like to achieve
• Can be concrete or abstract and promotion-
focused or prevention-focused
Goal
Drivers of Motivation (continued)
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.3 – Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• About acquiring or consuming an offering that fulfills one need
but fails to fulfill another
Approach-avoidance conflict
• About which offering to acquire when each can satisfy an
important but different need
Approach-approach conflict
• About which offering to acquire when neither can satisfy an
important and different need
Avoidance-avoidance conflict
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Appraisal theory
– Proposes that emotions are based on individuals’
assessment of a situation or an outcome and its
relevance to his or her goals
– Posits that emotions are affected by the
normative or moral compatibility, certainty, and
agency
Positive and negative emotions experienced
during or after consuming a product or
service change in time or get satiated
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Self-control conflicts arise when individuals
face decisions about actions related to goals
that are in conflict
– Self-control: Regulates feelings, thoughts,
and behavior in line with long-term goals
– Ego depletion: Outcome of decision-making
effort that results in mental resources being
exhausted
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Marketing Implications
of Needs and Goals
Enhancing motivation to process
communications
Product development and positioning
Encouraging specific behaviors
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Extent to which the consumer anticipates:
– Negative consequences of an action to emerge
– Positive consequences to not emerge
Tends to be high because of:
– New offering
– High price
– Complex technology
– Brand differentiation
– Little confidence or experience in evaluation
– Opinions of others and fear of judgment
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Performance
Financial
Physical or safety
Social
Psychological
Time
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Motivation to process information is:
– High when information is moderately
inconsistent with one’s attitude
– Low when information is highly inconsistent
with one’s prior attitude
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Ability and
Opportunity
Ability
– Factors that affect consumers’ ability to
process information and make decision
• Financial, cognitive, emotional, physical, social,
cultural resources, education, and age
Key influences in consumer opportunity
– Lack of time, distraction, and the amount,
complexity, repetition, and control of
information
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Marketing Implication of
Enhancing Information Processing
Repeating marketing communications
Reducing time pressure
Reducing time needed for purchase and learn
about a product or service
Providing information
- Chapter 2
- Consumer Motivation �and Effects
- Consumer Motivation �and Effects (continued 1)
- Consumer Motivation �and Effects (continued 2)
- Slide Number 9
- Exhibit 2.3 – Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
- Marketing Implications �of Needs and Goals
- Consumer Ability and Opportunity
- Marketing Implication of Enhancing Information Processing
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives (continued)
Motivation
Drivers of Motivation
Exhibit 2.4 – Categorizing Needs
Types of Need Conflicts
Goals and Emotion
Goals and Emotion (continued)
Perceived Risk
Types of Perceived Risk
Inconsistency with Attitudes
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
From
to Comprehension
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Discuss why marketers are concerned about
consumers’ exposure to marketing stimuli and what
tactics they use to enhance exposure
2. Explain the characteristics of attention and how
marketers can try to attract and sustain consumers’
attention with products and marketing messages
3. Describe the major senses that are part of perception
and outline why marketers are concerned about
consumers’ sensory perceptions
4. Discuss the process of comprehension, and outline how
marketing-mix elements can affect consumer inferences
about products and brands
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exposure
Consumer comes into physical contact with a
stimulus
Marketing stimuli: Information about
offerings communicated by the marketer or
by nonmarketing sources
Factors of influence
– Position of an ad within a medium
– Product distribution
– Shelf placement
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Zipping: Fast-forwarding through
commercials on a program recorded earlier
Zapping: Switching channels during
commercial breaks
Cord-cutting – Choosing streaming services
over cable television
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Focal attention – Consumers focus on a
stimulus
Nonfocal attention – Consumers are
simultaneously exposed to other stimuli
Preattentive processing: Non-conscious
processing of stimuli
– Leads to liking a brand name
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Appealing to one’s needs, values, emotions, or goals
Personal relevance
• Using attractive models, music, and humor
Pleasantness
Characteristics of Stimulus That
Attract Consumer Attention
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Using novelty, unexpectedness, and puzzles
Element of surprise
• Prominence and concreteness of stimuli
• Limited number of competing stimuli
• Contrast with competing stimuli
Easy to process
Characteristics of Stimulus That
Attract Consumer Attention (continued)
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Determining the properties of stimuli using
vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch
Factors in visual perception
– Size and shape
– Lettering
– Image location on package
– Color
– Appearance of being new or worn
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumers’ Stimuli
Perception
• Minimal level of stimulus intensity needed to detect stimulus
Absolute thresholds
• Intensity difference needed between two stimuli before they are
perceived to be different
• Weber’s law: Stronger the initial stimulus, greater the additional
intensity needed for the second stimulus to be perceived as different
Differential thresholds (just noticeable difference)
• Activation of sensory receptors by stimuli presented below the
perceptual threshold
Subliminal perception
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Process by which stimuli are organized into
meaningful units
Figure and ground: People interpret stimuli
in the context of a background
Closure: Individuals’ need to organize
perceptions so that they form a meaningful
whole
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Perceptual Organization
(continued)
Grouping: Tendency to group stimuli to form
a unified picture or impression
Preference for the whole: Perceiving more
value in a whole than in combined parts that
make a whole
– Even if the parts have the same objective
value as the whole
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Knowledge to Understand:
Comprehension
Extracting higher-order meaning from what
individuals have perceived in context of what
is already known
Source identification: Determining what
perceived stimulus actually is and what
category it belongs to
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Knowledge to Understand:
Comprehension (continued 1)
• Extent to which the consumer accurately
understands the message the sender intends
to communicate
Objective comprehension
• What the consumer understands from the
message, regardless of whether it is accurate
Subjective comprehension
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Brand names and symbols
– Create subjective comprehension and
inferences
Product features and packaging
− Product attributes
− Country of origin
− Package design
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Price
– Culture can influence perceptions of price
and quality
Message wording
Retail atmospherics, display, and distribution
- Chapter 3
- Characteristics of Stimulus That Attract Consumer Attention
- Characteristics of Stimulus That Attract Consumer Attention (continued)
- Consumers’ Stimuli Perception
- Perceptual Organization (continued)
- Knowledge to Understand: Comprehension
- Knowledge to Understand: Comprehension (continued 1)
Learning Objectives
Exposure
Selective Exposure
Focal and Nonfocal Attention
Perception
Perceptual Organization
Consumer Inference
Consumer Inference (continued)
1
Chapter 3
How Under Armour Gets Noticed
The Nike [http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/306325?u=tlearn_trl] swoosh may be one
of the most recognized logos in the world of sports, but the Under Armour
[http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/956606?u=tlearn_trl] logo (an interlocking U and
A) is increasingly in the spotlight as the company gets noticed on and off the field. Founded in
1996 by Kevin Plank, once a member of the University of Maryland’s football team, Under
Armour designs apparel and gear to help athletes feel and do their best in hot or cold weather, in
sports arenas or on the track. How can a latecomer to a fast-growing industry dominated by
global giants such as Nike get noticed?
A little-known brand name was only one of Under Armour’s early challenges. Another was
that many of its first products (such as undershirts that wick away moisture) were not actually
visible to onlookers. In contrast, the logos of competing brands were visible and often prominent
on athletic shoes, shirts, and caps. So the company initially positioned itself as “a brand for the
next generation of athletes.” Whereas Nike was sponsoring well-known, established athletes,
Under Armour’s sponsorships went to up-and-comers known for their dedication and athleticism.
Its first endorsement deal was with a Dallas Cowboys football player who had been at University
of Maryland with Under Armour’s founder. More recently, the company’s performance apparel
has been spotted on endorsers such as Heather Mitts (soccer), Cam Newtown (football), and
Derrick Williams (basketball).
As its sponsored athletes do well, and their teams win games and even championships, Under
Armour’s brand gains attention and visibility. Although not every rising star becomes a sports
http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/306325?u=tlearn_trl
http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/company/956606?u=tlearn_trl
2
legend, the brand still gets exposure as these athletes receive media coverage, become
established in their sports, and appear in Under Armour ads. Now that the company rings up
more than $1 billion in yearly revenue from the sale of clothing, footwear, and accessories for
men, women, and children, it can also afford some high-profile deals, such as being endorsed by
Tom Brady of the New England Patriots.
The Under Armour website features the brand mission—“Make all athletes better”—and
puts its “Universal guarantee of performance” in a conspicuous position, offering a full refund if
customers are ever dissatisfied with a product for any reason. The diversity of models and
athletes on the Under Armour site and in its ads, often shown participating in a sport, invites a
broad range of consumers to identify with the brand.
The close ties between Under Armour and the University of Maryland have led to additional
opportunities for brand and product exposure. To grab attention and sell more team merchandise,
college and professional football teams are switching to more fashionable uniforms and gear,
with flashier colors and styles. As part of this trend, Under Armour has designed 32 different
items for football players at the University of Maryland to wear. Fans, competing teams, and the
media can’t help but notice the eye-catching combinations of shirts, pants, and helmets worn by
team members on different days—with Under Armour’s now-familiar logo on each item.
What’s ahead for Under Armour? The company is expanding into Europe and beyond, relying
on distribution and marketing communications to reach more consumers, both casual and serious
athletes. It is using social media such as YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/user/underarmour],
Twitter [https://twitter.com/UnderArmour], and Facebook
[https://www.facebook.com/Underarmour/] to engage consumers, showcase its sports endorsers,
https://www.youtube.com/user/underarmour
https://www.facebook.com/Underarmour/
3
and increase brand and product visibility. Just as important, new products are in the pipeline,
along with new technology that enhances Under Armour’s differentiation.i
i Chris Sorenson, “An Underdog with Attitude,” Maclean’s, September 12, 2011, p. 46; Rosemary
Feitelberg, “Under Armour’s Unofficial All-Star Team,” WWD, December 1, 2011, p. 12c;
Andrea K. Walker, “Under Armour’s Rookie Strategy for Endorsement Deals,” Baltimore Sun, July
25, 2011, www.baltimoresun.com; and “Football or Fashion Show?” New York Times, October
24, 2011, p. 4.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Based on
High Consumer Effort
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Discuss how marketers can apply various
cognitive models to understand consumers’
attitudes based on high-effort thought processes
2. Describe some of the methods for using the
communication source and the message to
favorably influence consumers’ attitudes in high-
effort situations
3. Identify the emotional foundations of attitudes
when consumers’ processing effort is high
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4. Explain how and why a company might try to
change consumers’ attitudes by influencing their
feelings
5. Outline the three main factors that lead to a
positive overall consumer attitude toward an
advertisement
6. Discuss the various elements that can affect
whether a consumer’s attitudes will influence his
or her behavior
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Attitudes
Relatively global and enduring evaluation of
an object, issue, person, or action
Influences thoughts, feelings, and behavior
– Cognitive function
– Affective function
– Connative function
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Favorability Accessibility Confidence
Persistence Resistance Ambivalence
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.1 – Approaches to
Attitude Formation and Change
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Cognitive Foundations
of Attitudes
Direct or imagined experience
Reasoning by analogy or category
Values-driven attitudes
Social identity-based attitude generation
Analytic processes of attitude construction
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Cognitive Responses to
Communication
Cognitive response: Thought individuals have
in response to a communication
− Counterargument (CA): Thought that
disagrees with the message
− Support arguments (SA): Thought that agrees
with the message
− Source derogations (SD): Thought that
discounts or attacks the source of the message
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Explain how consumer attitudes form and
change based on:
– Beliefs or knowledge about an object or action
– Evaluations of these particular beliefs
Theory of reasoned action (TORA): Model
that provides an explanation of how, when, and
why attitudes predict behavior
– Normative influences play a significant role in
how people behave
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Components of the TORA
Model
Behavior (B): What one does
Behavioral intention (BI): What one intends to
do
– Determined by:
• Attitude toward the act (Aact): How one feels
about doing something
• Subjective norms (SN): How others feel about
another person doing something
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Marketing Implications on
Changing Consumer Attitudes
Strategies for changing attitudes, intentions,
and behavior
– Changing beliefs
– Changing evaluations
– Adding a new belief
– Encouraging attitude formation based on
imagined experience
– Targeting normative beliefs
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Source credibility – Trustworthiness, expertise, and status
• Company reputation
• Sleeper effect: Consumers forget the source of a
message faster than the message
Communication source
• Strong argument: Features the central merits of an
offering in a convincing manner
• One-sided messages: Only positive information
• Two-sided messages: Positive and negative information
• Comparative message: Direct comparisons with
competitors
Message
How Cognitively Based
Attitudes Are Influenced
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Affective (Emotional)
Foundations of Attitudes
High affective involvement leads to
emotional engagement with a stimulus
Affective response: Generation of
feelings and images in response to a
message
Emotional appeal: Message designed to
elicit an emotional response
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
How Affectively Based
Attitudes Are Influenced
Source
– Attractiveness: Evokes favorable attitudes if a
source is physically attractive, likable, familiar,
or similar to the consumer
– Match-up hypothesis: Idea that the source
must match the product or service
Message
– Emotional appeals – Elicit emotions that
attract consumers
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
How Affectively Based
Attitudes Are Influenced (continued)
– Emotional contagion: Message designed to
induce consumers to vicariously experience an
emotion
– Fear appeals: Stress negative consequences
• Terror management theory (TMT): Deals with
how individuals cope with threat of death by
defending their worldview of values and beliefs
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Attitude Toward the Ad (Aad)
Whether the consumer likes or dislikes an ad
Dimensions
– Utilitarian (functional): When an ad provides
information
– Hedonic: When an ad creates positive or
negative feelings
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What Do Attitudes Predict
Behavior
Factors
Level of involvement or elaboration
Knowledge and experience
Analysis of reasons
Accessibility of attitudes
Attitude confidence
Specificity of attitudes
Attitude-behavior relationship over time
Emotional attachment
Situational factors
Normative factors
Personality variables
- Chapter 5
- Exhibit 5.1 – Approaches to Attitude Formation and Change
- Cognitive Foundations �of Attitudes
- Cognitive Responses to Communication
- Components of the TORA Model
- Marketing Implications on Changing Consumer Attitudes
- How Cognitively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced
- Affective (Emotional) Foundations of Attitudes
- How Affectively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced
- How Affectively Based �Attitudes Are Influenced (continued)
- Attitude Toward the Ad (Aad)
- What Do Attitudes Predict Behavior
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives (continued)
Attitudes
Characteristics of Attitudes
Expectancy-Value Models
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
and
Information Search
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Describe how consumers recognize a consumption
problem and show why marketers must understand
this part of the decision-making process
2. Discuss what happens when consumers conduct an
internal search to solve a consumption problem and
identify some of the ways in which marketers can
affect internal searches
3. Explain why and how consumers conduct an
external search to solve a consumption problem,
and highlight the main implications for marketing
strategy
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Problem Recognition
Ideal state
– Where individuals
want to be
Actual state
– Where individuals
are now
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Searching for information from memory
Degree of internal search varies
Kinds of information recalled
– Brands
– Attributes
– Evaluations
– Experiences
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consideration or evoked set: Subset of top-of-
mind brands evaluated when making a choice
– Varies in terms of:
• Size
• Stability
• Variety
• Preference dispersion
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Factors that increase the possibility of
consumers’ recalling a particular brand
– Prototypicality
– Brand familiarity
– Goals and usage situations
– Brand preference
– Retrieval cues
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Accessibility/availability
Diagnosticity
Salience
Vividness
Goals
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Is Internal
Search Accurate?
Confirmation bias
– Drawing attention to negatives of competition
Inhibition
– Consumers do not always consider key aspects
– Consumers recall other attributes that are more
accessible
– Mood
• Enhancing the recall of positive attribute
information through the use of humor or
attractive visuals
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Sources of External
Information
Retailer Media and social media
Interpersonal Independent
Experiential Internet
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Influenced by:
– Motivation
– Ability
– Opportunity
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Motivation to Process
Information
Involvement and perceived risk
Perceived costs and benefits
Consideration set
Relative brand uncertainty
Attitudes toward search
Discrepancy of information
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer knowledge
Cognitive abilities
Consumer affect
Demographics
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Opportunity to
Process Information
Amount of information available
Information format
Time availability
Number of items being chosen
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Information Acquired
in External Search
Brand name
Price
Other attributes that are salient and
diagnostic
- Chapter 7
- Is Internal �Search Accurate?
- Sources of External Information
- Motivation to Process Information
- Opportunity to �Process Information
- Information Acquired �in External Search
Learning Objectives
Problem Recognition
Internal Search
Brand Recall
Brand Recall (continued)
Attribute Recall
Information Processing
Ability to Process Information
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Judgment and Decision-Making
Based on High Effort
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Distinguish between judgment and decision-
making, and indicate why both processes are
important to marketers
2. Describe the types of decisions consumers face in
situations where motivation, ability, and
opportunity to process are high
3. Identify two types of cognitive decision-making
models and understand how consumers make
decisions based on brands, product attributes,
and gains and losses
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4. Explain how affective decision-making models
differ from cognitive decision-making models, and
discuss the role of appraisals and feelings,
affective forecasting, and imagery in high-effort
decisions
5. Discuss why, in a high-effort situation, consumers
may delay a decision, and show how they make
decisions when alternatives cannot be compared
6. Outline the ways that consumer characteristics,
decision characteristics, and other people can
influence high-effort decisions
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
High-Effort Judgment
Processes
Judgment: Evaluation of an object or
estimation of likelihood of an outcome or
event
Decision-making: Making a selection among
options or activities
– Estimation of likelihood
– Judgment of goodness or badness
• Anchoring and adjustment: Starting with
initial evaluation and adjusting it with additional
information
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(continued)
• Imagery: Imagining an event in order to make
judgments
– Mental accounting: Categorizing spending
and saving decisions into accounts mentally
designated for specific consumption
transactions, goal, or situations
– Emotional accounting: Intensity of positive or
negative feelings associated with each mental
account for saving or spending
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Confirmation
Self-positivity
Negativity
Mood
Prior brand evaluations
Prior experience
Difficulty of mental calculations
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Deciding which brands to consider
– Options fall under inept set, inert set, and
consideration set
• Attraction effect: Addition of inferior brands to a
consideration set increases the attractiveness of
dominant brands
Deciding what is important to the choice
– Goals
– Time
– Decision framing
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
High-Effort Consumer Decisions
(continued)
Deciding what brand to choose
– Cognitive decision-making model
• Consumers combine items of information about
attributes to reach a decision
– Affective decision-making model
• Consumers base their decision on feelings and
emotions
Deciding whether to make a decision now
Deciding when alternatives cannot be
compared
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 8.5 – Types of Cognitive
Choice Models
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Brand processing Attribute processing
Multiattribute expectancy-value
model: Type of brand-based
compensatory model
Additive difference model: Brands
are compared by attribute, two
brands at a time
Conjunctive model: Sets minimum
cutoffs to reject bad options
Lexicographic model: Compares
brands by attributes, one at a time in
order of importance
Disjunctive model: Sets acceptable
cutoffs to find options that are good
Elimination-by-aspects model:
Similar to lexicographic model but
adds the notion of acceptable cutoffs
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decisions Based on Gains and
Losses
Prospect theory
– Losses have more influence than gains
– Endowment effect: Ownership increases the
value of an item
– Consumers have stronger reaction to price
increases than price decreases
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
High-Effort
Feeling-Based Decisions
Consumers tend to be more satisfied after
making a feeling-based decision
Emotions aid thought-based decisions
Brands can be associated with positive or
negative emotions
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Appraisal theory explains:
– How one’s emotions are determined by how one
appraises the situation
– How and why certain emotions can affect future
judgments and choices
Affective forecasting: Predicts how one will
feel in the future
Imagery: Consumer imagines consuming a
product or service
– Plays a key role in emotional decision-making
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Additional
High-Effort Decisions
Decision delay occurs if the decision is risky,
uncertain, or involves an unpleasant task
Noncomparable decision: Making decisions
about products or services from different
categories
– Alternative-based strategy: Choice based on
overall evaluation
– Attribute-based strategy: Choice based on
abstract representations of comparable
attributes
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Characteristics and
Decisions
Expertise
– Detailed consumption vocabularies
Good mood
– Allows one to process information and more
time to make a decision
Time pressure
– Leads to consumers’ failure to make intended
purchases
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumer Characteristics and
Decisions (continued)
Extremeness aversion: Options extreme on
some attributes are less attractive than those
with a moderate level of those attributes
• Compromise effect: Brand gains share as it is
an intermediate than an extreme option
• Attribute balancing: Picking a brand because
it scores equally well on certain attributes
Metacognitive experiences: How
information is processed beyond content of
the decision
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decision Characteristics
Affecting Decision Making
Information availability
Information format
Trivial attributes
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Individual-alone goals – Goals attained by an
individual’s action alone
Individual-group goals – Goals achieved based
on actions of an individual and a group
- Chapter 8
- High-Effort Judgment Processes (continued)
- High-Effort Consumer Decisions (continued)
- Exhibit 8.5 – Types of Cognitive �Choice Models
- Decisions Based on Gains and Losses
- High-Effort �Feeling-Based Decisions
- Additional� High-Effort Decisions
- Consumer Characteristics and Decisions
- Consumer Characteristics and Decisions (continued)
- Decision Characteristics �Affecting Decision Making
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives (continued)
High-Effort Judgment Processes
Biases in Judgment Processes
High-Effort Consumer Decisions
Brand versus Attribute Models
Affective Decision-Making
Group Decision Making
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Post-Decision Processes
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1. Distinguish between the dissonance and the regret
that consumers may experience after acquisition,
consumption, or disposition
2. Explain how consumers can learn from experience
and why marketers need to understand this post-
decision process
3. Discuss what happens when consumers experience
satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their decisions
about acquisition, consumption, or disposition
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4. Outline the ways in which consumers may respond
to dissatisfaction, and highlight the importance to
marketers
5. Discuss whether customer satisfaction alone is
enough to maintain customer loyalty
6. Describe how consumers may dispose of something,
why this process is more complex for meaningful
objects, and what influences consumer recycling
behavior
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Post-Decision Dissonance
and Regret
• Feeling of discomfort about whether or not the
correct decision was made
Post-decision dissonance
• Negative feeling that one should have made
another purchase, consumption, or disposition
decision than one actually did
Post-decision regret
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Factors Affecting
Learning from Experience
Motivation
Prior knowledge or ability
Ambiguity of information or lack of opportunity
Processing biases
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Marketing Implication of
Processing Bias
Top dog strategies Underdog strategies
Market leader or brand with a
large market share
Lower-share brand
Limitation on learning new
information during low motivation
is beneficial
Instigating learning through
comparison during low motivation
Blocking exposure to evidence to
avoid consumers from getting
new information
Creating expectations and using
promotion to provide actual
experience for consumers
Explaining experience by
reinforcing the messages and
encouraging consumers to try the
brand
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consumers evaluate the outcomes after
making acquisition, consumption, or
disposition decisions
– Satisfaction: Decision meets or exceeds
one’s expectations
– Dissatisfaction: Decision falls short of one’s
expectations
Utilitarian and hedonic
– Dimensions on which consumers are satisfied
or dissatisfied
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Thought-Based Judgments of
Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
Can relate to:
– Whether consumers’ beliefs and expectations
about the offering are confirmed or
disconfirmed by its actual performance
– Thoughts about:
• Causality and blame
• Fairness and equity
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Describes how individuals find explanations
for events
Based on stability, focus, and controllability
Ways to increase consumers’ positive post-
decision feelings
– Providing value-added services
– Using promotions and special deals
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Concerns about the fairness of exchanges
between individuals
Helps in understanding consumer satisfaction
and dissatisfaction
Perception of inputs and outputs are
exchanged between consumers and sellers
– Fairness in exchange: Perception that the inputs
and outputs of people involved in an exchange are
equal
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
Based on Feelings
Post-decision emotions: Emotions
experienced while using or disposing of the
acquired brands, products, or services
Dissatisfied consumers need to cope with
feelings of stress
Affective forecasting – Consumers tend to be
more dissatisfied when a product:
– Fails to perform as they thought it
would
– Makes them feel worse than they forecasted it
would
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Complaining
Responding to service recovery
Engaging in negative word-of-mouth
communication
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Caring about customers
Remembering customers between sales
Building trusting relationships
Monitoring service-delivery process
Providing extra effort
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
• Physical disposal of an item
Physical detachment
• Emotional disposal of a possession
Emotional detachment
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Depends on:
– Motivation
– Ability
– Opportunity
- Chapter 10
- � Post-Decision Dissonance and Regret
- Factors Affecting �Learning from Experience
- Marketing Implication of Processing Bias
- Thought-Based Judgments of Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
- Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction �Based on Feelings
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives (continued)
Consumer Judgments
Attribution Theory
Equity Theory
Responses to Dissatisfaction
Steps to Retain Customers
Disposing of Meaningful Objects
Recycling Behavior