So, then let’s bring to remembrance the chapter that discussed adverse possession of real property and this chapter’s discussion of an easement by prescription.
What are some of the similarities between the two (and don’t just guess: if you need to review the chapter on adverse possession and re-read what an easement by prescription is, please do so)?
Are they equally difficult to prove? What are the elements that would have to be proven in both? What if you were the owner of real property upon which someone tried to establish adverse possession or an easement by prescription; how would you respond?