The IDDR Approach and Immigration Law Case Study

A Question of Ethics—The IDDR Approach and Immigration Law. Split Rail Fence Company sells and installs fencing materials in Colorado. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent Split Rail a list of the company’s employees whose documentation did not satisfy the Form I-9 employment eligibility verification requirements. The list included long-term workers who had been involved in company activities, parties, and picnics. They had bank accounts, driver’s licenses, cars, homes, and mortgages. At Split Rail’s request, the employees orally verified that they were eligible to work in the United States. Unwilling to accept the oral verifications, ICE filed a complaint against Split Rail for its continued employment of the individuals. [Split Rail Fence Co. v. United States, 852 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2017)] (See Immigration Law.)

Using the IDDR approach, identify Split Rail’s ethical dilemma. What steps might the company take to resolve it? Explain.

Is penalizing employers the best approach to take in attempting to curb illegal immigration? Discuss.