Should more companies work to make supply design a core competence?

A report of 1000 words
The assignment is taken from Supply Chain Digest. (Attached)
The intent of this assignment is to evaluate the role of supply chain management.
Expected to exhibit the following competences:- Knowledge and understanding of key concepts- Analysis and level of argument- Extent of reading and references used- Structure and presentation of the submission, writing style
References needed. ( APA harvard referencing)

The following article appeared in Supply Chain Digest (SCDigest) on March

27, 2013. Your assignment is to answer the question at the end of the

article, which was also posted on SCDigest.

In an increasingly complex and dynamic supply chain world, should supply

chain design really be a core competence in most organizations?

The reality is that although some companies have built small teams (even as

small as a single person) to use some sort of network design and

optimization tool to answer an on-going series of questions, do lots of “what

if analysis” and more, it is still the exception. While the number of such

companies is growing, they still represent a pretty low percentage of

companies that could potentially benefit from such an approach.

“Instead, those companies will use network design tools perhaps just every
three to five years, when they make a major acquisition to optimize the

combined network, or based on some other one-time trigger, and then use
traditional spreadsheet type tools to analyze all the other issues and

questions in-between.

Are many those companies missing real opportunities to make better
decisions that can lead to lower supply chain costs, more optimal service and

performance, better management of trade-offs, and other benefits?

Absolutely, says Toby Brzoznowski, an executive vice president at Llamasoft,
a leading provider of network design software. And while given that role he

may be a little biased towards use of network design tools, he made a
compelling case on a recent Videocast on our Supply Chain Television

Channel that there was a significant amount of value that can be unlocked by
more continuous use of these capabilities.

“Leading companies out there are the ones that are really looking at supply
chain design as a process, not just a project,” Brzoznowski said. “There are

so many things that are changing constantly in the business world that
companies are realizing they have planning and execution systems use for

certain tasks, and that there are also systems that do design to continuously
re-engineer the supply chain.”

SCDigest editor Dan Gilmore added “I firmly believe, as I have written many

times, that the companies that are really investing in this and doing supply
chain network design on a continuous basis have a competitive advantage

over the companies that don’t. He then added that “I don’t see how in
today’s dynamic world you can almost argue that point.”

Another truism that is sometimes lost is that design is really just the flip side
of supply chain strategy, Gilmore added. “How can you be doing on-going

supply chain strategy without the right tools for marrying the supply chain
design that goes with that strategy?” he asked.

Common Supply Chain Design Challenges

Brzoznowski said that while there are many, many questions and decisions

that supply chain design tools can help companies address, there are several
common ones.

One is how to enter new markets and provide the optimal supply chain

support and cost structures for those strategies. He cited, for example,
Starbuck’s plan to roll-out 3000 to 4000 new stores in China.

“What kind of infrastructure do I need to make that happen?” Brzoznowski
asked.

Another common scenario is new product introduction, he said, which brings
questions such as where the product should be made, is it better to
outsource early in the product’s lifecycle, what the inventory strategies are

going to be and more.

“These are all supply chain design related questions,” Brzoznowski asked.

“ERP systems and traditional planning and execution systems cannot give
you the answers to those questions. They do not do supply chain design.”

Other common questions include building an optimal supply strategy while

factoring in risk considerations, looking across channels to see how much
supply chain infrastructure could or should be shared, how to react optimally

to changes in laws and regulations around the world that impact the supply
chain (a growing issue), where to optimally invest capital and many more.

Gilmore noted that in the end, these questions get answered one way or the
other, but if the analysis is done on spreadsheets, can you really factor in all

the right variables, do you really have an optimal answer in the end, and
what is your level of confidence you have telling executives what should be

done?

The Three Primary Use Cases

Brzoznowski says that at a high level, there are three main use cases for

supply chain design tools.

1. Better optimizing supply chain performance from an existing supply chain
or any of its components by creating a “digital model” of that supply chain,

ultimately from raw materials or other sourcing processes to final distribution
of a company’s products.

“Just seeing a model and understanding how their supply chain works is

usually very eye-opening to people,” Brzoznowski said, adding that it was
common for companies to find several areas ripe for improvement just from

this new visibility to what is really happening in their networks.

2. Performing continuous scenario analysis: These kinds of analysis
opportunities come up almost every day, Brzoznowski said, whether it’s

looking at dynamics of fuel and other input costs to how a carrier strategy
might play out.

“If you can use the digital models to test out those scenarios, it’s a huge

advantage,” he added.

3. Rapidly responding to changes in business conditions, costs, demand, etc.
One obvious example is how to optimally respond to a supply chain

disruption, Brzoznowski said.

There are literally dozens of ways companies are using these design tools
today, Brzoznowski said, in addition to traditional ways such as where to

locate manufacturing and distribution facilities. Those include designing a tax
efficient supply chain, supply chain risk analysis and mitigation, “freshness”

considerations, service policy optimization, supply chain segmentation
strategies, and several others that extend the areas of decision support well

beyond the traditional ways these tools have been used.

“I don’t you could have made this presentation say 10 years ago,” Gilmore
said. “Companies just weren’t using these tools to do these kind of things.”