learning team written assignment
grading rubric – week 4
Riordan Centralized/Distributed Server Model Comparison Paper
Content/Development
Subject Matter · Key elements of assignments covered · 500-600 words in length · Compares and contrasts the centralized versus distributed server model as an in-house implementation by describing the technical, operational, and strategic benefits/strengths and risks/weaknesses of each · From each of the business support tool perspectives (ERP, SCM, CRM, etc.), describe the pros and cons of both server models as they pertain specifically to Riordan’s needs · Determines and compares the overall viability of each model from distinct business support tool perspectives as they apply to Riordan by discussing how each addresses specifically the operational and strategic issues and concerns cited in the case by Riordan executives to understand keeping IS/IT functions in-house · Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive · Displays an understanding of relevant theory · Major points supported by specific details/examples · Research is adequate/timely · Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources |
3 Points |
Higher-Order Thinking · Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience · At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing
|
Organization
Organization
· The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points · Central theme/purpose is immediately clear · Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow · Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme · Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper
|
.5 Points |
Style/Mechanics
Format · Citations/reference page follow guidelines · Properly cites ideas/info from other sources · Paper is laid out effectively–uses, heading and other reader-friendly tools · Paper is neat/shows attention to detail
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling · Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed · Spelling is correct
Readability/Style · Sentences are complete, clear, and concise · Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure · Transitions between sentences/paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow of thought · Words used are precise and unambiguous · The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment
|
|
Possible Late Penalty |
10% / day |
Possible Points Earned |