USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
the due is aftere one week from now
Guidelines
·
Topic is (the effectiveness of online courses for high school at USA)
· Between 7-8 pages
·
FROM WHERE YOU WILL GET YOU’RE
RESOURCES
My instructor will ask me from where and what I have read about the information’s
that I use in to the research
· Free of grammatical and spelling errors.
· Times New Roman 12 point Font
· 1” Margins
·
Double Spaced
·
Follow APA
· Contain Headings Listed
Create Headings
· Introduction
· Problem Statement
· Literature Review
· Conclusion
· References
Main Purpose
· To address a challenge you are currently having in learning or instructional setting or may face in the future.
· Learn to synthesize information from research or peer reviewed articles.
· To incorporate scientifically based solutions to instructional decisions.
· To build a foundation of research practices geared to the graduate student’s content area.
Problem Statement
· The problem statement is intended to introduce the reader to why you have chosen the specific topic to research.
· The problem statement of your paper should clearly state the phenomenon or difficulty you have found in an educational or learning context.
· This statement should be at least a page.
Literature Review
· Read and review a minimum of ten peer reviewed articles pertaining to your problem statement.
· Determine which ones will help find a solution to the problem.
· Do not include articles or information that is peripheral to the discussion.
· Synthesize the information under the Literature Review heading. (For this project, you must include at least a page per article)
· Include quotes from articles which seem to address either the problem or what others have attempted to use to solve a similar problem.
Conclusion
· Concluding remarks tend to restate both the problem statement and provide a synthesized review of the literature.
· The conclusion should not include new details or examples but bring the discussion to a close.
FROM WHERE YOU WILL GET YOU’RE RESOURCES
My instructor will ask me from where and what I have read about the information’s
Research Paper Rubric Name__________________________Date_____________________
Score
________________________
|
Category |
Exemplary 20 Points |
Satisfactory 18 Points |
Developing 16 Points |
Unsatisfactory 14 Points |
Not Evident 12 Points |
Score | |||||||||||||||||
|
Title Page |
Title of the project Candidates Name, Instructor’s Name, Course Name, Date, Neatly finished-no errors and is according to Dr. Z Writing Instructions |
Evidence of 4 |
Evidence of3 |
Evidence of 2 or less |
Absent, no evidence |
/20 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Problem Statement |
Clearly and concisely stated the paper’s purpose in short sentences, which is engaging, and thought provoking and is innovative |
Clearly states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. |
States the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. |
Incomplete and/or unfocused. |
Absent, no evidence |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Introduction |
The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. |
The introduction states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. |
The introduction states the
main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. |
There is no clear introduction or main topic and the structure of the paper is missing. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Body, heading and subheading |
Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea with headings and subheadings |
Each paragraph has sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. |
Each paragraph lacks supporting detail sentences. |
Each paragraph fails to develop the main idea. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Organization- Structural Development of the Idea |
Author demonstrated logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. |
Paragraph development Present, and is logical. |
Logical organization; organization of ideas not fully developed. |
No evidence of structure or organization. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Use of appropriate vocabulary and filed technical terminologies |
Author applied 10 or more technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems. Author’s writing demonstrated an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. |
Author applied 8 or more technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems |
Author applied 6 or less technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems |
Author applied 4 or less technical vocabulary/terminologies and prior knowledge to design solutions to complex problems |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Conclusion |
The conclusion is engaging and addressed the thesis for the reader to fully understand the paper. |
The conclusion addressed the thesis. |
The conclusion does not adequately address the thesis. |
The conclusion is incomplete and/or ambiguous. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Grammar and punctuations |
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. |
two or less errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. |
More than 3 errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. |
More than 6 and distracting errors in punctuation, |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Citation and References |
All cited works, both text and visual, are reported in the correct APA format with no errors. |
5 or more cited works, both text and visual, are reported in the correct APA format. Inconsistencies evident. |
3 and less cited works, both text and visual, are reported in the correct APA format. |
1 or less cited authors |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Bibliography |
provided in the correct format with no errors. Includes more than 5 major references (e.g. peer reviewed journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. |
Provided in the correct format with 2 or less errors. Includes 5 major references (e.g. peer reviewed journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. |
Provided in the correct format with 4 or more errors. Includes 3 major references (e.g. peers journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. |
Provided in the correct format
with more than 5 errors. Includes 2 major references (e.g. peer reviewed journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total |
/200 |
