Topic Focus Sociology makes us aware of the larger social and historical forces that can impact our individual lives. What we experience in different social settings with others may be traced back to larger events, established patterns of interaction, and changes in the social structure. We can exercise our “sociological imagination” in order to understand what type of impact these larger social processes have on our individual lives. The core assessment for this course is a major essay in which you will write about how you believe your individual identity and opportunities or life chances have been shaped by your group identity (racial, ethnic, gender, religious, or sexual preference) and the established patterns of majority-minority relations in this society. You will incorporate course materials, concepts, theories, and models from this course, sources of original peer reviewed research, and demographic data to describe, explain, and analyze the processes that have shaped your group and individual identity and current status. You will also critique and evaluate the conclusions reached by theorists and authors regarding how patterns and processes shape minority-majority relations by contrasting your personal experience and evaluating both against findings from the peer-reviewed research and demographic data you locate. While it is preferable to do this paper based on your racial/ethnic identity, you may elect to write your paper based on another aspect of your identity such as gender, religion, or sexual preference. The group identity you choose should be applicable to you personally. You may also choose to combine two or more of the dimensions of personal identity, perhaps noting which dimensions are more important in terms of your individual identity. For example, an African American female who is a lesbian may choose to write about how each of these various dimensions has impacted her personal identity and life chances in society, perhaps noting which she believes has had the most impact. This may make the paper a little more challenging. You are encouraged to consult your instructor for guidance. Resources for Content and Analysis In writing your paper, you will integrate selected course materials from your assigned readings, concepts, theory, typologies, and models from the course, demographic data, and at least five outside sources of original academic research from peer-reviewed journals or books. You must incorporate these sources of information and analysis into your paper. Five is the minimum number of peer-reviewed sources you need to meet expectations. You should have at least three of these from doing your journal entries. If you want to “exceed expectations,” you will need to include more than five. Only reputable, peer-reviewed academic sources will count toward the reference requirements of your paper. You can and should draw on what you have learned about locating, evaluating, and integrating such sources with course material from your weekly activities and assignments. Links to appropriate sources for statistical and demographic data are provided in your list of web resources. You may also include interviews with relatives and additional information from newspapers, magazines such as Newsweek, news organizations such as CNN, and other well-selected Internet sources to supplement your analysis, but these should only be used for illustration and background information. They should not be used to support or substantiate your analysis and evaluation of theory or course materials. You must use peer-reviewed academic sources (academic research journals or books that reflect original work) and demographic data for that. If you have questions about a source or how to use it in your paper, contact your instructor for guidance. Citation and Formatting Guidelines Length of Paper: Your paper should be approximately 2000 – 2500 words excluding title page and references. It should be double spaced, 12-point font (Times Roman or Courier) with 1-inch margins. Do not exceed 3000 words. APA Style Requirement: You are required to use the APA style format for this paper, as in all written work in this course. Your paper should include a title page, an abstract, and a list of references. While information on APA style format has been made available to you, you may also want to obtain a copy of the sixth edition of the APA Publication Manual for additional guidance. Citation Requirement: You are required to cite all of the sources used in your paper by using citations within the text as well as providing a list of references. If you do not properly cite your reference sources, then you are guilty of plagiarism. Plagiarism will not be tolerated and may result in immediate and serious academic penalties. Given that, it is imperative that you follow the rules for citing your sources, especially those that pertain to in-text citations. If you quote directly, paraphrase, or summarize any information that comes from a reference source and do not note this appropriately in the text of your paper, you are guilty of plagiarism and will suffer the consequences. Citing your sources in a list at the end of your paper is necessary, but it is not sufficient to avoid charges of plagiarism. Any direct quotes, paraphrases, factual statements, or ideas used from your sources should be so noted in the text of your paper at the places where they appear and properly cited using parenthetical in-text citation in the APA format. Your work must be your own. Information about plagiarism and how to avoid it may be found on the Park Academic Support Center’s website at http://www.park.edu/support/ethics.asp Core Assessment Instructions Basic Organization and Content Guidelines: Introduction Your paper should include an introduction that contains your thesis statement (a statement that indicates the overall point of focus for your paper) and a summary of the major points you intend to cover in your paper to support your thesis. This should be a statement regarding how you believe your sense of group identity or lack of sense of group identity has been shaped by both historical factors and your own personal experience. Part I Relative Importance of Group Identity to Personal Identity How does your group identity shape your personal identity? Many things influence our personal identity—ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, gender, religion and even our physical capabilities. These are also things that form the basis of minority or majority status in society. Individuals share in a group identity, and the extent to which they do so varies according to the individual. You may want to use the following guidelines for writing this section, but only as a guide for the content of the paper. Do not just write out answers to individual questions: Define one or more aspects of group identity that are part of your individual identity and indicate whether or not you feel your group identity represents a minority or majority status and why. Differentiate your group identity from other group identities in terms of symbolic and/or cultural markers. What cultural or symbolic markers differentiate your group identity from that of other group identities? Explain the meaning group identity has for you and how it forms a part of your individual identity. To what extent is it significant for you? How do you feel you compare to other individuals within this group in terms of how you identify with it? If you do not feel a sense of group identity or affiliation, explain why you believe you do not. What theory or theories may explain why you feel no real sense of group affiliation? Indicate what factors in your personal experience have played a role in the extent to which you identify with this group. How have your experiences with other contrasting groups shaped your own identity? Indicate how you perceive your group identity as shaping your daily experience in this society and interaction with those of other groups. If you think it has little effect on you as an individual, explain why that is the case based on the theories we’ve covered. Consider the reasons people identify themselves by race, ethnicity, or some other basis for group belonging as well as the meanings of categories and terms people use to identify themselves and others. Consider how minority and majority groups are defined and the consequences of those definitions, including such things as prejudice, discrimination, negative self image, marginality, etc. What concepts, theories, and findings from research can you use to describe, explain, and support the points you make in this section? If you are part of the majority, you may not feel your race or ethnicity is a significant factor in your personal identity. If that is the case, you would want to explain why you believe it is not significant or why you feel that way, using what you have learned in the course and from your outside research to support your analysis. Part II Historical Context and Impact Link what you might know about your family history as well as your personal experiences with larger historical and social structural forces. Research and discuss the history of your group in American society and how its status may have changed over time, comparing/contrasting it with your individual family history to the extent that you can. There will be some information available in your text, but you may want to look for additional background information from outside sources. Research your family history to the extent that you are able and compare/contrast this history with the information you located on your identity group. Guidelines for writing this section: Indicate how your identity group became a part of this society. What is the history of this identity group as indicated by your course materials and outside research? Indicate how that history compares to your particular familial history. Are there similarities and differences? What are they? How would you explain them? What historical events have shaped your group’s and your family’s circumstances? Indicate how your identity group may have changed over time. What factors led to those changes? Is your group identity different than it was for your parents, their parents or earlier ancestors? Indicate whether or not life is different for you today than it was for your ancestors. You may want to interview older family members to find out what things were like for them as a member of this group and how they felt their group identity influenced their lives. If older relatives are not available, consider other older members of your identity group that you know. Interpret the underlying processes that shaped the status and experiences of your identity group and that of your ancestors, especially any strategies your group may have used to carve its niche (assimilate) in American society. Use course concepts and theory relevant to your group as well as findings from your outside research for your interpretation. Try to see the links between the experiences of the larger group and your personal life or to see areas where these may or may not match up. Explain how you feel your personal experience compares with your group as a whole and with what social theorists have said about the overall experience of your group in American society. Indicate similarities and differences and try to explain those using concepts and theories from the course. To what extent did your group have a cohesive identity? Does your group have a cohesive identity today? Why or why not? In writing this section, consider the ways in which majority and minority status is created and maintained and the consequences for both. Think about how you might use theories of ethnic stratification, theories of assimilation, and minority coping strategies (accommodation, separatism, radicalism) to explain and analyze your group’s experience and your own and your family’s experience. You will also want to critique and evaluate those theories against your own personal experiences and the findings from your outside research. Are there areas of agreement or disagreement? What do you feel are the strengths and the weaknesses of some of these models or theories and how would you justify your conclusions? Part III Impact on Life Chances and the Future In this section, you will write about how and to what extent you believe your group identity has affected your life chances (your opportunities to benefit from such things as a good education, job, home, and/or good health) and how you see the future in terms of opportunities for your group and yourself: Indicate how your group identity provides you with either advantages or disadvantages. Perhaps you believe it does both or neither. Compare your identity group to that of other groups in terms of life chances. Discuss the extent of acculturation and assimilation of your group and whether or not you perceive that as affecting your current status and life chances. Examine and evaluate your identity group’s strategy or strategies for advancing within the larger opportunity structure (those things you covered in Part II). Evaluate the relative success of these strategies and whether or not you feel they have played a role in your current life chances. Have you followed the same strategies or different ones? Are there strategies that you, as an individual of the group, believe would better serve your group? What are they, and why do you think they would be more effective? Discuss the future of your identity group in terms of the prospects for your group over the next two decades based on current trends and demographic data available. What larger historical forces do you see as shaping the future for your identity group and for yourself? What do you think the future holds for your identity group and for yourself, and what are the things that support your conclusions? In writing this section, continue to consider the impact larger historical forces and established patterns in the social institutions of society might have on your identity group and you personally. What types of things are currently happening in the areas of education, politics, the economy, the family, the criminal justice system, etc., that may impact the present opportunities and future opportunities of your identity group? How do you see these as applying to yourself as a member of this group? Conclusion In your conclusion, discuss what you feel your group/personal experience has to say about the nature of minority-majority relations in the US. Draw some conclusions about what you have learned overall from taking this course and writing this paper.
Numeric Grade:
22 / 30 pts |
The following questions should serve as a guide for your entry: · What is one group (racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, gender, religious, social class, etc.) with which you feel you can identify in terms of belonging to this group? · Would you consider this group a majority or minority group? Why? · How important is this group identity to you? If it is very important, what do you think makes it important? If it is not, why do you think it is not important to you? · In what way or ways might this group identity help to shape your view of the world? · How is your ability to be objective about minority-majority issues influenced, either positively or negatively by this group identity? Comments: Carl, you’ve done a very good job on your first journal entry and your application of the concepts of “machismo” and objectivity. See my comment on the definition of minority. Are Hispanics considered a minority only due to their numbers? Other relevant concepts that might apply to what you’ve written here might be symbolic interaction and cultural differentiation. You needed to apply two theories this week. You might have used social identity theory to explain your feeling of comfort around those like you in terms of the ethnicity and social status. You might also have used Interactionist theory to explain the process of cultural transmission of Hispanic norms and values, especially those that apply to Hispanic males as well as to explain why skin color may be significant in the U.S. while it is not as significant in Latin American countries. Interactionists would also suggest that taking one’s time may be interpreted as being lazy in the US and this might result in conflict. Our culture shapes our perceptions and in turn, this influences how we react to those who are not like us in certain respects. Your APA format is very good overall. If the information cited is quoted material, then you also need to include the page number on which the quoted material is located. As noted in the instructions, these journals are “practice” for the paper. They are meant to help you in applying concepts and theory, so be sure to follow my comments and the feedback I give you each week. Review the rubric below to see where you need to concentrate on improving your entries. If you do not understand something, please contact me. Thanks! Instructor C 🙂 The ethnic group with which I feel I can identify in terms of belonging to this group is Hispanic. I would consider this group to be a minority group and so does society. Although Hispanics have grown significantly in numbers throughout the United States their numbers as far as population goes are still low in comparison to others in the United States[k1] . Hispanics have grown to be the largest minority group in the United States (Parrillo, 2011). Being Hispanic to me is very important. It signifies who I am and what I am about. One thing that makes this identity important to me is its male image[k2] . Hispanic males are raised to be good providers for family, be the strength in face of adversity, be reliable, independent, and to protect the families honor at all times (Parrillo, 2011). “In most Latin American cultures skin color is less important than social class as an indicator of social status” (Parrillo, 2011, p[k3] . #). This view helps me to identify with society in a viewpoint that the person’s quality is what makes the difference and not where they are from or what color they may or may not be. Another thing that has shaped my view of the world is that I was brought up in the mentality that when you take your time things will get done right. Hispanics have a more casual attitude than others in the United States when it comes to rushing and believe that it robs one of dignity (Parrillo, 2011[k4] ). It’s hard to say I can be objective about minority-majority issues given my Hispanic background and upbringing. I try to be as objective as I can but I think this has to do with one’s level of education more than anything. It is my belief that in any given culture or ethnic group that the most there are those with a lesser degree of education who are severely subjective about minority-majority issues due to their lack of education about others.
Reference: Parrillo, V. N. (2011). Strangers to these shores. (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon [k1]However, remember that in the context of minority-majority relations, minority does not refer to numbers but to other characteristics that distinguish a group from the majority. [k2]“Machismo”? [k3]Include the page number on which this quoted material is found. [k4]What theoretical perspective do you think explains the points you’ve written in this paragraph? What do Inteactionists say shapes our view of the world and of other groups? |
Journal Week 2
· To what extent do you feel that your group identity influences your day-to-day experiences and interaction with others?
· In what way or ways have your experiences with those of other group identities helped to shape your own identity?
· What prejudices might you have? Do you feel these have influenced you to act in a discriminatory manner toward others based on their group identity? Why or why not?
· Have you experienced prejudice and discrimination due to your group identity? What are experiences with others from different groups that stand out in your mind as being very positive or very negative?
· In what way or ways have you responded to prejudice and/or discrimination? Have these been effective? Why or why not?
Fernando Pupo: Week 2 Journal |
Numeric Grade: 25 / 30 pts |
Letter Grade:
|
Comments:
Carl, you’ve done a very good job here of tying the research you used to your example of discrimination. Another major point made by the research that you might consider bringing out in your core assessment is the idea that non-white characteristics are usually defined as “deviant.” Deviance itself is a social construction as explained using interactionist theory and the labeling perspective. This would tie your research to a specific theory. See my note on the prejudice you noted. A specific example would have clarified this. Remember to include the page number in your in-text citation when you are quoting a source. Journal articles also have page numbers, just as your textbook has them. *Submit your entry by the due date to avoid a late penalty. Thanks and keep up the good work! Instructor C
I feel my group identity has an influence on my day to day interaction with others. I have been raised to respect my elders no matter if they are wrong or right. I treat others with the respect I deserve to be treated with. My experiences helping others each day is a strong influence from my Latino upbringing. I strive to help whoever I can in whichever way possible. The “never let anything stop you” cultural upbringing that I have does not leave room for me to not be able to help with something. If there is desire, there will always be a way to do things. That’s[k1] the way I see it and the way I was raised. A prejudice I have is towards cultures who allow their children to crash so to say in an “effort” to let them become mature[k2] , and adults on their own. I do act discriminatory at times towards cultures like this because it goes against everything I was raised and brought up on.
I have been discriminated against for being Hispanic by people saying I can’t do things on my own, and that I would always live in poverty like my ancestors before me. My classmates in school would say derogatory statements about my ethnicity saying I was a dirty field worker and there was no need for me to be in school. I was told I was wasting valuable classroom space and should go cut sugarcane and make them drinks because they where thirsty. “By assigning expectation states to status characteristics, one can observe the differentiation of social relations into positive or negative events” (Aguirre, 2004, p. 932[k3] ). School became increasingly difficult to deal with because the other cultures and ethnicities did not always treat me with the respect I deserved. I kept my head held high as I was raised to do and kept pushing forward.
Reference: Aguirre, A. (2004). Profiling Mexican American identity: Issues and concerns. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(7), 928-922. Doi: 10.1177/0002764203261072. Retrieved from
[k1]Watch comma splices. You have a tendency to separate two independent clauses with a comma rather than a period. [k2]This needs further clarification. What is meant by “crash”? Do you mean that the parents believe it is appropriate to allow their children to make mistakes in order to learn from those mistakes? Are you saying that such parents might be using this as an excuse to shirk their own duties as parents? A specific example would be good here. What culture or cultures practice this? [k3]Include the page number where this quoted material is located. |
Journal Week 3
Fernando Pupo: Week 3 Journal |
Numeric Grade: 30 / 30 pts |
Letter Grade: |
· How did your ancestors (or you) become part of this society? What types of factors may have influenced their or your decisions to come here? · Did the way in which you or your ancestors became part of this society influence the ability to assimilate? If so, why and how? If not, why not? · How do you feel the history of your identity group compares to the history of your ancestors and your personal family history? What are the similarities and/or differences? · What major historical events do you feel have helped to shape the circumstances of your identity group and that of your ancestors/family? Comments: Carl, you’ve done a good job applying theory and concepts this week. Interactionist theory is a good theory to use when you want to discuss how perceptions and socialization to cultural norms and values can affect intergroup relations. Interactionist theory would also be a good theory to explain how different Cuban immigrants were perceived, depending upon the time period and the circumstances of their immigration. Cubans who came during the time Castro took power in Cuba are often viewed much differently than those who came in the 1980s. Good APA format this week as well. Thanks and keep up the good work! Instructor C My grandmother on my mother’s side came to the United States from Cuba in 1967 when my mother was only five months old. Poverty was amongst them, in the town where they lived, and my grandfather who was the breadwinner, passed away. There were scarce opportunities to make money that would support my family so my grandmother fought hard and alone against all odds to come to the United States. The United States has always been a land of opportunity and endless possibilities. Many Cubans knew this and this part of why my family moved here. After the long hard battle was over and my grandmother arrived in the United States, things where difficult for her since she did not know English. Luckily she quickly moved to Hialeah Florida where there was a heavy Latino and minority presence which quickly helped her to get on her feet. [k1] Even though everyone was not Hispanic or even spoke Spanish in that neighborhood everyone blended in and had a sense of understanding, a common purpose and expression. The interactionist theory examines the shared interpretations and interaction patterns of everyday life (Parrillo, 2011 pg. 19). It doesn’t take everyone speaking the same language or even being from the same place to understand each other and interact[k2] .
Other than the language barrier, which made it difficult to get certain things done, my ancestors quickly applied what they were raised on and did not let anything stop them from living the American Dream and providing a safe, stable, healthy environment for themselves[k3] . Avoidance, a minority group response to prejudice and discrimination became common amongst many of my ancestors to those who would make things difficult for them by insulting them and their culture (Parrillo. 2011 pg.71). My ancestors where often made fun of and where talked down to when they first came to this country. It was a form of self-justification in which people are denigrated in an effort to justify their maltreatment (Parrillo, 2011 pg. 47). A major historical event that basically made my family need to move to the United States was Fidel Castro going into power. My grandmother talks about it almost every day. She says once he took over he promised the world and delivered to a very scare percentage and robbed everyone else from the daily necessities they needed to live on a day to day basis. A major historical event which allowed more family to come to the United States from Cuba and help my grandmother as well as save themselves from a falling country and economy was the Mariel boat lift which allowed Cubans to freely leave Cuba in 1980. Even though my ancestors suffered much prejudice in thinking they were less than they were and lower class people before even getting to know them, they lived with their heads held high. This is a tradition I hope to carry on in my family till the end of time. Parrillo, V. N. (2011). Strangers to these shores. (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [k1]This might be an example of “chain migration.” [k2]That is true, but your grandmother obviously went where she knew she would be able to speak Spanish and where she felt more comfortable. Interactionists suggest that when a group shares a similar history, they also share similar symbols that allow them to communicate easily. Likewise, if they do not share a similar history, it may be more difficult for them to communicate. [k3]Something I’ve noticed in your postings and entries is that you seem to gloss over the challenges faced or the conflicts that could and do occur. Acknowledging these things doesn’t mean that individuals have to give in to them or that they will not achieve their American Dream. When you do not acknowledge these issues as legitimate issues to be confronted, your statements can appear contradictory. For example, you are trying to apply Interactionist theory but instead of pointing out how differences can create conflict, you are trying to say they make no difference and that everyone in your grandmother’s neighborhood got along great, regardless of race/ethnicity or the language they spoke. Then later you point out that language barriers made it difficult to get some things done. This appears contradictory to the reader. |
Journal Week 4
· Did religion play a role in the lives of your ancestors? Does it play a role in your life? If so, how and to what extent?
· What religious or other
Cultural Markers
define you as an individual and/or as a member of your identity group?
· How might the circumstances of your identity group have changed over time? What are some of the cultural and structural factors you see as influencing those changes?
· In respect to the influence of group identity on the lives of individuals, how is life different for you today than it was for your ancestors? If you don’t think it is different, explain why.
Fernando Pupo: Week 4 Journal |
Numeric Grade: 30 / 30 pts
Letter Grade:
Comments:
Carl, you’ve done an excellent job in applying the findings of this research to your own experiences. Your entry demonstrates that you have a very good understanding of what the research encompassed as well as how it relates to you personally. *Continue to work on your APA format. See my comments on including the page number in your in-text citation when you are quoting word-for-word from your source. Thanks and keep up the great work! Instructor C
Religion has played a major role in the life of my ancestors. Most Cubans in Cuba are Hispanic and come to the United States with the mentality of those around them share similar beliefs and religious views. When moving to the United States they had to deal with others of different religions questioning their beliefs. Religion also plays a role in my life. Although while it can be scary to think someone is always watching over you, it often serves to keep you in the right direction when you may be falling off track. Religion has helped me treat others respectfully and has been a foundation of my upbringing and a major reason I am the way I am to this very day. Embracement of religion and acceptance of God or any other higher being in your religion is an essential step in being accepted by others of your ethnic group. Catholics have big parties and celebrations once members of their youth complete their communion. Becoming close to one’s religion is becoming close to their family. Religion brings people together and has brought my ancestors together for years. No matter what may be going on there will always be a common belief in a greater good that brings people together for a common good. Religion is very close to culture and ethnicity. “Sometimes it is very difficult to work out where a religious identity ends and a cultural identity begins” (Michell, 2006, p[k1] . #). Over time other ethnic groups have shared and expressed their religious views and ideas in various ways. Over time ones religion tends to shape throughout the decades. New testaments and beliefs are created based on a religion’s experiences and beliefs. Even if with time one tends not to be such engaged in the church and or religion is still forever apart of them and who they are. “Whilst the individual’s relationship with religious beliefs may be ambiguous, beliefs are clearly still a factor in their social relationships” (Michell[k2] , 2006). From the days my ancestors came to the United States till now I believe our religious beliefs as a family have changed quite a bit. Experiences change people. Mitchell, C. (2006). The religious content of ethnic identities. Sociology, 40(6), 1135-1152. Doi: 10.1177/0038038506069854. Retrieved from
[k1]Include the page number of the journal on which the quoted material can be located. [k2]See comment 1. |
Journal Week 5
Fernando Pupo: Week 5 Journal |
Numeric Grade: 24 / 30 pts |
· What specific strategies were used by your identity group in its attempt to establish itself in American society? · How would you characterize these according to the response patterns presented in Parrillo (2011) Chapter 4 and to the coping strategies outlined by Michael LeMay (Week 2 Lecture)? · What course concepts and theories do you feel are most relevant in explaining the experience of your identity group? Why? · Were the response patterns and strategies used by your ancestors similar or different from those identified by social theorists for your identity group? · How successful do you believe these response patterns and strategies have been in accomplishing group goals? Comments: Carl, you are on the right track here in terms of pointing out behavior that links to the response patterns in your text. I would agree that acceptance is a response pattern practice by Hispanics and has been from the beginning of their immigration. See my comments on other response patterns and on LeMay’s Model and how they might be applied. *You needed to apply LeMay’s Model in this entry, along with an additional theory. Thanks and keep up the good work! Instructor C
In establishing themselves in the United States, Hispanics have gone through many trials and tribulations. My ancestors got jobs in factories and crop fields where they received low pay. This was not much, but it served enough to put food on the table and take care of their own. Through the years they worked their way up in factories taking on tougher challenges proving that they could do more. Doing so slowly established a positive identity for them in society and they were less looked down upon and more respected. In coping with the typical response patterns presented in Parrillo (2011) acceptance had to be one of the first responses from Hispanics establishing themselves in the United States (Parrillo, 2011). Acceptance of a minority status and being less than an American needed to be the way they took things in order to get ahead in life. They simply could not let being a minority and being put down stop them from their dream of success for them and their family[k1] . The responses used by ancestors were very similar to those identified by social theorists for my identity group. Prejudice is a concept that is very relevant to the identity of my group. There are those who think of Hispanics as nothing but field and factory workers good for manual labor and not much more. I believe that my ancestors did what they had to do in terms of laying low and not creating a big disturbance at first when they were put down. They knew who they were and what they were about and fought hard to make in somewhere in the work place before coming out more aggressively towards equality. Discrimination has affected my ancestors tremendously and the Hispanic ethnicity. A head held high and a continued show of a positive attitude, continued education, and dedication will provide for the biggest step to overcome discrimination and head towards a more equal form of society[k2] . Reference: [k1]This is a good application of the minority response pattern of acceptance. Keep in mind that not all members of a group will utilize the same strategies and may try different strategies, depending on the time period and circumstances. One might also apply the response pattern of defiance or deviance as some choose to ignore immigration law to come here illegally and still do today. Deviance can also be seen in gang membership and activity.
What coping strategy identified by LeMay would you say is reflected in the overall Hispanic experience? Economic accommodation is definitely a strategy as Hispanics/Latinos have been recruited for labor in the United States. The Chicano Movement would be an example of New Style Radicalism. Separatism is also a coping strategy that has been used by Hispanic/Latino Americans. [k2]This would represent a functionalist view of Hispanic/Latino assimilation. That is one theory you might have used here in addition to an application of LeMay’s Model. |
Journal Week 6
· Do you feel your group identity provides you with either advantages or disadvantages or some of both? Why?
· How do you feel these advantages/disadvantages compare with others of your identity group and with members of other identity groups in terms of life chances?
· Do you feel the response patterns and coping strategies used by your identity group have played a role in your own life chances? Why or why not? Have you as an individual followed the same strategies or different ones?
· Are there more effective strategies you believe might have been used by your identity group? If so, what are they? What makes you feel they would be more successful?
Havent done this assignment yet.