Preliminary Overview of theEconomies of Latin America andthe Caribbean2016

 

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

1. Executive Summary for chapter 1.

.

2. Which are the three most CRITICAL ISSUES for EACH chapter? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail …

.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

3. Which are the three most relevant LESSONS LEARNED for EACH chapter? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail …

.

4. Which are the three most important BEST PRACTICES for EACH chapter? Please explain why? and analyze, and discuss in great detail …

.

I expect high caliber reviews with top analyses and interesting insights for this(these) Chapter(s) !!

.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

201

6

PreliminaryOverview of the Economie

s

of Latin America and the Caribbean

P
r

e

li
m

i

n

a

ry
O

v
e

rv
ie

w
o

f

th

e
E

c

o

n
o

m
ie

s

o
f

L
a

ti

n

A
m

e
ri

c
a

a
n

d
t

h
e

C
a

ri
b

b
e

a
n

2

0

16

20

16

Preliminary Overview of the Economies
of Latin America and the Caribbe

an

2 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Alicia Bárcena
Executive Secretary

Antonio Prado
Deputy Executive Secretary

Daniel Titelman
Chief, Economic Development Division

Ricardo Pérez
Chief, Publications and Web Services Division

Explanatory notes

– Three dots (…) indicate that data are missing, are not available or are not separately reported.
– A dash (-) indicates that the amount is nil or negligible.
– A full stop (.) is used to indicate decimals.
– The word “dollars” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise specified.
– A slash (/) between years (e.g., 2013/2014) indicates a 12-month period falling between the two years.
– Individual figures and percentages in tables may not always add up to the corresponding total due to rounding.

This publication should be cited as: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Preliminary Overview of the Economies
of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2016 (LC/G.2698-P), Santiago, 2016.

Applications for authorization to reproduce this work in whole or in part should be sent to the Economic Commission for Latin America and
the Caribbean (ECLAC), Publications and Web Services Division, publicaciones@cepal.org. Member States and their governmental institutions
may reproduce this work without prior authorization, but are requested to mention the source and to inform ECLAC of such reproduction.

The Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean is an annual publication prepared by the Economic Development
Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). This 2016 edition was prepared under the supervision of
Daniel Titelman, Chief of the Division, while Jürgen Weller, Senior Economic Affairs Officer, was responsible for its overall coordination.

In the preparation of this edition, the Economic Development Division was assisted by the Statistics Division, the ECLAC subregional headquarters
in Mexico City and Port of Spain, and the Commission’s country offices in Bogota, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, Montevideo and Washington, D.C.

The regional report was prepared by Daniel Titelman with inputs provided by the following exerts: Cecilia Vera, Claudia de Camino and José
Antonio Sánchez (global economic trends and external sector), Claudio Aravena (economic activity), Ramón Pineda (prices), Jürgen Weller
(employment and wages), Ricardo Martner, Michael Hanni and Ivonne González (fiscal policy), and Ramón Pineda, Rodrigo Cárcamo and Alejandra
Acevedo (monetary and exchange-rate policies). Pablo Carvallo, Cecilia Vera, Alejandra Acevedo and Claudio Aravena were responsible for the
economic projections, with input from the ECLAC subregional headquarters and national offices. Alejandra Acevedo, Alda Díaz, Fernando
Villanueva and María José Zambrano were responsible for the processing and presentation of the statistical data and graphical presentations.

The country notes are based on studies conducted by the following experts: Anahí Amar and Daniel Vega (Argentina), Michael Hendrickson
(Bahamas and Belize), Nyasha Skerrette (Barbados), Claudia de Camino (Plurinational State of Bolivia), Carlos Mussi (Brazil), Esteban Pérez
(Chile), Olga Lucía Acosta, Yaddi Miranda, Juan Carlos Ramírez and Tomás Concha (Colombia), Ramón Padilla (Costa Rica), Indira Romero
(Cuba), Cornelia Kaldewei (Ecuador), Stefanie Garry (El Salvador (with Jesús Santamaría) and Guatemala), Sheldon McLean (Eastern Caribbean
Monetary Union and Guyana), Randolph Gilbert (Haiti), Cameron Daneshvar (Dominican Republic and Honduras), Dillon Alleyne (Jamaica), Juan
Carlos Rivas (Mexico), Francisco Villarreal (Nicaragua), Rodolfo Minzer (Panama), Sonia Gontero (Paraguay), Rodrigo Cárcamo (Peru), Machel
Pantin (Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago), and Álvaro Lalanne and Martín Brum (Uruguay). Michael Hanni and José Luis Germán reviewed the
Caribbean country notes. Juan Pablo Jiménez collaborated in the review of the country notes for the Latin American countries.United Nations publication

ISBN: 978-92-1-121938-8 (print)

ISBN: 978-92-1-058574-3 (pd

f)

ISBN: 978-92-1-358050-9 (ePub)

Sales No.: E.17.II.G.2

LC/G.2698-P

Copyright © United Nations,

2016

All rights reserved

Printed at United Nations, Santiago

S.16-01332

3ContentsPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016

CONTENTS

Executive summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

7

Chapter I
Global economic trends ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 17

The global economy grew by 2.2% in 2016, the lowest rate since the international financial crisis
of 2008-2009, and growth is expected to pick up slightly to 2.7% in 2017 ………………………………………………… 1

9

Although global trade volume continued to slow in 2016 —with just 1.7% growth over the year—
the World Trade Organization (WTO) expects this to recover in 2017, with expansion
of between 1.8% and 3.1% ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

20

Prices for primary products bottomed out in January 2016, and have begun to rise again since then;
overall they are expected to show a drop of 6% for 2016, and a recovery of 8% in 2017 …………………………….

22

Financial market volatility eased in 2016 —notwithstanding a few short-lived spikes— and the prices
of stock market assets have recovered ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2

3

Chapter II
The external sector……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2

5

In 2016, the terms of trade fell by much less than in 2015, although hydrocarbon exporters
are still facing substantially lower export prices …………………………………………………………………………………….. 27

The balance-of-payments current account deficit narrowed sharply in 2016, mainly owing to
a reduction in the deficit on the goods account, although all components
of the current account contributed ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2

8

The reduction in goods imports has generated a significant improvement in the goods balance in 2016 …………..

28

The net financial flows received by Latin America in 2016 were 17% smaller than in 2015;
but they were more than sufficient to cover the current account deficit, so the region
as a whole accumulated international reserves …………………………………………………………………………………….. 32

External bond issues by Latin American and Caribbean countries in the first 10 months
of 2016 are up by 55% on the year-earlier period …………………………………………………………………………………… 33

The region’s sovereign risk, which peaked at 677 basis points in January 2016, retreated
and was below 500 basis points in late October …………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

4

Chapter III
Economic activity ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 37

Economic growth in the region contracted yet further in 2016, while there continued to be
large differences between the countries ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39

Economic performance has differed between South America and Central America …………………………………….

40

The contraction of regional GDP reflects the persistent decline of investment and consumption…………………. 40

This contraction of economic activity took place in a context where the agriculture, mining
and service sectors reinforced the negative contribution of industry to growth …………………………………………. 42

Chapter IV
Domestic prices ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45

In the first nine months of 2016, inflation gathered pace in the Latin American and Caribbean
economies on average, with some countries posting rates above 40% …………………………………………………….. 47

Inflation is higher in goods than in services, while food prices are running ahead of the headline rate ……………. 49

Chapter V
Employment and wages ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5

1

Unemployment rose in the context of a declining employment rate and a rising participation rate………………. 53

Labour market performance varied both between subregions and between men and women………………………

54

Average employment quality deteriorated ……………………………………………………………………………………………..

56

Real wage growth slowed

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 58

4 Contents Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Chapter VI
Macroeconomic policy ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

61

A. Fiscal policy ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

63

Fiscal accounts continued to follow different trends in the region’s north and south during 2016 ………….. 63

Public debt is still rising, but its growth has moderated healthily ………………………………………………………..

64

There were deeper cutbacks in public spending, and capital spending in particular ……………………………… 66

The decline in public revenues that has been ongoing in Latin America since 2013
was aggravated in 2016 by a drop in tax receipts……………………………………………………………………………… 67

B. Monetary and exchange-rate policies ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 69

Structural differences between economies and the effects of the factors mentioned above
led to divergent uses being made of the different monetary policy instruments available
to policymakers in the region…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

70

Lending interest rates held steady, trending slightly downward, while growth in credit
to the private sector slowed …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 72

The region’s currencies tended to weaken against the dollar in a context of very volatile
international financial markets ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 73

The region’s real effective exchange rate depreciated during 2016 ……………………………………………………. 76

International reserves rose by an average of 2.1% …………………………………………………………………………… 77

Chapter VII
Risks and outlook for 2017 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 79

Statistical annex

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

85

ECLAC recent publications ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 119

Tables
Table I.1 Annual variation in international prices for primary products, 2015, 2016 and 2017 ………………….. 22

Table II.1 Latin America: indicator of the growth of trading partners, 2015-2017 …………………………………. 32

Table II.2 Latin America and the Caribbean: variation in debt issues on international markets
by institutional sector, 2015-2016 …………………………………………………………………………………….. 34

Table II.3 Latin America (13 countries): Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (EMBIG), 2015 and 2016 ……..

35

Table IV.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average
12-month rates of variation, September 2014 to September 2016 ………………………………………… 48

Table VI.1 Latin America and the Caribbean (21 countries): annualized changes in nominal
dollar exchange rates, 2014 to November 2016 …………………………………………………………………. 74

Table VII.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: annual growth in gross domestic product, 2011-2017 ……………….83

Table A1.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: main economic indicators ……………………………………………….. 87

Table A1.2 Latin America and the Caribbean: gross domestic product in millions of dollars ……………………….. 88

Table A1.3 Latin America and the Caribbean: per capita gross domestic product ……………………………………… 89

Table A1.4 Latin America and the Caribbean: gross fixed capital formation………………………………………………

90

Table A1.5 Latin America and the Caribbean: balance of payments ………………………………………………………… 91

Table A1.6 Latin America and the Caribbean: international trade of goods ………………………………………………. 94

Table A1.7 Latin America: terms of trade for goods f.o.b./f.o.b. ………………………………………………………………

95

Table A1.8 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries): remittances from emigrant workers ……….. 95

Table A1.9 Latin America and the Caribbean: net resource transfer. ……………………………………………………….. 96

Table A1.10 Latin America and the Caribbean: net foreign direct investment …………………………………………….. 97

Table A1.11 Latin America and the Caribbean: gross external debt ………………………………………………………….. 98

Table A1.12 Latin America and the Caribbean: sovereign spreads on EMBI+ and EMBI global. …………………….. 99

Table A1.13 Latin America and the Caribbean: sovereign risk premiums on five-year
credit default swaps ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 99

5ContentsPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016

Table A1.14 Latin America and the Caribbean: international bond issues …………………………………………………

100

Table A1.15 Latin America and the Caribbean: stock exchange indices …………………………………………………… 100

Table A1.16 Latin America and the Caribbean: gross international reserves …………………………………………….. 101

Table A1.17 Latin America and the Caribbean: real effective exchange rates …………………………………………… 102

Table A1.18 Latin America and the Caribbean: participation rate. ……………………………………………………………

103

Table A1.19 Latin America and the Caribbean: open urban unemployment………………………………………………. 104

Table A1.20 Latin America and the Caribbean: employment rate …………………………………………………………….

105

Table A1.21 Latin America: real average wages…………………………………………………………………………………… 106

Table A1.22 Latin America and the Caribbean: monetary indicators ……………………………………………………….. 107

Table A1.23 Latin America and the Caribbean: domestic credit ……………………………………………………………… 1

10

Table A1.24 Latin America and the Caribbean: monetary policy rates. …………………………………………………….. 111

Table A1.25 Latin America and the Caribbean: representative lending rates ……………………………………………. 1

12

Table A1.26 Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer prices …………………………………………………………….. 113

Table A1.27 Latin America and the Caribbean: fiscal balances ………………………………………………………………. 1

14

Table A1.28 Latin America and the Caribbean: central government revenues composition ………………………… 1

15

Table A1.29 Latin America and the Caribbean: central government expenditure composition …………………….. 116

Table A1.30 Latin America and the Caribbean: central government gross public debt ……………………………….. 117

Table A1.31 Latin America and the Caribbean: non-financial public sector gross public debt ……………………… 1

18

Figures
Figure I.1 Selected regions and countries: gross domestic product growth, 2013-2017 …………………………. 19

Figure I.2 World: year-on-year variation in trade volume, three-month rolling averages, 2003-2016 ………….. 20

Figure I.3 Year-on-year variation in import volumes, three-month rolling averages,
December 2014 to August 2016 ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 20

Figure I.4 Annual variation in global trade volume and in global GDP, average by subperiod,
1981-2016 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21

Figure I.5 Implied market volatility indices, January 2015 to November 2016 ……………………………………….

23

Figure I.6 Stock market indices (MSCI) …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23

Figure I.7 12-month cumulative portfolio capital flows to emerging markets, January 2006
to October 2016……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

24

Figure II.1 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries and country groupings):
rate of variation in the terms of trade, 2013-2017………………………………………………………………….27

Figure II.2 Latin America: balance-of-payments current account by component, 2005-2016 …………………… 28

Figure II.3 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries and groupings): variation
in goods imports by price and volume, 2016 ………………………………………………………………………. 29

Figure II.4 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries and groupings): variation
in goods exports, by price and volume, 2016 …………………………………………………………………………29

Figure II.5 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries): variation in migrant
remittance inflows, 2014-2016 …………………………………………………………………………………………. 31

Figure II.6 Latin America (four countries): cumulative foreign direct investment and other
financial flows, January 2008 to September 2016 …………………………………………………………………33

Figure II.7 Latin America and the Caribbean: annual variation in cumulative debt issues
on international markets over the last 12 months by institutional sector,
January 2009-October 2016……………………………………………………………………………………………… 34

Figure II.8 Latin America (13 countries): sovereign risk according to the Emerging Markets
Bond Index Global (EMBIG), January 2012 to October 2016 …………………………………………………. 35

Figure III.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: GDP growth rates, 2016 …………………………………………………….39

Figure III.2 Latin America: year-on-year changes in quarterly GDP, weighted averages,
first quarter of 2008 to second quarter of 2016 ……………………………………………………………………..40

Figure III.3 Latin America: GDP growth rates and contribution by expenditure components
to growth, first quarter of 2008 to second quarter of 2016 ……………………………………………………..41

6 Contents Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Figure III.4 Latin America: value added growth rates and contribution of economic sectors to growth,
first quarter of 2008 to second quarter of 2016 ………………………………………………………………….. 43

Figure IV.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average
12-month rates of variation, January 2011 to September 2016 …………………………………………….. 47

Figure IV.2 Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average
12-month rates of variation in headline, core, goods and services inflation,
January 2011 to August 2016 …………………………………………………………………………………………… 49

Figure V.1 Latin America and the Caribbean (weighted average of 12 countries): urban participation,
employment and unemployment rates, rolling years and year-on-year changes,
first quarter of 2013 to third quarter of 2016 ……………………………………………………………………… 54

Figure V.2 Latin America and the Caribbean (simple averages of 17 countries): year-on-year
changes in participation, employment and unemployment rates, by sex,
first three quarters of 2016 ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 55

Figure V.3 Latin America and the Caribbean (weighted averages for 11 countries): economic growth
and job creation, 2013-2016 …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56

Figure V.4 Latin America (10 countries): year-on-year growth in registered employment, 2013-2016 ……….

57

Figure V.5 Latin America and the Caribbean (11 countries): employment changes between
the first three quarters of 2015 and 2016, by branch of activity, weighted
averages and medians of national rates of change …………………………………………………………….. 57

Figure V.6 Latin America (simple average of 10 countries): breakdown of year-on-year changes
in real wages, in total and for northern and southern countries, 2015
and first three quarters of 2016 …………………………………………………………………………………………

58

Figure VI.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: central government fiscal indicators, 2010-2016 ……………….. 63

Figure VI.2 Latin America (selected country groupings): central government fiscal indicators,
2010-2016 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 64

Figure VI.3 Latin America and the Caribbean: gross and net central government debt, 2015-2016 …………… 65

Figure VI.4 Latin America and the Caribbean: disaggregated central government spending,
by subregion and country grouping, 2015-2016 ………………………………………………………………….. 67

Figure VI.5 Latin America and the Caribbean: disaggregated central government revenues,
by subregion and country grouping, 2015-2016 ………………………………………………………………….. 68

Figure VI.6 Latin America and the Caribbean: central government tax burdens, 2007-2016 …………………….. 69

Figure VI.7 Latin America (selected countries): monetary policy rates in countries where
they are used as the main policy instrument, January 2013 to October 2016 ………………………… 71

Figure VI.8 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected country groupings): annualized rates
of change in the monetary base in countries using monetary aggregates
as the main policy instrument, first quarter of 2010 to third quarter of 2016 …………………………. 72

Figure VI.9 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected country groupings): average annualized
lending interest rates, January 2010 to September 2016…………………………………………………………. 72

Figure VI.10 Latin America and the Caribbean (selected country groupings): average annualized rates
of growth in domestic lending to the private sector, real terms, first quarter of 2013
to third quarter of 2016 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 73

Figure VI.11 Argentina, Haiti and Mexico: nominal dollar exchange-rate indices, January 2014
to November 2016……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

75

Figure VI.12 Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay and Uruguay: nominal dollar exchange-rate indices,
January 2014 to November 2016………………………………………………………………………………………. 76

Figure VI.13 Latin America and the Caribbean (18 countries): effective extraregional exchange-rate
indices by subregion, January 2014 to October 2016 ………………………………………………………….. 76

Figure VI.14 Latin America and the Caribbean: international reserves, 2000-2016 …………………………………… 77

Box
Box II.1 Contribution of each destination to the reduction in goods exports ………………………………………. 30

Executive summary

A.

Global economic trends

B. The external sector

C.

Economic activity

D. Employment

E. Policies

1. Fiscal policy

2. Monetary and exchange-rate policies and prices

F. Risks and outlook for 2017

9Executive summaryPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY

A. Global economic trends

In 2016 the global economy maintained the slow growth trend seen over the past eight
years, with a rate of 2.2%, the lowest since the international financial crisis of 2008-2009.
As in previous years, growth was driven by the developing economies, which posted
a rate of 3.6% as a group in 2016, while the developed economies expanded by 1.5%.

Projections for 2017 point to a better performance, with the global economy
expected to grow by around 2.7%, thanks to an upturn in both emerging and developed
economies. The emerging economies are projected to post a growth rate of 4.4% and,
as in 2016, India will perform especially well, with a projected rate of 7.7% for 2017.
China’s growth will slow to around 6.5%. Brazil and the Russian Federation will move
from negative to positive growth rates in 2017. The developed economies as a group
are expected to post growth of 1.7%. Within that group, the United States will see
the strongest growth, at around 1.9%, while the eurozone will exhibit a growth rate
of 1.7%. Japan’s economy will pick up to 0.9% growth in 2017.

Global trade volumes are growing even less than the global economy, at just
1.7% in 2106, down from 2.3% in 2015. As a result, world output growth will exceed
world trade growth in the 2015-2016 biennium for the first time in 15 years, with the
exception of 2009, at the height of the economic and financial crisis. The sluggish
trade activity has been attributed to factors both cyclical —lacklustre global demand
and a heavy fall in investment— and structural —the stalled growth in global value
chains following rapid expansion in earlier periods, trends towards “localization”, and
the growth slowdown in China.

The global economic upturn projected for 2017, which should improve the cyclical
factors mentioned, is expected to support an expansion rate in the range of 1.8% to
3.1% in the volume of global trade.

The fall in commodity prices, a very significant factor for the economies of the
region, eased in 2016, with a drop of 6%, compared to 29% in 2015. These prices
are expected to improve in 2017. Prices fell most heavily for energy products in 2016
(-16%), followed by minerals and metals (-4%). Agricultural products posted a slight
rise in prices over the year (3%). Commodity prices are projected to rise by 8% on
average in 2017, led by energy products, with a jump of 19%.

Financial market volatility eased in 2016 —with just a few short-lived spikes— and
the prices of stock market assets recovered. Towards the end of the year market
volatility was lower than at the January peak and stock market prices had picked up,
in some cases considerably.

Consistently with these more benign international financial conditions and with
changes in investors’ behaviour, capital flows to emerging markets trended back
upwards over the course of 2016, although remaining well below the levels seen
between 2010 and 2014.

B. The external sector

The upturn in commodity prices projected for 2017 would put the region’s average terms
of trade back on an upward path. The fall in the region’s terms of trade in 2106, at 1%,
was not as steep as it had been in 2015, when they tumbled by 9%. However, the
hydrocarbon-exporting countries were again the hardest hit, with an 8% fall, followed
by mineral exporters (down 2%). In contrast, the Central American countries, those
that export agro-industrial products, and the Caribbean (excluding Trinidad and Tobago),

10 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

all benefited from lower energy prices, and their terms of trade have risen this year,
albeit by less than in 2015.

For 2017, the regional terms of trade are likely to improve by about 5% on average,
with a rise of around 15% for the hydrocarbon exporters, owing to an expected jump
of some 20% in the oil price.

The deficit on the current account of the balance of payments narrowed from the
equivalent 3.4% of GDP in 2015 to 2.2% in 2016. While the largest reduction occurred
in Brazil, nearly all countries saw their current account balances improve in 2016. One
of the main factors in the smaller deficit was the narrowing of the deficit on the goods
account, by 81% in 2016.

External demand conditions for the region are expected to improve in 2017, and
countries for which Argentina and Brazil are significant trading partners should see a
recovery in intraregional trade. Economies that are more integrated with the United
States could benefit from the economic upturn expected in that country in 2017, but
could be hurt by the revision of trade relations following the presidential elections.

The net flow of financial resources into the region declined (by 17%) on the
2015 figure, but was more than sufficient to cover the current account deficit. As a
result, the region as a whole accumulated international reserves in an amount equivalent
to 0.4% of GDP.

The examination of financial flows into the region shows that the largest component
was foreign direct investment (FDI), which remained broadly stable in 2016. Flows
of portfolio capital and other investment net flows declined substantially in 2016,
mainly because of net outflows recorded by Brazil. External bond issues by Latin
American and Caribbean countries in the first 10 months of 2016 were up by 55%
on the year-earlier period.

The region’s sovereign risk, which peaked at 677 basis points in January 2016,
retreated and was below 500 basis points in late October. As from February 2016,
sovereign risk levels declined in all countries of the region, reflecting an easing of
tensions on the global financial market.

C. Economic activity

The GDP of Latin America and the Caribbean contracted by 1.1% in 2016, which translates
into a 2.2% decline in per capita GDP. This negative rate of GDP growth continues the
process of economic slowdown and contraction in which the region has been mired
since 2011. The slowdown in the region’s economic activity in 2016 was essentially due
to lower growth in most of the South American economies and outright contractions
in some, such as Argentina, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil and Ecuador.
In South America as a subregion, a contraction of 1.7% in 2015 was followed by one
of 2.4% in 2016.

In Central America, growth remained strong despite a slowdown in 2016, to 3.6%
from 4.7% in 2015. When Mexico is included with this group, the average falls to 2.4%
for the year (compared with 3% in 2015). The economies of the English- and Dutch-
speaking Caribbean contracted for the second year running (-1.7%).

The region’s negative growth was caused mainly by a large drop in investment and
consumption. Regionwide, domestic demand is estimated to have fallen by 2.0% in 2016,
with all its components contracting: private consumption (0.9%), public consumption
(1.0%) and gross fixed capital formation (6.8%). Meanwhile, imports dropped by about 3%
because of weaker domestic demand, which contributed positively to output growth.

11Executive summaryPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016

As with economic activity, in which trends contrasted between South and Central
America, the behaviour of domestic demand components was also differentiated
by subregion in 2016. Thus, in South America private consumption and investment
both contracted (by 2.3% and 9.9%, respectively), whereas in Central America both
components rose, private consumption by 3.0% and investment by 1.9%.

The Latin American and Caribbean region is expected growt 1.3% in 2017, which
would put an end to the contraction of the 2015-2016 biennium. Although the upturn
is projected to take place virtually across the board in 2017, as in previous years, its
magnitude will vary sharply from one country to another.

D. Employment

In Latin America and the Caribbean as a whole, the quantity and quality of jobs in
the labour market declined sharply during 2016. This deterioration did not take place
everywhere equally, however, but was concentrated in the South American countries.

The decline in the employment rate in 2016 was accompanied by a rise in the labour
market participation rate, which pushed up open unemployment. For the year and the
region as a whole, the expectation is for the urban unemployment rate to have risen
sharply from 7.4% in 2015 to 9.0% in 2016.

Labour market performance varied greatly across the different subregions and
between men and women. In the South American countries, it is estimated that
the unemployment rate rose from 8.2% in 2015 to 10.5% in 2016. By contrast,
unemployment dropped from 4.9% to 4.6% in the group comprising Central America,
Mexico and the Dominican Republic, and from 10.0% to 9.3% in the English-speaking
Caribbean countries.

The unemployment rate rose more steeply for women, by 0.7 percentage points,
in contrast with 0.3 points for the male rate, in the simple average for the countries
for which information is available.

The higher unemployment rate was accompanied by a deterioration in the quality
of employment, since wage-earning employment fell by 0.2% and self-employment
climbed by 2.7% over the course of 2016.

Although real wages in recorded employment rose by some 1% on average in the
countries with information available, this was about one percentage point less than
in 2015. In the South American countries, following a very small increase in 2015, real
wages held steady in the average figure. By contrast, the countries in the northern part
of the region recorded a fresh increase in average real wages. The gain was somewhat
smaller than in 2015, however, because nominal increases were lower and average
inflation picked up slightly.

E. Policies
1. Fiscal policy

The average fiscal deficit held steady in the countries of Latin America during 2016
relative to 2015. This reflects a reduction in public spending that offset a fall in public
revenues of 0.2 percentage points of GDP, so that the overall result came in at 3.0%
of GDP for the second year running. The primary deficit (before interest payments)
narrowed by a tenth of a percentage point to 0.8% of GDP.

12 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Differences in individual countries’ macroeconomic performance and in the economic
specializations of different country groupings were reflected in a great diversity of fiscal
situations in the region’s economies.

Fiscal accounts have improved in the north of the region: Central America, the
Dominican Republic, Haiti and Mexico. The average deficit continued to narrow in 2016,
to 2.1% of GDP from -2.4% of GDP in 2015. In the case of Mexico, the federal public
sector deficit also narrowed (from -3.5% to 2.9% of GDP) because of buoyant public
revenues. By contrast, in other hydrocarbon-exporting countries of the region, the
fiscal deficit widened.

In South America, the fiscal deficit expanded in 2016, to 3.9% of GDP from 3.6%
of GDP in 2015. This reflected the fact that the drop in public revenues —which began
in 2013— sharpened in 2016, when those revenues declined to 19.1% of GDP from
19.8% in 2015. The reduction in public spending as a share of GDP (from 23.4% to
23.0% of GDP) partly offset the fall in public revenues, but the fiscal deficit expanded
in 2016 for the fifth year running, to 3.9% of GDP, as mentioned above.

The average fiscal deficit in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean held
steady at 2.5% of GDP for the second year running. Higher public spending (up from
29.9% to 30.5% of GDP) was accompanied by a similar increase in public revenues
(up from  27.5% to 28.1% of GDP). The average primary result remained in surplus
(0.7%  of GDP), reflecting both the large share of total spending accounted for by
interest payments and the commitment of governments in the subregion to reducing
their high levels of public borrowing.

Gross public debt across all countries of Latin America continued its upward trend
to average 37.9% of GDP in 2016, a rise of 1.3 percentage points of GDP on 2015. This
trend was seen in 14 of the region’s 19 countries, with Brazil having the highest public
debt at 70.3% of GDP, followed by Argentina at 54.0% of GDP, Honduras at 45.9% and
Uruguay at 44.8%. At the other extreme, Chile’s public debt is the region’s lowest at 20.6%
of GDP, followed by Paraguay at 20.9% and Peru at 21.7%. The indebtedness level of
a number of countries changes significantly when the net debt status is considered.
In 2016, Brazil had net general government debt of 45.8% of GDP, equivalent to some
65% of its gross debt). Chile, meanwhile, had net central government debt of 3.3% of
GDP and Uruguay had net debt of 20.4% of GDP, or roughly half its gross debt.

Although the level of public debt in the region increased on average in 2016, its
growth slowed, because the countries opted on the whole to borrow with relative
moderation and keep the public accounts sustainable by trimming public spending
to offset the decline in public revenues. Conversely, the public debt burden fell in the
English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean in 2016, to 69.6% of GDP on average, a drop
of 2 percentage points of GDP from 2015.

There were no substantial increases in public debt service in 2016. Only Argentina,
Colombia and Honduras present increases of more than 0.5 percentage points of
GDP. Interest payments in Brazil underwent a large correction in 2016, dropping by
2.2 percentage points of GDP. The cost of public debt in the Caribbean was 3.2% of
GDP because of the subregion’s high debt levels. Barbados and Jamaica were the
countries where debt service represented the greatest cost to the fiscal accounts, at
over 8% of GDP.

Reflecting fiscal consolidation, capital spending dropped by an average of
0.3  percentage points of GDP. The largest falls were in the hydrocarbon-exporting
countries (Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago) and in Argentina, Panama and
Paraguay. Conversely, public investment rose sharply in some countries of Central
America (Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua) and in the Caribbean. Current primary
spending held steady in most of the countries in 2016.

13Executive summaryPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016

2. Monetary and exchange-rate policies
and prices

In the first nine months of 2016, cumulative 12-month inflation rose in the average for
the economies of Latin America and the Caribbean, from 6.9% in September 2015 to
8.4% in September 2016.1 The rise in inflation occurred in all the subregions of Latin
America and the Caribbean. In South America, the cumulative 12-month rate climbed
from 9.2% in September 2015 to 10.9% in September 2016.

Cumulative 12-month inflation in the economies of the group formed by Central
America, the Dominican Republic and Mexico rose, on average, from 2.5% in September
2015 to 3.4% in September 2016. In the economies of the English- and Dutch-speaking
Caribbean, cumulative 12-month inflation jumped by 4.5 percentage points between
September 2015 (1.8%) and September 2016 (6.3%).

As at September 2016, three economies in the region had inflation rates of over
40%: Argentina, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and Suriname. The economies with the
lowest rates of inflation included the Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint
Lucia, which reported negative rates in September 2016. In Brazil and Uruguay, inflation
eased in the first nine months of 2016, although it was still above 8% in both economies.

With regard to the components of inflation, in the average for the region food prices
are running ahead of the headline rate and inflation is higher in goods than in services.

During 2016, monetary and exchange-rate policies in the region were guided by
different factors, chief among them the dynamics of inflation, uncertainty and thence
volatility in international financial markets, and weak growth in aggregate demand.

The higher inflation observed in 2016 reduced the scope for expansionary monetary
policy. Similarly, the volatility of financial markets and the repercussions for exchange
rates in the region limited the potential for interest rates to be used to stimulate domestic
spending. Structural differences between economies and the effects of these factors
led to divergent uses being made of the different monetary policy instruments available
to policymakers in the region.

In economies that use interest rates as the main instrument of monetary policy,
there were differences in the frequency and direction of changes to monetary policy
benchmark rates during the first 10 months of 2016. In some countries, persistently
rising inflation led central banks to increase interest rates, while in others inflation fell
and interest rates were used to stimulate flagging activity in the domestic economy.
The differences in management of monetary policy rates have led to a situation in which
these rates are at their highest for five years in economies such as Brazil, Colombia,
Mexico and Peru, while in Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and
Paraguay they are currently close to their lowest levels since 2011.

In Latin American economies that use monetary aggregates as their main monetary
policy instrument, the rate at which central banks injected money into the economy
slowed in the first three quarters of 2016, reflecting trends in inflation in these
economies. This meant that the nominal growth of the monetary base slackened in
the South American economies (excluding the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela), in
the group formed of Central America (including only non-dollarized economies) and
the Dominican Republic and in the region’s dollarized economies. In the economies
of the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean, the growth of aggregates such as the
monetary base and M1 quickened slightly relative to 2015.

1 The regional and subregional averages exclude data on inflation for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, since no official
information is available for that country.

14 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Lending interest rates held steady, trending slightly downward, while growth in
credit to the private sector slowed.

The policies described above yielded fairly stable market interest rates, albeit with
a slight downward trend in most of the region’s economies. The exceptions were the
economies of South America that employ the monetary policy rate as their main policy
instrument, as market rates there increased slightly during 2016.

Where domestic lending is concerned, nominal growth has tended to slacken.
Real-term lending growth has slowed in South America, but edged up in real terms in
the group comprising Central America (including only non-dollarized economies), the
Dominican Republic and Mexico, as it has in the dollarized economies.

The region’s currencies tended to weaken against the dollar in a context of very
volatile international financial markets, and the trend was broadly towards nominal
depreciation, albeit with great volatility over the year.

In the comparison between the values for December 2015 and November 2016,
the currencies of 13 countries in the region depreciated against the dollar in nominal
terms. The five countries with the largest depreciations, all of them by over 15%, were
Argentina, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Haiti, Mexico and Suriname. A number
of the region’s currencies have shown a tendency to appreciate in the second half of
2016, which has lessened the average depreciation over the first 11 months of the year.

International reserves increased slightly (by 2.1%) in the first 11 months of 2016
relative to the end of 2015. However, they remained below their 2014 level. Reserves
increased in 22 of the region’s economies, with the largest rises being in Ecuador
(61.6%), Argentina (46.9%), Dominica and El Salvador (25.0%) and Saint Kitts and
Nevis (22.3%). Meanwhile, reserves contracted in 10 countries, most notably the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (28.2%), the Plurinational State of Bolivia (20.3%),
Belize (14.7%) and Uruguay (11.7%). Among the economies with the highest levels of
international reserves, particular mention should be made of increases in Brazil and
Chile, amounting to 2.6% and 2.1%, respectively.

The conjunction of a larger build-up of nominal reserves and low economic growth
has pushed up the ratio of international reserves to GDP in the region as a whole, so
that this indicator rose for the fourth year running, to 17.7% of GDP.

F. Risks and outlook for 2017

Global risks and uncertainties in 2107 will have diverse effects on the region’s economic
performance. Sluggish growth of the global economy, which has now lasted for over a
decade, with average growth of 2.5% in the period 2013-2016, will continue: the average
projected for 2017-2018 is 2.8%. This slack performance has been accompanied by
slowing productivity —which shows a growth rate of around 1%— and declining rates
of growth in global investment and trade. The positive effects of an upturn in 2017 for
global trade, which should grow by between 1.8% and 3.1%, could be overshadowed
by the mounting protectionism seen since the United Kingdom voted to leave the
European Union (Brexit).

In financial markets, the expected normalization of interest rates could increase
uncertainly and financial volatility, given the dynamics of financial asset prices.
Although the likelihood remains that interest rate rises will be gradual, this could still
affect financial flows to emerging markets, including those of Latin America and the
Caribbean. Concerns also persist over the financial stability of economies in which

15Executive summaryPreliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016

credit, especially in the form of international bond issues, has grown strongly, since
these could be hurt by higher interest rates on dollar liabilities. This is in addition to
concerns over the position of a number of financial institutions in developed countries,
chiefly in the eurozone.

To these complex financial and economic growth dynamics have been added
uncertainties that could have major impacts on economic performance in the coming
years. Recent protectionist trends have raised new uncertainties and risks regarding
the future of the global economy. These trends reflect the mounting tensions and
difficulties in reconciling and coordinating national policy emphases and aims with the
institutional arrangements governing international movements of goods and services,
finance and capital, technology and migration in a globalized world.

In this context, global trade —following the questioning of free trade agreements
such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA)— is not the only area of tension. The value chain dynamics of global
manufacturing, as well as technology mobility, will also be affected. Multilateralism
could well be weakened by a stronger tendency towards bilateral agreements on trade
and investment.

As in preceding years, global economic conditions will have different effects on the
various countries and subregions of Latin America and the Caribbean, and will sharpen
subregional differences by the production and trade orientation of their economies.

Although the protectionist tendencies emerging in the United States will have global
and regional effects, the possible renegotiation of NAFTA and other trade agreements,
as well as uncertainty over the dynamics of monetary transfers from migrants, will
have significant effects in particular on Mexico and Central America, which export
most of their manufactures and services to the United States. The performance of
the economies in the south of the region should benefit from the projected upturn
in their terms of trade, although uncertainty remains over the economic future of the
eurozone and China.

Terms of trade are expected to improve in the average for Latin America and the
Caribbean in 2017, along with an upturn in extraregional demand and a recovery of
intraregional trade, thanks to a stronger performance by the economies of the southern
part of the region, especially Argentina and Brazil.

Domestic demand in the countries of the region slowed heavily in 2016, mainly
owing to a heavy drop in investment and consumption by both public and private
sectors. These trends should improve in 2017.

Regaining a growth path will require reversing these trends, with an emphasis on
investment, which in turn will require strong mobilization of financial resources. The
growing difficulties faced by the countries of the region in financing countercyclical
fiscal policy, added to their status as middle-income countries —which hinders their
access to external concessional financing and to international cooperation funding—,
mean that mobilizing domestic and external resources to finance investment must be
a policy priority for the countries in the near term.

To regain fiscal space, it is essential to reduce tax evasion and avoidance, which
are very significant in the region. The Economic Commission or Latin America and
the Caribbean (ECLAC) estimates that tax evasion and avoidance cost the region the
equivalent of 2.4 percentage points of GDP in the case of VAT and 4.3 percentage points
in the case of income tax. This represented a total of US$ 340 billion in 2015, or 6.7%
of regional GDP. Budget adjustments involving cuts in public investment could deepen
the recessionary conditions, because this investment, like private investment, plays a

16 Executive summary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

key role in short- and long-run growth. Estimates show that fiscal multipliers are high
and significant in the region, and that the public investment multiplier exceeds 2 after
two years.

Unlike in 2016 when the region contracted by 1.1%, and despite complex external
conditions and a number of risks, the region’s economy is expected to switch direction
and return positive growth of 1.3%. As in 2016, the weighted average growth figure
masks different growth dynamics between countries and subregions. Central America,
including the Spanish-speaking Caribbean and Haiti, is expected to grow by around 3.7%
in 2017; including Mexico, with a projected growth rate of 1.9%, brings the average
down to 2.3%. Positive growth is projected in 2017 for South America, at 0.9%, and
for the English-speaking Caribbean, at 1.3%.

17Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter I

Global economic trends

I
CHAPTER

The global economy grew by 2.2% in 2016, the lowest rate since the international
financial crisis of 2008-2009, and growth is expected to pick up slightly to 2.7% in 2017

Although global trade volume continued to slow in 2016 —with just 1.7% growth over
the year— the World Trade Organization (WTO) expects this to recover in 2017,
with expansion of between 1.8% and 3.1%

Prices for primary products bottomed out in January 2016, and have begun to rise
again since then; overall they are expected to show a drop of 6% for 2016,
and a recovery of 8% in 2017

Financial market volatility eased in 2016 —notwithstanding a few short-lived spikes—
and the prices of stock market assets have recovered

19Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II
The global economy grew by 2.2% in 2016, the lowest
rate since the international financial crisis of 2008-2009,
and growth is expected to pick up slightly to 2.7% in 2017

With respect to the previous year, world economic growth slowed 0.3 percentage points
in 2016, to 2.2%, the lowest rate since the international financial crisis of 2008-2009.
A lower growth rate had not occurred since 2002.

The developed economies as a group expanded by 1.5%, compared with a rate
of 3.6% for the developing countries. This represented a slowdown for both groups,
which had posted rates of 2.1% and 3.8% respectively, in 2015.

Projections for 2017 point to a slightly better global growth performance (2.7%),
thanks to an upturn in the group of emerging economies, and a slight improvement in
the group of developed economies (see figure I.1).

Figure I.1
Selected regions and countries: gross domestic product growth, 2013-2017a

(Percentages)

2.5

1.1

1.7

1.4

4.6

7.8

6.6

2.7

1.9

2.4

-0.02

1.1

4.4

7.4
7.2

2.5
2.1

2.6

0.6

2.0

3.8

6.9 7.2

2.2
1.5

1.5

0.5

1.6

3.6

6.6

7.5

2.7
1.7 1.9

0.9
1.7

4.4

6.5

7.7

-2

0
2
4
6
8
10

World Developed
countries

United States Japan Eurozone Developin

g

countriesa

China Ind

ia

2013 2014

2015 2016 2017

-0.3

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of United Nations, World Economic
Situation and Prospects, 2015, 2016, 2017 and International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook (WEO). Subdued
Demand: Symptoms and Remedies, October 2016.

a The figures for 2016 are estimates and those for 2017 are projections, both from World Economic Situation and Prospects, 2017.

India will continue to post the fastest GDP growth among the large emerging
economies, with a projected rate of 7.7% for 2017. China’s growth, while forecast to
slow to 6.5% in 2017, remains much stronger than that of other large economies, such
as Brazil and the Russian Federation, whose output contracted in 2016 (by 3.6% and
0.9%, respectively), but should return to growth in 2017 (0.5% and 0.8%, respectively).
For the group of emerging economies overall, then, growth will pick up by around
0.8 percentage points to 4.4% in 2017.

The developed economies as a group are expected to post growth of 1.7% in 2017, a
slight upturn over 2016. Within that group, the United States will see growth strengthen
(0.4 percentage points with respect to 2016) to 1.9%, while the eurozone will register
slightly stronger growth than in 2016 (1.7%). Japan’s economy will pick up to 0.9%
growth which, although still very low, is higher than the average for 2014-2016 (0.4%).

20 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter I

Although global trade volume continued to slow
in 2016 —with just 1.7% growth over the year—
the World Trade Organization (WTO) expects
this to recover in 2017, with expansion of
between 1.8% and 3.1%

The volume of global trade will continue to slacken in 2016. Trade was growing at
annual rates of 8% on average before the global crisis of 2008-2009, but since then has
expanded very little (see figure I.2). For 2016 overall, WTO projects growth of 1.7% in
trade volumes, a lower rate than in 2015 (2.3%) and the lowest since the global crisis
of 2008-2009.

Figure I.2
World: year-on-year
variation in trade volume,
three-month rolling
averages, 2003-2016

(Percentages)

0
5
10
15
20

Ja
n

Ju

l

Ja
n

Ju
l

Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l
Ja
n
Ju
l

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2015 2016

-20

-15

-10

-5

8

1

2

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from the Netherlands Bureau
of Economic Policy Analysis (CPB).

The slack trade rendering reflects a disappointing import performance across all
the subregions (see figure I.3).

Figure I.3
Year-on-year variation
in import volumes,
three-month rolling
averages, December 2014
to August 2016
(Percentages)

-4

-2
0
2
4
6
8
10

United States
Japan

Eurozone

Emerging Asian economies

2015

2014

Ja
n

Fe
b

M

ar

A

pr

M
ay Ju

n

Ju
l

A
ug Se

p

O

ct

N

ov

D

ec

D
ec
2016
Ja
n
Fe
b

M
ar

A
pr

M
ay Ju
n

Ju
l

A

ug

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from the Netherlands Bureau
of Economic Policy Analysis (CPB).

21Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter I

Global trade has slowed so heavily that world output growth will exceed world
trade growth in the 2015-2016 biennium. Historically, the opposite is more normal,
with world trade usually expanding between 1.5 and 2 times faster than global GDP
(see figure I.4).1

Figure I.4
Annual variation in global trade volume and in global GDP, average by subperiod, 1981-2016
(Percentages)

-6

-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8

1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2007 2008-2009 2010-2014 2015-2016

World trade volume growth

World GDP growth

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of World Trade Organization (WTO) figures
and International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook Database, October 2016.

The sluggish goods trade has been attributed to both cyclical and structural factors.
Among the former are lacklustre demand since the international financial crisis, slack
investment —since investment is a demand component that is trade-intensive— and
weak economic activity in the eurozone, a trade-intensive region. The structural factors
include the stalled growth in global value chains following rapid expansion in earlier
periods, a tendency by transnational corporations to seek local suppliers of inputs
(localization), and the growth slowdown in China owing to its structural transformation
from an export-driven economy to a consumption- and service-based model.2

However, given that lower demand and —especially— lower investment are the
strongest forces weakening trade,3 the upturn in global economy activity projected for
2017 should halt the deceleration of trade volumes. In its September 2016 report, in
fact, WTO stated that it expected global trade to grow between 1.8% and 3.1% in 2017.

Nevertheless, global trade —owing to the questioning of free trade agreements such
as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA)— is subject to tensions. The value chain dynamics of global manufacturing, as
well as technology mobility, will also be affected. Multilateralism could well be weakened
by a stronger tendency towards bilateral agreements on trade and investment.

1 See World trade Organization (WTO), “Trade statistics and outlook. Trade in 2016 to grow at slowest pace since the financial
crisis”, Press Release, No. 779, 27 September 2016 [online] https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres16_e/pr779_e .

2 See United Nations, World Economic Situation and Prospects, 2017 and International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic
Outlook (WEO). Subdued Demand: Symptoms and Remedies, October 2016.

3 IMF attributes about three quarters of the decline in global import growth between the pre- and post-crisis periods (between
2003-2007 and 2012-2015) to lower levels of demand and investment.

22 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter I

Prices for primary products bottomed out in January
2016, and have begun to rise again since then; overall
they are expected to show a drop of 6% for 2016,
and a recovery of 8% in 2017

The contraction in prices in 2016 was not nearly as severe as in 2015 (6%, compared with
29%).4 As in 2015, the category of energy products (oil, gas natural and coal) showed
the heaviest fall in 2016 (-16%), followed by minerals and metals (-4%). Agricultural
products posted a slight rise in prices over the year (3%) (see table I.1).

4 These indices are calculated on the basis of products weighted by their relative share in the export basket of the Latin American
and Caribbean countries.

Table I.1
Annual variation in
international prices
for primary products,
2015, 2016 and 2017a

(Percentages)
2015 2016 2017

Agricultural and livestock products -16 3 2
Foods, tropical beverages and oilseeds -18 4 2

Foods -15 8 2
Tropical beverages -21 -1 5
Oils and oilseeds -22 0 2

Forestry and agricultural raw materials -6 -1 0
Minerals and metals -23 -4 3
Energy -42 -16 19

Crude oil -47 -16 20
Total for primary products -29 -6 8
Total for primary products (excluding energy) -19 -0.2 2

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures provided by Bloomberg, the
World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and The Economist Intelligence Unit.

a The figures for 2016 are estimates and those for 2017 are projections.

Commodity prices are projected to rise by 8% on average in 2017 which, as will
be discussed in chapter II, will improve the terms of trade for commodity-exporting
countries. The projections of specialized agencies indicate that energy products will
post the strongest recovery in 2017, at 19%, while other commodities will see prices
edge up by 2%.

Oil prices are expected to trend back up again in 2017 after their 58% fall between
mid-2014 and November 2016. Although oil inventories have remained high throughout
2016, production cuts announced by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) have led to higher price projections for crude oil. Although global demand for
crude oil is expected to edge up (1%), driven mainly by the emerging economies (2.3%)
given that demand in the developed economies will remain flat, supply by non-OPEC
producers will increase little in 2017 (0.6%). However, the current oil prices are in line
with the average for the last 50 years, so the effects of OPEC capacity to limit supply
remain to be seen.5

Prices of mining products will likely rise by 3%, according to the latest projection
revisions, owing to production restrictions for some of them, such as zinc, lead and tin.

Favourable supply conditions for most agricultural products account for the modest
price rise projected, of 2% for the group overall. However, agricultural price trends are
subject to ever-present climate risks, and some impact may be expected from the
protectionist measures implemented by economies such as India or from changes in
inventory management policy by China.

5 See Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Monthly Oil Market Report OPEC, 12 October 2016 [online]
http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/MOMR%20October%202016 .

23Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter I

Financial market volatility eased in 2016 —notwithstanding
a few short-lived spikes— and the prices of stock
market assets have recovered

Towards the end of the year market volatility was lower than at the January peak and
stock market prices had recovered, in some cases considerably (see figures I.5 and I.6).
Consistently with these more benign international financial conditions and with changes
in investors’ appetite for risk, capital flows to emerging markets have been trending
back upwards over the course of 2016, but they remain well below the levels seen
between 2010 and 2014 (see figure I.7).

Figure I.5
Implied market volatility indices,a January 2015 to November 2016

0
10
20

30

40

50

60

VIX IndexV2X Index (EURO STOXX) VXEEM Index (emerging markets)

1
Ja

n
19

J
an

6
Fe

b
24

F

eb

14
M

ar
1

Ap
r

19
A

pr
7

M

ay

25

M

ay
12

J

un

30
J

un
18

J

ul

5
Au

g
23

A
ug

10
S

ep

28

S
ep

28
O

ct
16

O
ct

3
N

ov
21

N
ov

9
De

c
27

D
ec

14
J

an
1

Fe
b

19
F

eb
8

M
ar

26

M

ar
13

A
pr

1
M

ay
19

M
ay

6
Ju

n
24

J
un

12
J

ul
30

J
ul

17
A

ug
4

Se
p

22
S

ep
10

O
ct
28
O

ct
15

N
ov
2015 2016

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Bloomberg.
Note: The VIX Index is prepared by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) from S&P 500 call and put option prices, and measures expected volatility over the next

30 days. Following the same logic, the CBOE also produces the VXEEM index, which measures volatility in emerging markets, while Deutsche Börse and Goldman
Sachs produce the V2X index, which measures eurozone volatility.

Figure I.6
Stock market indices (MSCI)a

(Index: 1 January 2016=100)

70
2016
75

80

85
90
95
100
105

110

115

120

United States EuropeEmerging Asian economies JapanChina

1
Ja
n

15
J

an

29
J

an

12
F

eb

26
F

eb

11
M

ar
25
M
ar

8
A

pr

22
A

pr

6
M

ay

20
M

ay

3
Ju

n

17
J

un

1
Ju

l
15
J
ul
29
J
ul

12
A

ug

26
A

ug

9
Se

p

23
S

ep

7
O

ct

21
O

ct

4
N

ov

18
N

ov

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Bloomberg.
a Market capitalization weighted index, Morgan Stanley Capital International.

24 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter I

Figure I.7
12-month cumulative portfolio capital flows to emerging markets, January 2006 to October 2016a

(Billions of dollars)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2015

Ja
n

A
pr Ju

l
O

ct

-100

-50

0
50
100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Ja

n
A

pr Ju
l

O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O

ct
Ja

n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
2016
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Bloomberg.
a Monthly indicator of portfolio capital flows prepared by the Institute of International Finance (IIF).

25Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II

The external sector

II
CHAPTER

In 2016, the terms of trade fell by much less than in 2015, although hydrocarbon exporters
are still facing substantially lower export prices

The balance-of-payments current account deficit narrowed sharply in 2016, mainly owing
to a reduction in the deficit on the goods account, although all components
of the current account contributed

The reduction in goods imports has generated a significant improvement
in the goods balance in 2016

The net financial flows received by Latin America in 2016 were 17% smaller than in 2015;
but they were more than sufficient to cover the current account deficit,
so the region as a whole accumulated international reserves

External bond issues by Latin American and Caribbean countries in the first 10 months
of 2016 are up by 55% on the year-earlier period

The region’s sovereign risk, which peaked at 677 basis points in January 2016,
retreated and was below 500 basis points in late October

27Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter IIII
The region’s current account deficit narrowed sharply in 2016, mainly owing to the fall in
import values associated with weak economic growth. Although net financial inflows were
smaller than in 2015, they were more than sufficient to cover the deficit; and the region
built up international reserves during the year. Sovereign risk has declined everywhere
in the region since February, reflecting an easing of tensions on global financial markets
and a simultaneous increase in international bond issues by individual countries.

In 2016, the terms of trade fell by much less than
in 2015, although hydrocarbon exporters are still
facing substantially lower export prices

In line with the global trend of commodity prices, the regional terms of trade fell by 1% in
2016, much less than the 9% drop recorded in the previous year. Hydrocarbon-exporting
countries have again been hit hardest, with a 8% fall, followed by mineral exporters, for
which the terms of trade declined by 2%. In contrast, the Central American countries,
those that export agro-industrial products, and the Caribbean (excluding Trinidad and
Tobago), have all benefited from lower energy prices; and their terms of trade have
risen this year, albeit by less than in 2015 (see figure II.1).

Figure II.1
Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries and country groupings): rate of variation
in the terms of trade, 2013-2017a

(Percentages)

-35

-30

-25

-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20

Latin America Brazil Exporters
of mining
productsb

Exporters of
agro-industrial

productsc

Mexico Central America,
Haiti and

Dominican Rep.

Hydrocarbon
exportersd

The Caribbean

(excluding Trinidad

and Tobago)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

a The figures for 2016 and 2017 are estimations and projections, respectively.
b Chile and Peru.
c Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
d Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Trinidad and Tobago and Plurinational State of Bolivia.

For 2017, if commodity prices recover as projected, the regional terms of trade are
likely to improve, by about 5% on average; although the effects on individual countries
will depend on the weight of commodities in their export and import baskets. In this
case, the hydrocarbon exporters are likely to benefit most, with their terms of trade set
to improve by about 15%, since oil is forecast to post the strongest percentage price
recovery in 2017 (by around 20%), having suffered the steepest falls in the previous
two years.

28 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter II

The balance-of-payments current account deficit
narrowed sharply in 2016, mainly owing to a reduction
in the deficit on the goods account, although all
components of the current account contributed

The deficit on the current account of the balance of payments was equivalent to
2.2% of regional gross domestic product (GDP) (US$ 104.8 billion) in 2016, compared
to 3.4% of GDP (US$ 175.2 billion) a year earlier (see figure II.2). While the largest
reduction occurred in Brazil, nearly all countries saw their current account balances
improve in 2016.1

For the region as a whole, all components of the current account helped to reduce
the deficit, although the goods account was the main contributor, with the shortfall
shrinking by 81% in 2016 (from US$ 52.9 billion in 2015 to US$ 9.8 billion in 2016).2

1 Excluding Brazil, the current account deficit in 2016 is 2.7%, compared to 3.5% in 2015.
2 If Brazil is excluded, there is still a reduction in the trade deficit, but only by 24%.

Figure II.2
Latin America: balance-of-payments current account by component, 2005-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)

0.2

0.8

-2.6

1.51.2
1.4

0.1

1.0

-0.7

-2.0 -1.9

-2.3 -2.7 -3.1
-3.4

-2.2

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6

2005 2006 2007

2008

2009 2010 2011

2012

2013 2014 2015 2016

Current transfers balance
Income balanceServices balance
Goods balance

Current account balance

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

a The figures for 2016 are projections.

The reduction in goods imports has generated a
significant improvement in the goods balance in 2016

The goods account deficit has narrowed sharply in 2016, owing to a 9% fall in the value
of imports relative to the previous year’s level, which more than offset the 5% drop
in goods exports.

The region’s lacklustre economic activity has drawn in smaller import volumes (-4%),
which, combined with lower prices (-5%), has produced the reduction in import value
noted above. Recessions in some of the region’s main economies, such as Argentina,
Brazil and Ecuador and, have also reduced imports substantially, by some 6%, 24%
and 19%, respectively (see figure II.3).

29Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

Latin Ameri

ca

Brazil

Exporters of mining productsa

Exporters of agro-industrial productsb

Mexico

Central America, Haiti and the

Dominican Rep.

Hydrocarbon exportersc

Price

Volume

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
a Chile and Peru.
b Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
c Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Trinidad and Tobago and Plurinational State of Bolivia.

The region has seen declining exports for the fourth straight year, as a result of
lower export prices (down by more than 5%), despite volumes growing by 1% (see
figure II.4). In 2016, exports have declined in all country groupings.

Figure II.4
Latin America and the
Caribbean (selected
countries and groupings):
variation in goods exports,
by price and volume, 2016
(Percentages)

Price
Volume

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10

Latin America

Brazil
Exporters of mining productsa
Exporters of agro-industrial productsb
Mexico

Central America, Haiti and Dominican Rep.

Hydrocarbon exportersc
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
a Chile and Peru.
b Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
c Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Trinidad and Tobago and Plurinational State of Bolivia.

Countries whose exports are based on hydrocarbons, such as the Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, the Plurinational State of Bolivia, and Trinidad and
Tobago, are reporting falls of around 21%, largely as a result of lower prices (-15%) but
also of smaller export volumes (-7%). In Chile and Peru, which export mainly mining
products, lower prices (-6%) were partly offset by larger volumes (up 4%), and this
helped cushion the 2% fall in value exported. Countries that export agro-industrial
products, such as Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay, have also compensated for lower
export prices (-6%) with volume growth (6%), and in these cases export value has
held up. In the case of Brazil, the larger volumes exported (4%) were insufficient to

Figure II.3
Latin America and the
Caribbean (selected
countries and groupings):
variation in goods imports
by price and volume, 2016
(Percentages)

30 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter II

offset the 7% fall in their prices, which resulted in exports shrinking by 4% in 2016. In
Central America, exports are down by about 4% in 2016, and Mexico’s foreign sales
shrank by 3%; in the latter case, however, the falling oil price had a significant impact.

Similarly to 2015, in terms of export destinations, intraregional sales accounted for
most of the fall in 2016 (see box II.1).

Box II.1
Contribution of each destination to the reduction in goods exports

In 2016 the value of goods exports from Latin America has fallen by nearly 5%, chiefly owing to reduced sales to the United States
(which explains 1.8 percentage points of the total fall) and within the Latin America and the Caribbean region (1.6 percentage
points of the fall). These two destinations had also been the main causes of the 15% decrease in exports in 2015, with the United
States accounting for 3 percentage points and Latin America and the Caribbean nearly 4 points.

The fact that the drop in export value is largely explained by a reduction in intraregional exports since 2014, has meant
that the intraregional trade coefficient has been declining significantly since then.a While this indicator maintained levels
around 20% from mid-2007 until late 2013, it ended the current year at just 15%, its lowest value since 2002.

South America is the subregion hit hardest by the reduction in intraregional exports; of a total fall of 6.4% in export value in
2016, nearly 3 percentage points are explained by weaker sales within the region, while exports to the United States generate
a smaller relative impact (around 1 percentage point), and the European Union also accounts for nearly 1 percentage point.
Exports to China and the rest of Asia jointly explain only half of a percentage point of the reduction in exports.

It has generally been argued that the downward trend in intraregional trade could restrict the region’s potential to
diversify exports and increase its productivity, since Latin America is the main recipient of the region’s own manufactures
—and hence of higher value added exports.b Nonetheless, an encouraging sign in this regard is that in South America
the sharp fall in exports to the region is closely related to recessionary processes in some of the leading economies of
the subregion during this year (Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela), so the trend can be
expected to reverse given the positive 2017 growth forecasts for the first three economies mentioned.c

Exports from Central America and Mexico are down by 2.8% overall in 2016, including a reduction of nearly 2 percentage
points in sales to their leading market and northern neighbour, the United States. In fact, the latter has been cutting its
import volumes sharply since early 2015, and this has had more of an impact on the subregion than the fall in intraregional
exports of just over one half a percentage point.

Latin America: contribution of each destination to the fall in goods exports, 2016
(Percentages)

Rest of the world
Latin America and the Caribbean
Other Asian countries
China
European Union
United States

0.0

-0.1 -0.1
-0.1

-0.2 -0.4 0.0

-1.6

-2.7

-0.6

-7

-6
-5
-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0.4

-0.9

-1.9-1.8
-1.2

-0.6

-1.1

-0.2

Latin America South America Central America
and Mexico

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Note: Projections on the basis of data for January-July. Central America includes Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua.

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
a The intraregional trade coefficient is defined as the intraregional share in total exports (or imports).
b ECLAC, Latin America and the Caribbean in the World Economy, 2016. Briefing paper [online] http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40745/1/

S1600895_en .
c Another factor influencing the decline in intraregional exports has been the fall in energy prices, for example in Ecuador and in the Plurinational State of Bolivia

(see ECLAC, ibid).

31Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II

The shortfall on the income account —where outgoing payments associated with
foreign direct investment (FDI) and interest on the external debt generate a structural
deficit— narrowed from US$ 131.8 billion in 2015 to US$ 124.3 billion, mainly as a
result of smaller profit repatriations by transnational enterprises, which continued to
face lower export prices.

The current transfers account posted a surplus again, with the 2016 figure
(US$ 69.2 billion) higher than in the previous year (US$ 65.1). The main component of this
account is migrant remittances flowing into the countries of the region, which, according
to the October figures, were up by an average of 7% year-on-year (see figure II.5).

Figure II.5
Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries): variation in migrant remittance inflows, 2014-2016a

(Percentages)

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25

Bolivia (Plur. State of)

Colombia

Costa Rica

Ecuador

El Salvador

Guatemala

Honduras

Jamaica

Mexico

Nicarag

ua

Paraguay

Peru

Dominican Rep.

Average

2014
2015
2016

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The figures for 2016 correspond to January-October in the cases of Colombia, Guatemala, El Salvador and the Dominican

Republic; January-September for Honduras, Mexico and Paraguay; January-August in the cases of Brazil and the Plurinational
State of Bolivia; and January-June for Costa Rica, Ecuador, Jamaica and Peru.

Looking ahead, if the projections for the recovery of economic activity and world
trade are borne out in 2017, the region’s external demand could also pick up.

The weighted average rate of GDP growth of the trade partners of the region’s
countries is forecast to be higher than in 2016 in all cases. In the case of Chile, for
example, although the country’s main trading partner, China, is expected to see slower
economic growth in the coming year, the other countries with which Chile trades could
more than take up the slack; so its trade partners’ weighted growth rate should be
somewhat higher (see table II.1).

Intraregional trade is also expected to recover in 2017 for countries that trade
intensively with Argentina and Brazil (such as Paraguay and Uruguay), given the relatively
stronger economic activity projected for these countries in the coming year.

The economies that trade more heavily with United States are likely to benefit
from the greater vibrancy projected for the country’s economy in 2017, but they could
also be hurt by the revision of trade agreements. The United States is currently the
largest export market for Colombia (28% of the country’s total goods exports), Costa
Rica (41%), Ecuador (39%), El Salvador (47%), Guatemala (36%), Honduras (44%),
Jamaica (39%), Mexico (81%), Nicaragua (54%) and Panama (20%); so trade flows in
these countries could be affected to some extent for these reasons.

32 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter II

  2015 2016 2017

South America

Argentina 1.7 1.6 2.6

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0.7 0.2 1.9

Brazil 3.0 2.7 3.1

Chile 3.1 2.9 3.2

Colombia 2.3 2.0 2.3

Ecuador 2.4 2.3 2.7

Peru 3.0 2.7 2.9

Paraguay -0.1 -0.2 1.7

Uruguay 1.2 1.1 2.0

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 4.0 3.9

4.0

Central America and Mexico

Costa Rica 2.8 2.7 2.8

Dominican Republic 1.9 2.1 2.4

El Salvador 3.1 3.1 3.1

Guatemala 2.7 2.7 2.9

Honduras 2.5 2.4 2.6

Mexico 2.4 2.3 2.5

Nicaragua 2.1 1.9 2.2

Panama 2.7 2.6 2.7

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from the United Nations
Commodity Trade Database (COMTRADE), for trade partner weightings, and International Monetary Fund (IMF) World
Economic Outlook, October 2016, for GDP growth projections.

a The growth rates have been weighted by each partner’s share in the total goods exports of the Latin American country
in question.

In addition to external demand factors, another influence on trade values in 2017 will
be commodity prices, which are projected to be 8% higher on average than in 2016. This
heralds a stronger export performance by economies that are specialized in exporting
these products, mainly those of South America.

The net financial flows received by Latin America in
2016 were 17% smaller than in 2015; but they were
more than sufficient to cover the current account
deficit, so the region as a whole accumulated
international reserves

In 2016, the net flow of financial resources into the region (in other words the balance-
of-payments capital and financial account),3 amounted to 2.6% of GDP, which was
more than sufficient to cover the current account deficit (-2.2% of GDP). As a result,
the region as a whole accumulated international reserves in an amount equivalent to
0.4% of GDP (an increase of more than 2% in the reserves stock).

Although total flows into the region in 2016 were 17% down on the previous
year’s level, this mainly reflects the reduction in Brazil, since flows to the rest of the
economies increased by 8% on average.

3 The capital and financial account balance includes balance-of-payments errors and omissions.

Table II.1
Latin America: indicator
of the growth of trading
partners, 2015-2017a

(Percentages)

33Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II

The financial account reveals differentiated patterns between net FDI, on the one
hand, and portfolio capital (essentially investments in bonds and shares) and net other
investment flows (mostly cross-border deposits and loans), on the other.

FDI is the main financial inflow to the region as a whole, representing around
US$ 133.5 billion in 2015, and remaining broadly stable in 2016 (see figure II.6).4

Meanwhile, the other financial account items (portfolio capital and net other
investment flows) declined substantially in 2016, mainly because Brazil recorded net
outflows in this category in the first three quarters of 2016.

4 Financial-account data is available up to the third quarter of 2016 for four countries whose FDI flows represented 72% of the
regional total in 2015.

Figure II.6
Latin America (four countries):
cumulative foreign direct
investment and other
financial flows, January 2008
to September 2016
(Billions of dollars)

100 000

50 000

0
50 000
100 000

150 000

200 000

250 000

2008 2009 2010

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Financial flows (excluding FDI)
Foreign direct investment
Total net financial flows

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Q1 Q2 Q3

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

External bond issues by Latin American and Caribbean
countries in the first 10 months of 2016 are up
by 55% on the year-earlier period

A significant part of the increase in debt issuances reflected the Argentine sovereign
sector’s return to the markets following the agreement with the debt-restructuring
holdouts and new issuances by the Brazilian State oil company (Petrobras), although
other countries in the region increased their issuances as well.

Mexico issued the largest volume of debt in absolute terms in 2016 —over 20%
more than in 2015. The second largest issuer was Argentina, where, in addition to the
sovereign sector, corporate issues increased eightfold year-on-year in January-October
2016; and the quasi-sovereign sector, mainly the provinces, tripled their issues.

The cumulative volume of bond issues over the last 12 months reflects an upturn
in all sectors, although the supranational institutions lead the issuance growth rates,
along with sovereigns and quasi-sovereigns (see figure II.7 and table II.2).5

5 The quasi-sovereign sector includes public-sector development banks and State-owned enterprises, among other entities. The
supranational sector includes regional development banks, such as the Development Bank of Latin American (CAF) and the
Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI).

34 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter II

Figure II.7
Latin America and the Caribbean: annual variation in cumulative debt issues on international markets
over the last 12 months by institutional sector, January 2009-October 2016
(Billions of dollars)

0

10 000

20 000

30 000

40 000

50 000

60 000

Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct
Ja
n
A
pr Ju
l
O
ct

BanksPrivate sectorQuasi-sovereignsSovereigns Supranational

2009

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from the Latin Finance Bonds Database.

Table II.2
Latin America and the
Caribbean: variation in debt
issues on international
markets by institutional
sector, 2015-2016a

(Percentages)

Institutional sector Variation
Supranational 102
Sovereigns 87
Quasi-sovereigns 55
Banks 14
Private sector 10
Total 55

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from the Latin Finance Bonds.
a Refers to the period January-October for each year.

The region’s sovereign risk, which peaked at 677 basis
points in January 2016, retreated and was below
500 basis points in late October

As from February this year, sovereign risk levels declined in all countries of the region,
reflecting an easing of tensions on the global financial market.

Between the peak in January and late October 2016, the regional Emerging Market
Bond Index Global (EMBIG) fell by 210 basis points, chiefly as sovereign risk decreased in
countries that had suffered sharp rises in 2015, such as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,
Brazil, and Ecuador (see figure II.8).6 The regional index stood at 467 basis points in late
October 2016; and the countries with the highest sovereign risk levels are Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela (2,316 basis points) and Ecuador (743 basis points) (see table II.3).

6 Sovereign risk in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela was improved by a debt swap undertaken by the oil company Petróleos
de Venezuela (PDVSA).

35Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter II

Figure II.8
Latin America (13 countries): sovereign risk according to the Emerging Markets Bond Index Global
(EMBIG), January 2012 to October 2016
(Basis points)

300
350
400
450

500

550

600

650

700

31
J

an

30
A

pr
31
J
ul

31
O

ct
31
J
an
30
A
pr
31
J
ul
31
O
ct
31
J
an
30
A
pr
31
J
ul
31
O
ct
31
J
an
30
A
pr
31
J
ul
31
O
ct
31
J
an
30
A
pr
31
J
ul
31
O
ct
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

-210 basis
points

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from JP Morgan.

Table II.3
Latin America (13 countries):
Emerging Markets Bond
Index Global (EMBIG),
2015 and 2016

Country 31 December 2015 29 January 2016 31 October 2016

Argentina 438 502 452

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 250 262 130

Brazil 548 540 316

Chile 253 274 177

Colombia 317 378 237

Dominican Republic 421 498 386

Ecuador 1 266 1 509 743

Mexico 315 362 293

Panama 214 246 168

Paraguay 338 364 268

Peru 240 273 155

Uruguay 280 317 230

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2 807 3 560 2 316

Latin America 605 677 467

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of figures from JP Morgan.

37Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter III

Economic activity

III
CHAPTER

Economic growth in the region contracted yet further in 2016, while there continued to be
large differences between the countries

Economic performance has differed between South America and Central America

The contraction of regional GDP reflects the persistent decline of investment
and consumption

This contraction of economic activity took place in a context where the agriculture,
mining and service sectors reinforced the negative contribution of industry to growth

39Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter IIIIII
Economic growth in the region contracted yet further
in 2016, while there continued to be large differences
between the countries

The GDP of Latin America and the Caribbean contracted by 1.1% in 2016, which translates
into a 2.2% decline in per capita GDP. This negative rate of GDP growth continues the
process of economic slowdown and contraction that the region has been mired in since 2011.

The loss of dynamism in the region’s economic activity in 2016 was essentially due
to lower growth in most of the South American economies and outright contractions in
some, such as Argentina (-2.0%), the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (-9.7%), Brazil (-3.6%)
and Ecuador (-2.0%). In South America as a subregion, a contraction of 1.7% in 2015 was
followed by one of 2.4% in 2016.

Growth likewise slowed in the group comprising Central America,1 where it declined
from 4.7% in 2015 to 3.6% in 2016, and in Mexico, where it dropped by half a percentage
point to 2.0% in 2016 from the 2.5% recorded in 2015 (see figure III.1). The economies of
the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean contracted for the second year running (-1.7%).

Figure III.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: GDP growth rates, 2016a

(Percentages based on dollars at constant 2010 prices)

-10.4
-9.7

4.5

-3.6

-2.4
-2.4

-2.0
-2.0

-1.7
-1.1
-1.1

0.0
0.4
0.6

1.0
1.1
1.1
1.4

1.6
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
2.9

3.3

3.5

3.6
3.7
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2

4.8
5.2

6.4

-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

Suriname
Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of)

Trinidad and Tobago
Brazil

South America
Belize

Argentina
Ecuador

The Caribbean

Latin America

Latin America and the Caribbean (weighted average)
Bahamas

Cuba
Uruguay

Dominica
Jamaica

Latin America and the Caribbean (simple average)
Barbados

Chile

Haiti

Mexico
Latin America and the Caribbean (median)

Colombia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

El Salvador
Central America and Mexico

Guyana
Saint Lucia

Grenada
Guatemala

Honduras
Central America

Saint Kitts and Nevis
Peru

Paraguay
Bolivia (Plur. State of)

Costa Rica
Antigua and Barbuda

Nicaragua
Panama

Dominican Rep.

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The figures are projections.

1 Includes Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic , El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

40 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter III

The Dominican Republic and Panama are the economies of the region that grew
most strongly (by 6.4% and 5.2%, respectively), followed by Nicaragua (4.8%), Antigua
and Barbuda (4.2%) and then Costa Rica (4.1%). Other than Suriname, Trinidad and
Tobago and Belize, which contracted by 10.4%, 4.5% and 2.4%, respectively, all the
other economies grew by between 0% and 4.0% (see figure III.1).

Economic performance has differed between
South America and Central America

Quarterly figures reveal the divergent performance of the different subregions and the
contrasting trends obtaining in South America and in the group of countries formed
by Central America. Growth rates in South America have declined constantly since
the first quarter of 2010, first because of the loss of dynamism in the external sector
and then because of the contraction of domestic demand. Conversely, recovery in the
United States meant that an upturn began in the second half of 2013 both in Central
America and in Mexico (see figure III.2).

Figure III.2
Latin America: year-on-year
changes in quarterly GDP,
weighted averages,
first quarter of 2008 to
second quarter of 2016
(Percentages based on dollars
at constant 2010 prices)

The contraction of regional GDP reflects the persistent
decline of investment and consumption

The region’s negative growth was caused mainly by a large drop in investment and
consumption. Regionwide, domestic demand is estimated to have fallen by 2%
in 2016, with all its components contracting: private consumption (-0.9%), public
consumption (-1.0%) and gross fixed capital formation (-6.8%). In this last case, the
main explanatory factors were the contraction of activity in the construction sector
in some countries and the general decline in machinery and equipment investment.
The contraction of private consumption reflects, first, the higher jobless rate and the
worsening composition of employment and, second, a loss of dynamism in financial
system lending (see chapter V, which deals with employment and wages). The drop
in public consumption resulted from a general intensification of the retrenchment in
public spending. A slowdown in exports, which are estimated to have grown by less
than 1% in real terms in 2016, meant that their contribution, while still positive, was
much smaller. Meanwhile, imports dropped by about 3% because of weaker domestic
demand, which contributed positively to output growth (see figure III.3).

-10

-8

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10

Q
1

Q
2

Q
3

Q
4

Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Latin AmericaSouth America Central America Mexico

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

41Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter III

Figure III.3
Latin America: GDP growth rates and contribution by expenditure components to growth,
first quarter of 2008 to second quarter of 2016
(Percentages)

-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15

20

A. Latin America

-15
-20
-10
-5
0
5
10
15

20

C. South America

-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15

20

B. Central America and Mexico

Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

General government consumption
Private consumptionInvestmentGoods and services exports

Goods and services imports GDP

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

42 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter III

Gross fixed capital formation has presented negative growth rates since the second
quarter of 2014, so that the end of 2016 marked the eleventh consecutive quarter of
decline. Prior to this, investment had only contributed negatively to GDP growth in years
of economic crisis in the region: in 1995 because of the Mexican economic crisis, in
1999 because of the Brazilian crisis, in 2002 because of the “dotcom” crisis and the
Argentine crisis, and in 2009 because of the international economic and financial crisis
originating in the United States subprime mortgage market.

As with the divergence of economic activity trends between South America and
Central America, the dynamics of domestic demand components also differed by
subregion in 2016.

Thus, while private consumption and investment dropped by 2.3% and 9.9%, respectively,
in South America, private consumption grew by 3.0% in Central America, becoming the
main source of growth, while investment also rose, albeit to a lesser extent (1.9%).

This contraction of economic activity took place in
a context where the agriculture, mining and service
sectors reinforced the negative contribution of
industry to growth

The performance of domestic demand in Latin America was matched by the decline
in economic activity at the sectoral level. For simplicity’s sake, the different production
activities have been grouped into three major sectors. The first includes agriculture
and mining. The second, the industrial sector, covers construction, manufacturing and
electricity, gas and water. The third, the service sector, encompasses transport and
communications, commerce, financial and business services and communal, social
and personal services.

The export slowdown brought a drop in output in the industrial sector (-3.0%)
in the first half of 2016, and this was compounded by a fall in service-sector output
(-1.2%), mainly because of the decline in commerce (-1.8%), reflecting lower private
consumption. Sluggish exports and declining commerce and imports negatively impacted
the transport and communications sector (-8.3%). Although other services did not
contract, their growth did slow as public-sector spending retrenched further. In industry,
the manufacturing contraction that had begun in 2014 deepened as domestic demand
deteriorated. In consequence, agriculture and mining contributed -0.56 percentage
points to value added growth in the first half of 2016 (with mining alone accounting for
-0.50 percentage points), the industrial sector -0.08 percentage points and the service
sector -0.51 percentage points (see figure III.4).

Once again, there were large subregional differences. In 2016, only mining contracted
in the subregion formed by Central America and Mexico, while in South America the
construction sector, the electricity, gas and water sector and the communal, social and
personal services sector were the only ones to grow.

43Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter III

Figure III.4
Latin America: value added growth rates and contribution of economic sectors to growth, first quarter of 2008 to second quarter of 2016
(Percentages)

Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
Q
3
Q
4
Q
1
Q
2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Agriculture and miningIndustryServices Value added

A. Latin America
C. South America
B. Central America and Mexico
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

45Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter IV

Domestic prices

In the first nine months of 2016, inflation gathered pace in the Latin American and
Caribbean economies on average, with some countries posting rates above 40%

Inflation is higher in goods than in services, while food prices are running ahead
of the headline rate

IV
CHAPTER

47Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter IVIV
In the first nine months of 2016, inflation gathered pace
in the Latin American and Caribbean economies on
average, with some countries posting rates above 40%

Cumulative 12-month inflation rose on average among the Latin American and Caribbean
economies in the first nine months of 2016, rising from 6.9% in September 2015 to 8.4%
in September 2016 (see figure IV.1).1 This regional dynamic has been under way since
inflation hit a 10-year low of 3.5% in October 2009.

1 The regional and subregional averages shown in the tables and figures of this section exclude the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,
since official information is not available on the trend of in this country in 2016.

Figure IV.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average 12-month rates of variation,
January 2011 to September 2016
(Percentages)

0
20
40
60
80
100
120

140

160

180

200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p

N

ov Ja
n

M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of) (right scale)
Latin America and the Caribbean excluding Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of)

The Caribbean South America excluding Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of)
Central America, Dominican Rep. and Mexico

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

Inflation has accelerated in all subregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. In
South America, the 12-month cumulative rate rose from 9.2% in the September 2015
to 10.9% a year later —even though Argentina and Colombia were the only countries
included in this subregional average to report higher individual rates.

The economies of Central America,2 the Dominican Republic and Mexico, as a
group, saw 12-month cumulative inflation rise from 2.5% in September 2015 to 3.4%
in September 2016. Among these countries, Haiti reported the highest inflation (12.5%)
and is the only one with a rate above 5%. In the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean
economies, the 12-month cumulative rate of inflation was up by 4.5 percentage points
year-on-year in September 2016 (from 1.8% to 6.3%). However, Suriname was the only
economy in this subregion to post inflation of over 3% in 2016, with a rate of 63.9% in June,
the highest rate for 10 years. This alone explains the rise in the subregional average rate.

2 Includes Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

48 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter IV

Table IV.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average 12-month rates of variation,
September 2014 to September 2016
(Percentages)

At September
2014

At September
2015

At September
2016

At December
2014

At December
2015

Latin America and the Caribbeana 6.4 6.9 8.4 6.3 7.9

South Americaa 7.6 9.2 10.9 7.5 10.6

Argentina 23.8 21.9 42.4 23.9 27.5

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 4.3 4.1 3.5 5.2

3.0

Brazil 6.7 9.5 8.5 6.4 10.7

Chile 5.1 4.6 3.1 4.6 4.4

Colombia 2.9 5.4 7.3 3.7 6.8

Ecuador 4.2 3.8 1.3 3.7 3.4

Paraguay 4.1 3.7 3.5 4.2 3.1

Peru 2.7 3.9 3.1 3.2 4.4

Uruguay 8.4 9.1 8.9 8.3 9.4

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 64.0 141.5 … 68.5 180.9

Central America, Dominican Republic and Mexico 4.2 2.5 3.4 4.0 2.7

Costa Rica 5.2 -0.9 0.4 5.1 -0.8

Cuba 1.7 2.1 … 2.1 2.8

Dominican Republic 2.8 0.4 1.4 1.6 2.3

El Salvador 1.7 -2.3 1.0 0.5 1.0

Guatemala 3.5 1.9 4.6 2.9 3.1

Haiti 5.3 11.3 12.5 6.4 12.5

Honduras 6.1 2.8 2.9 5.8 2.4

Mexico 4.2 2.5 3.0 4.1 2.1

Nicaragua 6.5 2.6 3.5 6.4 2.9

Panama 2.3 -0.4 1.2 1.0 0.3

The Caribbean 5.7 1.8 6.3 4.7 3.3

Antigua and Barbuda 1.6 0.9 0.0b 1.3 0.9

Bahamas 1.3 2.2 -0.3b 0.2 2.0

Barbados 2.0 -1.1 -0.4c 2.3

-2.5

Belize 0.9 -0.7 0.7 -0.2 -0.6

Dominica 0.9 -1.4 -0.4b 0.5

-0.5

Grenada 0.1 0.6 1.9b -0.6 1.1

Guyana 0.3 -1.0 0.9 1.2 -1.8

Jamaica 9.0 1.8 2.2 6.2 3.7

Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0 -2.9 -3.1b -0.5 -2.4

Saint Lucia 5.5 -2.2 -4.1b 3.7 -2.6

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.3 -1.7 0.9b 0.1 -2.1

Suriname 3.9 4.4 63.9b 3.9 25.2

Trinidad and Tobago 7.8 4.8 3.0 8.5 1.5

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Excludes the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela owing to the lack of official information for 2016.
b Data as of June 2016.
c Data as of April 2016.

49Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter IV

The countries with the region’s highest inflation rates (Argentina, Suriname and the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)3 have also been enduring steep economic downturns.
Other common features of these economies include steep nominal exchange-rate
depreciations, sharp public-utility rate hikes and the monetization of large fiscal deficits.

Among the economies with lower inflation (12-month cumulative rate), four English-
and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries (Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis and
Saint Lucia) reported negative rates in September 2016. In Brazil and Uruguay, inflation
eased in the first nine months of 2016, although it was still above 8% in both economies.

Inflation is higher in goods than in services, while food
prices are running ahead of the headline rate

Although the rise in average inflation for the region has been reflected in all of its
components, goods prices are outpacing services. According to figures for August 2016,
the 12-month regional average rates are 10.3% and 7.8%, respectively.

3 Although there are no official data for the Venezuelan economy, preliminary estimates suggest a price surge in 2016, pushing
inflation above the 180% recorded in the previous year. In fact, Latin America Consensus Forecast sees inflation in the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela reaching a level of 515.4% in 2016. The factors underlying this projection include: faster growth in the
monetary aggregates, driven by increasing monetization of the public sector deficit by the Central Bank of Venezuela; a steep
exchange-rate depreciation, on both the official and the parallel markets; and the severe external constraint faced by this
economy, which has exacerbated the dwindling supply of goods and inputs.

Figure IV.2
Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer price index (CPI), weighted average 12-month rates of variation in headline, core,
goods and services inflation, January 2011 to August 2016

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Core inflationFood prices Goods prices Service prices Headline inflation

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

For the economies of South America, excluding the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,
inflation in goods prices was up by 4.3 percentage points year-on-year in the cumulative
12-month rate in August 2016, to 13.8%, compared with 10.7% for services prices.
In Central America, the Dominican Republic and Mexico, the inflation rate recorded in
August 2016 was 3.3%, with service prices up 2.0%. The English- and Dutch-speaking
Caribbean is the only subregion to display a different inflation dynamic; and, in this
case, services outpaced goods, with prices rising by 8.7% and 6.9%, respectively.

50 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter IV

At the country level, goods prices rose by more than 50% in Argentina and Suriname,
driven by the depreciations in their individual nominal exchange rates, whereas Saint
Kitts and Nevis saw goods prices fall by 10.3%. In the case of services, Argentina and
Suriname are again the leaders with prices rising by more than 40%, fuelled by higher
public-utility rates and charges.

The food sector is posting the highest inflation rates, both in Latin America and
the Caribbean as a whole and in each subregion. As a regional average, food price
inflation was 10.7% in August 2016, 2.39 percentage points up on August 2015. In
South America, food inflation was 14.4% (4.5 percentage points higher than in 2015);
in Central America, the Dominican Republic and Mexico, as a group, it was 3.4%; and
in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean, it was 7.4%.

51Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter V

Employment and wages

V
CHAPTER

Unemployment rose in the context of a declining employment rate
and a rising participation rate

Labour market performance varied both between subregions
and between men and women

Average employment quality deteriorated

Real wage growth slowed

53Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VV
In Latin America and the Caribbean as a whole, the quantity and quality of jobs in the
labour market declined sharply during 2016. The region’s urban unemployment rate
increased by more than it had during the international financial crisis of 2009, and the
composition of employment worsened, with the share of insecure and unprotected
jobs increasing. This deterioration did not take place everywhere, though, but was
concentrated in the South American countries.

Unemployment rose in the context of a declining
employment rate and a rising participation rate

As regional GDP contracted, the average urban employment rate fell for the third year
in a row. Having dropped by a cumulative 0.6 percentage points in 2014 and 2015, it fell
even more quickly in 2016, the expectation being for a year-on-year decline to 57.1%
from 57.8% in 2015.1

Another development in 2016 was a reversal of the downward trend in the urban
participation rate that had been a feature of earlier years. In line with the predominantly
procyclical behaviour of the labour supply in the region, the gradual long-run upward
trend in this rate had been cut short in 2013 in response to weakening labour demand,
and between 2014 and 2015 it had dropped by a cumulative 0.4 percentage points.2
This loosening of working-age people’s ties to the labour market cushioned the impact
of lower job creation on the open unemployment rate. Probably because of the
negative consequences of the prolonged drop in the employment rate and its impact
on household incomes, however, many households began sending new members into
the labour market, and this contributed to an estimated 0.3 percentage point rise in
the urban participation rate in 2016.

Consequently, whereas the effects on open unemployment of developments
in the participation and employment rates had partially offset each other in earlier
years, they instead reinforced each other in 2016, and unemployment rose sharply
(see figure V.1A).

For the year and the region as a whole, the expectation is for the urban unemployment
rate to have risen from 7.4% to 9.0%. This shift represents a rise of 4.1 million in the
number of urban unemployed, bringing the total number of urban residents in this
situation to 21.3 million.

As can be seen in figure V.1B, covering a limited group of countries with quarterly
information available, year-on-year increases in the urban unemployment rate accelerated
over 2016, reaching 1.9 percentage points in the third quarter. Of particular concern is
the fact that the employment rate had shown no sign of reversing its decline by that
same quarter, having fallen by about 0.7 percentage points year on year in both the
second and the third quarters.

1 Updated information on a number of countries has been incorporated from 2016, so that the figures given in this report are
not comparable with those in earlier editions. See box I.2 of the Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2016
for further details.

2 Quarterly data show a year-on-year rise in the participation rate from the fourth quarter of 2015.

54 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter V

Figure V.1
Latin America and the Caribbean (weighted average of 12 countries): urban participation, employment and unemployment rates,
rolling years and year-on-year changes, first quarter of 2013 to third quarter of 2016a

56

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4b Q1b Q2b Q3b

2013 2014 2015 2016
57
58

59

60
61

62

63
64

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

Employment rate (left scale)

Participation rate (left scale)

Unemployment rate (right scale)

A. Urban participation, employment and unemployment rates, rolling years
(percentages)

B. Year-on-year changes
(percentage points)

-1.0

-0.5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5

Employment rate

Unemployment rate

Participation rate

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4b Q1b Q2b Q3b
2013 2014 2015 2016

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

a The countries considered are Argentina, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.

Some estimates based on incomplete data are included.
b Preliminary data.

Labour market performance varied both between subregions
and between men and women

However, labour market performance varied greatly across the different subregions. Urban unemployment rates
rose to a greater or lesser degree in all the South American countries with information available (Argentina, the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay). Thus, the urban
open unemployment rate for the South American countries as a group rose from 8.2% in 2015 to 10.5% in 2016.

55Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter V

By contrast, open urban unemployment dropped from 4.9% to 4.6% in the group
comprising Central America,3 the Dominican Republic and Mexico and from 10.0%
to 9.3% in the English-speaking Caribbean countries. According to preliminary data,
this more favourable evolution was due to the rate falling in Barbados, Belize, the
Dominican Republic, Jamaica and Mexico, while it held steady in Costa Rica and rose
in the Bahamas, Guatemala, Panama and Trinidad and Tobago.

Thus, urban unemployment rates rose in 13 of the 19 Latin American and Caribbean
countries with information available. There was a particularly large increase in Brazil,
where urban unemployment in the 20 main metropolitan regions, averaged across the
first three quarters, rose from 9.2% in 2015 to 12.8% in 2016. If Brazil is excluded from
the regional estimate, the urban unemployment rate only rose from 6.2% to 6.5%.

Taking the simple average for these countries, the rise in the unemployment
rate, averaged over the first three quarters of 2016, was 0.5 percentage points. As
figure V.2 shows, this increase was more marked for women than for men (0.7 versus
0.3 percentage points), so that the gender gap for this variable widened.

3 In this case, the Central American countries for which information is available are Costa Rica, Guatemala and Panama.

Figure V.2
Latin America and the Caribbean (simple averages of 17 countries): year-on-year changes in participation, employment
and unemployment rates, by sex, first three quarters of 2016a

(Percentage points)

-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8

Total Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women

Participation rate Employment rate Unemployment rate

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The countries considered are Argentina, the Bahamas, Barbados, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador,

Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay. Not all the countries have complete information for all three quarters.

The processes driving up unemployment rates were different for men and women.
In the case of men, the decisive factor was the drop in the employment rate, which
outstripped the decline in the participation rate. In contrast, what predominated for
women was the rise in the participation rate, while the employment rate held steady,
implying a small increase in the absolute number of women in work, once again as
a simple average of the countries with information available. Thus, the structural gap
between the sexes narrowed for both variables.

56 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter V

Average employment quality deteriorated

The increase in the proportion of women in work occurred, however, in a context of worsening
job quality. On the basis of information from 11 countries showing the contraction of regional
output and the concomitant weakness of employers’ demand for labour, it is estimated that
the number of wage workers must have fallen slightly (0.2%). In contrast, own-account
work continued to behave in a markedly procyclical way, rising by 2.7% (see figure V.3).4

4 The countries with information available reported median increases of 1.1% for total employment, 0.1% for wage employment
and 2.9% for own-account work.

Figure V.3
Latin America and the Caribbean (weighted averages for 11 countries): economic growth and job creation, 2013-2016a

(Percentages)

Change in total employed

Change in total wage workers

Change in total own-account workers

GDP
0

0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5

2013 2014 2015 2016
-1.5

-1.0
-0.5

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The countries considered are the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay and Peru.

The 2016 employment data are averages for the first three quarters; the 2016 GDP figure is an estimate for the year.

The weakness of labour demand and the divergent labour market performance of
the different subregions were also manifested in the evolution of registered employment
(employees paying into social security institutions), an indicator of good-quality
employment. With the exception of Chile, where growth rates held steady, there was
a sharp decrease in registered employment growth in the South American countries
with information available (see figure V.4).5 In Brazil and Uruguay, registered employment
fell year on year in absolute terms.

In contrast, registered employment growth has held steady or even increased in
most of the countries in the north of the region (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Mexico and
Nicaragua), with Panama being an exception, as employment there contracted at larger
firms in the areas of manufacturing, commerce, hotels and restaurants and other services.

The behaviour of another indicator of employment quality, hourly underemployment,
was mixed.6 This indicator of employment quality problems rose in Argentina, Chile,
Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru and Uruguay, while the proportion of employed people
affected by hourly underemployment fell in Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico and Paraguay.

Job creation by branch of activity displays differences and similarities whether
weighted averages or medians are used in the analysis (see figure V.5).

5 The number of people in registered employment changes not only as such jobs are created and destroyed but as existing informal
jobs become formal and formal ones become informal.

6 Employed people are considered to be affected by hourly underemployment when they work less than a minimum number of
hours set in each country, wish to work more hours and are available to do so.

57Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter V

Figure V.4
Latin America (10 countries): year-on-year growth in registered employment, 2013-2016a b

(Percentages)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2013 2014 2015 2016

Argentina Brazil Chile Costa Rica El Salvador Mexico Nicaragua Panama Peru Uruguay
-6

-4
-2

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The data are for wage workers paying into social security systems, with the exceptions of Brazil, where they are for private-sector wage workers reported by firms to the

General Register of the Employed and Unemployed (CAGED); Panama, where they come from surveys of firms employing five people or more; and Peru, where they are
for employment reported at small, medium-sized and large formal non-agricultural enterprises.

b The year-on-year changes given for 2016 are averages from January to June for Panama, January to July for El Salvador, January to August for Argentina and Nicaragua
and January to September for Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay.

Figure V.5
Latin America and the Caribbean (11 countries): employment changes between the first three quarters of 2015 and 2016,
by branch of activity, weighted averages and medians of national rates of changea

(Percentages)
0
1
2
3
4
5

Median

Weighted average
Agriculture Manufacturing Construction Commerce Financial

and business
services

Transport Other
services

Total
-6

-5
-4
-3
-2
-1

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The countries considered are Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay and Peru.

58 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter V

Data from 11 countries show, first, that total employment measured as a weighted
average was stagnant because of the impact of the jobs downturn in Brazil, whereas
the median increased modestly. When employment by major branch of activity is
taken, the weighted average also yields a more negative picture than the median for
manufacturing, commerce, financial services, real estate and business services, and
communal, social and personal services, whereas there is little difference in the cases of
agriculture and transport. Most of the difference by major branch of activity is explained
by the performance of Brazil, where employment contracted sharply in manufacturing
and in the financial services, real estate and business services sector (by 10.9% and
8.6%, respectively, if the average for the first three quarters of 2016 is compared to
the same period in 2015), while it held steady in commerce and construction.

Construction was the only branch where growth was more favourable when
measured as a weighted average than when measured as a median. In this case,
employment contracted in 5 of 11 countries because of weakening domestic demand,
but employment growth in this sector in Mexico drove a moderate increase in the
weighted average across the group of countries as a whole.

On both measures, in any event, employment contracted in agriculture and
manufacturing while expanding, particularly, in the tertiary sector.

Real wage growth slowed

Real wages in registered employment rose by some 1% on average in the countries
with information available, or about a percentage point less than in 2015 (see figure V.6A),
chiefly because of higher inflation that was not offset by larger nominal increases in a
context of weak demand for labour.

Figure V.6
Latin America (simple average of 10 countries): breakdown of year-on-year changes in real wages, in total and for northern
and southern countries, 2015 and first three quarters of 2016a

(Percentages)

A. Latin America B. Northern and southern countries

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

2015 2016
(first three quarters)

Nominal wages CPI Real wages

-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

2015

2016
(first three
quarters)

2016
(first three
quarters)
2015

North South

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The countries considered are Costa Rica, El Salvador, Mexico, Nicaragua and Panama (northern countries) and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Uruguay (southern countries).

59Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter V

Differences between countries in the north and south of Latin America are in evidence
once again, however. In the South American countries, following a very small increase
in real wages in 2015, the rise in average year-on-year inflation in 2016 prevented them
from growing again. In this group of countries, the decline in real wages in Brazil and
Colombia offset small increases in Chile, Peru and Uruguay.

In contrast, the northern countries recorded a fresh increase in real wages. This
was somewhat smaller than in 2015, however, because nominal increases were lower
and average inflation picked up slightly.

Wage policy was dominated by the effort to stabilize wages for the least skilled
workers, predominantly from low-income households, and the median minimum wage
across 18 countries rose by 2.5% in real terms.

In summary, the region’s macroeconomic performance affected labour markets,
and job creation deteriorated sharply in the region as a whole, in terms of both
quantity and quality. At the same time, the drop in the employment rate, the rise in
the unemployment rate and the deteriorating composition of employment depressed
households’ purchasing power, which weakened the ability of domestic demand to
reactivate economic growth. The small rise in the average real wage was the only factor
working to stabilize households’ consumption capacity. In the context of a deteriorating
labour market, however, real wage increases were also smaller than in previous years.

At the same time, there was a marked difference in labour market performance
between the South American countries, almost all of which suffered a deterioration of
different magnitude, and countries in the other subregions, where trends were moderately
more favourable.

In view of the economic growth projections for Latin America and the Caribbean
in 2017, the regional employment rate is expected to remain at around the average for
2016. This implies a further increase in the regional unemployment rate if the recent
trend towards a slowly rising participation rate continues, albeit only a small one of
around 0.2 percentage points.

61Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

Macroeconomic policy

A. Fiscal policy

Fiscal accounts continued to follow different trends in the region’s north
and south during 2016

Public debt is still rising, but its growth has moderated healthily

There were deeper cutbacks in public spending, and capital spending in particular

The decline in public revenues that has been ongoing in Latin America since 2013
was aggravated in 2016 by a drop in tax receipts

B. Monetary and exchange-rate policies

Structural differences between economies and the effects of the factors mentioned
above led to divergent uses being made of the different monetary policy
instruments available to policymakers in the region

Lending interest rates held steady, trending slightly downward, while growth
in credit to the private sector slowed

The region’s currencies tended to weaken against the dollar in a context
of very volatile international financial markets

The region’s real effective exchange rate depreciated during 2016

International reserves rose by an average of 2.1%

VI
CHAPTER

63Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VIVI
A. Fiscal policy

Fiscal accounts continued to follow different trends
in the region’s north and south during 2016

The average fiscal deficit held steady in the countries of Latin America during 2016
relative to 2015 (see figure VI.1). This reflects a reduction in public spending that offset
a fall in public revenues of 0.2 percentage points of GDP, so that the overall result
came in at -3.0% of GDP for the second year running. The primary deficit (before
interest payments) narrowed by 0.1 of a percentage point to -0.8% of GDP. However,
differences in individual countries’ macroeconomic performance and in the economic
specializations of different country groupings in Latin America were reflected in a great
diversity of fiscal situations.

Figure VI.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: central government fiscal indicators, 2010-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)

A. Latin America (17 countries)b B. The Caribbean (13 countries)

-1.9 -1.4 -1.9
-2.6 -2.8 -3.0 -3.0

-0.3
0.3 -0.2 -0.9 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

-3.6 -3.6 -3.3 -4.0

-2.7 -2.5

0 0 0.1 -0.7
0.6 0.70.7

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
10
15
20
25
30
35
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Overall result (right scale)Total revenue (left scale)Total spending (left scale) Primary result (right scale)

-2.5

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2016 figures are official estimates for the close of the fiscal year taken from 2017 budgets.

b Data from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Cuba and the Plurinational State of Bolivia are excluded.

Fiscal accounts have improved in the north of the region (Central America,1 the
Dominican Republic, Haiti and Mexico), reflecting favourable terms of trade and steady
growth in the United States, these countries’ main trading partner. The average deficit
continued to narrow in 2016, declining to -2.1% of GDP from -2.4% of GDP in 2015
(see figure VI.2). This was mainly due to a rise in public revenues (up 0.2 percentage
points of GDP to 16.2% of GDP), as public spending held steady at 18.3% of GDP. It
is important to note that while Mexico is a hydrocarbon exporter, the country’s federal
public-sector deficit also narrowed (from -3.5% to -2.9% of GDP) because of buoyant
public revenues.

1 Includes Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

64 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Figure VI.2
Latin America (selected country groupings): central government fiscal indicators, 2010-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)

-2.7 -2.1 -2.5 -3.0 -2.7
-2.4 -2.1

-1.1 -0.5 -0.9 -1.3 -0.9 -0.5 -0.1

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

-0.9 -0.6 -1.1
-2.0

-2.9
-3.6 -3.9

0.7 1.1 0.5
-0.4 -1.1 -1.4 -1.7

-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

A. Central America (6 countries), Dominican Rep., Haiti and Mexico B. South America (8 countries)b

Overall result (right scale)Total revenue (left scale)Total spending (left scale) Primary result (right scale)

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2016 figures are official estimates for the close of the fiscal year taken from 2017 budgets.
b The countries considered are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.

Conversely, the fiscal situation of the South American countries continued to
worsen as international commodity prices fell and domestic demand slowed. The
fiscal deficit expanded in 2016 for the fifth year running, to -3.9% of GDP from -3.6%
of GDP in 2015. The first reduction in public spending as a share of GDP in five years
(from 23.4% to 23.0% of GDP) was not enough to compensate for the slump in public
revenues (particularly those from non-renewable natural resources), whose downward
trend worsened in 2016 with a decline to 19.1% of GDP from 19.8% in 2015.

The average fiscal deficit in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean held steady at
-2.5% of GDP for the second year running. Higher public spending (up from 29.9% to 30.5%
of GDP) was accompanied by a similar increase in public revenues (up from 27.5% to 28.1%
of GDP). The average primary result remained in surplus (0.7% of GDP), reflecting both the
large share of total spending accounted for by interest payments and the commitment of
governments in the subregion to reducing their high levels of public borrowing.

Public debt is still rising, but its growth
has moderated healthily

Gross public debt across all countries of Latin America continued on its upward trend
to average 37.9% of GDP in 2016, a rise of 1.3 percentage points of GDP on 2015. This
trend was seen in 14 of the region’s 19 countries, with Brazil having the highest public
debt at 70.3% of GDP, followed by Argentina at 54.0% of GDP, Honduras at 45.9%
and Uruguay at 44.8%. At the other extreme, Chile’s public debt is the region’s lowest
at 20.6% of GDP, followed by Paraguay at 20.9% and Peru at 21.7%.

It is important to include holdings of financial assets in the region, since for some
countries they are substantial, so that net debt figures provide a clearer picture of each
country’s net financial position. The countries holding the largest portfolios of financial

65Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

assets in 2016 were Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, where they were worth about 24% of
GDP. Thus, Brazil had net general government debt of 45.8% of GDP, equivalent to
some 65% of its gross debt. Chile, meanwhile, had net central government debt of
-3.3% of GDP, as it had more assets than gross liabilities in 2016, while Uruguay had
net debt of 20.4% of GDP, or roughly half its gross debt. These countries were followed
by Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru with lower values (see figure VI.3).

Figure VI.3
Latin America and the
Caribbean: gross and net
central government debt,
2015-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)
70
54

46 45 45 44 44
41 39 38 38 37 37

36

30 29
23 22 21 21

-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90

Gross debt in 2015 Net debt in 2016

A. Latin America (19 countries)

Br
az

ilb

A
rg

en
tin

a

H
on

du
ra

s

U
ru

gu
ay

c

Co
lo

m
bi

a

Co
st

a
Ri

ca

El
S

al
va

do
r

Ve
ne

zu
el

a
(B

ol
. R

ep
. o

f)

Pa
na

m
a

H
ai

ti

La
tin

A
m

er
ic

a

M
ex

i

c
o

D
om

in
ic

an
R

ep
.

Ec
ua

do
rd

N
ic

ar
ag

ua

Bo
liv

ia

(P
lu

r.
St

at
e

of
)

G
ua

te
m

al
a

Pe
ru

c

Pa
ra

gu
ay

Ch
ile

Gross debt in 2016

124

103

78 78 74 74 70
67 66 65

50
45 44

36
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200

Gross debt in 2015 Gross debt in 2016

B. The Caribbean (13 countries)

Ja
m

ai
ca

Ba
rb

ad
os

Be
liz

e

G
re

na
da

Sa
in

t L
uc

ia

Ba
ha

m
as

Th
e

Ca
rib

be
an

A
nt

ig
ua

a
nd

B
ar

bu
da

D
om
in
ic
a
Sa
in

t V
in

ce
nt

a
nd

th
e

G
re

na
di

ne
s

Sa
in

t K
it

ts
a

nd
N

ev
is

G
uy

an
a

Tr
in

id
ad

a
nd

T
ob

ag
o

Su
rin

a

m
e

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Net debt is defined as gross debt minus financial assets. For 2016, the latest figure available is given.
b General government coverage.
c Non-financial public-sector coverage for net debt.
d Net debt equals consolidated debt.

66 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Although the level of public debt in the region increased on average in 2016, its
growth slowed to 1.3 percentage points of GDP from the 2.9 percentage points of
GDP recorded in 2015. This was because the countries opted on the whole to borrow
relatively moderately and keep the public accounts sustainable by trimming public
spending to offset the decline in public revenues.

At the subregional level, gross public debt increased by 1.9 percentage points of
GDP in South America, with Ecuador (4.9 percentage points of GDP), Brazil (3.8 points)
and Paraguay (3.6 points) seeing the largest increases. The debt level in Central America
was very similar to that in 2015, averaging about 37% of GDP, with increases in Costa
Rica (2.0 percentage points of GDP) and Haiti (1.7 points), as well as the Dominican
Republic (1.5 points).

Central government debt in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean averaged
69.6% of GDP in 2016, a drop of 2 percentage points of GDP from 2015. Jamaica was the
country with the highest level of public debt in 2016 (124% of GDP), followed by Barbados
(103% of GDP) and Belize (78% of GDP). Although debt levels are still quite high in many
countries of the region, the overall trend is downward, since there were declines in 10 of
the 13 countries, most particularly Antigua and Barbuda, Guyana, Jamaica and Suriname.

The cost of debt held steady relative to 2015, averaging 2% of GDP in Latin America.
The country with the highest interest payments was Brazil, where they were about 5%
of GDP, although this was 2.2 percentage points of GDP less than in 2015, followed
by Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic and Honduras, where the cost was
3% of GDP. At the other extreme, Chile and Paraguay paid less than 1% of GDP in
interest. The cost of public debt in the Caribbean was 3.2% of GDP because of high
debt levels. Barbados and Jamaica were the countries where debt service represented
the greatest cost to the fiscal accounts, at over 8% of GDP.

There were deeper cutbacks in public spending,
and capital spending in particular

The figures available show certain general trends in public spending. Budget cuts
continued in Latin America, with capital spending dropping by an average of 0.3 percentage
points of GDP across a number of the region’s countries, the largest falls being in
hydrocarbon-exporting countries (Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago) and in
Argentina, Panama and Paraguay (see figure VI.4). Public investment rose sharply in
some countries of Central America (Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua) and in the
Caribbean. There was also an increase in Mexico, mainly because of capital transfers
to Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX).

There have been no substantial increases in public debt service, with most
countries’ interest payments remaining broadly unchanged. Only Argentina, Colombia
and Honduras present increases of more than 0.5 percentage points of GDP. Interest
payments in Brazil underwent a large correction in 2016, dropping by 2.2 percentage
points of GDP, mainly because of the monetary adjustment resulting from falling
inflation (3.8 percentage points down on the 2015 rate), which corrected short-term
debt costs downward.

Current primary spending held steady in most of the Latin American countries, rising
by a modest 0.2 percentage points of GDP or so in food-exporting countries (Argentina,
Paraguay and Uruguay) and the Caribbean. In Brazil, the increase was 0.5 percentage
points of GDP. In the Central American countries and Mexico, conversely, current
primary spending dropped by 0.1 and 0.8 percentage points of GDP, respectively. In
hydrocarbon-exporting countries (Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago), this
decline was 0.7 percentage points of GDP.

67Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

Figure VI.4
Latin America and the Caribbean: disaggregated central government spending, by subregion
and country grouping, 2015-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)

14.9 14.9 22.0 22.1 21.1 21.6 19.6 18.8 12.1 12.0 18.0 17.3 20.2 20.3 18.2 18.5 20.1 20.5

2.0 2.1

3.2 3.2
7.3 5.1

2.2 2.5

1.8 2.0

2.0 2.3
1.0 1.0

1.6 1.9
3.5 3.6

3.8 3.5

4.7 5.2
2.0

1.9

5.1 5.9

3.3 3.2

5.6 4.4
4.2 4.7

2.7 2.0

5.1 5.4

20.7 20.5

29.9 30.330.5 28.5

26.9 27.2

17.2 17.2

25.6 24.0 25.4
26.0

22.5 22.4

28.7 29.5

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
Latin America
(17 countries)

The Caribbean
(13 countries)

Brazil Mexicob Central America,
Dominican Rep.

and Haiti

Hydrocarbon
exportersc

Mineral
and metal
exportersd

Food
exporterse

Service
exportersf

Current primary spendingInterestCapital spending

35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2016 figures are official estimates for the close of the fiscal year taken from 2017 budgets.
b Federal public sector.
c Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago.
d Chile, Guyana, Peru and Suriname.
e Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
f Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, Panama, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia

and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

The decline in public revenues that has been ongoing
in Latin America since 2013 was aggravated
in 2016 by a drop in tax receipts

Public revenues as a share of GDP in Latin America continued a decline that had
begun in 2013 (see figure VI.1). The trend intensified in 2016, however, with a drop
of 0.2 percentage points of GDP to 17.6% of GDP on average for the 17 countries
with information available (see figure VI.5). This was partly due to a fall in tax receipts
(0.2  percentage points of GDP), something not seen since 2009. Nonetheless, the
averages given here tend to mask a high degree of heterogeneity in the region’s results.

Public revenues, particularly tax receipts, dropped substantially in South America
owing to both the negative effects of the cycle and falling prices for the commodities
exported by the countries. In Brazil, public revenues fell by 0.4 percentage points of
GDP overall, but the drop in tax receipts was greater (0.8 percentage points of GDP).
In Argentina, likewise, a drop of 1.0 percentage point of GDP in the tax take was largely
responsible for a decline of 1.2 percentage points of GDP in total revenues.

In Central America, the Dominican Republic, Haiti and Mexico, public revenues held
steady or even grew. They were particularly strong in El Salvador (up 0.4 percentage
points of GDP), where they were driven by income tax receipts, and Haiti (0.6 percentage
points of GDP), where local tax receipts in Port-au-Prince rose strongly. Public revenues
rose in Mexico (0.9 percentage points of GDP) despite a fresh decline in oil revenues,
thanks to a rise in the income tax take and a one-off increase in the income of the
Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) because of a change in its pension regime.

68 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Figure VI.5
Latin America and the Caribbean: disaggregated central government revenues, by subregion and country grouping, 2015-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)

15.1 14.9 22.1 21.8 19.2 18.4 13.0 13.5 13.5 13.7 17.9 15.2 18.5 17.8 16.5 16.1 21.6 21.8

2.7 2.6

5.4 6.3

2.0 2.3 10.810.4

1.5 1.5

4.9

4.9

3.2 3.6
3.3 3.1

5.4 6.1

17.8 17.6

27.5 28.1

21.1 20.7
23.4

24.3

15.1 15.2

22.8
20.1

21.7 21.5
19.7 19.2

26.9
27.9

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
Latin America
(17 countries)
The Caribbean
(13 countries)
Brazil Mexicob Central America,
Dominican Rep.
and Haiti

Hydrocarbon
exportersc

Mineral
and metal
exportersd
Food
exporterse
Service
exportersf

Tax receiptsOther revenues

30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2016 figures are official estimates for the close of the fiscal year taken from 2017 budgets.
b Federal public sector.
c Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago.
d Chile, Guyana, Peru and Suriname.
e Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
f Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, Panama, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Notwithstanding a drop in tax receipts of 0.3 percentage points of GDP, public
revenues in the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean rose by 0.6 percentage points
of GDP to 28.1% of GDP because of growth in other income, mainly subsidies for
investment projects.

Further price declines for hydrocarbons and for minerals and metals negatively
affected public-sector receipts in countries exporting these. Public revenues dropped
by an average of 2.7 percentage points of GDP in hydrocarbon-exporting countries,
mainly because of a drop of the same size in tax receipts. Oil revenues in Trinidad and
Tobago, consisting mainly of income tax payments, fell greatly in 2016 as the sector
lost profitability in the country, although the base of comparison was high because
the State firm Petrotrin paid off tax arrears in 2015. Central government oil revenues
in Colombia, consisting mainly of income tax payments and dividend payments by
Ecopetrol, were close to zero because of the loss posted by Ecopetrol in 2015.

Public revenues in mineral- and metal-exporting countries also fell, by 0.2 percentage
points of GDP. Public revenues in Chile dropped by 0.3 percentage points of GDP, mainly
because of lower tax receipts. It is important to emphasize that this outcome in Chile
reflects both the large fall in the tax take from the private mining sector and a high
basis of comparison in 2015, when revenues were boosted by a tax amnesty. The fall
in total revenues in Peru (0.9 percentage points of GDP) is explained by a reduction in
tax receipts (a lower VAT take and a rise in rebates) and non-tax revenues (particularly
mining and hydrocarbon royalties). Tax receipts also dropped substantially in Guyana
and Suriname (by 0.9 and 0.8 percentage points of GDP, respectively), again dragging
total revenues down.

69Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

The tax take as a share of GDP dropped in almost half the region’s countries
with information available (13 of 27) in 2016. As figure VI.6 illustrates, the tax burden
dropped in Latin America at the central government level (for the first time since 2009)
from 15.1% to 14.9% of GDP. This was due to the trend in South America, since tax
receipts continued to move upward in the north of the region (Central America, the
Dominican Republic, Haiti and Mexico). Tax receipts fell on average in the Caribbean
after rising for two years, from 22.1% to 21.8% of GDP. Although this decline centred
on just a few countries, tax receipts in the other countries of the subregion were not
as dynamic as in the previous period.

Figure VI.6
Latin America and the Caribbean: central government tax burdens, 2007-2016a

(Percentages of GDP)
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Latin America (17 countries)

English- and Dutch-speaking
Caribbean (13 countries)

Central America, Dominican Rep.,
Haiti and Mexico

South America
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2016 figures are official estimates for the close of the fiscal year taken from 2017 budgets.

B. Monetary and exchange-rate policies
During 2016, as already discussed in the 2016 Economic Survey, the actions of those
directing monetary and exchange-rate policies in the region were guided by different
factors, chief among them the dynamics of inflation, uncertainty and thence volatility in
international financial markets and weak growth (and even contraction in some cases)
in aggregate demand.

Broadly speaking, the authorities of the region’s countries paid a great deal of
attention to the aggregate demand slowdown and the repercussions of variables
such as consumption and investment. Accordingly, the aim of policy was to stimulate
domestic aggregate demand as far as possible.

The region’s average inflation rate increased during 2016, reducing the scope for
monetary policymakers to take steps to stimulate aggregate demand. Similarly, the
volatility of financial markets and the repercussions for exchange rates in the region
likewise limited the potential for interest rates to be used to stimulate domestic spending,
as it was feared that this would dampen demand for local assets. Meanwhile, less
buoyant economic activity and expectations of low future growth, especially in the
economies of South America, also affected central banks’ ability to stimulate aggregate
domestic demand, partly by dampening growth in the demand for credit and partly by
increasing the perceived riskiness of lending and thus constraining the supply of credit.

70 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Structural differences between economies and the
effects of the factors mentioned above led to divergent
uses being made of the different monetary policy
instruments available to policymakers in the region

In economies that use interest rates as the main instrument of monetary policy,
there were differences in the frequency and direction of changes to monetary policy
benchmark rates during the first 10 months of 2016. In some countries, persistently
rising inflation led central banks to increase interest rates, while in others inflation fell
and interest rates were used to stimulate flagging activity in the domestic economy.

Interest rates moved most often in Colombia, Mexico and Paraguay, but in different
directions and for different reasons (see figure VI.7). In Colombia, rising inflation
meant that in 2016 the benchmark interest rate increased eight times by a total of
225 basis points from its level at the close of 2015. In Mexico, the benchmark rate
was raised four times, with a cumulative rise of 200 basis points, the trigger in this
case being uncertainty about monetary policy in the United States and, more recently,
that country’s presidential elections. In Paraguay, the benchmark rate was cut twice
following an increase in February 2016, giving a cumulative decline of 25 basis points
from the end-2015 level and 50 basis points from its value in February 2016. In Peru,
the benchmark rate was increased in the first quarter of 2016 and then left unchanged,
while in Brazil it was cut by 25 basis points in October 2016, the first change since
July 2015. In both economies, these movements were a response to inflation rising
above its target band and to political and electoral events. In Chile, Costa Rica, the
Dominican Republic and Guatemala, lesser inflationary pressures meant that benchmark
rates were left unchanged in the first 10 months of 2016.

Something else worth highlighting is that benchmark monetary policy rates in
economies such as Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru are at their highest for five years,
whereas in Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Paraguay they
are currently close to their lowest levels since 2011.

In Latin American economies that use monetary aggregates as their main monetary
policy instrument, the rate at which central banks injected money into the economy slowed
in the first three quarters of 2016. This meant that the nominal growth of the monetary
base slackened in the South American economies (excluding the Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela), in the group formed of Central America (including only non-dollarized
economies) and the Dominican Republic and in the region’s dollarized economies
(see figure VI.8). In the economies of the English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean, the
growth of aggregates such as the monetary base quickened slightly relative to 2015.

In the case of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the monetary aggregates
grew at rates of over 80% for the third year running. Indeed, annualized growth in the
monetary base was over 100% in the first three quarters of 2016, reaching 130% in
the third quarter.

71Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

Figure VI.7
Latin America (selected countries): monetary policy rates in countries where they are used
as the main policy instrument, January 2013 to October 2016
(Percentages)

4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov
2013 2014 2015 2016
Chile
Colombia
Paraguay
Peru

Brazil (right scale)

A. South America

0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0

Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov
2013 2014 2015 2016
Costa Rica
Guatemala
Mexico
Dominican Rep.

B. Central America, Dominican Rep. and Mexico

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

72 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Figure VI.8
Latin America and the Caribbean (selected country groupings): annualized rates of change
in the monetary base in countries using monetary aggregates as the main policy instrument,
first quarter of 2010 to third quarter of 2016
(Percentages)

-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

South America (except
Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of))

Central America (non-dollarized
economies) and Dominican Rep.
(right scale)

The Caribbean

Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of)
(right scale)

Dollarized economies

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

Lending interest rates held steady, trending slightly
downward, while growth in credit to the private
sector slowed

The policies described above yielded fairly stable market interest rates, although there
was a slight downward trend in most of the region’s economies. The exceptions were
the economies of South America that employ the monetary policy rate as their main
policy instrument, as market rates there increased slightly during 2016 (see figure VI.9).

Figure VI.9
Latin America and the Caribbean (selected country groupings): average annualized lending interest rates, January 2010 to September 2016
(Percentages)

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju

l
Se

p
N

ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
N
ov Ja
n
M
ar
M
ay Ju
l
Se
p
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

South American countries
using benchmark rates

Central America (non-dollarized
economies), Dominican Rep.
and Mexico (right scale)

English-speaking Caribbean

South American countries
using monetary aggregates

Dollarized economies
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

73Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

One salient fact is that both lending interest rates and monetary policy benchmark rates
in Brazil and Colombia have recently reached levels that are among the highest recorded
since 2011, while in most of the other economies lending interest rates have recently been
below the average for the period between January 2011 and September 2016.2

Where domestic lending to the private sector is concerned, nominal growth has
tended to slacken. In South America, real-term lending growth has slowed both in
economies that use benchmark rates as the main monetary policy instrument and in
those using monetary aggregates. By contrast, real-term lending has edged up in real
terms in the group comprising Central America (including only non-dollarized economies),
the Dominican Republic and Mexico, as it has in the dollarized economies. Real-term
credit to the private sector dropped sharply in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
during the first three quarters of 2016, reflecting the harsh contraction experienced
by this economy and three-digit inflation rates (see figure VI.10).

2 The exceptions are Argentina, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Trinidad and
Tobago and Uruguay.

Figure VI.10
Latin America and the
Caribbean (selected
country groupings): average
annualized rates of growth
in domestic lending to the
private sector, real terms,
first quarter of 2013 to third
quarter of 2016
(Percentages)

-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-5
0
5
10
15

2013

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2014
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2015
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2016
Q1 Q2 Q3

Argentina, Bolivia (Plur. State of)
and Uruguay

Central America (non-dollarized
economies), Dominican Rep.
and Mexico (right scale)
English-speaking Caribbean

Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Paraguay and Peru

Dollarized economies

Venezuela (Bol. Rep. of)
(right scale)

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

Other striking developments in the first nine months of 2016 were the considerable
drop in commercial lending in the South American economies that use aggregates as
the main monetary policy instrument and in lending to industrial sectors in the South
American economies that use benchmark rates as the main instrument.

The lending dynamic could be reflecting the influence of slowing aggregate demand
growth in the region. For one thing, lower economic growth has caused the supply of
credit to increase more slowly, since adverse growth expectations can make lending
risker. For another, lower income growth combined with expectations of a slow recovery,
less dynamic consumption and slow growth in private investment have been bearing
down on the demand for credit from the private sector, even though lending interest
rates have been trending slightly downward.

The region’s currencies tended to weaken against
the dollar in a context of very volatile international
financial markets

A number of factors affected the exchange rates of the region’s currencies in 2016,
and the trend was broadly towards nominal depreciation, albeit with great volatility
over the year. Since 2015, factors such as falling prices for the commodities the region

74 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

exports (particularly energy products and metals), the strengthening of the dollar against
currencies elsewhere in the world at a time of rising expectations of an increase in
the United States benchmark interest rate (which did finally go up in December 2015)
and slowing growth in a number of South American countries, together with specific
events in countries such as Argentina and Brazil, have driven down demand for assets
denominated in the currencies of a number of the region’s countries.

The international context remained uncertain in the first 10 months of 2016, and
factors such as the outcome of the referendum in the United Kingdom on the country’s
exit from the European Union (so-called “Brexit”), uncertainty about new monetary
policy adjustments in the developed economies, reports of increasing fragility in global
financial institutions and, more recently, the presidential elections in the United States
all affected the dynamics of Latin American and Caribbean exchange rates. Furthermore,
expectations for the price levels of commodities such as oil, copper and other metals
progressively stabilized in this period. The exchange rates of the region’s currencies
also reflected the effects of rising monetary policy benchmark rates in response to
higher inflation (in Brazil and Colombia), at a time of slowing growth.

The conjunction of these external and domestic factors meant that, comparing values for
November 2016 with those for December 2015, the currencies of 13 countries in the region
depreciated against the dollar in nominal terms, 5 of them by more than 15% (Argentina,
the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Haiti, Mexico and Suriname) (see table VI.1).

Table VI.1
Latin America and the Caribbean (21 countries): annualized changes in nominal dollar exchange rates, 2014 to November 2016
(Percentages)

Country 2014 2015 December 2015 to March 2016
March 2016 to

June 2016
June 2016 to

September 2016
September 2016 to
18 November 2016

December 2015 to
18 November 2016

Latin America

Argentina 29.8 52.8 13.7 2.3 1.7 1.1 19.7

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0.0 -0.1 -1.2 1.3 0.0 0.4 0.5

Brazil 12.5 49.0 -9.3 -10.6 1.5 3.9 -14.4

Chile 15.4 16.8 -5.8 -0.7 -0.9 3.2 -4.2

Colombia 23.2 33.6 -5.4 -2.7 -1.3 10.2 0.0

Costa Rica 7.6 -0.4 0.2 1.9 0.9 0.2 3.2

Dominican Republic 4.0 2.5 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.9

Guatemala -3.1 0.5 1.0 -0.9 -1.5 -0.3 -1.8

Haiti 8.1 20.0 10.1 1.5 4.0 1.4 17.8

Honduras 3.8 6.4 1.2 0.7 1.1 0.5 3.5

Mexico 13.2 16.6 0.4 5.8 6.0 5.4 18.7

Nicaragua 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.6 0.4 0.8 3.8

Paraguay 0.8 24.7 -2.7 -0.7 -0.6 4.4 0.3

Peru 6.5 14.6 -3.0 -0.7 2.9 0.6 -0.3

Uruguay 13.1 23.0 6.0 -3.5 -7.0 2.4 -2.6

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)a 0.0 58.7 36.5 130.2 4.9 0.2 229.9

The Caribbean

Belize 1.0 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Guyana -0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Jamaica 7.9 4.9 1.3 4.1 0.8 1.4 7.8

Suriname 3.8 16.8 27.7 38.5 8.9 -5.6 81.9

Trinidad and Tobago -0.6 0.8 2.8 0.7 1.0 0.5 5.0

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from Bloomberg.
a The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has multiple exchange rates. The figure is for changes in the “complementary currency” (DICOM) exchange rate for non-

priority exports.

75Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

Figure VI.11 presents the evolution of nominal dollar exchange-rate indices for
Argentina, Haiti and Mexico from January 2014 to November 2016.3 In Argentina,
following unification of the currency market in December 2015, the peso generally
showed a slight tendency towards depreciation and some volatility, especially in the
first half of 2016, as a number of policy measures were implemented to correct the
fiscal dominance problem bequeathed by the outgoing government. In Haiti, the gourde
continued to be affected by the country’s large current account deficit and uncertainty
about external financing flows of different kinds (including Petrocaribe), as well as by
specific problems such as hurricane Matthew. In the case of Mexico, a particular factor
was the exchange-rate volatility associated with the United States election period
during 2016. In Suriname, a major terms-of-trade shock and monetary financing of
the fiscal deficit led to a drop in demand for domestic assets, high inflation and, in
consequence, a large currency depreciation. In the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,
lastly, the different bolívar exchange rates depreciated in the context of one of the
world’s highest inflation rates, a general scarcity of goods, rapid growth in monetary
aggregates and a large decline in GDP.

Figure VI.11
Argentina, Haiti and Mexico: nominal dollar exchange-rate indices, January 2014 to November 2016
(Base January 2008=100)

175

225

275

325

375

425

475

525

75
2014
100

125

150
175
200
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
2015
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
2016
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov

HaitiMexico Argentina (right scale)

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

Another important factor is what could be characterized as the volatility of currencies
over the year, with analysis of currency developments in the region bringing to light
different patterns as 2016 progressed. Table VI.1 and figure VI.12 show movements
in the exchange rates of some of the region’s currencies over 2016. The table shows
quarterly dynamics, while the chart presents a more detailed picture of the five economies
that best exemplify this volatility. In both it can be seen that the currencies of several
economies in the region appreciated in the first three quarters of 2016, only for this
movement to be wholly or partly reversed in September and November. Indeed, the
chart shows that the trend moved towards depreciation following the results of the
United States elections.

3 Data for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela are not included because the country has multiple exchange rates applying in
different segments of the economy, which gives rise to problems of comparison.

76 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VI

Figure VI.12
Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay and Uruguay: nominal dollar exchange-rate indices, January 2014 to November 2016
(Base January 2008=100)

Brazil Chile ColombiaUruguay Paraguay

75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
2014
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
2015
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
2016
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

The region’s real effective exchange rate depreciated
during 2016

The real effective extraregional exchange rate of 18 countries of Latin America and the
Caribbean depreciated by an average of 1.9% in the first 10 months of 2016 relative to the
same period in 2015. The economies of South America experienced an effective depreciation
against the rest of the world of 1.5%, while there was a 2.2% aggregate depreciation in the
other subregions (Central America, the Dominican Republic, Mexico and the Caribbean),
heavily influenced by an effective depreciation of 14.7% in Mexico. When October 2016
is compared to October 2015, however, South America is found to have experienced an
effective appreciation of 6.8%, owing to nominal appreciation in countries such as Brazil,
Colombia and Uruguay, among others, as already described (see figure VI.13).

Figure VI.13
Latin America and the Caribbean (18 countries): effective extraregional exchange-rate indices by subregion,
January 2014 to October 2016
(Base 2005=100)

60
80
100

Latin America and
the Caribbean

South America

Central America, Dominican Rep.,
Mexico and the Caribbean

2014
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se

p
O

ct
N

ov
D

ec
2015
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
2016
Ja
n
Fe
b
M
ar
A
pr
M
ay Ju
n
Ju
l
A
ug Se
p
O
ct
N
ov
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.

77Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VI

The evolution of the total effective exchange rate4 of the region’s countries reflects in
particular the above-mentioned changes in the nominal exchange rates of each country
and of all trading partners plus the evolution of inflation in each country, as described in the
relevant section of this report. Particular mention should be made of countries with less
flexible exchange rates, where there was real effective appreciation during the period. This
was the case with the Plurinational State of Bolivia (where there was a 5.7% appreciation
in the first 10 months of the year), whose exchange rate has been acting as an inflation
anchor, Ecuador (2.2%), Panama (1.1%) and El Salvador (0.3%). The exception was Trinidad
and Tobago, where there was a total effective depreciation of 0.6%. Mention should also
be made of Guatemala: it had higher inflation than the United States, its nominal exchange
rate appreciated slightly and the currencies of its largest trading partners depreciated, the
result being a real effective appreciation of 5.5% for the country during the period.

International reserves rose by an average of 2.1%
International reserves increased slightly (by 2.1%) in the first 11 months of 2016 relative
to the end of 2015. However, they remained below their 2014 level (see figure VI.14).
Reserves increased in 22 of the region’s economies, with the largest rises occurring in
Ecuador (61.6%), Argentina (46.9%), Saint Kitts and Nevis (22.3%), Dominica (25.0%)
and El Salvador (25.0%). Meanwhile, reserves contracted in 10 countries, most notably
the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (28.2%), the Plurinational State of Bolivia (20.3%),
Belize (-14.7%) and Uruguay (11.7%). Among the economies with the highest levels
of international reserves, particular mention should be made of increases in Brazil and
Chile, amounting to 2.6% and 2.1%, respectively.

Figure VI.14
Latin America and the Caribbean: international reserves, 2000-2016a

(Billions of dollars and percentages of GDP)

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700

800

900

1 000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Gross international
reserves (left scale)

Percentages of GDP

(right scale)

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The 2015 figures are ECLAC estimates. The 2016 figures are for October and contain preliminary data.

The conjunction of a larger build-up of nominal reserves and low economic growth
has pushed up the ratio of international reserves to GDP in the region as a whole, so
that this indicator rose for the fourth year running, to 17.7% of GDP.

4 Unlike the effective extraregional exchange rate, which excludes trade with the Latin American and Caribbean countries from
the weighting, the total effective exchange rate takes account of trade with all the trading partners of each country.

79Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VII

Risks and outlook for 2017

VII
CHAPTER

81Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VIIVII
Global risks and uncertainties in 2107 will have diverse effects on the region’s economic
performance. Sluggish growth of the global economy, which has now been a reality for
over a decade, with average growth of 2.5% in the period 2013-2016, will continue: the
average projected for 2017-2018 is 2.8%. This slack performance has been accompanied
by slowing productivity —which shows a growth rate of around 1%— and declining
rates of growth in global investment and trade. These factors, together with depressed
aggregate demand, are holding down the growth potential of the world economy —across
developed countries and emerging economies alike— for the next few years.

Although trade is projected to pick up somewhat in 2017 —by between 1.8%
and 3.1%, better than the 1.7% in 2016— the effects of this improvement may be
overshadowed by the mounting protectionism seen since the United Kingdom voted
to leave the European Union (Brexit). One positive feature is that commodity prices
are projected to rise by 8% on average in 2017. The strongest recovery is expected in
energy products, whose prices should gain around 19%, while other products will see
a price rise of some 2%.

In financial markets, the windows of opportunity opened by the low interest rates
that have prevailed over the past few years may begin to close, owing to expected
rises in interest rates (the United States Federal Reserve will likely raise its rate by
between  0.5% and 0.75%), which would push up borrowing costs and shift global
portfolios. A normalization of interest rates, though desirable, could increase uncertainly
and financial volatility, given the dynamics of financial asset prices. Although the likelihood
remains that interest rate rises will be gradual, this could still affect financial flows to
emerging markets, including those of Latin America and the Caribbean. Concerns also
persist over the financial stability of economies in which credit, especially in the form
of international bond issues, has grown strongly, since these could be hurt by higher
interest rates on dollar liabilities.

This is in addition to concerns over the position of a number of financial institutions
in developed countries —chiefly in the eurozone— which have not been able to restore
their balance sheets to health since the global financial crisis and have, moreover, seen
their profits eroded by years of low growth and low interest rates. The results of stress
tests carried out in mid-2016 by the European Banking Authority (EBA) have not fully
dispelled doubts about the real situation of banks in some eurozone countries.

Recent protectionist trends, amid complex financial and economic growth dynamics,
have raised new uncertainties and risks regarding the future of the global economy.
These trends reflect the mounting tensions and difficulties in reconciling and coordinating
national policy emphases and aims with the institutional arrangements governing
international movements of goods and services, finance and capital, technology and
migration in a globalized world.

In this context, global trade —following the questioning of free trade agreements
such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA)— is not the only area of tension. The value chain dynamics of global
manufacturing, as well as technology mobility, will also be affected. Multilateralism
could well be weakened by a stronger tendency towards bilateral agreements on trade
and investment.

As in preceding years, global economic conditions will have different effects on the
various countries and subregions of Latin America and the Caribbean, and will sharpen
subregional differences by the production and trade orientation of their economies.
Although the protectionist tendencies emerging in the United States will have global
and regional effects, the possible renegotiation of NAFTA and other trade agreements,

82 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Chapter VII

as well as uncertainty over the dynamics of monetary transfers from migrants, will have
significant effects in particular on Mexico and Central America, which export most of
their manufactures and services to the United States (81% in the case of Mexico, 41%
for Costa Rica, 47% for El Salvador, 36% for Guatemala, 44% for Honduras, and 54%
for Nicaragua). For the region, therefore, any trade restrictions introduced in the United
States will at least partly offset the positive effects of growth in trade with that country.

For the region overall, extraregional demand should pick up in 2017, although this
could be dampened to some extent by trade decisions by the United States. Intraregional
trade should also regain some ground in 2017, thanks to a stronger performance by
the economies of the South America, especially Argentina and Brazil. The performance
of the economies in the south of the region should benefit from the projected upturn
in their terms of trade, although uncertainty remains over the economic future of the
eurozone and China.

The subpar performance of domestic demand across the region in 2016 was
attributable mainly to a heavy drop in investment and consumption by both public and
private sectors, although with sharp differences between subregions. While in South
America private consumption and investment dropped by 2.3% and 9.9%, respectively,
in Central America private consumption expanded by 3.0% and investment by 1.9%.
Some of these trends should improve in 2017, with stronger private consumption
and investment.

As noted earlier, growth in the region reflects uncertainty and shocks coming from
the international economy, on the one hand, and a heavy fall in domestic consumption
and investment, on the other. Regaining a growth path will require reversing these
trends, with an emphasis on investment, which in turn will require strong mobilization
of financial resources. The growing difficulties faced by the countries of the region in
financing countercyclical fiscal policy, added to their status as middle-income countries
—which hinders their access to external concessional financing and to international
cooperation funding—, mean that mobilizing domestic and external resources to finance
investment must be a policy priority for the countries in the near term.

To regain fiscal space, it is essential to reduce tax evasion and avoidance and to
gradually reform the public finances to safeguard the solvency of the public sector,
protect investment, lock in social progress and broaden tax resources. ECLAC estimates
that tax evasion and avoidance cost the region the equivalent of 2.4 percentage points
of GDP in the case of VAT and 4.3 percentage points in the case of income tax. This
represented a total of US$ 340 billion in 2015, or 6.7% of regional GDP. ECLAC also
estimates that tax losses associated with illicit financial flows from the region have
amounted to around US$ 31 billion over the past few years, or between 10% and 15%
of actual personal income tax collection.

Budget adjustments involving cuts in public investment could deepen the recessionary
conditions, because this investment, like private investment, plays a key role in short-
and long-run growth. Estimates show that fiscal multipliers are high and significant in
the region, and that the public investment multiplier is higher than 2 after two years.

Unlike in 2016 when the region contracted by 1.1%, and despite complex external
conditions and a number of risks, in 2017 the region’s economy is expected to switch
direction and return positive growth of 1.3% (see table VII.1), thanks mainly to the
expected upturn in the terms of trade and in international trade volumes. As in 2016,
however, the weighted average growth figure masks different growth dynamics between
countries and subregions. Central America, including the Spanish-speaking Caribbean
and Haiti, is expected grow by around 3.7% in 2017; including Mexico, with a projected
growth rate of 1.9%, brings the average down to 2.3%. Positive growth is projected
in 2017 for South America, at 0.9%, and for the English-speaking Caribbean, at 1.3%.

83Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Chapter VII

Table VII.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: annual growth in gross domestic product, 2011-2017
(Percentages, on the basis of dollars at constant 2010 prices)

Country 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a 2017b

Argentina 6.0 -1.0 2.4 -2.5 2.5 -2.0 2.3
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 5.2 5.1 6.8 5.5 4.8 4.0 3.8
Brazil 3.9 1.9 3.0 0.1 -3.9 -3.6 0.4
Chile 5.8 5.5 4.0 1.9 2.3 1.6 2.0
Colombia 6.6 4.0 4.9 4.4 3.1 2.0 2.7
Costa Rica 4.5 5.2 2.0 3.0 3.7 4.1 3.9
Cuba 2.8 3.0 2.7 1.0 4.3 0.4 0.9
Dominican Republic 3.1 2.8 4.7 7.6 7.0 6.4 6.2
Ecuador 7.9 5.6 4.9 4.0 0.2 -2.0 0.3
El Salvador 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.4 2.5 2.2 2.2
Guatemala 4.2 3.0 3.7 4.2 4.1 3.3 3.3
Haiti 5.5 2.9 4.2 2.8 1.7 2.0 1.0
Honduras 3.8 4.1 2.8 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.4
Mexico 4.0 4.0 1.4 2.2 2.5 2.0 1.9
Nicaragua 6.2 5.6 4.5 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.7
Panama 11.8 9.2 6.6 6.1 5.8 5.2 5.9
Paraguay 4.3 -1.2 14.0 4.7 3.0 4.0 3.8
Peru 6.3 6.1 5.9 2.4 3.3 3.9 4.0
Uruguay 5.2 3.5 4.6 3.2 1.0 0.6 1.0
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 4.2 5.6 1.3 -3.9 -5.7 -9.7 -4.7
Subtotal de América Latina 4.5 2.9 2.9 0.9 -0.5 -1.1 1.3
Antigua and Barbuda -1.8 3.8 -0.2 4.6 4.1 4.2 2.9
Bahamas 0.6 3.1 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 0.0 1.0
Barbados 0.8 0.3 -0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 1.9
Belize 2.1 3.7 1.3 4.1 1.2 -2.4 3.7
Dominica -0.2 -1.1 0.8 4.2 -1.8 1.0 3.2
Grenada 0.8 -1.2 2.4 7.3 6.2 2.9 2.6
Guyana 5.4 4.8 5.2 3.8 3.0 2.6 3.8
Jamaica 1.7 -0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.2
Saint Kitts and Nevis 2.4 -0.6 6.2 6.0 3.8 3.7 5.3
Saint Lucia 0.2 -1.4 0.1 0.4 1.9 2.8 2.3
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines -0.4 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.2
Suriname 5.3 3.1 2.9 1.8 -2.0 -10.4 0.8
Trinidad and Tobago -0.3 1.3 2.3 -1.0 0.2 -4.5 0.5
Subtotal for the Caribbean 1.0 1.3 1.5 0.4 0.4 -1.7 1.3
Latin America and the Caribbean 4.5 2.8 2.9 0.9 -0.5 -1.1 1.3
Central America (9 countries)c 4.4 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.7 3.6 3.7
South America (10 countries)d 4.7 2.5 3.3 0.3 -1.8 -2.4 0.9

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Estimates.

b Projections.
c Includes Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.
d Includes Argentina, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Plurinational State of Bolivia and Uruguay.

85Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Statistical annex

87Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.1
Latin America and the Caribbean: main economic indicators

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Annual growth rates

Gross domestic productb 5.8 4.1 -1.7 6.2 4.5 2.8 2.9 0.9 -0.5 -1.1

Per capita gross domestic productb 4.5 2.7 -2.9 4.9 3.3 1.7 1.7 -0.2 -1.6 -2.2

Consumer pricesc 5.6 7.0 3.5 5.4 5.8 4.9 5.0 6.3 7.9 8.4

Percentages

Urban open unemployment 8.6 8.0 9.2 8.6 7.8 7.4 7.2 7.0 7.4 9.0

Total gross external debt/GDPd e 31.9 29.0 29.9 27.6 26.5 28.4 30.2 32.6 34.9 36.4

Total gross external debt/exports
of goods and services 82.5 75.8 99.4 96.4 89.2 96.9 102.6 113.2 133.5 150.4

Millions of dollars

Balance of paymentse

Current account balance -8 599 -27 581 -34 487 -107 366 -122 850 -132 729 -158 445 -188 849 -179 185 -105 314

Exports of goods f.o.b. 766 565 881 042 714 303 898 126 1 099 819 1 116 240 1 099 371 1 083 333 924 085 864 955

Imports of goods f.o.b. 735 930 849 178 676 877 864 779 1 045 732 1 079 149 1 099 969 1 105 630 984 700 879 484

Services trade balance -17 907 -33 258 -37 009 -51 729 -67 387 -73 821 -73 372 -75 298 -52 864 -38 185

Income balance -101 006 -113 856 -107 864 -148 300 -172 339 -158 148 -146 933 -157 068 -133 735 -124 741

Net current transfers 66 009 67 211 59 364 59 315 62 789 62 149 62 457 65 854 68 029 71 722

Capital and financial balancef 144 090 63 600 85 833 187 526 210 919 185 728 168 060 219 328 150 938 125 098

Net foreign direct investment 96 000 103 021 72 157 110 405 153 484 148 447 142 086 142 354 134 795 499

Other capital movements 48 090 -39 421 13 676 77 121 57 436 37 281 25 974 76 973 16 143 124 599

Overall balance 134 933 38 879 51 712 83 160 91 758 58 688 16 477 37 907 -26 345 6 981

Variation in reserve assetsg -135 600 -42 872 -57 543 -80 270 -97 146 -59 217 -19 195 -40 175 23 780 -21 559

Other financing 667 3 993 5 831 -3 032 5 048 407 2 206 2 272 2 534 0

Net transfer of resources 43 751 -46 263 -16 201 36 195 43 628 27 986 23 333 64 531 19 737 392

International reserves 459 581 512 727 567 444 655 305 773 632 835 735 830 018 857 438 811 762 829 202

Percentages of GDP

Fiscal sectorh

Overall balance 0.1 -0.4 -2.7 -1.9 -1.4 -1.9 -2.6 -2.8 -3.0 -3.0

Primary balance 2.1 1.3 -0.9 -0.3 0.3 -0.2 -0.9 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8

Total revenue 17.8 18.1 17.0 17.6 17.8 18.0 17.9 17.8 17.8 17.6

Tax revenue 14.2 14.2 13.6 13.9 14.4 14.7 14.8 14.8 15.1 14.9

Total expenditure 17.6 18.5 19.7 19.5 19.2 20.0 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.5

Capital expenditure 3.1 3.7 3.8 4.0 3.8 4.2 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5

Central-government public debt 30.3 28.8 30.9 29.8 29.0 30.5 32.3 33.6 36.5 37.9

Public debt of the non-financial public-sector 32.3 30.9 33.2 32.4 31.3 32.7 34.6 36.2 39.4 40.7

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Based on official figures expressed in 2010 dollars.
c December-December variation. Weighted average, does not include the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
d Estimates based on figures denominated in dollars at current prices.
e Does not include the Caribbean, Cuba and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
f Includes errors and omissions.
g A minus sign (-) indicates an increase in reserve assets.
h Coverage corresponds to the central government. Simple averages for 19 countries.

STATISTICAL
ANNEX

88 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.2
Latin America and the Caribbean: gross domestic product in millions of dollars
(Current prices)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 5.8 4.1 -1.7 6.2 4.5 2.8 2.9 0.9 -0.5 -1.1

Latin America 5.8 4.1 -1.6 6.3 4.5 2.9 2.9 0.9 -0.5 -1.1

Argentina 9.0 4.1 -5.9 10.1 6.0 -1.0 2.4 -2.5 2.5 -2.0

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 4.6 6.1 3.4 4.1 5.2 5.1 6.8 5.5 4.8 4.0

Brazil 6.1 5.1 -0.1 7.5 3.9 1.9 3.0 0.1 -3.9 -3.6

Chile 4.6 3.7 -1.0 5.8 5.8 5.5 4.0 1.9 2.3 1.6

Colombia 6.9 3.5 1.7 4.0 6.6 4.0 4.9 4.4 3.1 2.0

Costa Rica 7.9 2.7 -1.0 5.0 4.5 5.2 2.0 3.0 3.7 4.1

Cuba 7.3 4.1 1.5 2.4 2.8 3.0 2.7 1.0 4.3 0.4

Dominican Republic 8.5 3.2 0.9 8.3 3.1 2.8 4.7 7.6 7.0 6.4

Ecuador 2.2 6.4 0.6 3.5 7.9 5.6 4.9 4.0 0.2 -2.0

El Salvador 3.8 1.3 -3.1 1.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.4 2.5 2.2

Guatemala 6.3 3.3 0.5 2.9 4.2 3.0 3.7 4.2 4.1 3.3

Haiti 3.3 0.8 3.1 -5.5 5.5 2.9 4.2 2.8 1.7 2.0

Honduras 6.2 4.2 -2.4 3.7 3.8 4.1 2.8 3.1 3.6 3.5

Mexico 3.1 1.4 -4.7 5.1 4.0 4.0 1.4 2.2 2.5 2.0

Nicaragua 5.3 2.9 -2.8 3.2 6.2 5.6 4.5 4.6 4.9 4.8

Panama 12.1 8.6 1.6 5.8 11.8 9.2 6.6 6.1 5.8 5.2

Paraguay 5.4 6.4 -4.0 13.1 4.3 -1.2 14.0 4.7 3.0 4.0

Peru 8.5 9.1 1.1 8.3 6.3 6.1 5.9 2.4 3.3 3.9

Uruguay 6.5 7.2 4.2 7.8 5.2 3.5 4.6 3.2 1.0 0.6

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 8.8 5.3 -3.2 -1.5 4.2 5.6 1.3 -3.9 -5.7 -9.7

The Caribbean 6.5 1.4 -3.6 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.4 0.3 0.2 -1.7

Antigua and Barbuda 9.3 0.0 -12.0 -7.0 -1.8 3.8 -0.2 4.6 4.1 4.2

Bahamas 1.4 -2.3 -4.2 1.5 0.6 3.1 0.0 -0.5 -1.7 0.0

Barbados 1.7 0.3 -1.5 0.3 0.8 0.3 -0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4

Belize 1.1 3.2 0.8 3.3 2.1 3.7 1.3 4.1 1.2 -2.4

Dominica 6.4 7.1 -1.2 0.7 -0.2 -1.1 0.8 4.2 -1.8 1.0

Grenada 6.1 0.9 -6.6 -0.5 0.8 -1.2 2.4 7.3 6.2 2.9

Guyana 7.0 2.0 3.3 4.4 5.4 4.8 5.2 3.8 3.0 2.6

Jamaica 17.1 -0.7 -4.4 -1.5 1.7 -0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.1

Saint Kitts and Nevis -0.2 6.3 -3.0 -2.2 2.4 -0.6 6.2 6.0 3.8 3.7

Saint Lucia 1.0 4.2 -0.4 -1.7 0.2 -1.4 0.1 0.4 1.9 2.8

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2.4 2.5 -2.1 -3.4 -0.4 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.6 2.1

Suriname 5.1 4.1 3.0 5.2 5.3 3.1 2.9 1.8 -2.0 -10.4

Trinidad and Tobago 4.5 3.4 -4.4 3.3 -0.3 1.3 2.3 -1.0 0.2 -4.5

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Based on official figures expressed in dollars at constant 2010 prices.

89Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.3
Latin America and the Caribbean: per capita gross domestic product
(Annual growth rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 4.5 2.7 -2.9 4.9 3.3 1.7 1.7 -0.2 -1.6 -2.2

Latin America 4.4 2.8 -2.9 4.9 3.3 1.7 1.7 -0.2 -1.6 -2.2

Argentina 7.9 3.0 -6.9 9.0 4.9 -2.1 1.3 -3.5 1.5 -2.9

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2.8 4.3 1.6 2.4 3.5 3.4 5.1 3.8 3.2 2.4

Brazil 4.8 3.9 -1.2 6.4 2.9 0.9 2.1 -0.8 -4.7 -4.4

Chile 3.4 2.5 -2.1 4.6 4.7 4.3 2.9 0.8 1.2 0.6

Colombia 5.6 2.3 0.5 2.8 5.5 3.0 3.8 3.4 2.2 1.1

Costa Rica 6.5 1.3 -2.3 3.6 3.2 3.9 0.9 1.9 2.7 3.0

Cuba 7.2 4.1 1.4 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.6 0.9 4.2 0.4

Dominican Republic 7.0 1.8 -0.4 6.9 1.8 1.5 3.5 6.3 5.8 5.2

Ecuador 0.5 4.6 -1.1 1.8 6.2 4.0 3.3 2.4 -1.3 -3.4

El Salvador 3.4 0.9 -3.5 1.0 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.0 2.0 1.8

Guatemala 3.9 1.0 -1.6 0.7 2.0 0.8 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.3

Haiti 1.7 -0.7 1.5 -6.9 4.0 1.4 2.8 1.4 0.3 0.7

Honduras 4.3 2.4 -4.1 2.1 2.2 2.6 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.1

Mexico 1.5 -0.3 -6.2 3.5 2.5 2.6 0.0 0.9 1.1 0.7

Nicaragua 3.9 1.5 -4.0 1.9 4.9 4.3 3.3 3.4 3.8 3.7

Panama 10.2 6.7 -0.1 4.0 9.9 7.4 4.9 4.4 4.1 3.6

Paraguay 4.0 4.9 -5.2 11.6 2.9 -2.6 12.5 3.3 1.6 2.7

Peru 7.2 7.8 -0.1 7.0 4.9 4.7 4.4 1.0 1.9 2.6

Uruguay 6.3 6.8 3.9 7.5 4.8 3.2 4.3 2.9 0.6 0.2

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 7.0 3.6 -4.7 -2.9 2.7 4.2 -0.0 -5.1 -6.9 -10.8

The Caribbean 5.7 0.6 -4.3 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 -0.3 -0.4 -2.3

Antigua and Barbuda 8.1 -1.1 -13.0 -8.0 -2.8 2.8 -1.2 3.5 3.1 3.1

Bahamas -0.5 -4.1 -5.8 -0.2 -1.0 1.5 -1.4 -1.9 -2.9 -1.2

Barbados 1.3 -0.1 -1.9 -0.1 0.4 0.0 -0.4 -0.1 0.2 1.1

Belize -1.5 0.6 -1.7 0.9 -0.3 1.4 -0.9 1.9 -1.0 -4.4

Dominica 6.2 7.0 -1.3 0.4 -0.6 -1.5 0.3 3.7 -2.2 0.5

Grenada 5.8 0.6 -6.9 -0.9 0.4 -1.5 1.9 6.9 5.8 2.4

Guyana 6.7 1.6 3.0 4.0 5.1 4.5 4.9 3.5 2.6 2.1

Jamaica 16.6 -1.2 -4.9 -1.9 1.3 -1.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7

Saint Kitts and Nevis -1.5 5.0 -4.2 -3.4 1.2 -1.8 4.9 4.7 2.6 2.6

Saint Lucia -0.5 2.6 -1.8 -2.9 -0.8 -2.3 -0.7 -0.4 1.2 2.0

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2.3 2.4 -2.2 -3.4 -0.4 1.4 1.8 1.1 1.5 2.0

Suriname 4.1 3.0 1.8 4.0 4.2 2.1 1.9 0.9 -2.9 -11.2

Trinidad and Tobago 4.0 2.9 -4.8 2.8 -0.8 0.8 1.8 -1.5 -0.2 -4.8

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Based on official figures expressed in dollars at constant 2010 prices.

90 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.4
Latin America and the Caribbean: gross fixed capital formationa
(Percentages of GDP)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016b

Latin America and the Caribbean 19.3 20.3 19.3 20.2 21.1 21.3 21.3 20.8 19.4 18.4

Argentina 16.9 17.6 14.5 16.6 18.4 17.3 17.3 16.5 15.6 15.5

Bahamas 27.9 25.8 24.3 24.0 25.3 27.6 26.9 30.4 27.1

Belize 20.1 24.9 20.1 15.3 14.9 15.7 18.2 20.1 … …

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 14.4 16.1 16.1 16.6 19.5 19.0 19.9 20.7 20.7 20.3

Brazil 17.9 19.1 18.7 20.5 21.1 20.8 21.4 20.4 18.3 17.4

Chile 19.4 22.4 19.9 21.0 22.8 24.1 23.7 22.3 21.5 21.5

Colombia 21.0 22.3 21.7 21.9 24.4 24.6 25.0 26.3 26.2 25.7

Costa Rica 20.5 22.1 19.9 20.0 20.8 21.4 20.7 20.7 21.7 21.0

Dominican Republic 26.8 27.6 23.3 25.1 23.7 23.0 22.4 23.3 26.3 28.3

Ecuador 22.1 24.1 23.1 24.6 26.1 27.3 28.7 28.7 27.0 25.6

El Salvador 16.9 15.8 13.2 13.3 14.8 14.3 15.4 14.2 15.0 …

Guatemala 19.7 18.0 15.6 14.8 15.2 15.3 15.0 15.0 15.2 15.3

Haiti 25.1 25.6 25.7 25.4 … … … … … …

Honduras 32.7 33.3 22.1 21.6 24.3 24.2 23.1 22.1 … …

Mexico 22.3 23.1 22.0 21.2 21.9 22.1 21.4 21.6 21.9 21.7

Nicaragua 23.8 23.9 19.4 21.4 24.4 27.3 28.0 26.9 31.0 31.0

Panama 27.5 29.5 28.2 30.2 33.7 37.3 42.2 43.7 … …

Paraguay 13.7 15.2 14.7 15.9 16.9 15.8 15.5 16.1 16.0 15.9

Peru 18.7 21.9 20.9 23.5 24.3 26.3 26.2 25.1 22.7 22.0

Uruguay 17.6 19.6 17.7 19.1 19.4 22.1 22.0 21.8 19.8 19.4

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 21.3 20.7 19.6 18.7 18.7 21.9 19.6 17.0 17.5 4.1

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Based on official figures expressed in dollars at constant 2010 prices.
b Preliminary figures.

91Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Ta
b

le
A

1.
5

L

a
ti

n
A

m
e

ri
c

a
a

n
d

t
h

e
C

a
ri

b
b

e
a

n
: b

a
la

n
c

e
o

f
p

a
y

m
e

n
ts

(M
ill

i

o
n

s
o

f
d

o
lla

rs
)

Ex
po

rt
s

of
g

oo
ds

f.
o.

b.
Ex

po
rt

s
of

s
er

vi
ce

s
Im

po
rt
s
of

g
oo

ds
f.

o.
b.

Im
po

rt
s

of
s

er
vi

ce
s

2

0
14

20
15

2

0
16

a
20

1

4
20

1

5
20

16
a

20
14

20
15
20
16
a
20

14
20

15
20

16
a

La
ti

n
A

m
er

ic
a

an
d

th
e

C
ar

ib
be

an

1
08

3
33

3
92

4
08

5

1

5
4

52
1

1

5
1

29
6


1

10
5

6

3
0

9

8
4

7

0
0


22

9
81

8
20

4
16

0

La
ti
n
A
m
er

ic
ab

1
06

1
34

4
90

6
88

6
83

7
02

2
14

3
67

0
14

0
35

8
13

9

10

5
1

07
7

27
4

95
9

74
9

85
1

09
7

2

2
1

26
9

19
5

99
7

1

6
9

36
4

A
rg
en
tin

a
68

4
07

56
7

88
57

1
17

13
8

7

7
14

0
46

12
6

78
62

4
29

57
1

76
53

5
16

16
9

40
17

9
71

18
8

66
Bo

liv
ia

(P
lu

rin
at

io
na

l S
ta

te
o

f)
12

8
10

8
67

3
7

02
5

1
23

1
1

2

4
2

1
16

6
9

88
8

9
00

4
7

74
3

3
02

4
2

8

1
0

2
67

0
Br

az
il

22
4

09
8

19
0

09
2

1

8
3

43
9

39
9

65
33

7
78

33
8

91
23

0
72

7
17

2
42

2
13

9
66

2
88

0
72

70
6

96
61

8
64

Ch
ile

74

9
24

62
2

32
58

8
00

11
0

11
9

77
7

9
78

0
68

5
80

58
7

38
55

2
14

14
8

29
13

5
89

12
8

45
Co

lo
m

bi
a

56
8

99
38

1
14

32
3

97
6

90
0

7
14

4
7

05
3

61
5

39
52

0
49

43
9

30
13

5
60

11
4

3

9
9

94
4

Co
st
a
Ri

ca

9
49

3
9

40
4

9
96

8
6

95
5

7
35

8
8

1

9
0

14
7

84
14

4
64

14
7

5

3
2

44
8

2
72

8
2

94
6

D
om
in
ic
an
R

ep
ub

lic

9
89

9
9

52
3

9
33

3
7
02
5

7
53

7
8

11
8

17
2

73
16

8
63

16
7

7

9
2

83
5

3
13

9
3

14
9

Ec
ua
do
r

26
5

96
19

0
49
16
7

63
2

34
6

2
39

1
2

07
1

26
6

60
20

6
99

15
7

3

1
3

51
7

3
19

7
2

80
0

El
S
al
va

do
r

4

25

5
4

38
1

4
24

9
2

22
6

2
33

0
2

4

7
0

9
46

3
9

32
0

8
76

1
1

48
6

1
54

4
1

71
6

G
ua
te
m

al
a

10
9

92
10

8
24

10
4

99
2

83
0

2
82

3
2

69
6

17
0

56
16

3
81

15
5

6

2
3

03
3

3
16

2
3

00
2

H
ai

ti
96

1
1

02
4

1
00

1
70

1
72

4
65

1
3

66
6

3

44

5
3

22
3

1
08

5
98

6
88

8
H

on
du

ra
s

8
07

2
8

04
1

7
75

9
1

08
7

1
10

4
1

15
3

11
0

7

0
11

0
97

10
6

53
1

78
4

1
79

4
1

76
3

M
ex

ic
o

39
7

6

5
0

3

8
1

04
9

36
9

61
8

21
0

86
22

8
86

22
8

86
40

0
44

0
39

5
57

3
38

6
00

8
33

5
37

32
0

56
30

3
47

N
ic
ar
ag

ua

3

62

2
3

34
1

3
17

4
1

38
8

1
43

7
1

65
7

6
02

4
6

08
3

6
20

4
1

03
6

94
8

1
05

3
Pa

na
m

a
14

9
72

12
7

84
10

9
94

12
6

55
14

5
35

14
6

80
25

7
95

22
4

9

2
19

7
93

4
86

8
4

49
9

4
36

4
Pa

ra
gu

ay

13
1

05
10

8
98

11
2

25
89

2
86

0
86

0
12

0
79

10
3

17
9

69
8

1
11

4
1

10
4

1
05

7
Pe

ru

39
5

33
34

2
36

35
2

99
5

95
0

6
22

6
6

41
3

41
0

42
37

3
85

35
7

41
7

6

8
0

7
95

8
7

79
9

U
ru
gu
ay

10

3
43

9
07

7
8

36
2

3
34

5
2

99
7

2

69

4
11

2
52

9
34

0
8

12
6

3
20

6
2

60
3

2
29

1
Ve

ne
zu

el
a

(B
ol

iv
ar

ia
n

Re
pu

bl
ic

o
f)

74
7

14
37

3
57


2

20
1

1
16

3

47
5

08
36

9
01


17

2
16

13
7

7

4

Th
e
C
ar
ib
be
an

21
9

8

9
17

2
00


10

8
50

10
9

3

7

28
3

56
24

9
51


8

54
9

8
16

3

A
nt
ig
ua
a
nd
B
ar
bu
da

69

60
61

52
2

54
3

55
8

51
7

44
4

45
3

22
5

22
6

23
3

Ba
ha
m
as

c
83

4
52

7

2
71

7
2

73
7


3

31
6

2
95

3

1
72

5
1

27
1


Ba

rb
ad

os

79
2

80
1


1

10
3

1
12

7

1
65

2
1

53
7


46

2
49

4

Be
liz

ec
58

9
53

8

49
4

49
6


92

6
96

1

22
5

22
1


D

om
in

ic
a

39
32

33
17

9
17

9
18

5
20

3
19

2
21

1
75

74
78

G
re
na
da

44

38
39

18
9

20
0

20
2

29
9

30
7

31
4

10
4

11
0

11
2

G
uy

an
a

1
16
7
1

17
0


18

1
14
3

1
79
1
1

47
5


42

6
42

3

Ja
m
ai
ca

1

44
9

1
26

1
1

28
6

2
95
2
3

05
7

2
87

2
5

20
8

4
41

4
4

27
5

2
24

5
2

15
7

2
24

1
Sa

in
t K

itt
s

an
d

N
ev

is

58
60

63
31

5
32

1
34

0
28

5
37

0
38

8
13

9
16

1
16

9
Sa

in
t L

uc
ia

18

4
20

7
19

5
44

8
45

6
46

4
55

2
50

2
48

2
19

1
18

6
18

5
Sa

in
t V

in
ce

nt
a

nd

th
e
G
re
na
di

ne
s

53
51

54
13

2
13
7
14

4
31

9
29

5
30

1
93

91
93

Su
rin

am
e

2
14

5
1

65
2


21

1
20

4

2
01

2
2

02
8


76

1
67

4

Tr
in
id
ad
a
nd
T
ob

ag
o

14
5

66
10

8
04


1

40
7

1
33

9

11
2

76
9

47
4


1

87
8

2
07

4

92 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

G
oo

ds
a

nd
s

er
vi
ce
s

ba
la

nc
e

I
nc

om
e

ba
la
nc
e

Cu
rr

en
t t

ra
ns

fe
rs

ba

la
nc

e
Cu

rr
en

t a
cc

ou
nt

ba
la
nc

e
20

14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
La
ti
n
A
m
er
ic
a
an
d
th
e
C
ar
ib
be
an

-9
7

63
5

-1
13

4
79


-1

57
0

6

8
-1

33
7

35

65
8

54
68

0
29


-1

88
8

4

9
-1

79
1

85

La
ti
n
A
m
er
ic
ab

-9
3

56
9

-1
08

5
02

-4
4

33
5

-1
53

3
92

-1
31

7
90

-1
20

2
86

62
8

84
65

0
96

69
2

6

5
-1

84
0

78
-1

75
1

96
-9

5
35

6
A

rg
en

tin
a

2
91

6
-4

3
12

-2
5

8

7
-1

0
78

8
-1
1
26

0
-1

0
51

5
-1

5

8
-3

7

2
-1

67
-8

0
31

-1
5

94
4

-1
3

27
0

Bo
liv

ia
(P

lu
rin

at
io

na
l S

ta
te

o
f)
1
08
9
-1

8
99

-2
2

22
-1

6
96

-1
1

2

4
-7

0

0
1

08
6

1
16
9
1

20
4

47
8

-1
8

5

4
-1

7
18

Br
az

il

-5

4
73

6
-1

9
24

9
15

8
03

-5
2

17
0

-4
2

35
7

-3
8

13
6

2
72
5
2

72
4

2

80

0
-1

04
1

8

1
-5

8
88

2
-1

9
53

3
Ch
ile

2

52
6

-3
17

52
1

-7
6

92
-6

1
94

-6
4

00
1

84
9

1
75

0
1

55
0

-3
3

16
-4

7
61

-4
3

28
Co
lo
m
bi

a

-1

1
30

0
-1

8
23

1
-1

4
42

4
-1

2
63

4
-5

8
25

-4
6

02
4

47
5

5
11

7
5

32
2

-1
9

45
9

-1
8

93
8

-1
3

70
5

Co
st
a
Ri
ca

-7
84

-4
30

45
9

-2
0

6

2
-2

3
59

-2
7

78
41

2
43

5
44

4
-2

4
34

-2
3

5

3
-1

8
75

D
om
in
ic
an
R
ep
ub
lic

-3
1

8

5
-2

9
42

-2
4

77
-3

2
65

-3
0

45
-3

1
97

4
30

9
4

68
0

4
91

4
-2

1
41

-1
3

0

7
-7

60
Ec
ua
do
r

-1
2

34
-2

4
55

30
3

-1
5

56
-1

7
45

-2
3

00
2

26
4

2
07
8
2

12
0

-5
26

-2
1

22
12

3
El
S
al
va
do
r

-4
4

67
-4

1
54

-3
7

59
-1

0
74

-1
1

37
-1

2
74

4
23

4
4

37
2

4
63

4
-1

3
07

-9
20

-3
99

G
ua
te
m
al
a

-6
2

67
-5

8
96

-5
3

69
-1

4
08

-1
3

99
-1

6
50

6
44

5
7

19
9

7
70

2
-1

2
30

-9
6

68
4

H
ai

ti

-3

0
89

-2
6

84
-2

4
59

50
46

37
2

29
1

2
43

7
2

37
7

-7
48

-2
02

-4
4

H
on
du
ra

s
-3

6
95

-3
7

4

6
-3

5
04

-1
3
22
-1

3
80

-1
5

69
3

57
2

3
83

5
3
95
0

-1
4

44
-1

2
91

-1
1
23
M
ex
ic
o
-1
5

24
1

-2
3

69
4

-2
3

85
1

-3
3

80
4

-3
3

82
3

-3
0

41
3

22
9

15
24

3
01

26
2

45
-2

6
13

1
-3

3
21

6
-2

8
01

9
N
ic
ar
ag
ua

-2
0

4

9
-2

2
52
-2
4

26
-3

1

4
-3

42
-3

44
1

45
0

1
54
8
1

59
5

-9
13

-1
0

45
-1

1
75

Pa
na

m
a

-3
0

36
32

8
1

51
8

-2
6

3

0
-3

5
99

-4
3

64
12

2
-1

06
-2

38
-5

5
44

-3
3
77
-3

0
84

Pa
ra
gu
ay

80

4
33

7
1

32
9

-1
3

83
-1

2
97

-1
4

77
60

6
67

2
74

0
27

-2
87

59
2

Pe
ru

-3

2
40

-4
8

82
-1

8
29

-9
3

2

8
-7

6
59

-9
1

45
4

37
2
3
33
1
3
95
0

-8
1

96
-9

2
10

-7
0

23
U
ru
gu
ay

-7

70
13

0
63

9
-1

9
41

-1
4

95
-1

4
59

13
1

12
4

12
3

-2
5

80
-1

2
41

-6
97

Ve
ne
zu
el
a
(B

ol
iv

ar
ia

n
Re

pu
bl

ic
o

f)
12

1
91

-1
2

15
5


-8

3
75

-5
7

98

-2
18

-1
97


3

59
8

-1
8

15
0


Th
e
C
ar
ib
be
an

-4
0

6

5
-4

9
77


-3

6
76

-1
9

45

2
97

0
2

93
3


-4

7
71

-3
9

89

A
nt
ig
ua
a
nd
B
ar
bu
da

-1

52
-6

8
-6

8
-3
6
-3
1
-3

7
28

29
29

-1
59

-7
1

-7
5

Ba
ha
m
as

-1

4
90

-9
60


-4

38
-4

0

2

0
-4

6

-1
9

28
-1

4
09


Ba
rb
ad
os

-2

19
-1

04

-1
97

-2
13


-1
4
2

-4

31
-3

15

Be
liz

e
-6

7
-1

49

-1
43

-9
5


74

70

-1
36

-1
75


D
om
in
ic

a
-6

1
-5

3
-7

0
-1
7
-1
7
-1

7
21

28
28

-5
7

-4
3

6
0

G
re
na
da

-1

70
-1

80
-1

84
-3

3
-3

4
-3

5
22

16
17

-1
81

-1
98

-2
03

G
uy
an
a

-8
69

-5
85


27

25

45
8

41
7

0
-3

85
-1

44
0

Ja
m
ai
ca

-3

0
51

-2
2

5

3
-2

3
58

-2
98

-4
49

-3
15

2
23

6
2

30
6

2
37

0
-1

1
14

-3
95

11
6

Sa
in

t K
itt

s
an

d
N

ev
is

-5
1
-1

51
-1

54
-2

6
-2
5
-2
6
42

39
37

-3
5

-1
37

-1
43
Sa
in
t L
uc
ia

-1
11

-2
6

-6
-2

3
-2
2
-2
0
11

11
11

-1
23

-3
7

-1
6

Sa
in
t V
in
ce
nt
a
nd

th

e
G

re
na

di
ne

s
-2

26
-1

97
-1

96
0

-3
-5

44
44

45
-1
82
-1
56
-1
56
Su
rin
am
e

-4
17

-8
46


-6

9
-2
7

71
65


-4

15
-8

08

Tr
in
id
ad
a
nd
T
ob
ag
o
2
82

0
59

5

-2
4

21
-6

50

-2
1

-4
7


37

8
-1

01

Ta
b
le
A
1.
5

(
c

o
n

ti
n

u
e

d
)

93Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Ta
b
le
A
1.
5
(
c
o
n

c
lu

d
e

d
)

Ca
pi

ta
l a

nd
fin

an
ci

al
b

al
an

ce
c

O
ve

ra
ll

ba
la
nc
e

Re
se

rv
e

as
se

ts
(v

ar
ia

tio
n)

d
O

th
er

fi
na

nc
in

g
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
20
14
20
15
20
16
a
La
ti
n
A
m
er
ic
a
an
d
th
e
C
ar
ib
be
an

21
9

32
8

15
0

93
8

37

9
07

-2
6

34
5


-4

0
17

5
23

7
80


2

27
2

2
53

4

La
ti
n
A
m
er
ic
ab

21
5

72
0

14
8

24
9

11
9

96
1

35
5

68
-2

4
98

7
12

6
35

-3
7

80
3

22
4

94
-2

7
21

3
2
23
3

2
49

1
0
A
rg
en
tin

a
9

22
6
11
0

73
25

2
39

1
19

5
-4

8
71

0
-3

4
28

2
06

3
-1

1
97

0
2

23
2

2
80

8
0
Bo
liv
ia
(P
lu
rin
at
io
na
l S
ta
te
o
f)

45
4

23
3

-5
65

93
2

-1
6

2

0
-2

2
83

-9
32

1
62

0
0
0
0
0
Br
az
il

11
5

01
4

60
4

51
27

6
33

10
8

33
1

56
9

8
10

0
-1

0
83

3
-1

5
69

-8
1

00
0

0
0
Ch
ile

4

37
3

4
97

3
5

43
8

1
05
7
21
1
1

10
9

-1
0

57
-2

11
-1

1
09

0
0

0
Co

lo
m
bi
a

23
8

96
19

3
54

13
9

39
4

43
7

41
5

23
4

-4
4

37
-4

15
-2

34
0

0
0
Co
st
a
Ri
ca

2
32

1
2
99
7
1
72
2
-1

13
64

4
-1

5

3
11

3
-6

44
15

3
0
0
0
D
om
in
ic
an
R
ep
ub
lic

2
78

9
2

07
7

43
5

64
8

77
0

-3
26

-1
95

-4
07

0
-4

55
-3

65
0
Ec
ua
do
r

10
1

63
3

1
73

9
-4

24
-1

4
89

1
86

2
41
1
1
45
3
-1
8

62
13

36
0

El
S
al
va
do
r

1
27

4
1
03
3
1
06
3
-3
3
11

3
66

4
33
-1
13

-6
64

0
0

0
G

ua
te

m
al

a
-2

2
92

-1
5

12
58

0
73

47
5
1
26
4
-7

3
-4

75
-1

2
64

0
0

0
H

ai
ti

28
8

85
25

2
-9

4
-1

57
20

8
47

9
15
5
-2

08
-3

85
2

0
H
on
du
ra
s

1
90

4
1

58
4

1
24

6
45

9
29
3
12

2
-4

59
-3

03
-1

22
-1

10
0

M
ex
ic
o

42
4

59
17

5
49

30
1

62
16

3
29

-1
5

66
7

2
14
2
-1

6
32

9
15

6
67

-2
1

42
0

0
0
N
ic
ar
ag
ua

1
19
5
1

24
2

1
07

4
28
2
19
7
-1

01
-2

82
-1

97
10

1
0
0
0
Pa
na
m
a

5
94

1
3
37
7

3
51

4
39

7
-7

8
43

0
-1

2
22

78
-4

30
82

5
0

0
Pa

ra
gu
ay

1
11
2
-2

72
13

1
1

13
8

-5
60

72
4
-1
1

31
56

0
-7

24
-7

0
0
Pe
ru

6

04
1

9
28

8
7
32
2
-2
1

88
73

29
9

2
17

8
-7
3
-2

99
10

0
0
U
ru
gu
ay

3

94
0

-5
47

-9
63

1
36

0
-1

7
88

-1
6

60
-1

3
60

1
78

8
1

66
0

0
0

0
Ve

ne
zu
el
a
(B
ol
iv
ar
ia
n
Re
pu
bl
ic
o
f)
-4
3

16
14

6
32


-7

18
-3

5
18


71

8
3
51
8


0

0

Th
e
C
ar
ib
be
an

3
60

8
2

68
9


2

33
9

-1
3

58

-2
3

72
1

28
6


38

43

A
nt
ig
ua
a
nd
B
ar
bu
da

25
3
12
8
75

94
58

0
-9

4
-5
9
0
0
0

0
Ba

ha
m

as

1
97
4
1

43
3


46

24
0

-4
6

-2
4


2

0

Ba
rb
ad
os

38

6
25

2

-4
6

-6
3


46

63

0
0

0
Be

liz
e

22
1

71

85
-1
04

-8
4

10
4

-1
0

D
om
in
ic

a
75

65
60

18
21

0
-1
5
-2
6
0
0
0
0
G
re
na

da

20
4

22
8

20
3

23
30

0
-2
3
-3
0
0
0
0
0
G

uy
an

a
40

8
16

9

22
25


-5

9
-6

8
0

37
43


Ja

m
ai

ca

-1
5

88
88

2
52

0
80

0
42

8
-1

97
-8

00
-4

28
19

7
0
0
0
Sa
in
t K
itt
s
an
d
N
ev
is

62

99
14

3
27

-3
8

0
-2

7
38

0
0
0
0
Sa
in
t L
uc
ia

19
0

76
16

67
39

0
-6

7
-6

3
0
0
0

0
Sa

in
t V
in
ce
nt
a

nd
th

e
G
re
na
di
ne

s
20

5
17

1
15

6
23

15
0

-2
3

-1
5

0
0
0
0
Su
rin
am
e

26
5

54
2


-1

50
-2

66

15
0

26
6


0
0

Tr
in
id
ad
a
nd
T
ob
ag
o

95
2

-1
4

27

1
33
0
-1

5
29


-1

3
30

1
52

9

0
0

S
ou

rc
e:

E
co

no
m

ic
C

om
m

is
si

on
fo

r L
at

in
A

m
er
ic
a
an
d
th
e
Ca
rib
be
an

(E
CL

A
C)

, o
n

th
e

ba
si

s
of

o
ff

ic
ia

l f
ig

ur
es

.
a

Es
tim

at
es

.
b
D

oe
s

no
t i

nc
lu

de
th

e
Bo

liv
ar

ia
n
Re
pu
bl
ic

o
f V

en
ez

ue
la

.
c

In
cl

ud
es

e
rr

or
s

an
d

om
is

si
on

s.

d
A

m
in

us
s

ig
n

(-)
in

di
ca

te
s

an
in

cr
ea

se
in

re
se

rv
e
as
se

ts
.

94 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.6
Latin America and the Caribbean: international trade of goods
(Indices: 2010=100)

Exports of goods, f.o.b.
Unit value

Value Volume

2014 2015 2016a 2014 2015 2016a 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America 120.5 103.0 98.0 112.5 115.3 116.2 107.2 89.4 84.4

Argentina 100.3 83.3 83.8 85.6 84.1 90.0 117.3 99.0 93.1

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 200.1 135.5 109.7 151.9 129.8 119.5 131.7 104.4 91.9

Brazil 111.3 94.4 91.1 103.7 112.1 116.3 107.4 84.2 78.3

Chile 96.8 80.4 76.0 102.6 100.5 102.1 94.3 80.0 74.4

Colombia 139.6 93.5 79.5 139.4 143.1 139.8 100.1 65.4 56.9

Costa Rica 126.7 125.5 133.0 126.3 131.7 138.2 100.3 95.3 96.3

Dominican Republic 145.3 139.7 137.0 143.7 148.6 147.1 101.1 94.0 93.1

Ecuador 146.6 105.0 92.4 125.5 125.2 126.6 116.8 83.9 73.0

El Salvador 122.5 126.1 122.3 110.3 112.2 108.8 111.0 112.5 112.5

Guatemala 128.8 126.8 123.0 129.3 135.5 136.9 99.6 93.6 89.9

Haiti 170.6 181.8 177.7 156.9 166.2 163.9 108.7 109.3 108.4

Honduras 128.9 128.4 123.9 130.2 135.1 137.3 98.9 95.0 90.2

Mexico 133.1 127.5 123.7 125.2 130.8 131.5 106.3 97.5 94.1

Nicaragua 149.4 137.8 130.9 135.8 129.0 127.6 110.0 106.8 102.6

Panama 118.1 100.9 86.7 110.5 95.6 84.8 106.9 105.4 102.3

Paraguay 125.1 104.0 107.2 112.3 100.4 108.9 111.4 103.6 98.4

Peru 110.4 95.6 98.6 105.8 107.6 116.6 104.4 88.8 84.6

Uruguay 128.8 113.0 104.1 108.2 106.9 104.8 119.0 105.7 99.4

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 111.7 55.9 39.2 92.0 83.7 70.3 121.4 66.8 55.7

Imports of goods, f.o.b.
Unit value

Value Volume
2014 2015 2016a 2014 2015 2016a 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America 127.6 113.7 103.4 116.3 112.5 107.6 109.7 101.1 96.1

Argentina 115.3 105.6 98.8 103.6 107.5 111.8 111.3 98.2 88.4

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 176.9 161.1 138.5 107.3 100.3 92.7 164.9 160.6 149.3

Brazil 126.2 94.3 76.4 112.9 95.7 84.3 111.8 98.5 90.6

Chile 94.1 80.6 75.8 89.9 86.9 86.4 104.7 92.8 87.7

Colombia 160.2 135.5 114.4 146.6 143.4 131.5 109.3 94.5 87.0

Costa Rica 133.9 131.0 133.6 129.4 140.6 146.4 103.5 93.1 91.3

Dominican Republic 113.6 110.9 110.3 104.8 119.0 123.3 108.4 93.2 89.5

Ecuador 135.7 105.4 80.1 123.9 100.4 79.5 109.5 104.9 100.7

El Salvador 126.3 124.3 116.9 113.3 123.1 120.5 111.4 101.0 97.0

Guatemala 133.2 127.9 121.5 123.5 131.7 131.7 107.9 97.1 92.2

Haiti 121.8 114.5 107.1 93.1 97.7 94.7 130.9 117.1 113.0

Honduras 124.3 124.6 119.6 113.6 125.0 127.6 109.4 99.7 93.7

Mexico 132.7 131.1 127.9 121.8 124.6 125.3 108.9 105.2 102.1

Nicaragua 138.5 139.8 142.6 126.0 146.2 158.6 109.9 95.6 89.9

Panama 149.8 130.6 115.0 139.7 128.3 117.0 107.2 101.8 98.3

Paraguay 125.9 107.5 101.1 116.7 111.5 112.7 107.9 96.4 89.7

Peru 142.4 129.7 124.0 127.7 128.1 125.8 111.5 101.3 98.6

Uruguay 131.5 109.1 95.0 124.1 118.2 113.0 105.9 92.4 84.0

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 113.8 88.4 52.6 104.9 87.6 54.3 108.5 101.0 96.9

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Estimates.

95Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.7
Latin America: terms of trade for goods f.o.b./f.o.b.
(Indices: 2010=100)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America 93.9 97.1 89.5 100.0 108.0 104.5 102.3 97.7 88.4 87.8

Argentina 85.5 95.9 96.6 100.0 110.9 115.7 108.1 105.4 100.8 105.3

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 93.9 99.0 95.2 100.0 118.1 112.3 94.5 79.9 65.0 61.5

Brazil 85.3 88.5 86.2 100.0 107.8 101.5 99.4 96.1 85.5 86.4

Chile 91.7 78.4 82.0 100.0 101.3 94.8 91.9 90.1 86.2 84.8

Colombia 86.2 91.3 86.1 100.0 114.6 108.2 100.5 91.6 69.1 65.4

Costa Rica 104.7 100.8 104.1 100.0 96.3 95.8 96.1 97.0 102.3 105.5

Dominican Republic 100.5 96.0 103.8 100.0 94.7 93.8 91.5 93.3 100.9 104.0

Ecuador … … … 100.0 112.4 112.1 113.2 106.7 80.0 72.5

El Salvador 104.0 94.1 105.9 100.0 97.5 98.0 96.3 99.6 111.3 116.0

Guatemala 95.1 92.6 100.5 100.0 99.1 93.7 91.8 92.3 96.4 97.4

Haiti 111.2 79.9 103.4 100.0 83.0 86.0 80.6 83.1 93.4 95.9

Honduras 97.0 91.1 97.3 100.0 108.4 94.6 88.6 90.4 95.3 96.3

Mexico 103.3 104.6 92.9 100.0 106.8 102.9 102.8 97.6 92.6 92.2

Nicaragua 94.6 90.9 97.9 100.0 106.6 106.5 98.2 100.1 111.7 114.1

Panama 101.9 97.3 101.9 100.0 97.8 98.2 97.7 99.7 103.5 104.1

Paraguay 95.3 102.3 100.0 100.0 102.4 103.4 102.8 103.3 107.5 109.8

Peru 95.0 84.6 82.6 100.0 107.2 105.0 99.0 93.6 87.7 85.8

Uruguay 87.1 94.1 100.5 100.0 102.4 106.3 108.1 112.3 114.5 118.2

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 93.6 115.5 84.1 100.0 120.2 121.4 118.9 111.8 66.1 57.5

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Estimates.

Table A1.8
Latin America and the Caribbean (selected countries): remittances from emigrant workers

(Millions of dollars)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 a

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 1 020 1 097 1 023 939 1 012 1 094 1 182 1 164 1 179 792 b

Brazilc 2 809 2 913 2 224 2 518 2 550 2 191 2 124 2 128 2 459 1 576 b

Colombia 4 430 4 785 4 090 3 996 4 064 3 970 4 401 4 093 4 635 3 942

Costa Rica 596 584 489 505 487 527 561 559 518 249 d

Dominican Republicc … … … 3 683 4 008 4 045 4 262 4 571 4 961 3 949 e

Ecuadorc 3 335 3 083 2 736 2 591 2 672 2 467 2 450 2 462 2 378 1 264 d

El Salvador 3 695 3 742 3 387 3 455 3 628 3 880 3 938 4 133 4 270 3 728

Guatemala 4 128 4 315 3 912 4 127 4 378 4 783 5 105 5 544 6 285 5 881

Haiti 2 510 2 707 2 403 2 526 2 750 2 842 3 093 3 437 3 726 2 924 e

Honduras 1 964 2 021 1 792 1 906 2 025 2 037 2 065 2 157 2 226 1 125 d

Jamaica 26 059 25 145 21 306 21 304 22 803 22 438 22 303 23 647 24 792 20 045 e

Mexico 740 818 768 823 912 1 014 1 078 1 136 1 193 922 e

Nicaragua 198 202 201 274 451 528 519 422 462 387 e

Peru 2 131 2 444 2 409 2 534 2 697 2 788 2 707 2 637 2 725 1 393 d

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of October.
b Figures as of August.
c New methodology according to the sixth edition of the Balance of Payments Manual of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
d Figures as of June.
e Figures as of September.

96 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.9
Latin America and the Caribbean: net resource transfera

(Millions of dollars)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016b

Latin America and
the Caribbean 43 751 -46 263 -16 201 36 195 43 628 27 986 23 333 64 531 19 737 392

Latin Americac 45 418 -43 876 -15 174 39 973 45 708 26 861 26 900 64 561 18 950 -325

Argentina -198 -10 991 -14 023 -14 284 -10 809 -14 397 -10 054 670 2 621 14 724

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) -128 -177 -1 094 -707 923 -1 888 -1 840 -1 242 -891 -1 265

Brazil 56 642 -9 401 37 269 57 870 65 194 38 810 36 374 62 844 18 094 -10 503

Chile -1 352 -15 786 -9 657 -914 218 -4 033 115 -3 318 -1 222 -962

Colombia 2 945 -517 -2 257 588 -2 018 1 626 4 882 11 262 13 529 9 336

Costa Rica 1 929 2 022 -180 589 979 3 065 1 064 258 639 -1 056

Cuba -960 … … … … … … … … …

Dominican Republic 665 2 462 1 248 3 167 2 522 1 079 686 -931 -1 333 -2 762

Ecuador -2 760 -2 418 -1 883 -625 -522 -1 611 1 427 -1 441 -1 076 -561

El Salvador 1 039 1 477 179 -302 79 1 039 267 200 -104 -211

Guatemala 1 159 -2 022 -1 172 -3 026 -3 740 -3 831 -4 250 -3 699 -2 911 -1 070

Haiti 688 374 373 971 573 788 1 022 -47 133 290

Honduras 612 1 531 -429 546 521 33 894 581 214 -324

Mexico 2 423 8 201 -1 921 12 579 21 204 8 679 8 028 8 655 -16 274 -251

Nicaragua 1 124 1 316 895 761 993 777 948 881 901 730

Panama 712 1 732 -664 1 223 2 854 673 1 585 4 136 -222 -850

Paraguay -1 046 -915 -767 -1 036 -603 -1 184 -1 127 -279 -1 569 -1 346

Peru -95 -219 -6 684 3 557 -5 455 7 573 879 -3 277 1 629 -1 823

Uruguay 710 3 045 929 -1 131 2 248 4 344 3 903 1 999 -2 042 -2 422

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) -18 691 -23 589 -15 337 -19 853 -29 453 -14 681 -17 901 -12 691 8 834 …

The Caribbean -1 667 -2 387 -1 027 -3 779 -2 080 1 126 -3 568 -30 787 717

Antigua and Barbuda 333 292 108 146 88 140 191 217 97 38

Bahamas 723 903 909 627 992 1 162 1 096 1 538 1 031 …

Barbados 233 136 182 116 254 251 45 188 39 …

Belize -84 38 22 -107 -60 -32 68 77 -24 …

Dominica 66 108 118 70 67 81 23 58 47 43

Grenada 211 201 160 154 177 157 223 171 194 168

Guyana 137 262 -51 101 341 311 568 471 236 …

Jamaica 937 2 120 430 91 1 277 86 -1 171 -1 886 432 205

Saint Kitts and Nevis 89 183 172 142 129 52 50 36 74 117

Saint Lucia 295 257 125 195 231 158 84 167 54 -5

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 168 204 189 221 163 208 247 205 168 151

Suriname -181 -96 -68 -720 -569 -175 -84 196 514 …

Trinidad and Tobago -4 594 -6 995 -3 324 -4 816 -5 170 -1 273 -4 909 -1 469 -2 077 …

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The net resource transfer is calculated as total net capital income minus the income balance (net payments of profits and interest). 

Total net capital income is the balance on the capital and financial accounts plus errors and omissions, plus loans and the use of  
IMF credit plus exceptional financing. Negative figures indicate resources transferred outside the country.

b Preliminary figures.
c Does not include the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

97Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.10
Latin America and the Caribbean: net foreign direct investmenta

(Millions of dollars)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Latin America and the Caribbean 96 000 103 021 72 157 110 405 153 484 148 447 142 086 142 354 134 795 …

Latin America 92 007 97 049 69 028 107 487 150 927 146 205 141 250 139 605 133 750 …

Argentina 4 969 8 335 3 306 10 368 9 352 14 269 8 932 3 145 11 103 …

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 362 508 426 672 859 1 060 1 750 690 495 …

Brazil 27 518 24 601 36 033 61 689 85 091 81 399 54 240 70 855 61 576 …

Chile 7 453 7 137 4 730 3 916 9 491 7 126 7 117 9 428 4 663 …

Colombia 7 607 7 480 4 530 947 6 228 15 646 8 557 12 426 7 514 …

Costa Rica 1 634 2 072 1 340 1 589 2 328 1 803 2 401 2 553 2 542 …

Dominican Republic 1 667 2 870 2 165 1 622 2 277 3 142 1 990 2 032 2 199 …

Ecuador 627 558 683 165 644 567 727 772 1 321 …

El Salvador 1 455 824 366 -226 218 484 176 311 429 …

Guatemala 720 770 626 829 1 043 1 284 1 329 1 495 1 338 …

Haiti 75 30 55 178 119 156 162 99 106 …

Honduras 926 1 007 505 971 1 012 851 992 1 120 1 113 …

Mexico 24 201 28 224 8 527 12 094 11 685 -2 293 34 199 20 282 22 127 …

Nicaragua 366 608 463 474 929 703 700 804 785 …

Panama 1 777 2 196 1 259 2 363 2 956 3 254 3 612 3 980 4 586 …

Paraguay 202 209 95 216 557 697 252 382 260 …

Peru 5 425 6 188 6 020 8 189 7 518 11 840 9 161 7 789 7 690 …

Uruguay 1 240 2 117 1 512 2 349 2 511 2 539 3 027 2 148 1 293 …

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 3 783 1 316 -3 613 -918 6 110 1 679 1 928 -704 2 609 …

The Caribbean 3 992 5 972 3 129 2 918 2 557 2 242 836 2 749 1 045 …

Antigua and Barbuda 338 159 81 97 65 133 95 149 148 …

Bahamas 746 860 664 872 667 530 388 251 76 …

Barbados 559 689 484 747 758 186 46 791 335 …

Belize 139 167 108 95 95 193 92 138 59 …

Dominica 40 57 42 43 35 59 23 33 34 …

Grenada 157 135 103 60 43 31 113 38 60 …

Guyana 152 178 164 198 247 278 201 238 117 …

Jamaica 751 1 361 480 169 144 -411 -631 -584 -931 …

Saint Kitts and Nevis 134 178 131 116 110 108 136 118 76 …

Saint Lucia 272 161 146 121 81 74 92 91 93 …

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 119 159 110 97 86 115 160 109 120 …

Suriname -247 -231 -93 -248 73 173 188 163 276 …

Trinidad and Tobago 830 2 101 709 549 156 772 -66 1 214 583 …

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Corresponds to direct investment in the reporting economy after deduction of outward direct investment by residents of that country. 

Includes reinvestment of profits.

98 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.11
Latin America and the Caribbean: gross external debta

(Millions of dollars, end-of-period stocks)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 738 254 769 247 834 876 999 251 1 123 667 1 235 162 1 300 637 1 421 974 1 457 798 1 542 753

Latin America 725 174 755 688 820 515 982 308 1 105 723 1 217 197 1 281 411 1 401 701 1 435 937 1 519 411

Argentina Total 125 366 125 859 119 267 134 011 145 154 145 722 141 491 144 801 152 632 188 266

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Total 5 403 5 930 5 801 5 875 6 298 6 625 7 756 8 543 9 445 9 941

Brazil Total 193 159 198 492 198 136 256 804 298 204 327 590 312 517 352 684 334 745 335 361

Chile Total 53 627 63 534 72 617 84 986 99 306 120 446 134 550 149 652 155 656 162 588

Colombia Total 44 553 46 369 53 719 64 738 75 568 78 763 91 976 101 282 110 596 116 378

Costa Rica Total 8 075 8 827 8 276 9 527 11 286 15 381 19 629 21 671 23 903 25 389

Dominican Republic Public 6 556 7 219 8 215 9 947 11 625 12 872 14 919 16 074 16 029 17 162

Ecuador Total 17 445 16 900 13 514 13 914 15 210 15 913 18 788 24 112 27 193 32 725

El Salvador Total 9 349 9 994 9 882 9 698 10 670 12 521 13 238 14 885 15 482 15 908

Guatemala Total 10 909 11 163 11 248 12 026 14 021 15 339 17 307 19 530 20 385 20 775

Haiti Public 1 627 1 921 1 333 354 709 1 173 1 562 1 875 1 985 …

Honduras Total 3 190 3 499 3 365 3 785 4 208 4 861 6 709 7 184 7 462 7 337

Mexico Total 124 995 123 626 160 427 193 971 209 766 225 973 259 535 285 754 297 896 321 153

Nicaragua Public 3 385 3 512 3 661 4 068 4 263 4 481 4 724 4 796 4 804 5 000

Panama Public 8 276 8 477 10 150 10 439 10 858 10 782 12 231 14 352 15 648 16 689

Paraguay Total 2 731 3 220 3 177 3 713 3 970 4 563 4 776 6 126 6 513 7 083

Peru Total 33 239 34 997 35 157 43 674 47 977 59 376 60 823 64 512 68 244 69 746

Uruguay Total 14 864 15 425 17 969 18 425 18 345 24 030 26 518 28 100 28 451 27 057

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Total 58 426 66 727 84 602 102 354 118 285 130 785 132 362 135 767 138 869 …

The Caribbean Public 13 081 13 559 14 361 16 943 17 945 17 965 19 226 20 273 21 861 23 342

Antigua and Barbuda Public 481 436 416 432 467 445 577 560 570 622

Bahamas Public 337 443 767 916 1 045 1 465 1 616 2 095 2 100 2 294

Barbados Public 1 103 1 089 1 321 1 523 1 564 1 490 1 590 1 652 1 610 1 579

Belize Public 973 958 1 017 1 021 1 032 1 029 1 083 1 127 1 177 1 192

Dominica Public 241 234 222 232 238 263 273 278 281 274

Grenada Public 469 481 512 528 535 535 562 578 581 605

Guyana Public 718 834 933 1 043 1 206 1 358 1 246 1 216 1 143 1 140

Jamaica Public 6 123 6 344 6 594 8 390 8 626 8 256 8 310 8 659 10 314 10 225

Saint Kitts and Nevis Public 323 312 325 296 320 317 320 280 210 199

Saint Lucia Public 399 364 373 393 417 435 488 526 457 568

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Public 219 229 262 313 328 329 354 385 378 351

Suriname Public 298 319 269 334 463 567 739 810 876 1 042

Trinidad and Tobago Public 1 398 1 515 1 351 1 522 1 706 1 478 2 068 2 109 2 164 3 251

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Includes debt owed to the International Monetary Fund.

99Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.12
Latin America and the Caribbean: sovereign spreads on EMBI+ and EMBI global
(Basis points to end of period)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America EMBI+ 268 722 328 305 410 317 410 491 584 476

Argentina EMBI+ 410 1 704 660 496 925 991 808 719 438 451

Belize EMBI Global … … … 617 1 391 2 245 807 819 822 1 284

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) EMBI Global … … … … … … 289 277 250 130

Brazil EMBI+ 221 428 192 189 223 142 224 259 523 313

Chile EMBI Global 151 343 95 115 172 116 148 169 253 177

Colombia EMBI+ 195 498 196 172 195 112 166 196 321 239

Dominican Republic EMBI Global … … … 322 597 343 349 381 421 386

Ecuador EMBI Global 614 4 731 769 913 846 826 530 883 1 266 743

El Salvador EMBI Global … … … 302 478 396 389 414 634 478

Jamaica EMBI Global … … … 427 637 711 641 485 469 386

Mexico EMBI+ 149 376 164 149 187 126 155 182 232 220

Panama EMBI+ 184 540 171 162 201 129 199 189 218 168

Paraguay EMBI Global … … … … … … 240 291 338 268

Peru EMBI+ 178 509 165 163 216 114 159 181 246 163

Uruguay EMBI Global 243 685 238 188 213 127 194 208 280 230

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) EMBI+ 506 1 862 1 017 1 044 1 197 773 1 093 2 295 2 658 2 281

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from JPMorgan, Emerging Markets Bond Index Monitor.
a Figures as of October.

Table A1.13
Latin America and the Caribbean: sovereign risk premiums on five-year credit default swaps
(Basis points to end of period)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Argentina 462 4 041 914 602 922 1 442 1 654 2 987 5 393 446

Brazil 103 301 123 111 162 108 194 201 495 297

Chile 32 203 68 84 132 72 80 94 129 89

Colombia 130 309 143 113 156 96 119 141 243 191

Mexico 69 293 134 114 154 98 92 103 170 181

Panama 118 302 134 99 150 98 111 109 182 138

Peru 116 304 124 113 172 97 133 115 188 119

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 452 3 218 1 104 1 016 928 647 1 150 3 155 4 868 4 079

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from Bloomberg.
a Figures as of October.

100 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.14
Latin America and the Caribbean: international bond issuesa

(Millions of dollars)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016b

Total 41 515 19 848 64 750 90 183 91 687 114 241 123 332 133 056 78 606 116 713

National issues 40 976 19 401 63 250 88 657 90 272 111 757 121 518 129 743 75 436 111 933

Argentina 3 256 65 500 3 146 2 449 663 1 025 1 941 3 586 33 083

Bahamas – 100 300 – – – – 300 – –

Barbados – – 450 390 – – – 2 500 320 –

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) – – – – – 500 500 – – –

Brazil 10 608 6 520 25 745 39 305 38 369 50 255 37 262 45 364 7 188 20 481

Chile 250 – 2 773 6 750 6 049 9 443 11 540 13 768 7 650 4 692

Colombia 3 065 1 000 5 450 1 912 6 411 7 459 10 012 9 200 6 400 4 061

Costa Rica – – – – 250 1 250 3 000 1 000 1 000 500

Dominican Republic 605 – – 1 034 750 750 1 800 1 500 3 500 1 870

Ecuador – – – – – – – 2 000 1 500 2 000

El Salvador – – 800 450 654 800 310 800 300 –

Guatemala – 30 – – 150 1 400 1 300 1 100 – 700

Honduras – – – 20 – – 1 000 – – –

Jamaica 1 900 350 750 1 075 694 1 750 1 800 1 800 2 925 364

Mexico 10 296 6 000 16 659 26 882 22 276 28 147 41 729 37 592 30 075 36 039

Panama 670 686 1 323 – 897 1 100 1 350 1 935 1 700 2 200

Paraguay – – – – 100 500 500 1 000 280 600

Peru 1 827 – 2 150 4 693 2 155 7 240 5 840 5 944 6 407 1 960

Suriname – – – – – – – – – 636

Trinidad and Tobago – – 850 – 175 – 550 – – 1 600

Uruguay 999 – 500 – 1 693 500 2 000 2 000 2 605 1 147

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 7 500 4 650 5 000 3 000 7 200 – – – – –

Supranational issues 539 447 1 500 1 526 1 415 2 484 1 814 3 313 3 171 4 780

Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI) – – 500 151 – 250 520 505 521 831

Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) – – – – 175 – – – – –

Foreign Trade Bank of Latin America (BLADEX) – – – – – 400 – – – 73

Development Bank of Latin America (CAF) 539 447 1 000 1 375 1 240 1 834 1 294 2 808 2 650 3 376

Inter-American Investment Corporation – – – – – – – – – 500

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan and Latin Finance.
a Includes sovereign, bank and corporate bonds.
b Figures as of October.

Table A1.15
Latin America and the Caribbean: stock exchange indices
(National indices to end of period, 31 December 2005=100)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Argentina 139 70 150 228 160 185 349 556 757 1 130
Brazil 191 112 205 207 170 182 154 149 130 185
Chile 155 121 182 251 213 219 188 196 187 214
Colombia 112 79 122 163 133 155 137 122 90 101
Costa Rica 217 207 142 118 121 129 190 211 191 252
Ecuador 121 128 107 126 128 135 148 168 161 148
Jamaica 103 77 80 82 91 88 77 73 144 171
Mexico 166 126 180 217 208 246 240 242 241 255
Peru 365 147 295 487 406 430 328 308 205 321
Trinidad and Tobago 92 79 72 78 95 100 111 108 109 113
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 186 172 270 320 574 2 312 13 421 18 925 71 546 162 829

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of information from Bloomberg.
a Figures as of November.

101Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.16
Latin America and the Caribbean: gross international reserves
(Millions of dollars, end-of-period stocks)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbean 459 581 512 727 567 444 655 305 773 632 835 735 830 018 857 438 811 762 829 202

Latin America 448 480 498 906 553 531 639 428 756 688 820 026 813 984 839 356 795 043 812 196

Argentina 45 711 46 198 47 967 52 145 46 376 43 290 30 599 31 443 25 563 37 210 b

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 5 319 7 722 8 580 9 730 12 019 13 927 14 430 15 123 13 056 10 694 b

Brazil 180 334 193 783 238 520 288 575 352 012 373 147 358 808 363 551 356 464 365 556

Chile 16 910 23 162 25 373 27 864 41 979 41 650 41 094 40 447 38 643 39 468

Colombia 20 955 24 041 25 365 28 464 32 303 37 474 43 639 47 328 46 740 46 974 b

Costa Rica 4 114 3 799 4 066 4 627 4 756 6 857 7 331 7 211 7 834 7 556

Dominican Republic 2 946 2 662 3 307 3 765 4 098 3 559 4 701 4 862 5 266 5 453 b

Ecuadorc 3 521 4 473 3 792 2 622 2 958 2 483 4 361 3 949 2 496 4 275 b

El Salvador 2 197 2 544 2 985 2 882 2 503 3 175 2 745 2 693 2 787 3 294 b

Guatemala 4 320 4 659 5 213 5 954 6 188 6 694 7 273 7 333 7 751 9 063 b

Haiti 494 587 733 1 284 1 344 1 337 1 690 1 163 977 1 034 d

Honduras 2 733 2 690 2 174 2 775 2 880 2 629 3 113 3 570 3 874 3 926 e

Mexico 87 211 95 302 99 893 120 587 149 209 167 050 180 200 195 682 177 597 176 852 b

Nicaragua 1 032 1 062 1 490 1 708 1 793 1 778 1 874 2 147 2 353 2 210

Panama 2 094 2 637 3 222 2 561 2 234 2 441 2 775 3 994 3 911 4 109 e

Paraguay 2 462 2 864 3 861 4 168 4 984 4 994 5 871 6 891 6 200 6 924 b

Peru 27 720 31 233 33 175 44 150 48 859 64 049 65 710 62 353 61 537 62 049 b

Uruguay 4 121 6 360 7 987 7 656 10 302 13 605 16 290 17 555 15 634 13 800

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 34 286 43 127 35 830 27 911 29 892 29 890 21 481 22 061 16 361 11 748

The Caribbean 11 101 13 821 13 913 15 877 16 944 15 709 16 034 18 081 16 718 17 007

Antigua and Barbudac 144 138 108 136 147 161 202 297 356 410 d

Bahamas 454 563 816 861 892 812 740 787 808 903 b

Barbados 622 523 563 575 587 630 516 467 434 415 b

Belize 99 156 210 216 242 289 402 483 432 361 b

Dominicac 60 55 64 66 75 92 85 100 125 157 d

Grenadac 110 104 112 103 106 104 135 158 189 195 d

Guyana 313 356 628 780 798 862 777 666 599 610 e

Jamaica 1 906 1 795 1 752 2 979 2 820 1 981 1 818 2 473 2 914 3 027 b

Saint Kitts and Nevisc 96 110 123 157 233 252 291 318 280 343 d

Saint Luciac 151 140 151 184 192 208 168 235 298 311 d

Saint Vincent and the Grenadinesc 86 83 75 111 88 109 133 156 165 169 d

Suriname 401 433 659 639 941 1 008 779 625 330 350 e

Trinidad and Tobago 6 659 9 364 8 652 9 070 9 823 9 201 9 987 11 317 9 788 9 757 b

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of November.
b Figures as of October.
c Net international reserves.
d Figures as of June.
e Figures as of September.

102 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.17
Latin America and the Caribbean: real effective exchange ratesa b

(Indices: 2005=100, average values for the period)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016c d

Latin America and the Caribbeane 95.0 89.9 90.5 85.5 83.8 82.2 81.9 82.7 83.6 85.2

Barbados 98.7 97.7 93.3 89.5 90.5 89.5 89.5 89.9 89.4 88.3

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 101.8 93.4 85.5 89.9 89.8 87.0 81.7 76.4 68.2 63.8

Brazil 82.8 80.4 82.3 72.0 69.2 77.7 83.1 85.8 106.9 104.4

Chile 97.1 97.3 101.6 96.3 95.3 94.0 95.2 105.4 108.8 109.0

Colombia 91.4 87.8 91.8 79.3 79.5 76.5 80.1 84.8 107.3 110.9

Costa Rica 97.4 94.1 92.8 82.4 79.7 76.6 74.1 77.4 73.5 74.6

Dominica 104.6 105.5 107.9 106.4 109.7 109.0 110.9 112.2 110.9 110.5

Dominican Republic 105.0 105.9 110.5 108.9 110.3 112.3 115.8 120.7 124.1 122.3

Ecuador 106.9 108.6 100.9 99.9 102.4 98.4 96.7 93.7 85.1 83.7

El Salvador 100.9 101.7 99.6 101.2 102.4 103.1 104.1 105.3 104.7 104.2

Guatemala 96.4 91.2 94.4 93.5 89.5 88.3 87.2 83.8 77.9 74.1

Honduras 97.5 94.2 87.1 86.1 85.4 83.8 84.8 82.4 81.9 83.4

Jamaica 104.9 99.2 110.8 98.2 96.3 95.3 100.0 109.4 117.9 122.0

Mexico 100.9 103.4 117.9 109.1 109.1 112.6 106.8 108.2 122.4 138.8

Nicaragua 100.4 94.9 103.4 100.8 105.8 103.4 100.1 101.9 102.4 103.8

Panama 105.8 106.5 103.5 103.0 103.9 94.4 92.3 90.6 86.2 85.1

Paraguay 82.1 73.8 81.6 80.1 71.7 73.0 68.5 66.4 67.4 69.1

Peru 102.6 99.5 97.8 94.4 96.6 90.1 90.6 92.7 94.3 96.7

Trinidad and Tobago 94.8 90.7 82.7 79.0 79.6 73.9 70.9 67.3 61.4 61.9

Uruguay 99.3 93.3 91.3 79.9 77.9 76.3 70.8 74.9 78.0 78.5

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 84.3 68.1 52.3 79.1 69.6 58.7 60.3 … … …

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a A country’s overall real effective exchange rate index is calculated by weighting its real bilateral exchange rate indices with each of its trading partners by each

partner’s share in the country’s total trade flows in terms of exports and imports. The extraregional real effective exchange rate index excludes trade with other
Latin American and Caribbean countries.

b Currency depreciates in real effective terms when this index rises and appreciates when it falls.
c Preliminary figures.
d Figures as of September.
e Simple average of the extraregional real effective exchange rate for 18 countries. Does not include countries with multiple exchange rates.

103Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.18
Latin America and the Caribbean: participation rate

(Average annual rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2015 2016a

January to September

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 61.8 61.8 62.1 61.8 61.7 61.7 61.6 61.5 61.5 … …

Argentinac Urban areas 59.5 58.8 59.3 58.9 59.5 59.3 58.9 58.3 57.7d … …

Bahamas Nationwide total … … 73.4 … 72.3 74.6 73.2 73.7 74.3 73.0 76.9e

Barbados Nationwide total 67.8 67.6 67.0 66.6 67.6 66.2 66.7 63.9 65.1 65.2 65.3f

Belize Nationwide total 61.2 59.2 … … … 65.8 64.0 63.6 63.2 63.4 63.7g

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Nationwide total 64.8 64.9 65.1 … 65.8 61.2 63.4 65.9 … … …

Brazilh Nationwide totali 56.9 57.0 56.7 57.1 57.1 | 61.4 61.3 61.0 61.3 61.2 61.4

Chilej Nationwide total 54.9 56.0 55.9 | 58.5 59.8 59.5 59.6 59.8 59.7 59.6 59.4

Colombia Nationwide total 58.3 58.5 61.3 62.7 63.7 64.5 64.2 64.2 64.7 64.3 64.2

Costa Ricah k Nationwide total 57.0 56.7 | 60.4 59.1 60.7 | 62.5 62.2 62.6 61.2 61.7 57.8

Cubal Nationwide total 73.7 74.7 75.4 74.9 76.1 74.2 72.9 71.9 69.1 … …

Dominican Republic Nationwide total 64.3 63.7 61.4 62.6 63.8 64.7 64.2 64.8 64.9 64.4 65.0g

Ecuador Nationwide totall 67.8 67.7 66.3 | 63.7 62.5 63.0 62.9 63.2 66.2 66.3 68.5

El Salvador Nationwide total 62.1 62.7 62.8 62.5 62.7 63.2 63.6 62.8 62.1 … …

Guatemalam Nationwide total 60.1 … … 54.3 | 61.8 65.4 60.6 60.9 60.7 60.4 61.5n

Honduras Nationwide total 50.7 51.0 53.1 53.6 51.9 50.8 53.7 56.0 58.3 … …

Jamaica Nationwide total 64.9 65.4 63.5 62.4 62.3 61.9 63.0 62.8 63.1 63.0 64.8

Mexico Nationwide total 58.8 58.7 58.6 58.4 58.6 59.2 60.3 59.8 59.8 59.6 59.7

Nicaraguak Nationwide total 53.4 53.3 | 66.6 71.2 75.6 76.8 75.8 74.0 … … …

Panama Nationwide total 62.7 63.9 64.1 63.5 61.9 63.4 64.1 64.0 64.2 64.2 64.4o

Paraguay Nationwide total 60.8 61.7 62.9 60.5 60.7 64.3 62.6 61.6 61.6 … …

Peru Metropolitan Lima 68.9 68.1 68.4 70.0 70.0 69.1 68.9 68.4 68.3 68.0 68.3

Trinidad and Tobago Nationwide total 63.5 63.5 62.7 62.1 61.3 61.8 61.3 61.9 60.6 60.8 60.1p

Uruguay Nationwide total 62.5 62.7 63.4 62.9 64.8 64.0 63.6 64.7 63.8 63.6 63.4

Venezuela (Bolivarian
Republic of) Nationwide total 64.9 64.9 65.1 64.6 64.4 63.9 64.3 65.1 63.7 64.4 62.9

q

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a The figures in the last two columns refer to the period January-September.
b The regional series are weighted averages of national data (excluding the Belize and Nicaragua) and include adjustments for lack of information and changes in

methodology. The data relating to the different countries are not comparable owing to differences in coverage and in the definition of the working-age population.
c The National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC) of Argentina does not recognize the data for the period 2007-2015 and has them under review. These

data are therefore preliminary and will be replaced when new official data are published.
d The figures refer to the average from first to three quarters.
e The figures in the last two columns refer to the mesurement for May.
f The figures in the last two columns refer to the first quarter.
g The figures in the last two columns refer to the mesurement for April.
h New measurements have been used since 2012; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
i Up to 2011, the figures refer to six metropolitan areas.
j New measurements have been used since 2010; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
k New measurements have been used since 2009; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
l Up to 2009, urban areas.
m New measurements have been used since 2011; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
n The figures in the last two columns refer to the measurement for May 2015 and March 2016.
o The figures in the last two columns refer to the measurement for August.
p The figures in the last two columns refer to the measurement for March.
q The figures in the last two columns refer to the average January-April

104 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.19
Latin America and the Caribbean: open urban unemploymenta

(Average annual rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016b
Latin America and the Caribbeanc 8.6 8.0 9.2 8.6 7.8 7.4 7.2 7.0 7.4 9.0
Argentinad Urban areas 8.5 7.9 8.7 7.7 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.3 6.5e 8.9 f

Bahamasg Nationwide total 7.9 8.7 14.2 … 15.9 14.4 15.8 14.8 13.4 12.7 h

Guatemalag Nationwide total 7.4 8.1 10.0 10.8 11.2 11.6 11.6 12.3 11.9 9.3 i

Belizeg Nationwide total 8.5 8.2 13.1 12.5 … 15.3 13.2 11.6 10.1 8.0 j

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Urban total 7.7 6.7 6.8 … 3.8 3.2 4.0 3.5 4.4 …

Brazilk Twenty metropolitan areasl 9.3 7.9 8.1 6.7 6.0 | 8.2 8.0 7.8 9.3 12.9

Chilem Nationwide total 7.1 7.8 9.7 | 8.2 7.1 6.4 5.9 6.4 6.2 6.5

Colombiag Municipal capitals 12.2 12.1 13.2 12.7 11.8 11.4 10.7 10.0 9.8 10.3

Colombian Municipal capitals 11.2 11.4 12.4 12.0 11.1 10.8 10.0 9.4 9.2 9.7

Costa Ricao Urban total 4.8 4.8 | 8.5 7.1 7.7 | 9.8 9.1 9.5 9.7 9.7 p

Cuba Nationwide total 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.3 2.7 2.4 …

Dominican Republic Nationwide total 5.1 4.7 5.3 5.0 5.8 6.5 7.1 6.4 5.9 5.7 j

Ecuadorg Urban total 7.4 6.9 8.5 7.6 6.0 4.9 4.7 5.1 5.4 6.7

Ecuadorn Urban total 5.5 5.4 6.9 6.1 5.0 4.2 4.0 4.3 4.7 6.0

El Salvador Urban total 5.8 5.5 7.1 6.8 6.6 6.2 5.6 6.7 6.8 …

Guatemalaq Urban total … … … 4.8 | 3.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.2 4.0 r

Honduras Urban total 4.0 4.1 4.9 6.4 6.8 5.6 6.0 7.5 8.8 …

Jamaicag Nationwide total 9.8 10.6 11.4 | 12.4 12.6 13.9 15.2 13.7 13.5 13.3 p

Jamaical Nationwide total 6.0 6.9 7.5 | 8.0 8.4 9.3 10.3 9.4 9.5 9.1 p

Mexico Urban total 4.0 4.3 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.3 4.7 4.3

Nicaragua Urban total 7.3 8.0 10.5 10.1 6.5 7.6 … … … …

Panamag Urban total 7.8 6.5 7.9 7.7 5.4 4.8 4.7 5.4 5.8 6.4 s

Panaman Urban total 5.8 5.0 6.3 5.8 3.6 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 5.2 s

Paraguay Asuncion and urban areas of Central Departmentt 7.2 7.4 8.2 7.4 6.9 7.9 7.7 7.8 6.5 8.3
u

Peru Metropolitan Lima 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.9 7.7 6.8 5.9 5.9 6.5 6.7

Trinidad and Tobagog Nationwide total 5.6 4.6 5.3 5.9 5.1 5.0 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.8 r

Uruguay Urban total 9.8 8.3 8.2 7.5 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.9 7.8 8.3

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)g Nationwide total 8.4 7.3 7.9 8.7 8.3 8.1 7.8 7.2 7.0 7.5 v

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of household surveys.
a Unemployed population as a percentage of the economically active population.
b Estimate based on data from January to September.
c Weighted average adjusted for lack of information and differences and changes in methodology. The data relating to the different countries are not comparable

owing to differences in coverage and in the definition of the working age population.
d The National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC) of Argentina does not recognize the data for the period 2007-2015 and has them under review. These

data are therefore preliminary and will be replaced when new official data are published.
e The figure refers to average from first to three quarters.
f The figure refer to the average for second and the three quarters.
g Includes hidden unemployement.
h Figures as of May.
i Figures as of first semester.
j Figures as of April.
k New measurements have been used since 2012; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
l Up to 2011, the figures refer to six metropolitan areas.
m New measurements have been used since 2010; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
n Includes an adjustment to the figures for the economically active population to exclude hidden unemployment.
o New measurements have been used since 2009; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
p January-September average.
q Owing to methodological changes, as of 2011 the data are not comparable with the previous series.
r Figures as of March.
s Figures as of August.
t Up to 2009, urban total.
u Figures as of first semester.
v January-April average.

105Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.20
Latin America and the Caribbean: employment ratea

(Average annual rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2015 2016b

January to September

Latin America and the Caribbeanc 57.3 57.5 57.2 57.2 57.4 57.6 57.6 57.6 57.4 … …

Argentinac Urban areas 54.5 54.2 54.2 54.4 55.2 55.0 54.7 54.0 53.9d … …

Bahamas Nationwide total 70.2 69.7 63.0 … 60.6 64.1 61.6 62.8 64.3 64.2 67.1e

Barbados Nationwide total 62.7 62.1 60.3 59.4 60.0 58.5 58.9 56.0 57.7 57.5 59.2f

Belize Nationwide total 56.0 54.3 … … … 55.7 55.7 56.3 56.8 56.6 58.7g

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Nationwide total 61.4 63.1 63.0 … 64.1 59.8 61.6 64.4 … … …

Brazilh Nationwide totali 51.6 52.5 52.1 53.2 53.7 | 56.9 56.9 56.8 56.1 56.1 54.4

Chilej Nationwide total 51.0 51.7 50.5 | 53.7 55.5 55.7 56.0 56.0 56.0 55.8 55.5

Colombiae Nationwide total 51.8 51.9 53.9 55.4 56.8 57.9 58.0 58.4 59.0 58.4 58.0

Costa Ricah k Nationwide total 54.4 53.9 | 55.4 54.8 56.0 | 56.2 56.4 56.6 55.4 55.7 52.3

Cubal Nationwide total 72.4 73.6 74.2 73.0 73.6 71.6 70.5 70.0 67.5 … …

Dominican Republic Nationwide total 54.2 54.7 52.3 53.6 54.5 55.2 54.6 55.4 55.8 55.4 56.4g

Ecuador Nationwide totalm 64.3 63.1 60.7 | 60.1 59.6 60.4 60.3 60.4 63.3 63.5 64.8

El Salvador Nationwide total 58.1 59.0 59.2 58.1 58.6 59.4 59.9 58.4 57.8 … …

Guatemalal Nationwide total 58.6 … … … | 59.2 63.5 58.7 59.1 59.2 58.9 59.6n

Honduras Nationwide total 49.2 49.4 51.5 51.5 49.7 48.9 51.6 53.1 54.0 … …

Jamaica Nationwide total 58.6 58.5 56.3 | 54.6 54.4 53.3 53.4 54.2 54.6 54.5 56.2

Mexico Nationwide total 56.7 56.3 55.4 55.3 55.5 56.3 56.2 56.9 57.2 57.0 57.3

Nicaraguak Nationwide total 48.6 50.1 | 61.3 65.6 71.2 72.3 71.5 69.1 … … …

Panama Nationwide total 58.7 60.3 59.9 59.4 59.1 60.8 61.5 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.8o

Paraguay Nationwide total 57.4 57.0 57.1 57.1 57.3 61.2 59.4 57.9 58.3 … …

Peru Metropolitan Lima 63.0 62.4 62.7 64.5 64.5 64.4 64.8 64.3 63.8 63.4 63.6

Trinidad and Tobago Nationwide total 59.9 60.6 59.4 58.4 58.2 58.8 59.1 59.9 58.9 58.6 57.8p

Uruguay Nationwide total 56.7 57.7 58.5 58.4 60.7 59.9 59.5 60.4 59.0 58.9 58.4

Venezuela (Bolivarian
Republic of) Nationwide total 59.5 60.2 60.0 59.0 59.0 58.7 59.3 60.4 59.2 59.8 58.2

q

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Employed population as a percentage of the working-age population.
b The regional series are weighted averages of national data (excluding Belize and Nicaragua) and include adjustement for lack of information and changes in

methology. These data are therefore preliminary and will be replaced when new official data are published. The data relating to the different countries are not
comparable owing to differences in coverage and in the definition of the working age population.

c The National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC) of Argentina does not recognize the data for the period 2007-2015 and has them under review. These
data are therefore preliminary and will be replaced when new official data are published.

d The figure refers to average from first to three quarters.
e The figures in the last two columns correspond to the mesurement for May.
f The figure in the last two columns refer to the first quarter
g The figures in the last two columns correspond to the mesurement for April.
h New measurements have been used since 2012; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
i Up to 2011, the figures refer to six metropolitan areas.
j New measurements have been used since 2010; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
k New measurements have been used since 2009; the data are not comparable with the previous series.
l Owing to methodological changes, as of 2011 the data are not comparable with the previous series.
m Up to 2009, urban total.
n The figures in the last two columns refer to the measurement for May 2015 and March 2016.
o The figures in the last two columns correspond to the mesurement for August.
p The figures in the last two columns correspond to the mesurement for March.
q The figures in the last two columns correspond to the January-April average.

106 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.21
Latin America: real average wagesa

(Index 2010=100)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016b

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)c 102.2 94.4 96.5 100.0 98.2 99.3 100.3 101.8 108.6 …

Brazild 94.3 96.3 98.5 100.0 101.4 104.9 107.1 108.8 105.3 103.8

Chilee 93.6 93.4 97.9 100.0 102.5 105.8 109.9 111.9 113.9 115.4

Colombiaf 97.6 96.1 97.3 100.0 100.3 101.3 104.0 104.5 105.4 103.8

Costa Ricag 92.8 90.9 97.9 100.0 105.7 107.1 108.5 110.7 115.2 119.7

Cuba 95.8 95.3 99.7 100.0 100.2 100.7 101.2 124.0 143.1 …

El Salvadorh 98.7 95.6 98.9 100.0 97.1 97.3 97.8 98.5 106.3 …

Guatemalag 99.7 97.1 97.2 100.0 100.4 104.4 104.3 106.8 110.4 …

Mexicog 101.7 101.9 100.9 100.0 100.8 101.0 100.9 101.3 102.8 103.8

Nicaraguag 97.2 93.3 98.8 100.0 100.1 100.5 100.7 102.4 105.2 106.4

Panama 94.7 90.9 93.3 100.0 100.1 103.5 103.8 109.5 113.1 118.0i

Paraguay 95.7 95.0 99.4 100.0 102.8 103.5 105.7 107.0 107.5 …

Peruj 97.9 100.0 103.1 100.0 108.4 111.0 114.7 117.9 117.5 119.5

Uruguay 87.1 90.2 96.8 100.0 104.0 108.4 111.7 115.4 117.3 118.9

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 117.4 112.1 105.6 100.0 103.0 109.1 104.3 … … …

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures deflated by the official consumer price index of each country.
b Estimate based on data from January to September.
c Private-sector average wage index.
d Private-sector workers covered by social and labour legislation.
e General index of hourly remuneration.
f Manufacturing.
g Average wage declared by workers registered with and paying into social security.
h Average taxable wage.
i Estimate based on interannual grwoth of average for January-June.
j Payroll workers in the Lima metropolitan area. Until 2010, formal private sector workers in the Lima metropolitan area.

107Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.22
Latin America and the Caribbean: monetary indicators
(Percentage variation with respect to the year-earlier period)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a
Latin America

Argentina Monetary base 29.0 19.1 5.4 25.1 37.1 34.9 30.2 19.7 33.2 28.0

Money (M1) 23.4 16.7 13.0 24.1 32.4 33.3 29.5 26.1 31.6 22.2b

M2 24.5 18.1 5.9 27.6 36.9 32.4 30.9 23.1 33.2 25.3 b

Foreign-currency deposits 27.8 36.4 61.6 35.9 8.7 -22.6 -6.1 51.7 38.5 141.8 b

Bolivia (Plurinational
State of)

Monetary base 48.2 53.8 19.6 32.4 11.6 18.2 10.8 9.5 19.2 9.7 c

Money (M1) 55.2 50.2 9.4 24.1 27.2 18.3 13.5 15.4 9.4 10.6 c

M2 68.1 59.6 18.4 34.6 34.0 31.3 22.6 18.8 18.4 15.3 c

Foreign-currency deposits 11.2 -9.2 20.4 4.7 -12.8 -5.0 -4.1 -3.4 3.7 0.4 c

Brazil Monetary base 20.9 12.5 8.0 17.5 11.0 9.4 5.5 7.2 3.0 3.1

Money (M1) 23.3 11.8 7.4 17.5 6.1 5.9 10.7 4.7 -1.6 -1.7

M2 14.1 30.3 22.1 11.1 21.0 13.4 9.3 11.7 6.8 5.2

Chile Monetary base 20.8 7.0 15.0 13.8 14.8 13.7 16.3 5.3 9.6 10.1

Money (M1) 17.9 11.1 14.1 27.7 10.9 9.1 10.1 12.1 14.3 7.9

M2 20.3 17.7 3.7 5.1 14.7 14.7 9.7 8.7 11.1 10.5

Foreign-currency deposits 11.6 40.7 2.6 8.5 11.8 8.9 18.7 29.0 18.7 8.6

Colombia Monetary base 18.1 14.3 10.3 12.4 15.1 9.5 12.5 16.7 15.0 12.4

Money (M1) 13.5 8.0 9.7 14.7 16.2 6.7 14.3 14.8 10.4 5.5

M2 18.7 14.6 13.2 6.9 14.8 16.9 17.5 12.9 10.1 11.6

Costa Rica Monetary base 25.4 25.7 6.3 10.0 11.7 12.1 14.1 11.7 11.1 10.9

Money (M1) 41.1 21.7 -3.4 9.5 19.2 9.4 11.9 13.0 9.3 20.4

M2 34.9 22.9 1.3 2.6 11.1 13.8 13.0 14.4 9.4 4.2

Foreign-currency deposits 7.2 10.7 36.8 -1.9 -7.1 -1.2 0.1 13.0 1.8 2.0

Dominican Republic Monetary base 18.4 12.3 3.4 6.4 5.8 9.0 3.9 3.3 22.1 9.5

Money (M1) 26.6 11.0 -1.1 17.5 4.9 7.3 12.1 13.6 12.9 14.2

M2 14.2 10.9 7.6 13.5 8.8 12.1 8.0 11.2 10.7 12.6

Foreign-currency deposits 10.7 15.0 4.4 18.9 17.8 18.4 16.1 11.5 11.9 9.6

Ecuador Monetary base … 16.4 18.1 24.1 9.9 16.1 23.3 17.5 10.1 21.9b

Money (M1) … 44.5 38.0 16.1 15.5 14.0 14.8 14.4 10.6 8.2b

M2 … 33.0 22.0 18.6 20.0 17.8 13.4 14.5 6.7 3.3b

El Salvador Monetary base 13.9 8.1 10.8 0.4 -1.3 1.8 4.8 2.8 1.2 3.1

Money (M1) 12.2 8.5 7.6 19.8 10.4 4.4 2.9 4.0 4.9 5.9b

M2 15.0 6.1 0.9 1.6 -2.1 0.5 1.8 0.8 3.7 6.1b

Guatemala Monetary base 17.3 4.1 6.6 8.0 10.1 5.8 9.2 5.8 12.1 9.0

Money (M1) 17.6 3.4 7.6 7.2 9.1 5.8 7.0 5.2 11.9 6.0

M2 11.7 7.3 9.4 8.4 10.6 9.4 9.7 8.1 11.5 8.0

Foreign-currency deposits 4.2 9.9 18.1 11.6 4.9 3.2 11.2 9.4 6.0 4.3

Haiti Monetary base 11.3 16.1 14.2 34.1 18.1 9.2 0.4 -1.0 15.4 29.8d

Money (M1) 3.5 21.4 9.2 26.9 14.4 8.7 11.1 8.7 12.7 2.3d

M2 5.3 13.7 6.9 17.4 11.5 5.7 9.4 8.4 11.9 8.1 d

Foreign-currency deposits 3.2 22.1 14.4 22.5 18.4 6.9 8.2 8.5 18.5 31.9 d

Honduras Monetary base 31.3 24.8 11.6 -13.8 10.7 11.3 4.0 9.7 16.6 12.4 b

Money (M1) 18.4 11.5 2.2 5.2 17.7 2.1 -5.0 8.4 19.0 9.8 b

M2 19.4 9.2 0.8 4.7 17.2 8.7 3.6 8.9 12.8 10.0 b

Foreign-currency deposits 10.5 20.3 -1.0 5.4 7.8 15.3 12.6 7.3 11.2 5.7 b

108 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.22 (continued)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Mexico Monetary base 12.6 12.6 15.9 9.7 9.5 13.9 6.3 13.5 20.1 16.0

Money (M1) 11.6 8.5 11.8 11.2 16.2 13.7 7.5 13.9 16.1 11.8

M2 7.5 13.9 11.5 5.8 12.4 10.7 7.1 11.0 13.5 9.8

Foreign-currency deposits -6.4 2.8 20.7 0.9 3.0 16.8 13.3 26.6 40.0 26.3

Nicaragua Monetary base 18.3 15.2 0.7 24.0 20.5 18.3 6.3 12.9 17.4 13.0

Money (M1) 18.2 32.9 4.4 21.4 24.8 17.6 8.5 16.5 21.0 10.3 b

M2 18.2 32.9 4.4 21.4 24.8 17.6 8.5 16.5 21.0 10.3 b

Foreign-currency deposits 8.0 10.2 5.3 25.8 7.8 21.2 13.6 20.4 16.3 15.8 b

Panama Monetary base 9.6 17.7 11.2 7.5 27.1 12.7 16.0 -1.2 28.5 11.0 b

Money (M1) 29.2 26.5 17.4 19.2 21.5 17.1 6.9 13.6 0.9 0.1 b

M2 22.4 17.1 9.2 11.3 9.9 10.8 6.3 12.4 5.6 6.1 b

Paraguay Monetary base 31.2 27.6 30.7 5.2 5.0 11.8 5.1 8.3 11.3 1.9

Money (M1) 34.4 30.5 6.6 28.7 7.8 8.6 15.6 9.6 11.6 1.5

M2 34.2 38.4 13.3 26.4 14.0 13.7 17.4 10.6 11.2 2.7

Depósitos en moneda extranjera 9.3 21.1 40.1 16.4 13.5 14.9 15.8 29.3 22.3 17.7

Peru Monetary base 25.2 38.2 2.1 24.2 31.3 31.2 21.1 -8.6 -0.9 1.9 b

Money (M1) 30.6 31.3 8.8 28.0 19.7 18.7 14.3 4.9 5.1 4.4

M2 37.7 48.5 -2.2 27.8 18.7 23.2 18.4 2.5 2.9 9.0

Foreign-currency deposits 7.9 11.2 23.1 -0.1 13.8 0.4 16.3 21.4 17.3 11.8

Uruguay Monetary base 28.9 28.6 6.1 12.9 23.1 21.8 15.3 11.0 11.5 13.2

Money (M1) 23.0 22.4 13.1 24.6 19.6 18.4 11.7 6.1 7.1 1.1

M2 22.5 26.1 11.3 25.8 26.0 17.4 12.4 8.7 9.4 10.3

Foreign-currency deposits 2.2 3.1 24.1 2.3 10.7 19.6 14.8 25.8 26.6 23.5

Venezuela (Bolivarian
Republic of)

Monetary base 65.5 39.5 18.3 24.5 27.0 40.8 61.1 86.5 95.2 110.9

Money (M1) 66.8 24.3 28.8 27.5 44.8 62.0 66.1 69.5 85.1 100.5b

M2 60.2 16.9 28.3 18.0 37.6 57.5 65.4 69.1 84.9 100.9b

The Caribbean
Antigua and Barbuda Monetary base 10.0 2.0 -10.5 0.9 20.1 29.4 13.2 20.0 14.4 13.2b

Money (M1) 16.4 6.7 -14.2 -7.3 -6.6 -2.1 3.1 11.5 4.4 11.8b

M2 11.3 7.6 -2.9 -3.1 -1.1 1.7 2.8 3.5 2.5 -0.5b

Foreign-currency deposits 32.0 -0.5 39.9 -45.2 5.8 -12.8 0.9 20.0 17.0 25.7b

Bahamas Monetary base 17.2 6.4 2.0 2.5 26.8 -7.8 2.2 13.8 -1.8 15.0d

Money (M1) 1.5 0.3 -0.2 2.8 6.2 8.6 5.6 8.4 18.7 3.8d

M2 8.5 6.5 2.8 2.8 2.3 1.1 -0.6 0.1 1.5 1.3d

Foreign-currency deposits 17.7 15.9 8.4 0.1 -2.7 11.6 15.8 -1.5 -19.9 -12.8d

Barbados Monetary base 26.8 9.2 -13.9 3.4 7.7 -0.9 10.6 5.8 31.5 22.1c

Money (M1) 11.9 7.7 -5.3 1.7 -0.5 -20.3 5.5 9.4 14.1 18.2d

M2 11.7 9.3 -1.0 -0.8 0.3 -5.7 3.5 1.5 3.4 5.2d

Belize Monetary base 15.1 11.5 11.9 -1.2 8.2 17.5 19.2 18.8 24.6 18.4b

Money (M1) 17.0 9.2 -1.9 -0.9 9.1 24.0 13.7 14.0 14.6 15.1c

Dominica Monetary base 6.5 -0.1 -4.6 9.7 8.5 17.8 -0.0 15.0 19.1 27.3b

Money (M1) 10.1 4.4 -1.3 -1.5 -2.1 9.8 2.5 2.2 7.8 17.5b

M2 10.5 8.2 7.5 3.8 3.2 7.0 4.5 6.5 4.3 6.0b

Foreign-currency deposits -0.6 19.0 15.9 30.2 38.8 25.4 -6.1 13.5 1.3 -8.9b

Grenada Monetary base 9.2 3.5 -8.5 6.0 7.2 4.7 5.4 21.1 6.1 5.0b

Money (M1) 7.1 3.1 -12.9 3.8 -7.3 2.9 5.4 24.1 20.6 12.8b

M2 5.2 8.1 1.0 3.4 0.4 1.8 3.0 5.2 3.7 2.0b

Foreign-currency deposits 26.0 2.7 17.4 -3.9 -5.5 5.5 -18.8 7.8 17.4 45.7b

Guyana Monetary base 0.8 16.5 10.6 17.7 17.4 15.2 6.6 2.5 14.3 13.4b

Money (M1) 20.5 18.6 8.2 12.9 21.9 16.1 6.7 10.1 7.9 5.5b

109Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.22 (concluded)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Jamaica Monetary base 15.1 9.5 22.8 5.5 5.3 6.3 6.3 5.9 9.9 15.7

Money (M1) 18.8 9.1 7.6 7.0 7.8 4.7 5.9 5.0 15.7 18.0c

M2 14.3 7.9 4.4 6.1 5.6 3.3 6.4 2.6 9.9 13.1c

Foreign-currency deposits 18.2 10.9 17.5 -0.9 -4.8 6.8 28.5 9.2 15.6 21.5c

Saint Kitts and Nevis Monetary base 15.7 7.3 48.3 -3.2 36.1 13.7 22.2 10.5 -14.5 16.7b

Money (M1) 17.4 7.2 9.2 16.8 28.6 18.2 12.3 1.6 10.8 2.3b

M2 11.9 10.3 10.2 9.4 10.7 8.8 6.4 6.4 5.9 1.9b

Foreign-currency deposits 16.4 -9.2 -7.0 -9.0 -1.0 6.4 35.6 46.4 16.3 -6.5b

Saint Lucia Monetary base 14.4 10.2 8.5 3.6 16.3 4.2 8.0 8.0 25.2 4.8b

Money (M1) 5.0 7.1 -2.4 -4.3 4.0 3.2 2.2 7.1 3.0 3.6b

M2 11.3 10.7 4.1 0.2 4.9 3.7 3.5 -1.0 1.6 2.6b

Foreign-currency deposits 47.8 8.9 9.3 -13.2 16.4 14.0 -10.1 45.0 20.1 18.6b

Saint Vincent and
the Grenadines

Monetary base 4.5 2.0 -3.2 11.9 0.8 11.8 26.2 16.9 8.3 17.2b

Money (M1) 6.8 -1.4 -8.3 -0.5 -3.9 -0.4 9.6 5.8 8.6 8.6b

M2 9.5 1.9 0.8 2.2 1.9 1.2 8.6 8.1 5.6 4.4b

Foreign-currency deposits 102.1 1.5 -6.5 -7.7 30.8 -7.3 29.2 15.6 17.6 13.2b

Suriname Monetary base 39.7 30.2 22.1 13.0 3.2 27.0 13.8 -7.2 -6.2 34.3

Money (M1) 26.7 21.3 26.3 16.7 5.3 17.0 11.3 5.4 -5.1 16.1b

M2 30.2 21.0 25.1 18.2 7.0 20.0 17.7 8.1 -2.8 11.5b

Foreign-currency deposits 25.7 24.3 12.0 7.9 39.1 13.6 10.8 11.4 9.9 77.3b

Trinidad and Tobago Monetary base 19.0 32.3 37.6 24.7 14.1 15.4 19.5 8.0 -7.9 -7.7c

Money (M1) 7.6 17.6 24.0 25.5 17.2 15.4 19.2 19.8 0.0 0.8c

M2 13.3 17.2 17.6 17.9 8.4 12.0 11.8 11.6 3.8 3.0c

Foreign-currency deposits 36.4 21.1 32.2 7.9 -4.0 4.7 12.6 -5.6 0.8 …

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of September.
b Figures as of August.
c Figures as of July.
d Figures as of June.

110 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.23
Latin America and the Caribbean: domestic credit
(Percentage variation with respect to the year-earlier period)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America

Argentina 1.7 23.9 2.3 51.3 59.5 33.0 40.8 24.7 36.2 27.8b

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 6.5 7.5 10.9 13.0 18.8 22.7 21.6 17.6 16.7 18.8c

Brazil 20.1 15.8 11.3 18.0 17.6 16.8 11.9 9.5 9.0 9.8b

Chile 15.6 18.4 6.6 -0.1 12.1 15.1 9.3 7.6 8.4 9.9d

Colombia 15.4 15.7 14.4 25.9 19.0 15.7 13.8 12.2 16.6 9.7e

Costa Rica 22.1 21.1 19.1 4.6 12.4 11.7 9.2 19.9 15.5 13.6
Dominican Republic 10.7 17.4 12.3 7.5 9.5 12.1 12.4 11.6 14.9 15.4
Ecuador 18.2 1.7 20.8 33.6 31.5 21.5 16.7 16.2 10.1 2.2b

El Salvador 12.4 11.3 2.4 2.2 3.5 9.6 5.5 9.5 7.3 8.7
Guatemala 13.8 10.4 5.2 5.6 15.2 11.3 12.6 12.0 12.0 6.8
Haiti 0.3 7.8 9.7 -23.0 -17.1 11.4 70.0 30.4 18.2 10.7e

Honduras 49.0 27.1 6.7 10.0 10.8 18.0 9.6 6.8 7.9 5.0
Mexico 21.6 8.7 16.7 10.6 11.3 10.7 9.4 9.8 12.3 13.7e

Nicaragua 11.4 16.7 -1.2 -4.6 -6.2 21.6 21.4 11.3 13.4 13.4
Panama 10.7 15.9 1.2 9.5 18.8 18.1 12.9 15.4 6.4 10.5
Paraguay 11.0 33.5 12.7 36.3 25.5 28.4 20.8 12.0 26.0 9.4
Peru 38.0 9.4 9.9 24.1 12.0 9.6 6.6 18.6 14.2 12.5
Uruguay … … … 3.9 24.7 19.4 16.5 18.6 12.9 41.1b

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)f 51.6 22.0 28.4 13.7 36.0 56.1 61.9 63.8 74.5 92.0b

The Caribbean
Antigua and Barbuda 17.3 12.5 19.9 0.6 -3.8 -3.0 -4.9 -0.4 -5.9 -13.9b

Bahamas 4.8 7.5 5.3 3.4 0.8 4.0 1.9 -0.0 0.7 0.8e

Barbados 8.2 10.1 6.4 -0.5 -0.9 6.6 8.0 2.3 3.2 9.2g

Belize 13.7 8.9 5.7 -0.4 -1.6 0.4 -2.6 -0.6 8.9 22.2b

Dominica -9.3 5.0 8.5 12.5 13.7 7.6 7.7 1.7 -1.8 -20.7b

Grenada 15.4 13.1 8.9 3.9 2.6 5.0 -2.1 -9.0 -10.2 -11.9b

Guyana 28.9 15.8 4.5 -0.8 34.5 40.1 26.3 16.0 11.3 13.8b

Jamaica 12.4 16.3 15.0 -3.4 -4.1 11.7 16.0 14.2 -2.2 1.7d

Saint Kitts and Nevis 9.9 3.0 6.2 6.3 0.2 -9.0 -20.9 -18.7 -2.3 -3.5b

Saint Lucia 29.6 21.1 4.6 -0.3 2.9 6.6 5.4 -3.1 -12.2 -6.2b

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 16.5 9.5 7.1 1.5 -7.2 -1.0 6.4 3.5 5.4 1.3b

Suriname 20.7 18.5 16.9 21.4 20.8 10.3 23.5 21.5 23.5 43.1b

Trinidad and Tobago 90.1 6.5 35.5 36.6 9.3 7.9 -20.4 -23.8 3.2 35.1b

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of September.
b Figures as of August.
c Figures as of March.
d Figures as of July.
e Figures as of June.
f Credit granted by the commercial and universal banks.
g Figures as of May.

111Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.24
Latin America and the Caribbean: monetary policy rates
(Average rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a
Latin America

Argentina 9.1 11.3 14.0 12.3 11.8 12.8 14.6 26.7 27.0 29.7b

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 6.0 9.0 7.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 5.1 2.7 2.5b

Brazil 12.0 12.4 10.1 9.9 11.8 8.5 8.4 11.0 13.6 14.2

Chile 5.3 7.2 1.8 1.5 4.8 5.0 4.9 3.7 3.1 3.5

Colombia 8.8 9.8 5.8 3.2 4.0 4.9 3.4 3.9 4.7 7.0

Costa Rica 6.0 8.0 9.6 8.1 5.6 5.0 4.4 4.9 3.5 1.8

Dominican Republic 7.3 9.0 5.1 4.2 6.4 5.8 5.3 6.3 5.4 5.1

Guatemala 5.5 6.9 5.5 4.5 4.9 5.2 5.1 4.6 3.3 3.0b

Haiti 11.6 6.9 6.2 5.0 3.2 3.0 3.0 4.8 12.3 15.0b

Honduras 6.3 8.4 4.9 4.5 4.8 6.6 7.0 7.0 6.5 5.8b

Mexico 7.2 7.9 5.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.9 3.2 3.0 4.1

Paraguay 6.0 5.9 2.1 2.2 7.9 6.0 5.5 6.7 6.1 5.8

Peru 4.7 5.9 3.3 2.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 3.8 3.4 4.2

Uruguayc … 7.4 8.5 6.3 7.5 8.8 9.3 … … …

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 9.8 12.3 8.1 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.4 6.2 6.5d

The Caribbean

Antigua and Barbuda 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Bahamas 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5b

Barbados 12.0 11.8 7.9 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0b

Belize 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0b

Dominica 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Grenada 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Guyana 6.5 6.6 6.9 6.4 5.4 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0b

Jamaica 11.7 14.1 14.8 9.0 6.6 6.3 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.2d

Saint Kitts and Nevis 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Saint Lucia 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5b

Trinidad and Tobago 8.0 8.4 7.5 4.7 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 4.1 4.8

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of November.
b Figures as of October.
c As of June 2013, the interest rate was no longer used as an instrument of monetary policy.
d Figures as of August.

112 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.25
Latin America and the Caribbean: representative lending rates
(Average rates)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America
Argentinab 14.0 19.8 21.3 15.2 17.7 19.3 21.6 29.3 28.2 34.4
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)c 8.3 8.9 8.5 5.2 6.3 6.7 7.0 6.5 6.4 6.2
Brazild 51.0 54.1 47.5 42.9 44.7 39.6 38.8 44.6 49.1 53.1
Chilee 13.6 15.2 12.9 11.8 12.4 13.5 13.2 10.8 9.3 10.3
Colombiaf 17.9 19.6 15.6 12.4 12.8 13.7 12.2 12.1 12.1 14.7
Costa Ricag 17.3 16.7 21.6 19.8 18.1 19.7 17.4 16.6 15.9 14.7
Dominican Republich … … … … … 15.5 13.6 13.9 14.9 15.1
Ecuadori 10.1 9.8 9.2 9.0 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.8
El Salvadorj 7.8 7.9 9.3 7.6 6.0 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.2 6.3
Guatemalag 12.8 13.4 13.8 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.8 13.2 13.1
Haitik 31.2 23.3 21.6 20.7 19.8 19.4 18.9 18.6 18.8 19.8
Hondurasg 16.6 17.9 19.4 18.9 18.6 18.4 20.1 20.6 20.7 19.5l

Mexicom … … … … 29.9 28.6 27.9 28.6 28.5 26.4n

Nicaraguao 13.0 13.2 14.0 13.3 10.8 12.0 15.0 13.5 12.0 11.5
Panamap 8.3 8.2 8.3 7.9 7.3 7.0 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.6l

Paraguayq 12.8 13.5 14.6 12.5 16.9 16.6 16.6 15.7 14.4 15.9l

Perur 22.9 23.7 21.0 19.0 18.7 19.2 18.1 15.7 16.1 16.3
Uruguays 10.0 13.1 16.6 12.0 11.0 12.0 13.3 17.2 17.0 17.8
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)t 16.7 22.8 20.6 18.0 17.4 16.2 15.6 17.2 20.0 21.3
The Caribbean
Antigua and Barbudah 10.3 10.1 9.5 10.2 10.1 9.4 9.4 9.6 8.7 9.2l

Bahamasu 10.6 11.0 10.6 11.0 11.0 10.9 11.2 11.8 12.3 12.4l

Barbadosh 9.6 9.3 8.8 8.3 8.1 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.9 6.7l

Belizev 14.3 14.1 14.1 13.9 13.3 12.3 11.5 10.9 10.3 9.9l

Dominicah 9.2 9.4 10.0 9.4 8.7 8.9 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.3l

Grenadah 9.7 9.4 10.7 10.3 10.4 9.5 9.1 9.1 8.8 8.5l

Guyanah 14.1 13.9 14.0 15.2 14.7 14.0 12.1 11.1 10.8 10.8l

Jamaicah 21.6 21.4 21.5 20.4 20.0 18.6 17.7 17.2 17.0 16.6l

Saint Kitts and Nevish 9.3 8.6 8.6 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.4 8.8 8.5 8.4l

Saint Luciah 9.7 9.3 9.5 9.5 9.2 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.2l

Saint Vincent and the Grenadinesh 9.6 9.5 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.1l

Surinamew 13.8 12.0 11.7 11.7 11.8 11.7 12.0 12.3 12.6 13.3l

Trinidad and Tobagoh 11.8 12.4 12.0 9.5 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.7 8.3 9.1

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Figures as of October.
b Local-currency loans to the non-financial private sector, at fixed or renegotiable rates, signature loans of up to 89 days.
c Nominal local-currency rate for 60-91-day operations.
d Interest rate on total consumer credit.
e Non-adjustable 90-360 day operations.
f Weighted average of consumer, prime, ordinary and treasury lending rates for the working days of the month.
g Weighted average of the system lending rates in local currency.
h Business credit, 30-367 days.
i Effective benchmark lending rate for the corporate commercial segment.
j Basic lending rate for up to one year.
k Average of minimum and maximum lending rates.
l Figures as of September.
m Average interest rate for credit cards from commercial banks and average interest rate for mortgage loans.
n Figures as of August.
o Weighted average of short-term lending rates in local currency.
p Interest rate on one-year trade credit.
q Commercial lending rate, local currency.
r Market lending rate, average for transactions conducted in the last 30 business days.
s Average rate for loan operations for the six major commercial banks.
t Weighted average of lending rates.
u Weighted average of lending and overdraft rates.
v Rate for personal and business loans, residential and other construction loans; weighted average.
w Average of lending rates.

113Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.26
Latin America and the Caribbean: consumer prices
(12-month percentage variation)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 6.3 8.3 4.6 6.5 6.8 5.7 7.5 9.4 16.5 …

Latin America and the Caribbeanc 5.6 7.0 3.5 5.4 5.8 4.9 5.0 6.3 7.9 8.4

Latin America

Argentina 8.5 7.2 7.7 10.9 9.5 10.8 10.9 23.9 27.5 42.4

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 11.7 11.9 0.3 7.2 6.9 4.5 6.5 5.2 3.0 3.5

Brazil 4.5 5.9 4.3 5.9 6.5 5.8 5.9 6.4 10.7 8.5

Chile 7.8 7.1 -1.4 3.0 4.4 1.5 3.0 4.6 4.4 3.1

Colombia 5.7 7.7 2.0 3.2 3.7 2.4 1.9 3.7 6.8 7.3

Costa Rica 10.8 13.9 4.0 5.8 4.7 4.5 3.7 5.1 -0.8 0.4

Cubad 10.6 -0.1 -0.1 1.5 1.3 2.0 0.0 2.1 2.8 -0.8

Dominican Republic 8.9 4.5 5.7 6.3 7.8 3.9 3.9 1.6 2.3 1.4

Ecuador 3.3 8.8 4.3 3.3 5.4 4.2 2.7 3.7 3.4 1.3

El Salvador 4.9 5.5 -0.2 2.1 5.1 0.8 0.8 0.5 1.0 1.0

Guatemala 8.7 9.4 -0.3 5.4 6.2 3.4 4.4 2.9 3.1 4.6

Haiti 9.9 10.1 2.0 6.2 8.3 7.6 3.4 6.4 12.5 12.5

Honduras 8.9 10.8 3.0 6.5 5.6 5.4 4.9 5.8 2.4 2.9

Mexico 3.8 6.5 3.6 4.4 3.8 3.6 4.0 4.1 2.1 3.0

Nicaragua 16.2 12.7 1.8 9.1 8.6 7.1 5.4 6.4 2.9 3.5

Panama 6.4 6.8 1.9 4.9 6.3 4.6 3.7 1.0 0.3 1.2

Paraguay 6.0 7.5 1.9 7.2 4.9 4.0 3.7 4.2 3.1 3.5

Peru 3.9 6.7 0.2 2.1 4.7 2.6 2.9 3.2 4.4 3.1

Uruguay 8.5 9.2 5.9 6.9 8.6 7.5 8.5 8.3 9.4 8.9

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)e 22.5 31.9 25.1 27.2 27.6 20.1 56.2 68.5 180.9 …

The Caribbean

Antigua and Barbuda 5.2 0.7 2.4 2.9 4.0 1.8 1.1 1.3 0.9 -0.5f

Bahamas 2.8 4.5 1.3 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.2 2.0 -0.3f

Barbados 4.7 7.3 4.4 6.5 9.6 2.4 1.1 2.3 -2.5 1.3g

Belize 4.1 4.4 -0.4 0.0 2.6 0.8 1.6 -0.2 -0.6 0.7

Dominica 6.0 2.0 3.2 0.3 1.9 1.3 -0.4 0.5 -0.5 -0.4f

Grenada 7.4 5.2 -2.3 4.2 3.5 1.8 -1.7 -0.2 1.1 1.9f

Guyana 14.1 6.4 3.6 4.5 3.3 3.4 0.9 1.2 -1.8 0.9

Jamaica 16.8 16.9 10.2 11.8 6.0 8.0 9.7 6.2 3.7 1.8

Saint Kitts and Nevis 2.9 6.5 1.2 4.3 2.0 0.5 0.6 -0.5 -2.4 -3.1f

Saint Lucia 6.8 3.4 -3.1 4.2 4.8 5.0 -0.7 3.7 -2.6 -4.1f

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 8.3 8.7 -1.6 0.9 4.7 1.0 0.0 0.1 -2.1 0.9f

Suriname 8.3 9.4 1.3 10.3 15.3 4.4 0.6 3.9 25.2 77.1

Trinidad and Tobago 7.6 14.5 1.3 13.4 5.3 7.2 5.6 8.5 1.5 3.0

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Twelve-month variation to September 2016.
b Weighted average.
c Weighted average, does not include the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
d Refers to national-currency markets.
e Up to 2008, national consumer price index.
f Twelve-month variation to June 2016.
g Twelve-month variation to May 2016.

114 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.27
Latin America and the Caribbean: fiscal balances
(Percentages of GDP)

Primary balance Overall balance

2013 2014 2015 2016a 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb -0.7 -0.4 -0.3 -0.3 -2.9 -2.7 -2.7 -2.8

Latin Americac -0.9 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -2.6 -2.8 -3.0 -3.0

Argentina -1.3 -2.3 -1.9 -2.7 -2.5 -4.2 -3.8 -5.0

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)d 2.0 -1.7 -3.6 … 1.4 -2.5 -4.5 …

Brazil 1.5 -0.3 -1.9 -2.8 -2.6 -5.1 -9.2 -7.9

Chile -0.0 -1.0 -1.5 -2.3 -0.6 -1.6 -2.2 -3.0

Colombia -0.1 -0.4 -0.8 -0.7 -2.3 -2.4 -3.0 -3.9

Costa Rica -2.8 -3.1 -3.0 -2.6 -5.4 -5.7 -5.8 -5.5

Cuba … … … … 1.9 0.6 -0.4 …

Dominican Republic -0.4 -0.1 0.3 0.2 -2.7 -2.6 -2.4 -2.7

Ecuador -4.5 -4.9 -2.0 … -5.7 -6.3 -3.8 …

El Salvador 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.4 -1.8 -1.6 -1.1 -0.2

Guatemala -0.6 -0.4 0.1 -0.1 -2.1 -1.9 -1.4 -1.6

Haiti -1.0 -0.5 0.3 0.8 -1.4 -0.9 0.1 0.6

Honduras -5.8 -2.1 -0.6 -0.3 -7.9 -4.4 -3.0 -3.2

Mexicoe -0.5 -1.2 -1.3 -0.4 -2.3 -3.2 -3.5 -2.9

Nicaragua 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 -0.3 -0.6 -0.9

Panama -1.9 -2.3 -2.1 -0.8 -3.8 -4.0 -3.9 -2.9

Paraguay -1.4 -0.7 -1.2 -0.7 -1.7 -1.1 -1.8 -1.5

Perud 1.8 0.8 -1.2 -1.8 0.7 -0.3 -2.2 -2.9

Uruguay 0.9 -0.1 -0.5 -0.5 -1.5 -2.3 -2.8 -3.0

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) … … … … … … … …

The Caribbeanf -0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 -4.0 -2.7 -2.5 -2.5

Antigua and Barbuda -2.4 -0.1 4.6 2.5 -4.5 -2.7 2.1 0.0

Bahamasg -3.1 -1.7 0.2 1.9 -5.6 -4.4 -3.0 -1.1

Barbadosh i -4.1 0.7 0.1 -0.4 -11.2 -6.9 -7.5 -8.7

Belizeh 0.9 -1.2 -4.7 1.0 -1.7 -3.8 -7.3 -1.7

Dominica -7.4 0.4 0.0 -0.5 -9.4 -1.4 -1.8 -2.3

Grenada -3.4 -1.2 2.2 3.7 -6.5 -4.7 -1.2 0.0

Guyana -3.4 -4.5 -0.4 -3.7 -4.4 -5.5 -1.4 -4.6

Jamaicah 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.0 0.1 -0.5 -0.3 -1.0

Saint Kitts and Nevis 17.0 13.9 6.7 4.6 13.2 10.5 4.7 3.1

Saint Lucia -3.0 0.2 1.4 1.6 -6.8 -3.7 -2.4 -2.4

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines -3.7 -1.8 -0.7 -0.2 -6.2 -4.1 -2.9 -2.3

Surinamej -3.2 -3.8 -7.7 -6.4 -6.0 -5.7 -10.0 -7.7

Trinidad and Tobagok -1.4 -0.8 0.4 -2.5 -3.0 -2.5 -1.5 -4.2

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures established on the basis of information from official budgets and estimates.
b Simple averages for the 33 countries reported. Coverage corresponds to central government.
c Simple averages for 17 countries. Does not include Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Cuba or Plurinational State of Bolivia.
d General government.
e Federal public sector.
f Simple averages.
g Fiscal years, from 1 July to 30 June.
h Fiscal years, from 1 April to 31 March.
i Non-financial public sector.
j Includes statistical discrepancy.
k Fiscal years, from 1 October to 30 September.

115Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.28
Latin America and the Caribbean: central government revenues composition
(Percentages of GDP)

Total revenue Tax revenue

2013 2014 2015 2016a 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.9 17.8 18.0 18.3 18.1

Latin Americac 17.9 17.8 17.8 17.6 14.8 14.8 15.1 14.9

Argentina 19.9 20.6 20.7 19.5 17.5 17.3 17.6 16.6

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)d 36.7 37.7 36.1 … 21.7 22.3 23.2 …

Brazil 22.2 21.5 21.1 20.7 19.7 19.2 19.2 18.4

Chile 21.0 20.6 21.4 21.1 18.2 18.0 19.1 18.8

Colombia 16.9 16.6 16.1 14.8 14.2 14.3 14.5 14.0

Costa Rica 14.3 14.1 14.4 14.5 13.5 13.3 13.6 13.7

Cuba 43.1 31.3 34.2 … 22.3 19.4 … …

Dominican Republic 14.4 14.8 14.5 14.1 13.7 13.8 13.5 13.0

Ecuador 21.4 19.9 20.3 … 14.4 14.1 15.6 …

El Salvador 16.3 15.8 16.0 16.4 15.4 15.1 15.2 15.6

Guatemala 11.6 11.5 10.8 11.0 11.0 10.8 10.2 10.3

Haiti 13.3 13.1 13.5 14.1 12.2 12.0 13.2 13.5

Honduras 17.0 18.7 19.5 19.4 15.1 16.7 17.7 17.7

Mexicoe 23.6 23.1 23.4 24.3 9.7 10.5 13.0 13.5

Nicaragua 17.4 17.6 17.8 18.3 15.2 15.4 15.7 15.9

Panama 15.4 14.4 13.9 13.9 10.8 10.2 9.7 9.9

Paraguay 17.1 17.9 18.8 18.3 13.1 14.4 14.3 13.9

Perud 22.4 22.3 20.3 19.4 19.0 19.2 17.5 16.9

Uruguay 20.7 20.0 19.6 19.7 18.2 17.7 17.6 17.7

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) … … … … … … … …

The Caribbeanf 26.5 27.4 27.5 28.1 21.1 21.8 22.1 21.8

Antigua and Barbuda 18.6 19.8 23.8 24.4 17.2 16.6 17.0 17.2

Bahamasg 17.0 19.7 21.3 23.6 14.6 17.4 19.2 20.5

Barbadosh i 27.3 28.8 29.2 30.9 25.2 26.7 27.5 29.1

Belizeh 29.0 29.3 28.1 29.2 23.3 24.7 24.2 25.1

Dominica 27.9 31.8 31.0 33.4 22.1 22.1 23.6 24.3

Grenada 20.6 24.5 24.8 27.8 18.4 19.4 20.0 18.9

Guyana 23.6 23.6 25.8 26.5 20.6 21.4 21.9 21.0

Jamaicah 27.8 26.6 27.8 28.1 24.1 24.0 25.2 25.8

Saint Kitts and Nevis 46.2 43.4 39.8 … 19.8 20.7 21.5 …

Saint Lucia 24.8 25.7 26.2 … 22.9 22.9 23.6 …

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 26.9 28.2 27.8 29.9 21.6 23.8 24.2 …

Suriname 23.3 21.7 19.3 18.9 18.5 16.5 15.4 14.6

Trinidad and Tobagoj 31.0 33.4 32.0 26.0 26.2 27.1 23.6 16.9

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures established on the basis of information from official budgets and estimates.
b Simple averages for the 33 countries reported.
c Simple averages for 17 countries. Does not include Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Cuba or Plurinational State of Bolivia.
d General government.
e Federal public sector.
f Simple averages.
g Fiscal years, from 1 July to 30 June.
h Fiscal years, from 1 April to 31 March.
i Non-financial public sector.
j Fiscal years, from 1 October to 30 September.

116 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.29
Latin America and the Caribbean: central government expenditure composition
(Percentages of GDP)

Total expenditure Interest payments on public debt Capital expenditure

2013 2014 2015 2016a 2013 2014 2015 2016a 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 25.6 25.4 25.5 25.6 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 5.2 5.0 4.5 4.5

Latin Americac 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5

Argentina 22.4 24.8 24.5 24.5 1.2 1.9 1.8 2.4 2.8 4.2 2.7 2.1

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)d 35.4 40.2 40.6 … 0.6 0.8 0.9 … 13.5 16.6 13.8 …

Brazil 24.8 26.6 30.3 28.5 4.1 4.8 7.3 5.1 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.9

Chile 21.6 22.3 23.6 24.1 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 3.7 3.8 4.3 4.2

Colombia 19.2 19.0 19.2 18.7 2.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 1.9

Costa Rica 19.6 19.7 20.2 19.9 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.8 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8

Cuba 41.1 30.7 34.6 … … … … … 7.4 3.1 4.0 …

Dominican Republic 17.1 17.3 16.9 16.8 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.3 2.7 2.8 2.3

Ecuador 27.2 26.2 24.1 … 1.2 1.4 1.8 … 12.2 11.5 9.6 …

El Salvador 18.1 17.4 17.1 16.7 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4

Guatemala 13.8 13.4 12.3 12.6 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.5 3.0 2.9 2.2 2.4

Haiti 14.5 13.4 12.6 12.9 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 3.7 1.9 1.4 1.2

Honduras 24.9 23.1 22.6 22.6 2.1 2.3 2.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 4.7 5.7

Mexicoe 26.0 26.3 26.9 27.2 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.5 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.9

Nicaragua 17.3 17.9 18.4 19.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 3.8 4.0 4.5 5.2

Panama 19.2 18.4 17.7 16.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.1 8.5 6.8 6.2 4.6

Paraguay 18.8 19.0 20.6 19.8 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 3.8 3.6 4.1 2.7

Perud 21.7 22.6 22.5 22.3 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 6.2 6.0 5.5 5.3

Uruguay 22.2 22.3 22.4 22.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) … … … … … … … … … … … …

The Caribbeanf 30.3 30.1 29.9 30.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.7 5.4 4.7 5.2

Antigua and Barbuda 23.0 22.5 21.7 24.4 2.1 2.6 2.5 2.5 1.3 1.6 1.4 5.1

Bahamasg 22.7 24.2 24.3 24.7 2.5 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.0 2.6

Barbadosh i 38.5 35.7 36.6 39.6 7.1 7.6 7.6 8.3 2.0 2.2 2.6 4.2

Belizeh 30.7 33.1 35.4 30.9 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.7 6.8 8.6 9.8 5.1

Dominica 37.4 33.2 32.8 35.7 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.8 11.7 8.5 5.9 8.0

Grenada 27.1 29.2 26.0 27.8 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.7 6.8 9.2 8.4 10.5

Guyana 28.0 29.1 27.3 31.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 8.2 8.0 4.7 7.3

Jamaicah 27.6 27.1 28.1 29.1 7.7 8.1 7.7 8.0 2.6 1.5 2.0 2.5

Saint Kitts and Nevis 33.0 32.8 35.1 … 3.8 3.4 2.0 1.4 6.7 5.7 7.1 …

Saint Lucia 31.6 29.4 28.6 … 3.8 3.9 3.8 4.0 7.8 5.7 5.7 …

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 33.0 32.3 30.7 32.2 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 7.8 6.4 5.0 4.4

Suriname 27.8 26.4 28.5 26.6 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.3 4.5 5.2 2.5 2.0

Trinidad and Tobagoj 34.0 36.0 33.5 30.3 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 5.4 4.8 4.3 2.7

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures established on the basis of information from official budgets and estimates.
b Simple averages for the 33 countries reported.
c Simple averages for 17 countries. Does not include Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Cuba or Plurinational State of Bolivia.
d General government.
e Federal public-sector.
f Simple averages.
g Fiscal years, from 1 July to 30 June.
h Fiscal years, from 1 April to 31 March.
i Non-financial public sector.
j Fiscal years, from 1 October to 30 September.

117Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2016 Statistical annex

Table A1.30
Latin America and the Caribbean: central government gross public debt
(Percentages of GDP)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 42.9 41.6 45.3 45.5 45.6 47.4 48.9 49.6 50.7 50.8

Latin Americab 30.3 28.8 30.9 29.8 29.0 30.5 32.3 33.6 36.5 37.9

Argentina 44.4 39.2 39.6 36.1 33.3 35.1 43.3 44.4 53.6 54.0

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 37.2 34.0 36.3 34.6 34.5 29.1 28.4 27.7 29.5 29.2

Brazilc 57.2 57.5 59.6 52.0 50.8 55.3 56.7 58.9 66.5 70.3

Chile 3.9 5.1 5.8 8.7 11.1 12.0 12.8 15.0 17.4 20.6

Colombia 36.6 36.2 38.1 38.7 36.5 34.6 37.2 40.0 43.9 44.6

Costa Rica 26.9 24.1 26.5 28.4 29.8 34.3 36.0 38.9 41.5 43.4

Dominican Republic 16.9 23.2 27.1 27.6 28.8 32.2 38.1 37.1 35.2 36.7

Ecuador 25.2 20.5 15.0 17.8 17.3 20.1 22.9 27.4 30.7 35.6

El Salvador 34.9 34.4 42.6 42.6 41.7 45.7 44.0 44.4 44.6 44.4

Guatemala 21.4 19.9 22.8 24.0 23.7 24.3 24.6 24.3 24.2 23.4

Haitid 33.6 42.3 34.3 22.8 23.9 28.0 30.5 35.1 36.7 38.4

Honduras 17.4 20.1 23.9 30.4 32.5 35.4 43.8 45.6 45.2 45.9

Mexicoe 20.6 24.0 27.2 27.2 27.5 28.2 29.8 31.7 34.4 36.7

Nicaragua 32.3 28.6 32.3 33.3 31.9 31.5 30.8 30.2 29.9 29.9

Panama 49.4 42.0 40.7 39.6 36.7 35.2 35.0 36.8 38.5 38.9

Paraguay 14.7 13.4 13.9 12.1 9.8 12.6 13.0 15.8 17.3 20.9

Peru 25.8 23.1 22.8 20.7 18.4 18.3 17.3 18.2 19.8 21.7

Uruguay 57.2 44.5 53.3 39.9 38.4 40.2 36.9 39.2 47.3 44.8

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 19.9 15.2 25.2 29.0 25.1 27.5 32.9 28.5 38.0 41.1

The Caribbeanb 61.2 60.4 66.4 68.6 69.7 72.2 73.1 72.9 71.5 69.6

Antigua and Barbuda 85.8 73.8 80.8 74.3 77.1 71.9 77.7 82.7 70.0 66.9

Bahamas 36.9 37.4 50.2 54.3 55.4 59.6 65.6 72.9 75.1 74.0

Barbados 51.7 55.7 63.2 71.9 78.0 83.9 96.4 100.1 104.9 103.3

Belize 83.6 79.4 82.2 72.3 70.7 72.8 78.5 75.6 78.4 78.2

Dominica 67.0 59.4 53.1 56.7 54.6 64.6 64.2 64.3 66.1 66.2

Grenada 75.1 70.9 80.9 84.2 87.8 91.4 93.5 88.6 80.2 77.5

Guyanaf 61.2 62.9 67.0 68.0 66.7 63.6 58.1 51.9 48.6 44.5

Jamaicaf 110.9 112.3 126.3 131.7 131.4 133.9 135.5 131.8 127.3 124.2

Saint Kitts and Nevis 81.4 97.9 105.5 113.8 114.1 108.7 76.9 64.8 53.5 49.8

Saint Lucia 50.4 50.1 51.2 54.4 61.0 68.1 71.9 72.9 74.0 74.3

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 48.0 45.8 51.0 55.6 58.5 61.2 63.6 68.3 66.8 65.2

Suriname 17.6 15.7 15.7 18.6 20.1 21.6 29.9 26.8 40.5 36.4

Trinidad and Tobago 26.5 23.8 36.3 36.1 30.9 36.9 37.9 47.2 43.7 44.2

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Simple averages.
c General government.
d Data to September 2013. Does not include public sector liabilities owed to commercial banks.
e Federal government.
f Public sector

118 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)Statistical annex

Table A1.31
Latin America and the Caribbean: non-financial public sector gross public debt
(Percentages of GDP)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016a

Latin America and the Caribbeanb 47.4 46.1 50.6 51.1 50.5 52.3 53.7 54.0 54.9 55.0

Latin Americab 32.3 30.9 33.2 32.4 31.3 32.7 34.6 36.2 39.4 40.7

Argentina 44.4 39.2 39.6 36.1 33.3 35.1 43.3 44.4 53.6 54.0

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)c 40.7 37.2 39.5 38.1 33.7 31.3 30.4 30.0 31.6 30.9

Brazild 57.2 57.5 60.9 53.6 50.8 55.3 56.7 58.9 66.5 70.3

Chile 8.7 11.6 12.1 14.7 17.8 18.9 20.5 24.2 27.6 30.2

Colombia 43.8 42.6 45.1 46.2 43.1 40.7 43.1 46.0 50.1 50.3

Costa Rica 31.0 29.0 34.0 35.7 37.1 41.5 44.2 47.3 49.8 51.5

Dominican Republice 16.9 23.2 27.1 27.6 28.8 32.2 38.1 37.1 35.2 36.7

Ecuador 27.1 22.1 16.3 19.6 18.3 21.1 24.0 29.5 32.7 38.4

El Salvador 37.0 36.9 45.2 45.1 44.1 47.9 46.3 46.7 47.3 47.2

Guatemala 21.6 20.1 23.3 24.4 23.9 24.5 24.7 24.5 24.3 23.5

Haitie f 33.6 42.3 34.3 22.8 23.9 28.0 30.5 35.1 36.7 38.4

Hondurase 17.4 20.1 23.9 30.4 32.5 35.4 43.8 45.6 45.2 45.9

Mexicog 22.4 26.5 34.3 31.7 34.4 33.9 36.8 40.1 44.7 49.2

Nicaragua 32.9 29.4 34.2 34.8 32.6 32.2 31.5 30.7 30.4 30.3

Panama 50.0 42.6 45.4 43.0 37.3 35.7 35.5 37.1 38.8 39.2

Paraguayh 16.8 15.5 16.8 14.9 11.5 14.2 14.4 17.6 19.7 23.5

Peru 29.9 26.9 23.7 23.5 22.1 20.4 19.6 20.1 23.3 22.7

Uruguay 62.5 48.9 49.4 43.5 43.4 45.7 41.5 44.6 52.4 49.5

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)e 19.9 15.2 25.2 29.0 25.1 27.5 32.9 28.5 38.0 41.1

The Caribbeanb 69.3 68.3 76.1 78.6 78.7 80.9 81.6 79.9 77.7 76.0

Antigua and Barbuda 81.1 81.9 95.7 87.1 92.2 86.5 99.9 98.5 83.9 80.3

Bahamase 36.9 37.4 50.2 54.3 55.4 59.6 65.6 72.9 75.1 74.0

Barbados 62.4 67.2 76.0 88.1 93.9 96.6 106.5 110.1 108.5 107.7

Belize 83.6 79.4 82.2 72.3 70.7 72.8 78.5 75.6 78.8 78.7

Dominica 81.2 72.6 66.4 73.1 67.5 77.6 76.7 75.7 78.3 78.5

Grenada 82.9 82.2 90.0 91.8 98.7 101.4 102.4 95.7 86.8 83.2

Guyana 61.2 62.9 67.0 68.0 66.7 63.6 58.1 51.9 48.6 44.5

Jamaica 110.9 112.3 126.3 131.7 131.4 133.9 135.5 131.8 127.3 124.2

Saint Kitts and Nevis 134.6 125.5 142.0 151.4 140.1 137.4 99.4 77.5 65.5 62.1

Saint Lucia 64.7 58.4 64.0 65.5 68.6 74.4 77.4 77.3 77.8 79.0

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 55.5 58.0 64.7 66.7 69.9 72.8 75.8 79.9 78.5 77.9

Surinamee 17.6 15.7 15.7 18.6 20.1 21.6 29.9 26.8 40.5 36.4

Trinidad and Tobago 28.8 34.5 49.0 52.9 48.0 53.0 54.5 65.1 60.6 61.4

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of official figures.
a Preliminary figures.
b Simple averages.
c Refers to the external debt of the non-financial public-sector and central-government domestic debt.
d General government.
e Data to September 2013. Does not include public sector liabilities owed to commercial banks.
f Central government.
g Federal public-sector.
h Domestic debt includes liabilities owed to the central bank only.

Publicaciones recientes de la CEPAL
ECLAC recent publications
www.cepal.org/publicaciones

Informes periódicos / Annual reports
También disponibles para años anteriores / Issues for previous years also available
• Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe 2016, 242 p.
Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2016, 230 p.

• La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe 2015, 150 p.
Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2015, 140 p.

• Anuario Estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2015 / Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean 2015, 235 p.

• Balance Preliminar de las Economías de América Latina y el Caribe 2015, 104 p.
Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean 2015, 98 p.

• Panorama Social de América Latina 2015. Documento informativo, 68 p.
Social Panorama of Latin America 2015. Briefing paper, 66 p.

• Panorama de la Inserción Internacional de América Latina y el Caribe 2015, 102 p.
Latin America and the Caribbean in the World Economy 2015, 98 p.

Libros y documentos institucionales / Institutional books and documents
• 40 años de agenda regional de género, 2016, 130 p.
40 years of the regional gender agenda, 128 p.

• La nueva revolución digital: de la Internet del consumo a la Internet de la producción, 2016, 100 p.
The new digital revolution: From the consumer Internet to the industrial Internet, 2016, 100 p.

• Panorama fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe 2016: las finanzas públicas ante el desafío de conciliar austeridad con crecimiento
e igualdad, 2016, 90 p.

• Reflexiones sobre el desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe: conferencias magistrales 2015, 2016, 74 p.

• Panorama Económico y Social de la Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, 2015, 58 p.
Economic and Social Panorama of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States 2015, 56 p.

• Desarrollo social inclusivo: una nueva generación de políticas para superar la pobreza y reducir la desigualdad en América Latina y el Caribe,
2015, 180 p.

Inclusive social development: The next generation of policies for overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in Latin America and
the Caribbean, 2015, 172 p.

• Guía operacional para la implementación y el seguimiento del Consenso de Montevideo sobre Población y Desarrollo, 2015, 146 p.
Operational guide for implementation and follow-up of the Montevideo Consensus on Population and Development, 2015, 139 p.

• América Latina y el Caribe: una mirada al futuro desde los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio. Informe regional de monitoreo de los Objetivos
de Desarrollo del Milenio (ODM) en América Latina y el Caribe, 2015, 88 p.

Latin America and the Caribbean: Looking ahead after the Millennium Development Goals. Regional monitoring report on the Millennium
Development Goals in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2015, 88 p.

• La nueva revolución digital: de la Internet del consumo a la Internet de la producción, 2015, 98 p.
The new digital revolution: From the consumer Internet to the industrial Internet, 2015, 98 p.
• Globalización, integración y comercio inclusivo en América Latina. Textos seleccionados de la CEPAL (2010-2014), 2015, 326 p.

• El desafío de la sostenibilidad ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe. Textos seleccionados de la CEPAL (2012-2014), 2015, 148 p.

• Pactos para la igualdad: hacia un futuro sostenible, 2014, 340 p.
Covenants for Equality: Towards a sustainable future, 2014, 330 p.

• Cambio estructural para la igualdad: una visión integrada del desarrollo, 2012, 330 p.
Structural Change for Equality: An integrated approach to development, 2012, 308 p.

• La hora de la igualdad: brechas por cerrar, caminos por abrir, 2010, 290 p.
Time for Equality: Closing gaps, opening trails, 2010, 270 p.
A Hora da Igualdade: Brechas por fechar, caminhos por abrir, 2010, 268 p.

Libros de la CEPAL / ECLAC books
139 Hacia una nueva gobernanza de los recursos naturales en América Latina y el Caribe, Hugo Altomonte, Ricardo J. Sánchez, 2016, 256 p.

138 Estructura productiva y política macroeconómica: enfoques heterodoxos desde América Latina, Alicia Bárcena Ibarra, Antonio Prado,
Martín Abeles (eds.), 2015, 282 p.

137 Juventud: realidades y retos para un desarrollo con igualdad, Daniela Trucco, Heidi Ullmann (eds.), 2015, 282 p.

136 Instrumentos de protección social: caminos latinoamericanos hacia la universalización, Simone Cecchini, Fernando Filgueira,
Rodrigo Martínez, Cecilia Rossel (eds.), 2015, 510 p.

135 Rising concentration in Asia-Latin American value chains: Can small firms turn the tide?, Osvaldo Rosales, Keiji Inoue, Nanno Mulder (eds.),
2015, 282 p.

134 Desigualdad, concentración del ingreso y tributación sobre las altas rentas en América Latina, Juan Pablo Jiménez (ed.), 2015, 172 p.

Copublicaciones / Co-publications
• El imperativo de la igualdad, Alicia Bárcena, Antonio Prado, CEPAL/Siglo Veintiuno, Argentina, 2016, 244 p.

• Gobernanza global y desarrollo: nuevos desafíos y prioridades de la cooperación internacional, José Antonio Ocampo (ed.), CEPAL/Siglo
Veintiuno, Argentina, 2015, 286 p.

• Decentralization and Reform in Latin America: Improving Intergovernmental Relations, Giorgio Brosio and Juan Pablo Jiménez (eds.),
ECLAC/Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom, 2012, 450 p.

• Sentido de pertenencia en sociedades fragmentadas: América Latina desde una perspectiva global, Martín Hopenhayn y Ana Sojo (comps.),
CEPAL/Siglo Veintiuno, Argentina, 2011, 350 p.

Coediciones / Co-editions
• Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2016: hacia una nueva asociación con China, 2015, 240 p.
Latin American Economic Outlook 2016: Towards a new Partnership with China, 2015, 220 p.
• Perspectivas de la agricultura y del desarrollo rural en las Américas: una mirada hacia América Latina y el Caribe 2015-2016, CEPAL/FAO/IICA,

2015, 212 p.
Documentos de proyecto / Project documents
• Complejos productivos y territorio en la Argentina: aportes para el estudio de la geografía económica del país, 2015, 216 p.

• Las juventudes centroamericanas en contextos de inseguridad y violencia: realidades y retos para su inclusión social, Teresita Escotto Quesada,
2015, 168 p.

• La economía del cambio climático en el Perú, 2014, 152 p.

Cuadernos estadísticos de la CEPAL
44 Las cuentas de los hogares y el bienestar en América Latina. Más allá del PIB, 2016.

43 Estadísticas económicas de América Latina y el Caribe: Aspectos metodológicos y resultados del cambio de año base de 2005 a 2010

Series de la CEPAL / ECLAC Series
Asuntos de Género / Comercio Internacional / Desarrollo Productivo / Desarrollo Territorial / Estudios Estadísticos / Estudios y Perspectivas
(Bogotá, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, México, Montevideo) / Studies and Perspectives (The Caribbean, Washington) / Financiamiento del Desarrollo /
Gestión Pública / Informes y Estudios Especiales / Macroeconomía del Desarrollo / Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo / Población y Desarrollo / Política
Fiscal / Políticas Sociales / Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura / Seminarios y Conferencias.

Manuales de la CEPAL
3 Manual de formación regional para la implementación de la resolución 1325 (2000) del Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones Unidas relativa a

las mujeres, la paz y la seguridad, María Cristina Benavente R., Marcela Donadio, Pamela Villalobos, 2016, 126 p.

2 Guía general para la gestión de residuos sólidos domiciliarios, Estefani Rondón Toro, Marcel Szantó Narea, Juan Francisco Pacheco, Eduardo
Contreras, Alejandro Gálvez, 2016, 212 p.

1 La planificación participativa para lograr un cambio estructural con igualdad: las estrategias de participación ciudadana en los procesos de
planificación multiescalar, Carlos Sandoval, Andrea Sanhueza, Alicia Williner, 2015, 74 p.

Revista CEPAL / CEPAL Review
La Revista se inició en 1976, con el propósito de contribuir al examen de los problemas del desarrollo socioeconómico de la región. La Revista
CEPAL se publica en español e inglés tres veces por año.

CEPAL Review first appeared in 1976, its aim being to make a contribution to the study of the economic and social development problems
of the region. CEPAL Review is published in Spanish and English versions three times a year.

Observatorio demográfico / Demographic Observatory
Edición bilingüe (español e inglés) que proporciona información estadística actualizada, referente a estimaciones y proyecciones de población de
los países de América Latina y el Caribe. Desde 2013 el Observatorio aparece una vez al año.

Bilingual publication (Spanish and English) proving up-to-date estimates and projections of the populations of the Latin American and Caribbean
countries. Since 2013, the Observatory appears once a year.

Notas de población
Revista especializada que publica artículos e informes acerca de las investigaciones más recientes sobre la dinámica demográfica en la región.
También incluye información sobre actividades científicas y profesionales en el campo de población. La revista se publica desde 1973 y aparece
dos veces al año, en junio y diciembre.

Specialized journal which publishes articles and reports on recent studies of demographic dynamics in the region. Also includes information on
scientific and professional activities in the field of population. Published since 1973, the journal appears twice a year in June and December.

Las publicaciones de la CEPAL están disponibles en:
ECLAC publications are available at:

www.cepal.org/publicaciones

También se pueden adquirir a través de:
They can also be ordered through:

www.un.org/publications

United Nations Publications
PO Box 960

Herndon, VA 20172
USA

Tel. (1-888)254-4286
Fax (1-800)338-4550

Contacto / Contact: publications@un.org
Pedidos / Orders: order@un.org

P
re

li
m

in
a

ry
O
v
e
rv
ie
w
o

f
th

e
E
c
o
n
o
m
ie
s

o
f
L
a
ti
n
A
m
e
ri
c
a

a
n

d
t
h
e
C
a
ri
b
b
e
a
n

2

0
16

www.eclac.org

Still stressed from student homework?
Get quality assistance from academic writers!

Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER