Need a 4 page in 3hrs

I need an assignment to strictly follow the guidelines i give in 4 hrs. 

Corporate Governance for Managers

In this unit you will focus on meeting the requirements relating to four primary learning
outcomes.
Knowledge
Critical analysis and problem solving skills
Judgement
Communication
These learning outcomes will be assessed in the assessment tasks. The four learning outcomes
have been adapted from the Australian national standard for the Accounting Discipline to apply
to Corporate Governance for Managers.

Length: 2,400 words total (+/- 10%), comprising 1,200 words for each of the 2 parts in the
question. Reference list and cover sheet details are not included in this word-limit total.

Part 1 (1,200 words)
Assessment Criteria:

• Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your
analysis

• Demonstration of your ability to apply the knowledge to identify keys issues leading to
your recommendations

• Evidence of sound reasoning and the exercise of professional judgement to support your
recommendations

• Development and statement of concise recommendations for presentation to the
Chairman and shareholders

• Overall structure and professional presentation of the report to the Chairman and
shareholders

• High quality written communication of concepts and terms in ordinary English as not all
shareholders can be assumed to be professionally competent in corporate governance

Case Study 1
‘Directors warn the buck stops with chief executives in the latest salvo in the business culture
wars between government, regulators and boards.
Australian Securities Commission chairman Greg Medcraft last week said that accusations he
wants to change the law to hold directors criminally liable for wayward culture are a
misunderstanding and he is not pushing for changes “at this stage”.
Tensions between directors and ASIC have escalated following the regulator’s cases against
Westpac Banking Corp and ANZ Banking Group and Labor’s call’s for a royal commission into the
banking sector which have given rise to accusations the regulator is seeking to become the
culture police.
Directors including Qantas Airways’ Jacqueline Hey, Australia Post chairman John Stanhope and
founder and director of IBIS World Phil Ruthven told an Australian Institute of Company
Directors lunch on Wednesday that while boards can “set the right tone”, the buck stops with
the CEO.
“CEOs set culture not boards,” Mr Ruthven said.

Patrick Durkin ‘Directors of boards warn that buck stops with CEOs’ The Australian Financial
Review Thursday 14 April 2016, p.8

Required
Assume you have been engaged as a corporate governance consultant to a board of
directors of a public company listed on the stock exchange. Your assignment is to prepare a
report to be submitted to the Chairman of the board explaining and analysing how the
company should define and delineate the separate roles, duties and responsibilities of the
company’s board of directors from those of the CEO. Your report should contain specific
recommendations on the separate roles of directors and the CEO. The Chairman has
specifically indicated that she intends to make your report available to shareholders of the
company and that the document will be published on the company’s web site.

Part 2 (15% – 1,200 words)
Assessment Criteria:
Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your
analysis

• Demonstration of your ability to apply the knowledge to identify keys issues leading
to your recommendations

• Evidence of sound reasoning and the exercise of professional judgement to support
your recommendations

• Development and statement of concise recommendations for presentation to the
AICD
Overall structure and professional presentation of the report to the AICD

• High quality written communication of concepts and terms in ordinary English as not
all readers of the report can be assumed to be specialists competent in corporate
governance

Case Study 2
‘As a separate legal person, a corporation has two basic objectives: To survive and to thrive.
Shareholder value is not the objective of the corporation; it is an outcome of the
corporation’s activities. While shareholders entrust their stakes in a corporation to the
board of directors, shareholders are just one audience among others that the board may
consider when making decisions on behalf of the corporation.
These audiences, typically called stakeholders, may also include other financial
stakeholders, such as bondholders, and nonfinancial stakeholders, such as employees,
customers, suppliers, and NGOs representing various concerns of civil society. In the face of
limited resources, no matter how large the corporation, directors must make choices
regarding the significance of the corporation’s many audiences.’
Source: Robert G Eccles and Tim Youmans (2015) ‘Why Boards Must Look Beyond
Shareholders’, MIT Sloan Management Review http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-
boards-must-look-beyond-shareholders

Required
Assume you have been employed as a corporate governance consultant by the Australian
Institute of Company Directors (AICD). The AICD is concerned that many company directors
hold the opinion that the company’s board of directors has a responsibility to place the
interests of shareholders above all other stakeholder interests.
Your assignment is to prepare a report to be submitted to the AICD evaluating the evidence
that the responsibility of a company director is to place shareholder interests above those
of other stakeholders. Specifically, the AICD has requested that your report contain
evidence, examples and recommendations for company directors that will guide them when
making board decisions so they are responsive to diverse stakeholder audiences. The AICD
has advised you that they intend to make your report a public document and it will be
uploaded to the website so it can be read by both corporate governance specialists and
non-specialists.

Hello, I assigned this paper to a writer who totally did rubbish. Here is what I need.

The paper should use Havard reference. Australia context and should incorporate the ASX CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Don’t just state roles. Write a better paper

Here are the clients comments and disappointments.

I need you to work on part 1.

This report is totally unacceptable

I was assured of a top quality document that would get me top marks- this document will NOT do that. All you have done is provide a list of roles and responsibilities

It has made no reference to Australian ASIC corporate governance principals – this was requested and agreed as part of this assignment !!!

It makes no reference to the company itself or the people in it

There is NO analysis of how the company should define and delineate the separate roles, duties and responsibilities of the company’s board of directors from those of the CEO.

There is NO identification of key issues leading to recommendations

There are spelling and grammar mistakes throughout the document.