major essay

Instructions for Summary / Response EssaySummary/Response Essay
Assignment Description
For this essay, you should read the articles from the folder in this unit and choose one to respond to in a formal essay. The summary/response essay asks you first to summarize the main points of the article and to respond to those points by agreeing, disagreeing, or agreeing with some but not all of the arguments made in the article. You should include evidence (from the article, from your own reasoning, from examples, from experiences, etc.) to support your response.

Due Dates
Please refer to the calendar due dates. Please remember the peer review is a separate grade and has separate due dates.

Purpose and Learning Objectives
The purpose of writing a response paper is to encourage you to read actively and to evaluate the selected articles critically. While it is possible to read an article just once and gain an understanding of the main idea, much of the depth and nuance of the article will only be discovered after multiple readings.  Moreover, your grasp of the ideas and concepts presented in the article will remain superficial until you apply those ideas and concepts in your own writing. As you write, you should practice making clear claims about the material you’re writing about and should practice supporting those claims with evidence from the text and from your own reasoning about the subject.

Minimum Requirements

600- 900 words  (approx. 2-3 pages)
An interesting and informative title
MLA format with in-text citations and works cited page
An introductory paragraph that tells readers what article you are responding to and that includes a thesis statement
One or more paragraphs that summarize the article
One or more paragraphs that respond to the article
A conclusion paragraph that wraps up the main ideas in the essay
You should not expect to earn a grade higher than a 60% if you do not meet the minimum requirements.

Process for Completion

The first step in writing a good response paper is to actively read the article assigned. Active reading means consciously identifying the thesis, purpose, audience, and tone.  It means determining what main points the author is trying to convey with his or her article.
Next, it might help to construct an outline or graphic organizer that will help you visualize the claims and the evidence supporting those claims. Once you have a firm understanding of the article, start formulating your response by asking questions:

What do I really think about this topic? Why do I think that? 
Do I disagree with any points being made? Why?
Do I agree with any points? Why?
Can I think of additional examples or evidence that support or refute the author’s claims?
Can I connect something in the article to my own personal experience?
Can I apply the ideas presented in the article to some other subject?  

At this point, you should start to formulate your response. Once you have an idea of what you want to say, start drafting your essay. 

The introduction should clearly identify the author and article you’re summarizing. It may include a bit of brief summary to show what the main point of the article is. It should include a thesis statement that presents your response to the article. 
The body paragraphs should begin with a summary of the article that you’ve chosen (one or two paragraphs). Be sure to accurately represent the ideas and arguments from the source. Next, you should develop your response (between one and three paragraphs), usually with a statement of agreement or disagreement, followed by your reasons, examples, and evidence. Remember that the purpose of a response paper is to add your own voice to the mix, to join the conversation.  I want to read your reactions, your interpretations, and your opinions. Take this opportunity to develop your own voice.
The conclusion paragraph should reinforce the ideas you stated in the essay.

Once you’ve drafted your paper, go back and review how you’ve organized your paragraphs (do they have topic sentences?) and integrated evidence (all quotes should be seamlessly incorporated into your own sentences). 
When you’re happy with your draft, you should complete the peer review process to get feedback on your writing.
After you have read the feedback provided by your peers, continue revising and editing your draft.  You might find that some comments are more helpful than others. You are not obliged to take anyone’s advice, but you should at least consider every suggestion. When you are comfortable that the essay is in good shape, upload it to eCampus. The final draft will automatically be sent through “Safe Assign,” which is an originality checker used to help identify plagiarism.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is using someone else’s words or ideas without giving credit and is a serious academic offense.  It can range from:

Turning in a paper any part of which you did not write, 
Cutting and pasting a paper together from various sources without attributing the sources correctly,
Changing a few words but basically keeping most of the words and sentence structure of the original,
Using the ideas of another without giving credit to the person who originally had the idea.
Using the exact words of the source without using quotation marks even if you give the name of the source.
Refer to the syllabus for consequences of plagiarism in this class. For more information, see http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/589/01/

Grading and Rubric
To access the rubric, go to the essay submission and select “View Rubric.” Please remember that the grades for peer are listed in the syllabus as separate grades.
Instructions for Peer Review
Peer reviews are an essential part of the revision process, as it’s important to receive feedback on your writing. Even the best writers ask for others to read their work. All you need to do is turn to the acknowledgement section of many books to find praise for others who have read drafts of the book. All important writing should be read by someone else prior to submission.

To earn credit for peer review, you must submit a draft to the peer review discussion board by the due date and comment on one of your classmates’ drafts by the second due date (the schedule lists two due dates: the first is when you must submit your draft; the second is when you must submit your responses to others). You must submit a draft AND comment on someone else’s draft to earn any credit for peer review. Just submitting a draft OR just commenting on someone’s draft will not earn credit.

Posting Your Draft
To post your draft, go to the discussion board for peer review included within the unit.
Create a new thread and post your draft as an attachment.  Your attachment must be saved as a or x document. Please ensure that your draft uploads correctly.
Responding to Classmates
Select a classmate’s thread and download his/her attached draft.
Reply to his/her thread to indicate the draft is under review (i.e. John Dow is currently reviewing the document).  Do not select the paper if someone else is already reviewing.
Read the draft carefully and respond to the questions listed below, either in a new document or at the top of your classmate’s document. At the very least, you must answer the questions, but you can also use the “Comment” function in Microsoft Word to write comments to your classmates within the essay (put your cursor where you want the comment, go to the “Review” tab in Microsoft Word, and select “New Comment”).
Complete the review and save the document to your computer.
Once you have completed the review, reply to your classmate’s thread and upload the review.
Questions for Peer Review
1. Read your peer’s essay from beginning to end just to let its ideas wash over you.  What are your initial thoughts? Did your peer satisfy the requirements of assignment?  Please explain in detail.

2. Review the essay’s title as well as its introduction and conclusion.  Think about the relationships among these three components. Do they match or do they disagree? Make note of strengths or weaknesses in these crucial areas.  Please explain in detail.

3. Find the essay’s thesis.  Is it clear? Is it well positioned? Paraphrase (put in your own words) the thesis of the essay to check your understanding. Review the assignment guidelines to ensure that your peer’s thesis is on target. Make note of strengths or weaknesses in this area. Please explain in detail.

4. Focus on the individual paragraphs of the essay.  Does each paragraph have a topic sentence that previews the ideas of the paragraph? Observe the essay’s development of paragraphs.  Does each paragraph have a single main idea that relates to the thesis?  Are there any paragraphs that seem disconnected or out of place?

5. Consider the essay’s use of the English language.  Are sentence structures, grammar, spelling, punctuation and mechanics employed effectively, or do errors distract the reader from understanding and enjoying the writer’s analysis? Make note of strengths and weaknesses in this area.  Please explain in detail.

Remember: When in doubt about how to do the peer review, be honest, helpful, and constructive. Saying “Great job! Don’t change a word!” never helped anyone to be a better writer.
 

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/

2

Is Google Making Us Stupid

The writer of this particular article is Nicholas Carr,
it is crystal clear that the writer has been able to reach out to his target audience. This can be proved by the fact that he has been able to use a number of stylistic devices, for instance the use of direct speech. The use of direct speech in this instance makes the audience feel like he or she is a part of that particular conversation.

Moreover, the author has also been able to apply a number of stylistic devices, the use of these devices have
made this particular piece not to appear as being plane
. For instance the use of allegory from the movie ‘2001’ has helped to present ideas via this movie. Additionally, he has been able to arrange his content in a manner that shows well developed English writing skills. The author of this article pus it clear
that he spends most of his time on the internet. This aspect of being on the internet over long periods of time has made him loose
control over himself
and any time he is not on the internet he feels uncomfortable. Therefore, the main idea presented on this article is on whether people have become over independent when it comes to the use of the internet.

Before the internet was invented people used to access information using the old fashioned way,
during these particular periods of time people could visit libraries and they would spend a considerable amount of time looking for information. In some instances, this could even have taken days, weeks and months. However, with the invention of the internet people know
started accessing information via the internet. With time, people became over-independent on the use of the internet to a point where no one wills
to visit a library. This particular aspect shows that the use of internet.

From this particular article, the writer clearly indicates that people have lost interest on reading and they only skim readings in order to attain only a small portion of information. This aspect of skimming has been due to the use of internet where one can be able to access information of any particular size
. I concur with the writer when he says that the human brain needs to be trained to read. This is because training it to read helps the brain to develop the ability of capturing and storing information (Anon, 2018).

From this article, it is clear that google has made people stupid to a point where people believe that their brain capacity can be improved through the aspect of artificial intelligence. I believe that we have a brain capacity that can hold enough information that we may need; however, supplementing our brains artificially means that we have lost touch with reality.

Moreover, I believe that the writer has a point when he says that the impact of the internet does not end on the computer screen,
rather this impact is also posted on our brains. This means that any time we need a piece of information we just rush to the internet. In conclusion, I believe that the author of this article has been able to reach the targeted audience. Moreover, the author has shown outstanding writing skills by integrating the various stylistic devices used in the English language. Moreover
, the author has also been able to address the subject of the article in a well –thought manner leaving the audience to take their own stand either to support the ideas of the writer or not. In conclusion I believe that this article has been successful in conveying its intended message.

Works Cited

Anon, (2018). [online] Available at: Carr, N. (2018). Is Google Making Us Stupid?. [online] The Atlantic. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/ [Accessed 6 Feb. 2018]. [Accessed 6 Feb. 2018].

�This is not an original and interesting title.

�Comma splice

�Is this your thesis statement? It should present your response to the article. Also, the introductory paragraph should include a brief summary of the main point of the article.

�has

�I do not understand your meaning here.

�pus? Please proofread.

�lose

�Does the article say this?

�Comma splice

�now

�is willing

�This is not clear to me.

�Comma splice

�Don’t repeat this word so often.