USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
For this assignment, you will choose a company with which you are familiar. You are encouraged to choose a company for which you currently work or have worked, but you may choose some other firm if you believe it will be a compelling analysis.
You may choose one area of the company, such as a manufacturing plant or product design, to focus on if you can make a strong case. Your recommendations should have the following features.
- Repeatable: If you “fix” three things in a manufacturing plant, you should be able to tackle the “next” three in iteration.
- Scalable: If they work in one plant, they should work in all of them.
- Replicable: Your process for improvement should be repeatable in different, disparate parts of the organization.
This is a key initiative at the “C” level, and your recommendation will reach the board of directors.
Your paper must include the following sections:
- Strategic Overview: (1 page) Provide a brief description of the following elements:The company, including its products or servicesMarketing strategy: target market segments, value proposition, market position, and source of competitive differentiationOrganizational structureAny other relevant facts
- Analysis of the Supply Chain: (4 pages)Analyze the supply chain for your identified company by explaining the following key elements of the supply chain:Identify key inputs, including less tangible assets, such as human resources and information. How are these key inputs sourced, reconfigured into a product or service, and delivered to your customers?Identify the key processes that add value, and evaluate the supply chain performance relative to the competition. What are the key inputs for each process? How are these inputs processed or configured into the final offering for your customers?What is the value added at each step?What is the role of information technology and e-commerce in serving your customers?What are the key performance measures for evaluating your supply chain?Research online sources to explain how the performance on these measures compares to that of your competitors?
- Plan to Improve Operating Processes: (3 pages)Create a plan for improving the performance of three specific operating processes in your company. Your plan should address the following:Identify three elements of the supply chain that you recommend as targets for improvement.State the performance improvement opportunity for each element, and indicate how it will improve process speed, quality, efficiency, and productivity.Explain what specific action or change you recommend for each supply chain element selected.
- Explanation of the Results of Performance Improvements Regarding Product or Service: (2 pages) Explain the following:How will your product or service be improved as a result of these changes to the supply chain activities?How are you altering the specific features or attributes of your product or service?Why are these specific changes important to your customers?How do these changes enhance the value proposition and competitive position of your company?What lasting capabilities and improvement are you introducing into your company through these changes?How will you measure the scope and impact of your improvements? What are your key performance indicators?
- Assessment of the Impact on Human Resources: (1–2 pages) Detail how your plan impacts your company’s HR and human capital strategy by explaining how the organization’s structure supports the new process configuration you are recommending. Your response should address the following questions:
- Changes: Explain changes to the compensation and incentives at your company that are necessary to reinforce your recommendations and increase efforts for continuous improvement throughout the organization. Explain how your plan motivates employees, customers, and suppliers better.
Are the roles and responsibilities in your organization properly defined and aligned to enable these changes? Who will perform these new/modified process activities, and what changes to their jobs do you anticipate?Is decision-making authority assigned so that the process changes you propose can be implemented and properly managed under the current structure? Who will own the process and the results? Based on the current structure, will they have the authority to make changes as necessary?Are the individuals with the right skills in place to implement these changes? If not, how will you attract the talent necessary to implement your changes? How will you retrain the existing employee base? How will you handle attrition? How will you reduce the risk of impacted protected classes?
Write a 10–12-page paper in Word format. You may rearrange the above sections if it improves the quality of your paper. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M6_A2 .
By Tuesday, February 19, 2013, deliver your assignment to the M6: Assignment 2 Dropbox.
This assignment is worth 300 points and will be graded using a rubric. Download and read the rubric to understand the expectations.
Review the following scenario:
Assume that you have recently been hired as the director of continuous improvement of a company. You are an outside hire with limited history of the firm and personal capital at the firm, and you are responsible for lean production, total quality management (TQM), six sigma, and best practice implementation. Lean production means doing more with less, such as less inventory, fewer workers, or less space. A recent trade in quality management is lean six sigma (also known as lean sigma) that integrates six sigma and lean production. The capacity for which you were hired has existed for three years with a direct line of report to the vice-president of operations and dotted line of report to the head of information technology (IT), the chief information officer (CIO), and the director of internal controls and audit. You are the second person to fill in this position. You have a team of internal consultants; half of your team has six sigma black belt or equivalent capabilities with the remainder having a solid understanding of operations and IT. You also have a budget for two external vendor resources. You have taken six months to familiarize yourself with the organization and its people, mission, goals, strategy, and structure. In this time, you have also evaluated current operations. At the end of this period, you are assigned to deliver a report identifying the three most promising avenues for achieving best practices within the company. You have already been told that the company suffers from both aging and complex information systems and that your recommendation must include a major upgrade of those systems. The executive officers anticipate major investments in IT over the next several years. Your best practice implementations, coupled with new technology, must be measurable in terms of speed, quality, productivity, and efficiency or other key performance indicators that you identify in your report.
LASA 2—Company Analysis Report Rubric
NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
|
Assignment Components |
Unsatisfactory < 77% (C- to C) |
Emerging 78–82% (C+ to B-) |
Proficient 83–89% (B to B+) |
Exemplary 90–100% (A- to A) |
|
Synthesize data to explain a strategic overview of your company, its services, and all other required data. (Course Objective [CO] 1) (Program Objectives [PO] 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3) |
Synthesis includes a vague description of company’s specific products and services and does not address all assignment components. Discussion is supported by a few examples. Scholarly evidence is sparse. |
Synthesis includes a broad description of company’s specific products and services, and marketing strategy Discussion is supported by a few examples. Scholarly evidence is present, but how it supports ideas is unclear. |
Synthesis includes a description of company’s specific products and services, marketing strategy, and organizational structure. Discussion is supported by relevant facts and examples. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
Synthesis includes clear discussion of company’s specific products and services; in-depth discussion of marketing strategy; and a detailed organizational structure. Discussion is supported by additional relevant facts and examples regarding the company’s structure and services. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
|
Analyze the supply chain for your identified company by explaining all the following required key elements of the supply chain. (PO 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3) |
Analysis of the supply chain examines one-to-two inputs. Processes that add value, relative to the competition are listed. The key performance criteria used for evaluating the supply chain are not identified. Scholarly evidence is sparse. |
Analysis of the supply chain examines only a few key inputs. Processes that add value, relative to the competition, are identified for only a few steps. The role of info-technology and ecommerce in meeting customer needs is discussed superficially. The key performance criteria used for evaluating the supply chain are identified. Scholarly evidence is present, but how it supports ideas is unclear. |
Analysis of the supply chain examines all its key inputs including source, reconfiguration, and delivery to the customer. For each step, several processes that add value, relative to the competition, are identified. Synthesis examines the role of info-technology and ecommerce in meeting customer needs. The key performance criteria used for evaluating the supply chain are accurate. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
Analysis of the supply chain examines all its key inputs including source, reconfiguration, and delivery to the customer. For each step, several processes that add value, relative to the competition, are identified and compared. Synthesis examines and analyzes the role of info-technology and ecommerce in meeting customer needs. The key performance criteria used for evaluating the supply chain are accurate, measureable, and are evaluated against what many other competitors utilize for measurement. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
|
Synthesize data to create a plan for improving the performance of three specific operating processes in your company (including answers to all required elements). (PO 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3) |
Performance improvement plan lists three elements in need of improvement. Some improvement opportunities are listed but not explained. Scholarly evidence is sparse. |
Performance improvement plan lists three elements in need of improvement. A few innovative improvement opportunities are explained. Explanation includes one-to-two points regarding process speed, quality, efficiency, etc. Scholarly evidence is present, but how it supports ideas is unclear. |
Performance improvement plan identifies three elements in need of improvement. Improvement opportunities are explained. Explanation includes details regarding process speed, quality, efficiency, etc. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
Performance improvement plan diagnoses current supply chain and isolates three or more elements in need of improvement. Several innovative improvement opportunities are explained and justified. Explanation includes multiple details regarding process speed, quality, efficiency, etc. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
|
Synthesize data to explain results of performance improvements regarding the product/service (including answers to all required elements). (PO 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3) |
Synthesis lists a few performance results based on improvement recommendations. Related changes to the product or service are identified, but do not address all necessary requirements. A minimal discussion on how these changes will enhance the value proposition and competitive positioning is included. Means for measurement are not outlined. Scholarly evidence is sparse. |
Synthesis lists performance results based on improvement recommendations. Related changes to the product or service are identified including how these changes meet customer needs. A sketchy discussion on how these changes will enhance the value proposition and competitive positioning is included. Some means for measurement are outlined. Scholarly evidence is present, but how it supports ideas is unclear. |
Synthesis outlines performance results based on improvement recommendations. Related changes to the product or service are identified including how these changes meet customer needs. A discussion on how these changes will enhance the value proposition and competitive positioning is included. Some effective means for measurement are outlined that include key performance indicators for success. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
Synthesis outlines performance results in detail based on improvement recommendations. Related changes to the product or service are discussed including how these changes meet customer needs. A logical and detailed justification for how these changes will enhance the value proposition and competitive positioning is included. Many logical and effective means for measurement are outlined that include key performance indicators for success. Scholarly evidence is used to support ideas throughout. |
|
Configure data to explain how your plan impacts your company’s HR and human capital strategy and how the organizational structure supports the new process configuration you are recommending. Explain any changes to the compensation / incentives for your company that are necessary to reinforce your recommendations. (PO 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3) |
Synthesis utilizes minimal data to analyze how the plan affects the company’s HR and human capital strategy. The discussion includes very few details regarding alignment with roles, decision-making authority, existing employee talent, and compensation. |
Synthesis utilizes data to analyze how the plan affects the company’s HR and human capital strategy. The discussion includes a few details regarding alignment with roles, decision-making authority, existing employee talent, and compensation. |
Synthesis utilizes data to analyze how the plan affects the company’s HR and human capital strategy. The analysis includes details and examples regarding alignment with roles, decision-making authority, existing employee talent, and compensation. |
Synthesis utilizes research and data to analyze how the plan affects the company’s HR and human capital strategy. The analysis includes several details and examples regarding alignment with roles, decision-making authority, existing employee talent, and compensation. |
|
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
Writing is unclear and disorganized, and rereading to solidify understanding is frequently necessary. Although ethical scholarship is attempted, it is sloppy or incomplete throughout. Spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors severely interfere with readers’ comprehension. |
Writing is somewhat clear and is organized, although rereading to solidify understanding is occasionally necessary. It demonstrates an attempt at ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, and errors are occasional or minor. Writing has good spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but errors somewhat interfere with readers’ comprehension. |
Writing is generally clear and organized. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension. |
Writing is clear, concise, and well organized. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources and displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
Page 1 of 4
Operations Management: Solutions to Business Challenges
©2012 Argosy University Online Programs
Page 4 of 4
Operations Management: Solutions to Business Challenges
©2012 Argosy University Online Programs
