USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
My group Presentation is about Johnson and Johnson .It has 3 parts , my part is about Consumers product issues .It should be 8 or 9 slides, Tow or three issues would be better, and I need the citation and refrences ,3 or more resurces.
Management 501
Global Corporate Sustainable Development Analysis Rubric
Date:
Rater: ________________ Students:
Total Points 0 – 200 201 – 270 280 – 300
|
TRAIT – 10 POINTS TOTAL EACH |
Unacceptable 0-10 PTS |
Acceptable 11-20 PTS |
Exemplary 21-30 PTS |
Score |
|
Overview |
No introduction or overview of the global corporation and/or no information on past 5 years financials for the company |
Basic overview of the corporation with 5 years of financials |
Overview of corporation that includes extra details such as market share in industry, rank in Global 100: Most sustainable corporations in the world, rank on sustainability indices such as Dow Jones, plus 5 years of financials |
|
|
Issues/Problems
|
Does not recognize key problem(s) or main issue(s) |
Recognizes one or more key problem(s)/issues in the case. |
Recognizes multiple problems/issues in the case. Indicates some issues are more important than others and explains why |
|
|
Describe the issues in terms of the concept of SD |
Does not identify or explain key issues in terms of SD or surface the underlying assumptions and ethical issues; Does not identify any relationship between the company and SD |
Identifies some of the key problems/issues in terms of SD and triple bottom line and underlying assumptions and ethical issues; Explains why the problems/issues that the company faces are SD issues and relevant to the company |
Identifies key problems in terms of SD, the triple bottom line and ethics, and explains why they are SD/ethical issues; Explains not only why the problems are SD issues and relevant to the company, but also recognizes and identifies how these issues affect the company |
|
|
Key Stakeholders and impact that business SD focus or lack of SD focus has on stakeholders |
Does not identify the key stakeholders involved in the problems/issues |
Identifies some of the stakeholders involved in the problems/issues |
Identifies the multiple stakeholders involved in the problems/issues and explains how & why they are involved |
|
|
Construct the business case for sustainability |
No business case presented or poorly done with no financials |
Basic overview of how being more sustainable will benefit company. Includes financial benefits as well as other benefits. |
Basic overview of how being more sustainable will benefit company. Includes financial benefits as well as other benefits. Also, Includes comparisons to other companies in the industry that have successfully inculcated SD practices |
|
|
Knowledge base/Research
|
Minimal knowledge of issues and lack of breadth and depth. |
Provides considerable facts about the case and cites related knowledge from theoretical or empirical research |
Discusses facts of the case in relation to empirical and theoretical research and provides examples and/or adds knowledge from personal experience |
|
|
Actions/recommendations |
No action proposed or proposes infeasible action(s) |
More than one reasonable action proposed. |
Proposed actions seem to deal with the most important issues and are well substantiated |
|
|
Consequences |
No positive and negative consequences are identified |
Positive and negative consequences for each action are discussed |
Consequences are tied to the issues deemed most important. |
|
|
Quality of evidence
|
Merely repeats/provides information, presenting it as truth with no substantiation or adequate justification |
Examines the evidence and source of evidence, questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness |
Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences. Clearly distinguishes between fact, opinion, and acknowledges value judgments |
|
|
Presentation quality |
Weak PowerPoint presentation: inconsistent use of color, font, layout; no use or inconsistent use of citations and references; choppy transitions – no logical flow; lack of notes or notes that do not explain the slides sufficiently; poor grammar and misspellings |
Understandable, consistent PowerPoint presentation: consistent use of citations and references, smooth transitions – logical flow; good notes that clearly explain the slides; good grammar and no spelling errors |
Excellent presentation: very clear, well worded presentation; consistent use of citations and references, smooth transitions – logical flow; good notes that clearly explain the slides that include examples and links to other sources; good grammar and no spelling errors |
