HU245: Assignment

Conflict Resolution Paper Assignment 1.Read the case study for this unit regarding ExtremeNet and Allen Lopez.As the Chief Executive Officer for ExtremeNet, you are responsible for resolving the conflict between Allen Lopez and ExtremeNet in a manner that demonstrates solid ethical reasoning skills and the ability to manage stakeholder interests. 2.Click the “Rubric” button to view how the Conflict Resolution Paper Assignment will be graded. 3.As the leader of ExtremeNet, it is your responsibility to resolve the following questions: •Should Allen Lopez be allowed to keep his job with ExtremeNet? Support your answer using ethical theory. •Should ExtremeNet attempt a lawsuit to force the removal of this website? Support your answer using ethical theory. •How can ExtremeNet’s leadership best respect the rights of Allen Lopez and ExtremeNet? Explain the impact of your ethical decision on Allen Lopez and the company. •How can ExtremeNet’s leadership best repair the relationship between management and employees while meeting the needs and goals of the company? Demonstrate an understanding of the issues and how to best unify the company to move forward.   Write a one to two page decision in which you address the above questions and explain your reasoning. •The paper should be double-spaced, well organized, and free of errors. •Put your Assignment in a Word document. Save it in a location and with a name that will help your instructor identify the Assignment, the course, and you, the student. Please see the attached for the unit’s grading rubric. 

HU245 Unit 8 | Assignment Rubric

Grade: Grading Criteria

A: 90 – 100 points

 Paper addresses each of the following questions in a thorough manner supported
by ethical reasoning:

1. Should Allen Lopez be allowed to keep his job with ExtremeNet?

2. Should Allen Lopez be forced to remove his website?

3. How could ExtremeNet’s executives best respect Allen Lopez’s rights and

moral dignity?

4. How can ExtremeNet’s leadership best repair the relationship between

management and employees while meeting the needs and goals of the

company? Demonstrate an understanding of the issues and how to best unify

the company to move forward.

 Paper makes frequent, informed references to unit material including course terms,

concepts, and/or ethical theories.

 Paper is clearly written.

 Paper meets posted length requirements.

B: 80 – 89 points  Paper addresses each of the following questions supported by ethical reasoning:
1. Should Allen Lopez be allowed to keep his job with ExtremeNet?
2. Should Allen Lopez be forced to remove his website?
3. How could ExtremeNet’s executives best respect Allen Lopez’s rights and

moral dignity?
4. How can ExtremeNet’s leadership best repair the relationship between
management and employees while meeting the needs and goals of the
company? Demonstrate an understanding of the issues and how to best unify
the company to move forward.

 Paper makes some informed references to unit material including course terms,
concepts, and/or ethical theories.

 Paper is generally clearly written.

 Paper meets posted length requirements.

C: 70 – 79 points  Paper strays from assigned topic or arguments are weak. Paper fails to address
one or more of the following questions:

1. Should Allen Lopez be allowed to keep his job with ExtremeNet?
2. Should Allen Lopez be forced to remove his website?
3. How could ExtremeNet’s executives best respect Allen Lopez’s rights and
moral dignity?
4. How can ExtremeNet’s leadership best repair the relationship between
management and employees while meeting the needs and goals of the
company? Demonstrate an understanding of the issues and how to best unify
the company to move forward.

 Paper makes vague or summary references to unit material including course

terms, concepts, and/or ethical theories.

 Paper has several mechanical or stylistic errors.

 Paper does not meet posted length requirements.

D: 60 – 69 points  Paper is only partially on topic, and lacks originality, fails to answer some assigned
questions.

 Paper makes little or no references to unit material including course terms,

concepts, and/or ethical theories.

 Paper has several mechanical or stylistic errors.

 Paper does not meet posted length requirements.
F: 0 – 59 points

 Paper is off topic, and lacks originality, fails to answer any of the assigned

questions

 Paper makes little or no references to lesson material including course terms,

concepts, and/or ethical theories.

 Paper has several mechanical or stylistic errors.