Fitchburg State University Business Law Worksheet

i need help with my business law assignment about three different cases with details explanations in each of the three cases. All the cases are attached to the word document that I uploaded. Please if you have any questions let me know.

Business Law I: home work II–Case I
1.1.Professor Lucas Phelps sent the following e-mail to Professor Marlin Jones: “I
recently read the opinion piece you wrote for the Sacramento Bee on
affirmative action. Your opinion is incorrect, your reasoning and analysis are
poor, and I am embarrassed that you are a member of the faculty here at Cal
State Yolinda.” Professor Jones forwarded the note from Professor Phelps to
the provost of the university and asked that Professor Phelps be disciplined
for using the university e-mail system for harassment purposes. Professor
Phelps objected when the provost contacted him: “He had no right to forward
that e-mail to you. That was private correspondence. And you have no right
of access to my e-mail. I have privacy rights.”
============
INSTRUCTIONS 1.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Points; single
(1) Read the
case.
space)
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters [1],
2, 5, 7, or 8).
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions. (Make
sure you justify
your answers
with learned
concepts of
law.1.1.
1.1. Question 1: Was there a breach of the “privacy right” of Professor
Phelp’s.
1.2. Questions 2: Which law makes provision to protect the “right of
privacy” of individuals?
1.3.Questions 3: What is the “right of privacy,” as prescribed by legal
provisions?
(1) Read the
case.
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters 1, 2,
[5], and 7).
1. 2.1. Larketta Randolph purchased a mobile home from Better Cents Home
Builders, Inc., and financed her purchase through Green Tree Financial
Corporation. Ms. Randolph signed a standard form contract that required
her to buy Vendor’s Single Interest insurance, which protects the seller
against the costs of repossession in the event of default. The agreement
also provided that all disputes arising from the contract would be resolved
by binding arbitration. Larketta found that there was an additional $15 in
finance charges that were not disclosed in the contract. She and other
Green Tree customers filed a class-action suit to recover the fees. Green
Tree moved to dismiss the suit because Larketta had not submitted the
issue to arbitration. Larketta protests, “But I want the right to go to court!”
Does she have that right? What are the rights of parties under a contract
with an arbitration clause? [Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph, 531
U.S. 79]
2.2. Purport:
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions.
(Make sure you
justify your
answers with
learned concepts
of law.
Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Points; single
space)
2.3. Question 1: Why the Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph case
would not be tried in a court of federal-trial jurisdiction?
2.4. Questions 2: What is arbitration and what legal strength would
arbitration have in the remedy of the complaint in the Green Tree
Financial Corp. v. Randolph?
2.5. Questions 3: What is the specific jurisdiction in which the Green
Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph case was tried?
Business Law I: Midterm Exam Part II–Case 3
1. 3.1. In April 2006, a DC-9 aircraft landed in the port city of Ciudad del
Carmen, located 500 miles east of Mexico City. When the plane’s crew
began directing security personnel away from the plane, the suspicious
activity piqued the curiosity of local law enforcement officials. They
decided to search the plane and found 128 suitcases packed with over 56
tons of cocaine. The cocaine was to have been delivered to Toluca, near
Mexico City. In investigating the plane and individual involved, law
enforcement agents discovered that the plane had been purchased with
money that had been laundered through two U.S. banks, Wachovia Corp.
and Bank of America Corp. Neither bank was actually aware that the
============
INSTRUCTIONS money was being used to purchase a plane that would then be used for
drug trafficking. Are the banks still criminally liable for breaking the
(1) Read the
rules? Explain why or why not.
case.
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters 1, 2,
5, or [7]).
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions.
(Make sure you
justify your
answers with
learned concepts
of law.
3.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Point; single
space)
2. 3.3. Question 1: What crimes can be understood to be committed?
3.4. Question 2: Would the legal doctrine of Respondeat Superior
considered to be involved, as far as the bank is concerned?
3. Question 3: What if the banks were aware of large sums of money being
run through particular customers’ accounts? Would that knowledge make
a difference?
Business Law I: home work II–Case I
1.1.Professor Lucas Phelps sent the following e-mail to Professor Marlin Jones: “I
recently read the opinion piece you wrote for the Sacramento Bee on
affirmative action. Your opinion is incorrect, your reasoning and analysis are
poor, and I am embarrassed that you are a member of the faculty here at Cal
State Yolinda.” Professor Jones forwarded the note from Professor Phelps to
the provost of the university and asked that Professor Phelps be disciplined
for using the university e-mail system for harassment purposes. Professor
Phelps objected when the provost contacted him: “He had no right to forward
that e-mail to you. That was private correspondence. And you have no right
of access to my e-mail. I have privacy rights.”
============
INSTRUCTIONS 1.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Points; single
(1) Read the
case.
space)
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters [1],
2, 5, 7, or 8).
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions. (Make
sure you justify
your answers
with learned
concepts of
law.1.1.
1.1. Question 1: Was there a breach of the “privacy right” of Professor
Phelp’s.
1.2. Questions 2: Which law makes provision to protect the “right of
privacy” of individuals?
1.3.Questions 3: What is the “right of privacy,” as prescribed by legal
provisions?
(1) Read the
case.
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters 1, 2,
[5], and 7).
1. 2.1. Larketta Randolph purchased a mobile home from Better Cents Home
Builders, Inc., and financed her purchase through Green Tree Financial
Corporation. Ms. Randolph signed a standard form contract that required
her to buy Vendor’s Single Interest insurance, which protects the seller
against the costs of repossession in the event of default. The agreement
also provided that all disputes arising from the contract would be resolved
by binding arbitration. Larketta found that there was an additional $15 in
finance charges that were not disclosed in the contract. She and other
Green Tree customers filed a class-action suit to recover the fees. Green
Tree moved to dismiss the suit because Larketta had not submitted the
issue to arbitration. Larketta protests, “But I want the right to go to court!”
Does she have that right? What are the rights of parties under a contract
with an arbitration clause? [Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph, 531
U.S. 79]
2.2. Purport:
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions.
(Make sure you
justify your
answers with
learned concepts
of law.
Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Points; single
space)
2.3. Question 1: Why the Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph case
would not be tried in a court of federal-trial jurisdiction?
2.4. Questions 2: What is arbitration and what legal strength would
arbitration have in the remedy of the complaint in the Green Tree
Financial Corp. v. Randolph?
2.5. Questions 3: What is the specific jurisdiction in which the Green
Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph case was tried?
Business Law I: Midterm Exam Part II–Case 3
1. 3.1. In April 2006, a DC-9 aircraft landed in the port city of Ciudad del
Carmen, located 500 miles east of Mexico City. When the plane’s crew
began directing security personnel away from the plane, the suspicious
activity piqued the curiosity of local law enforcement officials. They
decided to search the plane and found 128 suitcases packed with over 56
tons of cocaine. The cocaine was to have been delivered to Toluca, near
Mexico City. In investigating the plane and individual involved, law
enforcement agents discovered that the plane had been purchased with
money that had been laundered through two U.S. banks, Wachovia Corp.
and Bank of America Corp. Neither bank was actually aware that the
============
INSTRUCTIONS money was being used to purchase a plane that would then be used for
drug trafficking. Are the banks still criminally liable for breaking the
(1) Read the
rules? Explain why or why not.
case.
(2) Provide a
paragraph with
more than five
sentences (i.e., in
the section for
“Purport”) that
interprets the
theme of the
case, based on
concepts learned
in Chapters 1, 2,
5, or [7]).
(3) In at least
three sentences,
answer the
questions.
(Make sure you
justify your
answers with
learned concepts
of law.
3.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font—10-Point; single
space)
2. 3.3. Question 1: What crimes can be understood to be committed?
3.4. Question 2: Would the legal doctrine of Respondeat Superior
considered to be involved, as far as the bank is concerned?
3. Question 3: What if the banks were aware of large sums of money being
run through particular customers’ accounts? Would that knowledge make
a difference?