|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem 7.10 Arthur Doyle at Baker Street |
Arthur Doyle is a currency trader for Baker Street, a private investment house in London. Baker Street’s clients are a collection of wealthy private investors who, with a minimum stake of £250,000 each, wish to speculate on the movement of currencies. The investors expect annual returns in excess of 25%. Although officed in London, all accounts and expectations are based in U.S. dollars. |
Arthur is convinced that the British pound will slide significantly — possibly to
|
|
| $1.32 |
00
/£ — in the coming
|
| 30 |
to
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
days
. The current spot rate is
$1.4260 |
/£. Arthur wishes to buy a put on pounds which will yield the 25% return expected by his investors. Which of the following put options would you recommend he purchase. Prove your choice is the preferable combination of strike price, maturity, and up-front premium expense.
Strike Price |
Maturity |
Premium |
|
|
| $1.36 |
/£
|
| 30 days |
| $0.00081 |
/£
|
|
| $1.34 |
/£
30 days
| $0.00021 |
/£
| $1.32/£ |
30 days
| $0.00004 |
/£
$1.36/£ 60 days
| $0.0033 |
3/£
$1.34/£ 60 days
| $0.0015 |
0/£
$1.32/£ 60 days
| $0.0006 |
0/£
Assumptions |
Values |
Current spot rate (US$/£) |
$1.4260
Expected endings spot rate in 30 to 60 days (US$/£) |
$1.3200
Potential investment principal per person (£) |
£250,000.00 |
| Put options on pounds |
Put #1 |
Put #2 |
Put #3 |
|
| Strike price |
(US$/£)
$1.36 $1.34 $1.32
| Maturity (days) |
30 30 30
| Premium (US$/£) |
$0.00081 $0.00021 $0.00004
Put options on pounds
| Put #4 |
| Put #5 |
| Put #6 |
Strike price (US$/£) $1.36 $1.34 $1.32
Maturity (days) 60 60 60
Premium (US$/£) $0.0033 $0.0015 $0.0006
Issues for Sydney to consider: |
1. Because his expectation is for “30 to 60 days” he should confine his choices to the 60 day options to be sure and capture |
the timing of the exchange rate change. (We have no explicit idea of why he believes this specific timing.) |
2. The choice of which strike price is an interesting debate. |
* The lower the strike price (1.34 or 1.32), the cheaper the option price. |
* The reason they are cheaper is that, statistically speaking, they are increasingly less likely to end up in the money. |
* The choice, given that all the options are relatively “cheap,” is to pick the strike price which will yield the required return. |
* The $1.32 strike price is too far ‘down,’ given that Sydney only expects the pound to fall to about $1.32. |
Put #4 Put #5 Put #6
|
| Net profit |
Net profit Net profit
Strike price
$1.36000 |
$1.34000 |
$1.32000 |
Less expected spot rate |
|
| (1.32000) |
(1.32000) (1.32000)
Less premium |
Profit |
If Sydney invested an individual’s principal purely |
in this specific option, they would purchase an |
option of the following notional principal (£): |
Expected profit, in total (profit rate x notional): |
Initial investment at current spot rate |
Return on Investment (ROI) |
Risk: They could lose it all (full premium) |