discussion post

In this discussion, define “confidence” using behavioral terms, avoiding mentalistic explanations. Describe a specific time when you felt confident, and analyze the situation by identifying the antecedents, behaviors, consequences, and contextual factors that contributed to that feeling. Connect your explanation to the principles of reinforcement schedules or functional relationships discussed in the course.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper
  • Concepts of Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Discussion Post Rubric
  • Overview
    The discussion posts in this course are slightly different than in previous courses. The aim is to utilize all of the
    information provided in a thoughtful, synthesized argument. Each post should be unique and avoid a summary
    of the readings. Artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, is not permitted. Although many students will still use
    this resource, it almost always is obvious and scores on other assessments in the course will reflect unoriginal
    posts.

    Length of the post
    While exceptionally long posts are not automatically more scholarly, to synthesize philosophical information
    thoroughly, these posts are expected to be a bit longer than in other applied courses. Also, citations and
    article titles do not count in the word count. Please use APA format for references and citations.

    Save Time On Research and Writing
    Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
    Get My Paper

    Grammar, usage, and spelling
    The University of West Florida students receive free access to Microsoft Office and Grammarly. These are
    expected to be utilized to provide feedback on student writing before assignment submission.

    Referencing Sources
    Students are expected to cite all assigned readings within the module that a discussion post is assigned. They
    are also expected to find an outside source that is eligible and academic.

    Promotes Discussion
    At this level, high academic standards in scholarly writing are expected. Students promote discussion by
    contributing ideas and support, not summarizing assignments.

    Demonstrates Application
    The course aims to take the philosophical discussions of behaviorism and apply them to everyday activities.
    Again, a summary of the readings will not provide insight into how behaviorism is apparent in applied behavior
    analysis.

    Response to Peer
    A response to a peer is expected by the following week. The response should contribute to the conversation or
    challenge ideas. Simply stating “I said the same thing!” or “I really enjoyed the points you made” will result in
    zero points.

  • Scoring Breakdown
  • Category 10 points 5 points 0 points

    Length of Post At least 200 words. 150 – 200 words. Less than 150 words.

    Grammar, usage,
    and spelling

    No more than 1 error. 2 – 4 errors. More than 4 errors.

    Referencing Cited all the assigned
    readings and included an
    academic, outside
    reference.

    Missed 1 assigned
    reading or the outside
    reference was not
    academic or ineligible.

    Did not cite an outside
    reference and/or missed
    more than 1 assigned
    reading.

    Promotes
    discussion

    The author produces
    content beyond a
    summary and applies it
    to a logical argument.
    The author’s post
    clearly responds to the
    assignment prompt,
    develops ideas cogently,
    organizes them
    logically, and supports
    them through empirical
    writing. The author’s
    post also raises
    questions or stimulates
    discussion.

    The author’s post
    responds to the
    assignment prompt but
    relies heavily on
    definitional
    explanations and does
    not create and develop
    original ideas and
    support them logically.
    The author’s post may
    stimulate some
    discussion.

    The author’s post does
    not correspond with the
    assignment prompt,
    mainly discusses
    personal opinions,
    irrelevant information,
    or information is
    presented with limited
    logic and lack of
    development and
    organization of ideas
    Does not support any
    claims made.

    Demonstrates
    Application

    The
    author is able to apply
    content to an example
    or real world
    application
    The author’s post
    clearly demonstrates
    application and
    relationship to the
    week’s assigned
    reading/topic.

    The author’s post refers
    to the assigned
    topic/reading
    tangentially but does
    not demonstrate
    application.

    The author’s post does
    not demonstrate
    application of the
    week’s assigned
    topic/reading.

    Response to Peer Timely and thoughtful
    response to peer.

    Missed the due date or
    provided a generic
    statement to the peer.

    Missing response.

      Concepts of Applied Behavior Analysis

      Discussion Post Rubric

      Overview

      Length of the post

      Grammar, usage, and spelling

      Referencing Sources

      Promotes Discussion

      Demonstrates Application

      Response to Peer

      Scoring Breakdown

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER