Plagiarism free, APA is required for this assignment, solid academic writing is expected need back on Monday January 8, 2018 by 6 p.m.
Citing four scholarly sources, In 850 words essay explain developmental aspects of grief and bereavement for these two following life stages:
1. Childhood
2. Older adulthood
Describe the developmental stage that you believe has the most difficulty dealing with death and grieving. Explain why this stage has more difficulty than the others.
Explain why it is important for mental health workers to know the significance of culture and spirituality within stages of development.
Please read the attachment and follow rubric guidelines for this assignment.
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3 Satisfactory 79.00% |
4 Good 5 Excellent 100% 87.00% |
||
|
Content 70% |
|
||||
|
In an essay of (750-1,000 words), address the following: Describe major factors unique in each group- (Factors such as: traditions, attitudes toward death, practices, encounters with dying, death, and bereavement.) |
Essay omits or incompletely describes major factors unique in each group. |
Essay inadequately describes major factors unique in each group. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes major factors unique in each group. Description is limited. |
Essay clearly describes major factors unique in each group. Description is strong, showing sound analysis. |
Essay expertly describes major factors unique in each group. Description is comprehensive and insightful. |
|
20.0 %Describe major factors that were similar for the groups. |
Essay omits or incompletely describes major factors that were similar for the groups. |
Essay inadequately describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. |
Essay clearly describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims. |
Essay expertly describes major factors that were similar for the groups. Description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. |
|
20.0 %Describe how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. |
Essay omits or incompletely describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. |
Essay inadequately describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. |
Essay adequately describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. |
Essay clearly describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims. |
Essay expertly describes how you will use this information to assist those in the grieving process. Description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. |
|
20.0 %Organization & Effectiveness |
|||||
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
10.0 %Format |
|||||
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
100 %Total Weightage |