“Critical Thinking Paper — Draft and Self-evaluation 1” Background and Preparation: •In Week 4, Discussion 2, you picked a topic, did some brainstorming and “starbursting

“Critical Thinking Paper — Draft and Self-evaluation 1” Background and Preparation: •In Week 4, Discussion 2, you picked a topic, did some brainstorming and “starbursting” on the topic, and used the CAP process to organize the generated material into a rough outline. •In the Week 7 “Explore It” activity, you created and conducted a survey on the topic you selected. •This week, in Discussion 3, you shared the results of your survey with your classmates. •Now it is time to write a first draft of your position paper and to self-evaluate the draft. •Please note: For this assignment you will write both a draft and your self-evaluation of the draft. However, you will submit only the self-evaluation of your draft. Even though you are not submitting the draft itself, it is important to follow the guidelines below, because these are the identical guidelines for the final paper that is due in Week 10. Draft: Write a four to six (4–6) page (1000–1200 word) paper that presents a reasoned, convincing argument for a position on a selected topic. Your paper should cover the following: 1.Follow the five steps of persuasion: establishing credibility, acknowledging the audience’s position, constructing a rationale, transplanting root elements, and asking for a response. 2.Clearly define your position and supporting evidence, including the results of your survey. 3.Include all the necessary “evidence” for the reader to reach the expected conclusion in each argument in the paper (whether the over-riding argument or one contained in an individual paragraph) 4.Ensure that each argument in the paper (whether the overriding argument or one contained in an individual paragraph) is valid and free from both formal and informal fallacies. 5.Include at least four (4) references (sources). At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases accessible from the Learning Resources Center Web page. The paper should follow guidelines for clear and effectively organized writing: •The paper is well-organized, and every explanation is both complete and easy to understand. •Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph for the paper. •Main ideas should be addressed in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. •Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. •The paper should be checked for spelling and grammatical errors. The format of the paper is to be as follows: •Typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format. •In addition to the four to six (4–6) pages assigned, a title page with the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date is to be included, as well as a Reference Page. •Sources documented using APA style for in-text citations and listed on the References Page using APA style format. Self-evaluation: Note: This is the part you will submit for this assignment. After you have written the draft of your position paper, review it to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your argument. Respond to the following questions, as specifically as you can: 1.What is your topic? 2.What are the possibly different main claims/positions related to this topic? (There will be at least two (2) possibly different claims/positions, but there could be more; however, one of them will be YOUR claim/position.) 3.What is your position regarding the topic? 4.What “evidence” have you offered to support your claim/position? Have you included your survey results? 5.Put your claim/position and “evidence” through the “Scientific Method” and “Proving a theory” steps. Are there any steps on which your claim/position and evidence do not measure up to the examination? If so, what can you do to make them more acceptable? 6.Who is your intended audience? (This does not have to be specifically your instructor.) 7.What is your purpose? What do you want the audience to do, to feel, or to think? Remember that a persuasive paper is always asking for some sort of response from the audience. 8.What words or phrases have you included to cause your audience to do, feel, or think the way that you want them to do, feel, or think? Include all of your motivational or empathetic “cues” for your audience. 9.How can your position actually better meet the needs of your audience than other possible positions? 10.What more might your audience need to know before they believe that they need to do, to feel, or to think that what you are suggesting should in fact cause them to be doing, feeling, or thinking something? 11.What position that is different from yours might cause your audience not to accept your position? (Note: There may be more than one.) Now that you have identified it, what do you need to add to your own argument to convince your audience that this alternate position should be rejected in favor of your own position? 12.Can you think of anything else that your audience might need in order to be persuaded by your argument? 13.Once you have completed these tasks, start editing and revising your paper. The self-evaluation should be at least one (1) page, 250 words minimum. The evaluation should be typed. APA format is not required for the assignment. Include your name and date.

Critical Thinking Paper – Draft and Self-evaluation 2 (Due Week 9)” Once you have completed a draft which presents and defends your position for your chosen topic, look at your paper and pay careful attention to any arguments that you are using to support your position. (Note: If there are no arguments, then you have not written an argumentative paper!) Self-evaluation • On a separate sheet (not part of the paper), identify the premises and conclusion of each of the arguments in your paper. Most papers will have one overriding argument and then several smaller arguments which “prove” the truth of the premises you are making in the larger argument. • Look at each of the arguments you have located in your paper. Carefully study them to see if there are any informal fallacies. If there are any fallacies, note the name of the fallacy beneath your identified arguments. Explain why each is a fallacy. • Carefully examine each of your arguments again. Even if there isn’t an informal fallacy present, is each of the individual arguments valid? Do the premises provide enough evidence to support the conclusion? If you are not sure, try rewriting each argument as categorical syllogism and then test for validity. Under each argument, identify whether it is valid or invalid. • Explain to your instructor how you intend to change these arguments in your paper in order to be certain that they are free from fallacies and are perfectly valid. • Once you have completed these tasks, continue editing and revising your paper in order to eliminate the problems that you have just noted and to make it more persuasive. The self-evaluation should be at least one (1) page, 250 words minimum. The evaluation should be typed. APA format is not required for the assignment. Include your name and date.