Joy M. Parker
English II
Professor Karen Price
Reacting to a Written Argument Part 3:
Writing Your Own Argument
Pg. 2
The argument that is presented in this article is basically about the government and how it spends, spends, spends and not helping America . Based on this article written by John Stossel it states that “ The Government continues to threaten our future by printing gobs of money and guaranteeing trillions in loans to banks, homeowners, students and other politically connected groups.” (Stossel. J) This is neither right nor wrong based on morality. The government tries to protect the people from things so us as a whole don’t see what is going on we just hear. It is there job to make decisions for the American people just for the simple fact that we only know so much. Not saying everything they do is accurate and correct, but it ultimately benefits America.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/04/10/when-government-plays-favorites/
The reason I disagree with this article is because according to John Stossel the government is just wasting our money: Friveristly spending. That is not accurate. They take certain to steps to try to make America better, but no one see’s that. True! you don’t know where your tax dollars are going, but with all these new health care systems for low income people and things like section 8 and food stamps, that is what is helping America to succeed. You have those people who don’t think about this stuff and are just angry because they make 50 million dollars a year and have to pay taxes on it. But what about the single mother with 4 kids or the single father trying to provide, that’s what is helping them to get to the next level of life.
Fox news reported “This year, the federal government will spend $890,000 on service fees for bank funds that have $0 balances. In 2012, taxpayers were on the hook for $2 million. The government could close the accounts and save the money, but no one has done the paperwork.” (April 27, 2013) My question is what paper work needs to be done. How do they know that is accurate and where the money is going. They are trying to accommodate the rich and the poor the best way they can. Don’t get me wrong, I do think there is more that can be done, but it takes time. It’s the baby steps that will allow America to prosper and remain a great country. According to Paul Krugman with the New York Times “ there are two things you need to know about it. First, it’s temporary, and already fading out fast. Second, a large part of the stimulus “spending” was actually aid to state and local governments intended not to expand spending but to avert a fall (Krugman. P). Meaning the spending is not all in vain, its going to help us in the long run.
Sometimes people in America need to sit back and realize everything can’t be done over night. Whether thinking the government is taking all our money or not, they are trying to help. There is always going to be someone that is unhappy with whatever goes on, it can’t accommodate everyone, but they do try. Patience is a virtue, and it’s going to take just that much to see the final outcome of what can be done.
Pg. 3
References
Krugman. Paul (29, July 2011) The Conscience of a Liberal: The Truth About Federal
Spending. Retrieved from
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/29/the-
truth-about-federal-spending/
Fox News.com (27, April 2013) Government spends thousands of taxpayer dollars on
absolutely nothing. Retrieved from
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/27/government-spends-thousands-
taxpayer-dollars-on-absolutely-nothing/
Weisburg. Amy (3, April 2013) A Little Investment For A Big Future
Retrieved from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-weisberg/california-
class-sizes_b_3003631.html
Full
Sail
University
ENC1102:
English
Composition
II
Reacting
to
a
Written
Argument:
Responding
to
a
Classmate’s
Argument
Estimated
completion
time:
Two
hours
For
this
assignment,
you
will
be
responding
to
a
classmate’s
argument—the
essay
they
posted
on
the
board
on
Sunday
night.
To
view
all
of
the
arguments,
you
will
need
to
go
into
the
“Activities”
tab
and
click
on
Sunday’s
discussion
there.
You
are
required
to
include
the
following
in
your
response:
• State
which
classmate’s
arguing
you
are
responding
to.
• State
the
claim
of
the
argument—the
specific
statement
where
your
classmate
presents
his
or
her
argument.
• Say
whether
you
agree
or
disagree
with
the
claim
made.
• Explain
why
you
agree
or
disagree.
• Also
say
whether
your
classmate
presented
a
strong
argument
and
whether
he
or
she
supported
the
claim.
Provide
reasons
why
you
came
to
this
conclusion.
• If
you
disagree,
provide
strong
support
for
your
side
of
the
argument.
If
necessary,
cite
outside
sources
to
defend
your
position.
You
will
be
expected
to
use
APA
formatting
to
document
any
claim
that
you
make.
• If
you
agree,
provide
more
support
for
your
position.
• If
you
use
outside
sources,
include
both
in-‐text
parenthetical
citations
and
a
references
list.
Your
response
should
be
between
300
and
500
words
long
and
must
be
proofread
and
error-‐free.
The
word
count
does
not
include
the
references
list
if
you
have
one.
Also,
break
the
response
into
paragraphs—do
not
write
one
long
paragraph.