Coaching Model Analysis

Prepare and submit an analysis of the coaching process model in order to make connections between theory and practice and to critically assess the utility of the proposed model.

Criteria Ratings Points

Coaching
Model
Flow
Chart

70 to >63 pts

Advanced

The comments provided on
the flow chart exhibit
thorough reflection and
analysis; the comments
also provide specific
examples applicable to the
student’s sport/coaching
practice.

63 to >58 pts

Proficient

The comments provided on
the flow chart exhibit a
general reflection and
analysis; the comments
also provide some specific
examples applicable to the
student’s sport/coaching
practice.

58 to >

0 pts

Developing

The comments provided on
the flow chart exhibit a
vague reflection and
analysis; the comments
provide a few and/or no
specific examples
applicable to the student’s
sport/coaching practice.

0 pts

Not
Present

70 pts

Critical
Analysis

70 to >63 pts

Advanced

There is a thorough critical
analysis regarding the utility
of the model for coaching
the student’s sport
according to (1) Sport
Specificity, (2) Systematic
Coaching Behaviors, and
(3) Adapting the Model.

63 to >58 pts

Proficient

There is a general critical
analysis regarding the
utility of the model for
coaching the student’s
sport according to (1) Sport
Specificity, (2) Systematic
Coaching Behaviors, and
(3) Adapting the Model.

58 to >0 pts

Developing

There is a vague critical
analysis regarding the
utility of the model for
coaching the student’s
sport according to (1) Sport
Specificity, (2) Systematic
Coaching Behaviors, and
(3) Adapting the Model.

0 pts

Not
Present

70 pts

Grammar,
Structure,
and
Spelling

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

• Assignment is
well-written with correct
word choices, good
phrasing, few grammatical
errors, and few spelling
errors.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

• Assignment is
well-written with a few
errors with word choice,
phrasing, grammar, and/or
spelling; errors do not
distract or detract from the
overall meaning.

24 to >0 pts

Developing

• The assignment is poorly
written. There are
numerous errors with word
choices, phrasing,
grammar, and/or spelling;
errors distract and detract
from the overall meaning.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Format 30 to >27 pts

Advanced

• Current APA guidelines
are followed.
Assignment is 5 pages.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

• Current APA guidelines
are followed with few
errors.
Assignment is 3–4 pages.

24 to >0 pts

Developing

• Current APA guidelines
followed with frequent
errors or not followed.
Assignment is 1–2 pages.

0 pts

Not
Present

30 pts

Total Points: 200

Coaching Model Analysis Grading Rubric | SMGT621_B01_202520

SMGT 621

Coaching Model Analysis Assignment Instructions

For this assignment you will prepare and submit an analysis of the coaching process model in your text. This assignment is intended to help you make connections between theory and practice and to critically assess the utility of the proposed model. Your analysis must include 2 sections in current APA format:

1. An edited version of the
Coaching Model Flow Chart (2 pages, found under
Additional Recourses in the assignment) and

2. A critical analysis of the utility of the model that includes a partial redesign (3 pages).

For Section 1
: Using the
Coaching Model Flow Chart (provided under
Additional Recources and adapted from your course text) you will make comments on the document by reflecting on and analyzing your own coaching practice. The comments you make in the flow chart should be specific examples of applying the model to your sport and your coaching practice, to the extent that this is possible.

· When not possible, you must comment on the reason why aptness does not apply and relate to #3 in Section 2 below.

· Note: The comments must be shown on the actual
Coaching Model Flow Chart. It is advised that you print the chart, write your comments on the chart, and then scan and upload the chart to your computer. You can submit this with the second portion of your assignment.

For Section 2
: Using the 3 sections outlined in Chapter 7 of your text, critically assess the utility of the model for coaching your sport according to the following:

1. Sport Specificity,

2. Systematic Coaching Behaviors; and

3. Adapting the Model

· Note: This section must include the re-design of 1 component of the model that you have identified as not apt for your coaching context in Section 1 (use examples on page 157 of your text as examples).

Please review the
Coaching Model Analysis Grading Rubric for further information.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Recruitment

Recruitment by coach

Third party referral

Athlete approach

Organizational appointment

Organizational progression

Coach appointment

Situational review

Performance history

Initial expectations

Organizational

need/demand

Coach/athlete

need/demand

Agreement

· Contract

· Boundaries

· Conditions

Situational Analysis

Comparative standards

Resources

Facilities

Finance

Sport structures

Strategic plan

Organizational needs

Proceed

t

Introductory programme

Goal-setting

Situational analysis

Group goals

Athlete ambitions

Coach goals

Goal accommodation process

Coach evaluation of potential

Organizational goals

Implications from initial expectations

Goals

Short term

Medium term

Long term

Component content and balance

Competition programme

Pre-planning model

Integration of

· Component staging

·

Plan

ning cycles

· Immediate targets

· Activity patterns

Year or multi-year plan

Extrapolate first implementation cycle

Extrapolate first implementation cycle

Schedule cycle

Detail microcycle

Initiation phase

Strategic planning phase phase

Termination

Priorities set

Goal-setting phase

Non-intervention contact

Athlete-led activity

Competition episode

Coach Intervention

Extrapolate new cycle

t

t

Training unit preparation

Regulation phase

Preparation phase

From evaluation

Conduct session

Manage load input

To goals

Competition phase

Plan

Execute

Feedback

Progress

End Management

· Organization

· Athlete-related support role

· Forward administration

·

Recording

Initial management

· Situational assessment

· Contingency planning

· Organization

Training adaptation

Load n Load 1

Adaptation Training Component Adaptation Training Component

Next unit starting capacity

Previous unit end capacity

Evaluation Recording

Contest management

Plan
Execute

Coach role input

Feedback
Progress
Recording

Pre-contest management

· Strategy rehearsal

· Pre-start checklist

· Selection amendments

Post-contest management

· Athlete support role

· Forward administration

Decision point

· Pre-determined schedule

· Performance model

· Environmental circum.

· Athlete – current status;

· Organism readiness

Completion unit preparation

· Event strategy

· Performance expectations

Goal derived expectations

Strategic mental model

Threshold feedback

· Schedule completion

· Athlete response

· Performance outcome

· Results

t

t

Completion of cycle

Adapted from Lyle & Cushion (2017)