USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Hello, need help in business statistics I have attached problem.
>Data
3 3
7
72
Common 4
8 Common 0
7 Common 8
7 Common 64
Common 22 Common 59
Common 1 Common 3
137 Common 121 6 Common 12 Common 18 Common 10 Common 127 13 Common 6 Common 7 1 19 4 Domestic 9 Domestic 32 3 Domestic 4 6 Muni 41 6 Muni 43 5 Muni 2
35 13 Muni 6 0 Muni 5 0 Muni 29 5 Muni 13 2 Muni 6 1 Muni 25 8 Muni 9 Muni 34 7 Muni 13 1 Muni 28 9 Muni 7 3 Muni 41 13 Muni 33 6 Muni 22 4 Muni 4 2 Muni2
Judge
Disposed
Appealed
Reversed
Court
Fred Cartolano
3
0
7
1
12
Common
Thomas Crush
33
1
1
9
10
Patrick Dinkelacker
12
5
8
4
Timothy Hogan
1954
6
Robert Kraft
3
13
127
William Mathews
22
91
18
William Morrissey
30
32
121
Norbert Nadel
29
131
20
Arthur Ney Jr.
3219
25
14
Richard Niehaus
3
35
16
Thomas Nurre
3000
John O’Connor
2969
129
Robert Ruehlman
3205
145
J. Howard Sundermann Jr.
955
60
Ann Marie Tracey
31
41
Ralph Winkler
3089
88
Penelope Cunningham
2729
Domestic
Patrick Dinkelacker
6001
Deborah Gaines
8799
48
Ronald Panioto
12970
Mike Allen
6149
43
Muni
Nadine Allen
7812
34
Timothy Black
7954
David Davis
7736
Leslie Isaiah Gaines
5
28
Karla Grady
5253
Deidra Hair
2532
Dennis Helmick
7900
Timothy Hogan
2308
James Patrick Kenney
2798
Joseph Luebbers
4698
William Mallory
8277
38
Melba Marsh
8219
Beth Mattingly
2971
Albert Mestemaker
4975
Mark Painter
2239
Jack Rosen
7790
Mark Schweikert
5403
David Stockdale
5371
John A. West
2797
Read the Hamilton County Judges case study and please provide a Managerial Report that includes the following:
1. The probability of cases being appealed and reversed in each of the three different courts.
2. The probability of a case being appealed for each judge.
3. The probability of a case being reversed for each judge.
4. The probability of reversal given an appeal for each judge.
5. Rank the judges within each court. State the criteria you used and provide a rationale for the ranking method you used.
Sheet2
Sheet3
