BUS308 UAGC week 4 yellowdig

Prior to engaging in discussion in the Yellowdig community on the ANOVA Case Problem Touristopia Travel, ensure you have completed the Week 4 Learning Activity

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Your are asked to critically think about the outcome from the data analysis in the Week 4 Learning Activity. In order to receive credit for your YellowDig work, the contributions to the community are to be posted during the week the activity is assigned, (Days 1-7).

In addition to the Topic Headers in YellowDig, here are some ideas that you can use for substantial YellowDig work.

Think about what you found in your analysis of the data.

What recommendations does your ANOVA results support?

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper
  • What surprising findings did you come up with during your analysis?
  • 1
    V
    UAGC BUS 308 Week 4
    Alecia kent
    The University of Arizona Global
    Statistics for Managers BUS 308
    Victor Smolensky
    June 21, 2024
    2
    Summary
    Aerial
    Calibri
    Tahoma
    white background
    Count
    Sum
    Average
    10
    104
    310 .4
    10
    252. 5
    252. 5
    10
    2515
    251. 5
    Variance
    1761.822
    Total
    30
    8144
    271.
    4667
    2404. 278 339. 1667 2182.
    395
    green background Count
    Sum
    Average
    Variance
    10
    10
    10
    30
    2529.0
    2410.0
    2492.0
    7431.0
    252. 9
    241
    249. 2
    247. 7
    2439. 211 3104. 222 1890. 622 2332. 7
    pink background Count
    Sum
    Average
    Variance
    10
    10
    10
    30
    2532.0
    2349.0
    2064.0
    6945.0
    253. 2
    234. 9
    206. 4
    231. 5
    2407. 289 3810. 989 818. 9333 2567.
    569
    Total
    Total
    Count
    Sum
    Average
    Variance
    30
    30
    30
    8165.0
    7284.0
    7071.0
    272. 1667 242. 80
    235. 7
    2806. 971 2947. 338 1391 .114
    ANOVA
    Source of Variation
    Sample
    Columns
    Interaction
    Within
    SS
    24246.29
    22426.29
    12182.18
    170788.8
    229 643. 6
    df
    2
    2
    4
    81
    89
    MS
    12123.14
    11213.14
    3045.544
    2108.504
    F
    5.749643
    5.318058
    1.44441
    P-value
    0.004624
    0.00676
    0.226942
    F cr
    3.10
    3.10
    2.48
    3
    The above statistics were obtained after running the ANOVA.
    Regarding the background color, the Triple T website’s white background has the
    longest time spent per visit. The above conclusion has been made since the average for white
    backgrounds is 271.5, while the averages for pink and green backgrounds are 231.5 and
    257.7, respectively. Regarding the font type, Triple T visitors spent more time using the
    Aerial font. Aerial’s average is 272.2, while Tahoma’s and Calibri’s are 235.7 and 242.8,
    respectively. Based on the above observations, it can be concluded that Ariel’s font and white
    background could make Triple T’s visitors stay longer at the website compared to the other
    fonts and backgrounds. Based on the sample data, visitors spent more time (310.4 seconds)
    when the website had a combination of Ariel front and white background. However, the
    visitors spent the least time on average (206.4 seconds) when the website had a combination
    of Tahoma font and pink background. Little time was spent on Triple T’s website among
    Tahoma, Ariel, and Calibri’s fonts when the background was green.
    The company conducted a controlled experiment. I conclude that the above is because
    the organization directed visitors randomly to various websites with different fonts and
    background color combinations. The company then measured the time visitors spent on the
    websites.
    Based on the above ANOVA results, visitors’ time on the company’s website is
    unequal for the three background colors. Based on the test statistic, F=5.75 with a p-value of
    0.05>0.0046 significance level. Based on the results, it can also be concluded that the time
    spent by visitors to the company’s website is not equal for Aerial, Calibri, and Tahoma’s fonts
    as test statistic F= 5.32 with p value < 0. 05 significance level. However, there is inadequate evidence to show that the time spent by the company's visitors to the website is unequal for the nine combinations of font and background color, i.e., F= 1. 44, P value= 0. 2269> 0.05
    4
    significance level.
    Despite the combination of color and background not appearing to impact visitors’
    time, the Aerial font and white background have the longest time spent with significant test
    results. Therefore, I recommend that the company’s website should have

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER