9:097LTE
bb.fscj.edu
Course Assignment
Before you start:
1. Carefully review the instructions and information below.
2. If you prefer to print the assignment, right click on this block of text,
and choose This Framel Print Frame.
3. Prepare and save your response using a word-processing program,
such as Microsoft Word. Save it to your computer in a place where you
will be able to find it again.
4. Attach your document using the Browse My Computer button.
5. This Case Study is worth 70 points toward your total points.
Important Guidelines:
1. Your score will be determined using the Critical Legal Thinking Case
Rubric. Please read this rubric thoroughly BEFORE attempting this
assignment. You should also consult the Critical Legal Thinking “How-
to” rubric and the example case in the Critical Legal Thinking Case
Assignments of the Syllabus.
2. Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive
content. Your analysis and solutions must be based on the principles
of law, ethics, and business – not on your opinions. You MUST describe
how application of the principles to the key facts support your
determination of the issues, in other words, you need to show the
reasoning behind your decision.
3. Key facts are those facts that determine if the principles of law are
met. You must demonstrate that you recognize the key facts in this
case. List the key facts individually. Do NOT simply repeat or retype
the factual scenario.
4. The length of your response has no bearing on your score. There is no
minimum or limit, however most responses will be between two and
three substantial pages.
5. Your assignment must be prepared using APA format. See the Tools
and Resources page for more information about APA styling.
Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh
flowers, Flowers. Inc. In order to accommodate one of the company’s
best customers, Ron offers to immediately rush a delivery of fresh
peonies. All of the delivery trucks are currently out on delivery. Ron
directs an employee, Ruth, to use her own vehicle to deliver the
flowers.
Ruth carelessly parks her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral
and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolls down the hill,
knocking down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignite
a grass fire. The fire spreads until it reaches a gasoline station one
mile away. There is a tanker truck off-loading gasoline to the station’s
gas tanks. The fire ignites the gasoline being pumped into the tanks,
and one of the tanks explodes, causing part of the station structure to
fall on and injure a passing motorist, Jim.
1. Can Jim recover damages from Ruth; from Flowers’ Inc? Why or why
not?
2. Identify the cause of action. Discuss each element of the cause of
action, and relate them to your assessment of whether Jim has a
cause of action against Ruth.
3. Discuss the legal doctrine under which Jim might also recover from
Flowers, Inc.
Draft your response.