argumentive essay

Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution

Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

GEN499 Sample Final Paper

Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.

Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.

Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper
      • Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
      • Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
      • Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
      • Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
      • Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The Final Argumentative Essay

      • Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
      • Must include a separate title page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. with the following:
      • Title of paper
      • Student’s name
      • Course name and number
      • Instructor’s name
      • Date submitted
      • Running header with page numbers
      • Must include in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. rather than simply inserting it.
      • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
      • Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
      • Must include a separate reference page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
      • Source Document Requirements:
      • Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
      • Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
      • Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
      • Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
      • Religious texts must not be used.

Good Critical Thinking Tips:

  • Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
  • Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
  • Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
  • Week 5 – Final Argumentative Essay

          

          
    Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution
    Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.
    Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.
    Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:

    Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
    Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
    Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
    Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    The Final Argumentative Essay

    Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Must include a separate title page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. with the following:

    Title of paper
    Student’s name
    Course name and number
    Instructor’s name
    Date submitted
    Running header with page numbers
    Must include in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. rather than simply inserting it.
    Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
    Must include a separate reference page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Source Document Requirements:

    Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
    Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
    Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
    Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
    Religious texts must not be used.
    Good Critical Thinking Tips:

      Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
      Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
      Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.

    • Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research
    • Week 5 – Final Argumentative Essay       

          
    Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution
    Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.
    Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.
    Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:

    Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
    Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
    Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
    Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    The Final Argumentative Essay

    Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Must include a separate title page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. with the following:

    Title of paper
    Student’s name
    Course name and number
    Instructor’s name
    Date submitted
    Running header with page numbers
    Must include in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. rather than simply inserting it.
    Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
    Must include a separate reference page (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
    Source Document Requirements:

    Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
    Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
    Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
    Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
    Religious texts must not be used.
    Good Critical Thinking Tips:

      Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
      Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
      Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
      Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research

    Runninghead: ANIMAL TESTING 1

    To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing

    Student Name

    GEN 499 General Education Capstone

    Professor Millie Jones

    November 16, 2050*

    *This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a stu-
    dent. Used by permission.

    ANIMAL TESTING 2

    To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing

    The subject of animal testing raises questions of necessity. Animal testing is

    something that has been done for many years for several different reasons. It has been

    used since the dawn of medicine by physicians and scientists. From biomedical research

    to testing cosmetics, people claim that animal testing is necessary to benefit people in sa-

    tiating their need for certain products as well as saving lives. There is an idea that animals

    are the best way to find treatments and cures for people, but the treatment of animals is of

    concern for some members of society. Society is feeling more and more that animals

    have as much right to live freely in this world as humans do, and our obligation to see to

    this makes animal testing a societal problem. Due to these concerns and others, there

    have been several laws and acts formed to protect animals and minimize their suffering.

    And with the advances of technology and other discoveries, the question of the necessity

    of animal testing is becoming an issue for animal activists and lovers everywhere. The

    future of medicine and biomedical research should not rely on animals for testing. In-

    stead, we should use alternative testing methods and work toward making different life-

    style choices. These solutions create the ethical outcome of ending the suffering of these

    animals, which will have a positive influence on society and culture.

    Problem

    Animal testing has been deemed necessary for many reasons. Animal testing has

    been done to determine the safety of household cleaning products, cosmetics including

    The introduction should introduce your topic and share the societal problem that you see. At the end of the introduction, you
    should state your thesis, which should include your proposed solution to the problem. You may also state the positive ethical
    effects of your proposed solution.

    The introduction
    ends with a the-

    sis statement
    that includes the

    student’s pro-
    posed solu-
    tion(s) to the
    societal prob-
    lem. She also

    has included the
    positive ethical
    outcome of the

    solution(s).

    The introduction
    includes a very
    brief discussion
    of why this is a

    societal problem.

    {

    }
    Use section headers for

    each of the major
    sections of your paper.

    Background

    Here, the
    student is

    introducing the
    topic of animal
    testing to the

    reader.

    This first body section of your paper
    should provide some background

    information on your topic and discuss why
    this is a societal problem.

    ANIMAL TESTING 3

    skin care, shampoo and makeup, as well as biomedical research that provides medicine

    and treatments for humans and pets alike. The BioIndustry Association (2002) argues that

    “Animal research has made a vital contribution to the development of medicines that save

    many lives every day” (Taylor, 2005, p. 7). In 1938 Congress passed the Food, Drug and

    Cosmetic Act because of public demands after tragic incidents involving an untested

    product (Why Do Companies Test Cosmetics or Other Products on Animals?, 2013).

    There have been many arguments and evidence that shows the “good” that animal re-

    search has done in regards to biomedical research. Studies involving dogs, rats, rabbits,

    cats, chickens, pigs and sheep have all helped to contribute to the understanding of heart

    disease. Drugs and vaccines that can be a possible solution to the devastating HIV/AIDS

    virus are present due to the tests that have been performed on chickens, cats and monkeys

    with a similar virus. Animals have been used as models for research for almost every dis-

    ease that is known to man (Lee, 2015). If animal testing has contributed to creating drugs

    for diseases as serious as cancer and HIV/AIDS, naturally animals are being used to find

    cures and treatments for many other diseases and sicknesses.

    Therefore, how could animal testing be wrong? Indeed, research has shown that

    animal testing is helpful to progress in the field of medicine and biomedical research as

    well as developing treatments that are yielding promising results. However, it comes with

    a high cost. It comes with the cost of animals being subjected to tests that put them

    through distress and can harm or kill them. Humans and animals are both sentient beings;

    sentient meaning a person or being that has feelings or that can feel (Sentient, 2015). Re-

    search shows that 37% percent of animals used for science suffer moderate to severe

    stress and discomfort or severe pain (National Statistics, 2014). When it comes to using

    This paragraph
    discusses the first
    reason that ani-
    mal testing is a
    societal problem
    and provides evi-
    dence to support
    this.

    Reason #1

    In this paragraph,
    the student has
    given the reader

    some background
    information on the

    topic.

    ANIMAL TESTING 4

    animals for science and experimentation, people tend to focus on the fact that non-human

    animals are inferior to humans. Regardless of whether or not this is true it does not take

    away from the fact that animals are sentient and that they experience pain and seek pleas-

    ure. Animals and people react to pain in similar ways by screaming or trying to avoid the

    source of the pain. “The American Veterinary Association defines animal pain as an un-

    pleasant sensory and emotional experience perceived as arising from a specific region of

    the body and associated with actual or potential tissue damage” (Dunnuck, n.d, para. 6).

    Some of the animals used in biomedical research are not given any pain relief. They are

    subjected to painful conditions and physical procedures that leave them in intense cold or

    heat, or have limbs crushed and spinal cords damaged (Callanan, 2009). Pain and suffer-

    ing are unique to every individual. Every person’s and even animal’s pain threshold is

    different. However, evidence clearly shows the pain that is experienced by these animals

    is experienced the same way that it is in humans.

    Physical pain is unfortunately not the only problem that these animals undergo.

    Psychological distress, fear, and sadness have been demonstrated amongst a wide variety

    of species (Ferdowisiann & Beck, 2011). The use of chimpanzees and other primates for

    animal testing has generated a lot of controversy because of their similarities to humans.

    Ironically enough, it is also the reason that so many researchers have wanted to use them

    as models. Indeed chimpanzees are highly emotional and intelligent creatures that are

    evolutionarily and genetically similar to human beings. This is the argument of research-

    ers that makes them great candidates for biomedical research. Philosophy Department

    Chair Lori Gruen states, “They’re very similar to us in terms of their emotional lives and

    This next para-
    graph discusses a
    second reason
    that animal testing
    is a societal prob-
    lem and again
    provides evidence
    to support this.

    Reason #2

    ANIMAL TESTING 5

    their intellectual and physical and social experiences, and using them in painful, invasive

    ways is to harm them; they don’t consent to it” (Lee, 2015, p. 3).

    Besides the obvious reasons of the pain and suffering that these animals feel, there

    is the question of the necessity for animal testing in regards to medical advances. Despite

    the increasing number of technological alternatives to animal testing, over 100 million

    animals are legally used for animal experiments each year for medical research alone. In

    2007, England, Wales and Scotland used 3.1 million animals for genetic and biomedical

    experimentation (Callanan, 2009). In October of 2006 attendees of the opening day of the

    Joint World Congress for Stroke in Cape Town, South Africa were devastated at the fail-

    ure of a drug that was intended for ischemic stroke. The drug, NXY-059, had reached

    phase III of clinical trials and failed to do what the animals used for the research had

    promised. The drug was supposed to “stop the cascade of the necrosis in the event of a

    stroke, and protect the remaining viable brain cells” (Gawrylewski, 2007, para. #). Direc-

    tor of Michigan Alzheimer’s Diseases Research Center in the Department of Neurology

    at the University of Michigan Sid Gilman says that one of the major faults in the trials for

    NXY-059 was its use of animal models (Gawrylewski, 2007). Besides the millions of

    dollars wasted, there was a waste of life and unnecessary use of animals for painful re-

    search. This is one of many examples of disappointing let-downs of drugs that were test-

    ed on animals that did not work.

    Solution

    Considering the horrific psychological and physical pain that animals have to go

    through in the midst of testing for biomedical research, alternative testing methods are in

    Reason #3

    This paragraph
    discusses a third
    reason that ani-
    mal testing is a
    problem.

    Evidence is used
    to support this.

    Solution #1

    This next section of your paper is where
    you will discuss your proposed solu-
    tion(s) to the problem.

    ANIMAL TESTING 6

    order. According to Callanan (2009), there has been much successful research and many

    tests done to help find treatments for diseases and sicknesses that have plagued humans

    and did not involve animal testing. Many scientists have started and are continuing to de-

    velop alternate ways to test and find treatments for people because they do not want to

    harm animals. Some of these new developments include cell cultures, analytical technol-

    ogy, micro-organisms, computer models, population research, and volunteer studies. Cell

    cultures have contributed to the understanding of cancer, Parkinson’s, and HIV/AIDS.

    Analytical technology uses equipment that selects anti-cancer and anti-malaria drugs be-

    cause of the reaction it produces with DNA. Computer models are allowing for virtual

    experiments to be conducted (Callanan, 2009). Tissue engineering is also an alternative to

    animal testing. It uses a 3-D skin equivalent that is physiologically comparable to skin. It

    investigates wound healing melanoma research, infection biology, analysis of infection,

    invasion of different pathological microorganisms and immunological, histological, and

    molecular-biological analysis. This study has been inspired by economical and ethical

    incentive (Mertsching et al, 2008). Animals are subjects for painful and uncomfortable

    vaccine success for human diseases. However, some researchers have begun to rely only

    on human data, cells and tissue. As far as vaccine development goes, researchers have set

    up a surrogate in-vitro human immune system to help predict an individual’s immune re-

    sponse to certain drugs and vaccines. This test has been compared with data from animal

    experimentation and has proven to produce more accurate pre-clinical data (Ferdowsian

    & Beck, 2011). This evidence shows that alternative ways to test treatments are in fact

    possible and even better, making testing on animals more of a choice than a necessity.

    In this paragraph,
    the student dis-
    cusses her first
    solution.

    You can see that
    she used several
    pieces of evi-
    dence to support
    her argument that
    this solution is
    viable.

    ANIMAL TESTING 7

    Along with alternatives to animal testing, there are alternative lifestyle choices

    that can prevent people from having to use the drugs that are being tested on animals.

    Naturally there are some things that are out of people’s control including genetics and

    accidents that cause serious bodily harm. However, there is the choice to exercise, eat

    healthy, and engage in healthy behavior and activities that will prevent a lot of diseases

    that call for people to use some of the drugs that tested on animals. Complementary and

    alternative as well as integrative healthcare include preventative healthcare, and natural

    remedies to help treat the physical body as well as treating the mental state. Having better

    habits can help to eliminate some of the issues that these medicines that torture animals

    can be good for. For instance, headaches and migraines are a common problem unfortu-

    nately. According to the International Headache Society, 46% of the adult population suf-

    fers from regular headaches 11% suffers from migraines while about 46% suffers from

    tension headaches (as cited in Adams & Lui, 2013). Also noted is that the most common

    way that people treat headaches and migraines is through conventional medicines that

    include acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that

    may cause a plethora of issues including dry mouth, constipation, seizures, and weight

    gain. These are also some of the things that they induce animals with in order to see if the

    drugs they are giving out work. There are several different alternative methods to treating

    headaches in migraine including drinking more water, having a healthier diet, acupunc-

    ture, massage therapy, yoga, meditation, and breathing exercises. These are all cruelty

    free and have been shown to help people (Adams & Lui, 2013). Again, these alternative

    and preventative treatments offer a solution to the problem of animal testing.

    Solution #2 In this paragraph,
    the student dis-
    cusses her
    second proposed
    solution.

    You can see that
    she used several
    pieces of evi-
    dence to support
    her argument that
    this solution is
    viable.

    ANIMAL TESTING 8

    Evaluation of the Evidence

    The evidence used here is all valid and reliable and without bias. The majority of

    sources used here are scholarly, peer-reviewed articles which makes them both valid and

    reliable. There are also a few sources used here that would be considered popular sources.

    However, the information used from these sources is valid and reliable because these

    sources are secondary sources where the evidence used from them was provided by relia-

    ble organizations. For example, one source (Sentient, 2015) was used only to provide a

    definition to the reader for background information. This definition is valid and reliable.

    Another source (Why Do Companies Test Cosmetics or Other Products on Animals,

    2013) was used to provide background information on the 1938 Food, Drug and Cosmet-

    ic Act, which is also valid and reliable information. A third source was also used to pro-

    vide a definition for background information (Dunnuck, n.d). This definition is from the

    American Veterinary Association and is valid and reliable. While some of the sources can

    be seen as having biases, I do not feel that any of the evidence presented here from these

    sources is biased in any way. For example, some of the authors may very well feel

    strongly that animals should not be tested, but the evidence used was not based solely on

    opinion. Instead, it was based on facts, studies, and experts in the field. For this reason, I

    do not feel that the evidence used here contains biases. The real strength of each of my

    sources is that they did include valid and reliable evidence and they were not simply ap-

    pealing to the emotions of the reader. The main weakness of the sources is that some

    failed to provide alternative viewpoints to their argument.

    In this section evaluate all of the evidence you used by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases. Identify
    the strengths and weaknesses of your sources. Interpret and discuss the statistical data you used and explain it
    to your reader. You may even want to use visual representations such as graphs or charts to show statistics.
    Then, point out the limitations of current research and attempt to indicate areas for future research.

    Be sure to use a
    topic sentence
    for each of your

    body paragraphs
    to indicate the
    focus of the
    paragraph.

    The student
    has discussed
    why the evi-
    dence used in
    the paper is
    valid and reli-
    able and has
    discussed
    several
    sources indi-
    vidually to
    show this.

    Here, the stu-
    dent discusses
    any possible
    biases of the
    evidence pre-
    sented in the
    paper.

    Strengths and
    weaknesses of
    the sources
    are also pre-
    sented.

    ANIMAL TESTING 9

    Several of the sources provide statistical data that needed to be interpreted. The

    statistic from National Statistics (2014) about the percentage of animals for science that

    suffer can be seen in the following graph:

    This statistical evidence shows that while there are certainly animals used for research

    that are not suffering, more than 37% are suffering, which is more than a third of all of

    these animals. These statistics provide evidence that show a concrete percentage of the

    suffering that is occurring.

    The future of biomedical research can continue to make advances without causing

    harm and suffering to sentient beings. However, more research will need to be done to

    find additional alternatives and to make the most out of the current alternatives. There is

    also limited research on preventative measures of healthcare related to the issue of animal

    testing. It would be useful to see more correlation studies done on preventative medicine

    and a drop in the need for biomedical testing.

    In this paragraph,
    the student inter-
    prets statistical
    data from a
    source and also
    provides a graph
    to show a visual
    representation of
    this data. Be sure
    to cite any visual
    data that you
    include.

    Here, the stu-
    dent states
    some of the
    limitations of
    current re-
    search on the
    topic and/or
    areas where
    more research
    is needed.

    ANIMAL TESTING 10

    Ethical Outcomes of Solution

    The issue about the physical and emotional pain that animals feel during animal

    testing has been considered by supporters a “necessary evil.” This offers insight to a utili-

    tarian view of why we use animals for testing purposes. Utilitarianism is the idea that

    when there is a choice between two acts, the one chosen should yield the greatest amount

    of happiness for the greatest number of people (Mosser, 2013). There is an obvious corre-

    lation with this way of thinking when it comes to animal research. Throughout different

    studies involving the opinions and thoughts on animal testing, people use words like “re-

    grettably” or phrases like “necessary evil.” The BioIndustry Association (2002) states,

    “If we are to develop effective new treatments against mass killers such as cancer and

    heart disease, regrettably [animal testing] will continue to be necessary for the foreseea-

    ble future” (Taylor, 2005, p. 7). The utilitarian view claims that despite whether people’s

    acts are morally right or wrong, the results, consequences, or effects of the acts shown

    will determine the morality of what is done (Regan, 1997). The theory of utilitarianism

    shows that ending animal testing would lead to a negative outcome for society because it

    could cause more people to suffer.

    Ending animal suffering is clearly a positive ethical outcome, and the solutions of

    alternative testing and alternative lifestyles can create this outcome. One of the issues that

    animal activist have with this practice is that animals are sentient beings who feel and are

    very aware of what is happening to them. They feel pain and fear in knowing that they

    are being harmed. It has been shown in research and is no secret that animals are sentient

    and feel pain and react to pain virtually the same way that humans do. It presents an ethi-

    cal dilemma because animal testing inflicts pain, suffering, and death to non-consenting

    This first para-
    graph of this sec-
    tion shares an
    argument that
    could be consid-
    ered a negative
    ethical outcome to
    her proposed so-
    lutions.

    This second par-
    agraph of this
    section shares an
    argument that
    could be consid-
    ered a positive
    ethical outcome to
    her proposed so-
    lutions.

    Negative
    Outcomes

    Positive
    Outcomes

    For this section of the paper, the stu-
    dent discusses ethical arguments for
    and against implementing her proposed
    solutions. In this section, you can refer
    to ethical theories as well as your own
    personal ideas about what is ethical or
    unethical.

    ANIMAL TESTING 11

    sentient beings (Masterton, 2014). Their lives obviously mean something to them due to

    the noticeable depression they are in when under the conditions of tortuous research. Re-

    gardless of the good that animal testing has done, it does not take away from the fact that

    pain and suffering is involved to the beings that are a part of it. Using alternative testing

    practices and adopting alternative lifestyles of preventative care can help eliminate the

    need for harming animals in the name of medicine.

    The positive ethical outcome of ending the suffering of animals in the name of

    medicine outweighs the argument that testing animals provides the greatest good for the

    greatest number. The reason for this is that the argument for the negative ethical outcome

    can actually be avoided by using alternative testing measures. We can still continue to

    test medicines and treatments without the use of animals. Scientist and researchers alike

    are developing and testing new alternatives without having to set back all of the hard

    work that has already been done and these alternatives have been successful. Finding

    ways to treat and heal alternatively removes the horror of animal testing. Therefore, this

    “necessary” evil is not necessary after all. And the greatest good for the greatest number

    can still be reached without making animals suffer. Also, the solution of changing our

    lifestyles to prevent needing so much medicine will lead to the greatest good for the

    greatest number as well.

    Conclusion

    While animal testing is a social concern for our society and culture, there are

    ways that we can and should work to eliminate this. One major way to do this is by re-

    searching and investing in alternative testing measures. There are alternatives that cur-

    rently exist and are being used, but this needs to continue at a greater rate. The cost of

    In this section, summarize the main
    points made in your paper.

    Here, the stu-
    dent has
    shown a
    rationale for
    why her pro-
    posed solution
    will produce a
    positive ethical
    outcome.

    Rationale

    ANIMAL TESTING 12

    delaying this is the unnecessary suffering of innocent animals. We should also continue

    with the current trend of investing in preventative healthcare such as living a healthy life-

    style to help eliminate illnesses and the need for medicines. We now know more than ev-

    er about the benefits and risks of certain foods, products, and behaviors and we are in a

    greater position to use this for the good of all living beings. This is an important issue to

    tackle because the way that we treat those who are not in a position of power, such as an-

    imals, reflects on our identity and who we are as a culture and a society. Our character is

    in question if we continue to allow unnecessary suffering to animals to happen.

    The student
    ends her pa-
    per by stating
    why this is an
    important
    conversation.

    ANIMAL TESTING 13

    References

    Adams, J., Barbery, G., & Lui, C. (2013). Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use

    for Headache and Migraine: A Critical Review of the Literature. Headache: The

    Journal Of Head & Face Pain, 53(3), 459-473 15p. doi:10.1111/j.1526-

    4610.2012.02271.x.

    Callanan, C. (2009). Tests on trial. Nursing Standard, 23(21), 19-21.

    Dunnuck, H. (n.d). Save the animals: Stop animal testing. Retrieved from

    http://www.lonestar.edu/stopanimaltesting.htm

    Ferdowsian, H. R., & Beck, N. (2011). Ethical and scientific considerations regarding

    animal testing and research. PLoS One, 6(9)

    doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024059.

    Gawrylewski, A. (2007, July 1). The trouble with animal models. The Scientist. Retrieved

    from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/25184/title/The-Trouble-

    with-Animal-Models/

    Lee, M. (2015, Mar 26). Animal testing poses ethical questions. University Wire

    Masterton, M., Renberg, T., & Kälvemark Sporrong, S. (2014). Patients’ attitudes to-

    wards animal testing: “to conduct research on animals is, I suppose, a necessary

    evil”. BioSocieties, 9(1), 24-41. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2013.39

    Mertsching, H., Weimer, M., Kersen, S., & Brunner, H. (2008). Human skin equivalent

    as an alternative to animal testing. GMS Krankenhaushygiene Interdisziplinaer, 31-4.

    National Statistics (2014, July 10). Statistics of scientific procedures on living animals,

    Great Britain 2013. Retrieved from

    http://www.lonestar.edu/stopanimaltesting.htm

    ANIMAL TESTING 14

    https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-

    living-animals-great-britain-2013

    Regan, T. (1997). The Rights of Humans and Other Animals. Ethics & Behavior, 7(2),

    103.

    Sentient (2015). In the Academic world book. Retrieved from the World Book Academic

    database.

    Taylor, R. (2005). Testing drugs on animals: A test case for socially responsible invest-

    ment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 164-175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-

    8608.2005.00400.x.

    Why do companies test cosmetics or other products on animals? (2013). Retrieved from

    http://www.animalresearchcures.org/testing.htm.

    http://www.animalresearchcures.org/testing.htm

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER