Add 1 page to the current content

I need 1 page added to the current work. Instructions and current paper 

Final Project

Developing a Case Study

For your Final Project, you will develop a case scenario. The purpose for developing a case scenario is for you to demonstrate your understanding of the materials covered in the course and relate it to professional experiences. Students producing excellent case scenarios may be asked to submit their work to the Public Administration Genome Project (PAGP). The PAGP is an attempt to digitally “map” and employ the full set of topics (“genes”), variables, and interrelationships that comprise all the matters that make up public administration. It is based on the Human Genome Project—the effort to identify and codify 35,000 or so genes in our DNA. Few people would deny that the public administration world—like the world in general—is becoming more and more complicated. Plus, no one could possibly know, much less remember, the many strategies, external forces, and their interconnected impacts that might apply in a particular situation. Hence there is a need for a comprehensive, logical, and readily available system to help capture such topics, variables, and interrelationships. Such a system could provide a rational and scientific approach to public administration and, as a result, further enhance the field’s impact on public matters such as health, security, and welfare. Contributors submit source cases in a partially structured, systematic format. The cases then are placed into a wiki database known as ComPASS (COMprehensive PA Support System). There currently are about 82 cases. The full set of cases presently includes about 15,000 variables and 15,500 relationships.

Your Final Project must be presented as a 12- to 15-page (not including references, title page, or abstract), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper that is submitted by Day 7 of Week 11. Refer to Week 11 for specific instructions for submission.

Case Scenario Guidelines

Select an actual event from your prior professional experience in which you or the organization(s) with which you work developed, enacted, implemented, and/or impacted public policy. If you do not have an example of a professional experience or organization, select one from the literature (i.e., reputable newspapers, periodicals, websites, etc.) with which you are familiar enough to complete this Assignment. Think in broad terms about the definition of public policy. Social change and/or an organization’s strategic agenda are acceptable.

Write a case scenario that illustrates how you or your organization developed, enacted, implemented, and/or impacted public policy.

Organize the case scenario according to the following format:

Background: Provide the background for the case scenario. The background section of the paper must include but is not limited to the following:

· A brief description of the organization(s) involved including the country where the case originates

· A description of the policy issue and how it was addressed

· An explanation of the desired outcome or goal

· An explanation of the action undertaken to achieve the outcome (i.e., was the organization attempting to develop, enact, implement, and/or impact public policy or was it a combination of these activities and what was done?)

· A detailed description of the actual policy outcome and an explanation of the factors that may have impacted it

Variables: Provide a description of the variables that effected the development, enactment, and implementation of the public policy. Use the following prompts to help structure this section. Please note, not all prompts will apply to the event you select.

· Explain what, if any, basic democratic concepts, principles, and processes were involved.

· Explain the network interactions involved, if any, and explain what they were.

· Explain the tools of democracy or strategies your organization used.

· Describe the leaders and explain their influence on the process.

· Explain the ethical concerns and implications surrounded the action.

· Explain diversity issues involved, if any, and explain how they were addressed.

· Explain whether the action presented a challenge to democratic governance and explain how those challenges were addressed.

· Explain the role of technology in the process.

Relationships: Describe the relationships among the variables you explained in the previous section. For example, did the actors in the policy network related to the event influence the type of tools used to implement a policy? Or, did social networking technology used to connect actors lead to ethical issues surrounding privacy? Be creative and think about all the possible relationships among the variables.

Insights: Share conclusions, insights, and recommendations that emerged from your experiences and the development of the case scenario. Include insights you have gained concerning how this case might have played out differently in a different country or culture as well as how the public policy might effect social change.

Bibliography: Provide a bibliography of all works you used in the development of this Final Project.

Please consult your Instructor for approval if the event you selected is not drawn from your prior professional experience.

Your Final Project will be graded on a 142-point scale and is worth 20% of your final grade.

More efforts would also be needed to increase financial mediation to direct more durable capital and investments that would finance and fund infrastructure. A significant and important source has corporate investors that hold massive and infinite amounts of savings that can be fully utilized and used with supportive moderations to enable improved supply of suitable and reliable proposals. The public policy in this case scenario also encouraged making use of government loans and bonds in order to achieve suitable levels of infrastructure in the nation. It was decided that it would be better to work underway to review the various ways in which the funding sector could take account of issues related to climate and help channel more funding to suitable investments in infrastructure. In conclusion, bearing in mind that Uganda is a developing country, it was noted that there was the need to greatly improve efforts to develop the country’s local capital markets. The reason for stating this is because it would be cardinal in funding investment, mostly in middle-income and developing countries such as Uganda.

It was agreed upon that with leadership and guidance from members of the global economic powerhouses and developed countries, the dream that was nurtured through the implementation of this policy would be easily achievable. This would in turn help in making Uganda gain economic supremacy through the Operation Sustainable Infrastructure policy. With the support from both the government and the public, it would not take long for the fruits of this policy to be experienced.

With time, the desired goals and outcomes would start to be experienced as a result of sustaining a desired level of infrastructure in order to impact economic growth. For instance, the outcomes can be experienced in health and social amenities in Uganda which after the implementation of the OSI policy have been structured according to the desired levels. This has affected social change, in that Ugandan citizens are happy accessing health services from state of the art facilities. Another desired goal that arose from the enacting of the public policy is in the development of transport and communications systems in Uganda. Prior to the strategizing and implementation of this policy, the transport and communication system in Uganda had suffered a great blow. The poor conditions of roads was a nightmare to the citizens and most of them incurred heavy losses due to the direct impact that transport had in the smooth operation of the people’s business activities. However, the technological advancement contributed to the successful implementation of the project, by utilizing knowledge and level of knowhow to make infrastructure development a reality.

Conclusion

It is interesting to note that the public policy case study on sustainable infrastructure in Uganda proved to be a master plan that set out to achieve greatness in the country. It is crucial to note that if this policy was implemented in the already developed countries such as China, or the United States of America, the results would have affected a magnitude of the desired impacts all over these countries. Needless to say, the desired goals have already started to be experienced in Uganda in a gradual process that will prove to be ultra-successful in the coming days. With sustainable infrastructural developments in the country, the economy is set to experience a high development index and it is our hope that the goal to conserve the climate will also be achieved.

References

Committee for Economic Development. & Committee for Economic Development. (2006).

reducing global poverty: Encouraging private investment in infrastructure: a CED policy update. Washington, D.C: CED.

Ferroni, M. A., Gerrard, C. D., Mody, A., & Workshop on Global Public Policies and Programs.

(2001). Global public policies and programs: Implications for financing and evaluation; proceedings from a World Bank workshop. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Great Britain. (2007). International policies and activities of the Research Councils: Ninth report

of Session 2006-07. London: Stationery Office.

Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2017). Global developments in public infrastructure Procurement: Evaluating public-private partnerships and other procurement options.

In Driouchi, A., & Forum Euroméditerranéen des Instituts de Sciences Économiques,. (2014). Knowledge-based economic policy development in the Arab world.

John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Continuum.

Knoepfel, P. (2011). Public policy analysis. Bristol: Policy Press.

Moran, M., Rein, M., & Goodin, R. E. (2006). The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Qureshi, Z. (2016). Meeting the challenge of sustainable infrastructure: The role of public policy.

Sarté, S. B. (2010). Sustainable infrastructure: The guide to green engineering and design. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

OECD, P. O. E. C. D. D. C., Organisation, E. C.-D., & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Perspectives on global development 2013: industrial policies in a changing world.

Silova, I., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2008). How NGOs React: Globalization and education reform

in the Caucasus, Central Asia, and Mongolia. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

Qureshi, Z. (2004). Policies and actions for achieving the millennium development goals and

related outcomes. Washington, DC: World Bank.