Business Question

Dear Freelancer, please fix the attached presentation according to the below feedback. Presentation to edit is in the below link.

https://we.tl/t-PcJxLIquhp

What and how to fix:

1. Check the examples provided

2. The personas should be in the beginning of the project ( project objectives page or around that page)

3. The scenarios should be not in the way he specified, please check the examples to see and understand how you can write the scenarios and where because it’s an important part of the task

4. The references list should be only in the end of the project on the last slide.

5. All the images you added in the task should be referred to Saxion university campus, The Handelskade campus

6. Project Approach

7. POE

8. Multi criteria analysis within 1 page but before the multi criteria analysis page you should provide three alternatives solutions which are three scenarios, three scenarios should be as in the example you did a scenario but not as in the task so please check the scenarios, and multi criteria analysis should be like in table, also I’m asking you kindly to check the examples to better understand the situation,

Strategic Building Management – Coursework assignment 2 – Assessment form
Student instruction: see Paragraph7.2.2. of the student guide
…
0
1
…
…
Examiners instruction: see column C for points of attention while grading the work
2
No
0
3
Yes
1
Name assessor:
2
Date of assessment:
Dutch grade:
British grade:
4
Competence
Criteria
Side constraints
Use of the English language
Side letter
Referencing
Competence 1
Competencies 4
+5
Competencies 4
+5
Competence 4
Compentence
4
Competence 4+
5
Competencies
1+5
Competency
5
Introduction of the context
Introduction of the business and the dynamics of the business
environment, including trends and developments. Identification of
relevant issues,that lead to the focus for the building performance
evaluation.
Building Performance Evaluation
Organisation perspective: explicitly link the organisation’s issues or
strategic challenges to the building (for example, by establishing themes,
added values or housing ambitions) The analysis of the (mis)match
between demand and supply is performed using relevant models.
User/functional perspective: through the execution of a Post Occupancy
Evaluation or secondary data analysis, establish the (mis)match between
functional demand and the performance of the work environment.
Identification of optimisation potential
Holistic conclusions on the performance evaluation-findings and
identification for optimisation potential. Optimisations in functionality of
the space are translated to impact on business performance (organisation
perspective).
Project pitch
Convincing elaboration of selected option in a project proposal for the
management board. Clear discussion of project outline and deliverables.
The pitch must by tailored to the target audience, convincing and concise
storytelling
Student number:
Attention points
Decision
No
No
No
Correct spelling and grammar
Side letter of max 10 pages included
According tot APA standard
Based on an analysis of the corporate strategy, trends and
developments, the student is capable of selecting these
business issues that are impacted by the performance of
the building. From these, the student selects a well argued
focus for the building performance evaluation.
Use suitable models/methodologies to judge and reflect on
the building’s performance from the organisation’s
perspective (ambitions). The conclusions are presented in
the presentation, the analysis is elaborated in the side
letter.
Use suitable models/methodologies to assess the building’s
performance from the functional (user) perspective (POE),
motivated in the side letter. The conclusions of the POE are
included in the presentation, the underlying data analysis in
the side letter. .
0
1
Unclear or
Incomplete
missing
description
context,
of business
trends and and
developmen context,
ts or focus and/or
for
unclear or
performanc irrelevant
e evaluation focus
0
Tools/methods
BPE not
used in a
proper way.
No clear
analysis of
the current
situation.
0
Based on the building performance evaluation from strategic Missing or
and functional perspective, the student identifies the
very
potential for optimisation. The student demonstrates the
inconsistent
ability to link functional optimisation to impact on business with
level. Where possible, student uses academic evidence to
previous
underpin the expected outcome.
parts
.
Three scenario’s/options are developed for solving the mismatch between The three scenario’s are relevant for the issues identified.
demand and supply or for improved building performance.
The relation between the analysis and possible solutions in
terms of scenario’s or interventions is clear.
The scenario’s are evaluated in a weighted multicriteria evaluation that
leads to the selection of a scenario that delivers best value for money.
Name student:
The criteria are weighted based on the (expetected) impact
on the succes of the coporate strategy (organisation
perspective) and their expected impact of the building
performance/solving the mismatch (functional perspective).
The project pitch clearly communicates the ambitions and
deliverables and project organisation (time line and team),
without getting lost into details. It should help the board
decide on a go/no go for the project.
It is pitch to convince the management-board of the need
to lanch a project, so it should be convincing, a good read
and attractive for the non-specialist audience, concise, tothe-point and insightfull.
Missing or
very
inconsistent
with
outcomes
performanc
e analysis
Missing
MCA
0
Weak
relation to
previous
parts, or
incomplete
Yes
Yes
Yes
2
Coherent
but
descriptive
overview of
business,
context and
focus.
3
Compact
and
complete
(graphic)
overview of
business,
its context
resulting in
a motivated
choice of
focus.
1 (2)
2 (3-4)
3 (5-6)
Insufficient Suffcient
2 + higher
or
conclusions level of
inconsistent on
abstraction
use of tools, alignment
unclear or
issues using
incorrect
relevant
conclusions models
on
alignment
Insufficient
analysis of
the current
situation
due to
incorrect or
missing
parts, weak
alignment
Sufficiently
clear
analysis of
the match
between
demand
and supply
from a
functional
persective
using a
limited but
suitable
dataset ( 3
points
barely
sufficient
data, 4
points
sufficient
data)
4+ good
quality
POE/dataset
or (5) and
(6)
motivation
of methods
used
1 (2)
2 (3-4)
Insufficient Holistic
insight in
assessment
potential for of potential
optimisatio for
n or only 1 optimisatio
perspective n
addressed
3 (5-6)
2+ with an
evidence
based
approach.
Weak
relation
with
outcomes
performanc
e analysis
or limited
scenarios
3 basic
4+
scenarios
expected
address the improveme
outcomes of nt is clear
the
or (5) and
performanc (6)
e analysis
scenarios
(3), 4 points are creative
if scenarios
are
distinctive
insufficient Multicriteria
and/or
analysis
inconsistent includes all
assessment, relevant
unclear
aspects for
criteria/wea a holitsic
k
and aligned
alignment
evaluation.
…
…
…
X
3
…
X
3
…
6
…
X
3
…
6
…
3
…
6
…
6
…
2+ highlevel
interpretion
.
1 (2)
2 (3-4)
3 (5-6)
Incomplete Project
4+ high(er)relation
pitch is
level
between
aligned with translation
proposed
previous at into
solution and a
deliverables
project
descriptive and
pitch.
level. 3
requirement
points for
s
scolarly
approach, 4
points for
business
style
Highly
Insufficient Moderately Attractive or
insufficient pitch in
attractive
and
pitch in
terms of
pitch but
convincing
terms of
alignment
tone of
pitch for
alignment
with
voice/level nonwith
managemen of
specialist
managemen t board
detail/convi audience
t board
audience
ncingness
(manageme
audience
storyline,
could be
nt board) (5
storyline,
attractivene improved (3 points). 6
attractivene ss, not fully points if all points for
ss, not
convincing can be
5+ creative
convincing
improved, 4 work.
points for
some
Competence 5
The side letter offers a transparant underpinning of the presented
The side letter transparantly underpins the methodological
conclusions and supports the advise given. The goal of the side letter is to choices, the data analyses and conclusions reached, but
establish trust in the board in the quality of the analysis and the
leaves out unneccesary details.
correctness of the conclusions.
Missing side Incomplete Transparant 2+ with the
letter
motivation underpinnin help of
of choices, g of
competent
methodolog choices,
methodes
y, data
methodolog
analysis or y, data
way too
analysis and
much detail conclusions
given
TOTAL:
3
…
Max
39
Score
0
Dutch grade:
not finished yet
British grade:
9
1
1
Explanation:
Note: assessment details are not complete
Explanation:
Note: assessment explanations are not complete
Ned omzetting
1
=
2
=
3
=
4
=
5
=
6
=
7
=
8
=
9
=
10
=
NL
omzet top
Score NL
0
4
8
12
17
22
26
31
35
38
0
1
1
–
3
7
11
16
21
25
30
34
37
39
Engelse Omzetting
0%
=
5%
=
10%
=
15%
=
20%
=
25%
=
30%
=
35%
=
40%
=
45%
=
50%
=
55%
=
60%
=
65%
=
70%
=
75%
=
80%
=
85%
=
90%
=
95%
=
100%
ENG
omzet top
Score ENG
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
1
2
3
4
6
8
11
14
18
22
25
28
31
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
–
0
1
2
3
5
7
10
13
17
21
24
27
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Engelse Omzetting
0
0%
1
5%
2
10%
3
15%
4-5
20%
6-7
25%
8-10
30%
11-13
35%
14-17
40%
45%
18-21
22-24
50%
25-27
55%
28-30
60%
31-32
65%
33
70%
34
75%
35
80%
36
85%
37
90%
38
95%
39
100%