Event Planning for an International Conference and IT Integration

What am I required to do in this assignment?

Your assessment task is comprised of two main parts.

Part 1: Assessment Checkpoint No 1 (worth 15% of the overall assessment):

Checkpoint Task: During the assessment checkpoint session, students will be presented with three detailed project management simulation scenarios. They will be required to attend the checkpoint project briefing session to cover the following items:

Overview of the simulated project, objectives, and deliverables.

Presentation of potential challenges and risks in the project.

Introduction to available project management tools and techniques that can be used to address the challenges.

To pass the checkpoint successfully, students must actively participate in the briefing session and submit a brief project plan outlining their initial approach to tackling the simulation. During the checkpoint session, your tutor will confirm your project management simulation scenario. Students must present in class (a 5-minute presentation in class) and upload slides using the BREO submission link. The presentation for Assessment Checkpoint 1 must be done in the third week. So, students shall finalise their selected scenario and start working on their assessment.

Engagement Requirement:

Students are encouraged to attend and actively participate in the checkpoint briefing session. The specific date for the checkpoint briefing session will be determined by your tutor and communicated to you during class and through BREO announcements. The checkpoint aims to ensure active engagement and prepare students for real-world application.

Part 2: Summative final report (weight: 85%)

2.1 Scenario Analysis (Weight: 50%)

Students will be presented with a real-life project scenario, complete with a project brief, objectives, constraints, and stakeholders’ details. They will be asked to thoroughly analyse the scenario and propose an appropriate project management approach. The proposal should include the following elements:

Project scope and deliverables

Stakeholder analysis and engagement plan

Work breakdown structure (WBS)

Project schedule (Gantt chart or other suitable formats)

Risk assessment and mitigation plan

2.2 Project Evaluation and Lessons Learned (Weight: 20%)

In this part of the assessment, you are required to assess the success of the completed project. You are required to critically analyse the project’s performance against initial objectives and outcomes, identify key lessons learned, and propose evidence-based recommendations for future improvement.

2.3 Process log (15%)

Make sure to complete the process log documenting the various steps you have taken on your learning journey. Process logs will help you identify gaps in your learning and seek help where needed. You can find the template for process logs in your BREO shells under the Assessment & Feedback page. Students must add their completed process log to the appendices of their main report.

You may choose one of the scenarios below. During the assessment checkpoint session, your tutor will confirm your allocated project management simulation scenario. Your attendance and engagement with the checkpoint activity are compulsory.

Project Management Simulation Scenarios:

Scenario 1: “Communication plan with Stakeholders and IT integration”

Description: To organise a communication plan for the project sponsor to deliver the ensure products supply in three different countries on AI-driven supply chains. The project aims to address global challenges and foster cooperation between nations. The project uses ERP to ensure communication, coordination, quality management and networking.

Project length: 1 year

Estimated Supply: 100,000 products in 3 countries.

Supply Chain Budget: £8 million

Key Stakeholders: IT Department, Business Units, Government Representatives, Foreign Partners

Summit Dates: 4 days in a prestigious venue

Estimated Attendance: 1,000 delegates from 50 countries

Summit Budget: £8 million

Key Stakeholders: Organizing Committee, IT Department, Business Units, Government Representatives, International Delegates

Challenges:

Communication, coordination, and quality management are the key aspects to be linked with the IT system for smooth working and information dissemination

.

Coordinating with foreign partners, supply chain management, key supply chain tools and techniques for different countries as per entry requirements.

Ensuring smooth logistics for supply, warehouse and safety of the products.

Planning and executing multilingual interpretation food labels and packaging services as per the country’s requirements.

Communication, coordination, and quality management are the key aspects to be linked with the IT system for smooth working and information dissemination

Coordinating with diplomatic missions and obtaining visas for delegates from countries with strict entry requirements.

Ensuring smooth logistics for travel, accommodation, and security for international delegates.

Planning and executing multilingual interpretation services for participants from different linguistic backgrounds.

Festival Days: 3 days in a country of your choice

Estimated Attendance: 3000 guests from around the globe

Festival Budget: £6 million

Key Stakeholders: Organizing Committee, Government Representatives, International guests, IT Business units, stakeholders.

Project risk impacting the project planning process.

Ensuring smooth logistics, safety and security for customers and tourists.

Planning and executing multilingual interpretation services for participants from different linguistic backgrounds.

Ensuring quality management, waste management and IT system for communication with the event planners and security system.

Balancing the need for minimal disruption to the existing city’s daily routine disruption while executing the festival plan.

Scenario 2: “Event Planning for an International Conference and IT Integration”

Description: To organise an international summit to bring political leaders, diplomats, and industry experts from various countries. The summit aims to address global challenges and foster cooperation between nations. The event includes keynote addresses, panel discussions, workshops, and networking sessions.

Challenges:

Scenario 3: “Potential Stakeholders for a Global Gala Festival “

Description: Students are assigned to organise a global gala event and propose strategies to manage various categories of stakeholders for a successful outcome. The project aims to address the communication, coordination and quality management as well as the challenges faced in ensuring the timely management of the project execution.

Assignment Brief
Submission Deadline
Marks and Feedback
Before 10am on:
20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)
15 working days after deadline (L6)
10 working days after deadline (block delivery)
19/07/2024
09/08/2024
Key assignment details
Unit title & code
Management and Administration of Projects and Operations BSS056-3
Assignment number and title
1 Written report
Assignment type
Report
Weighting of assignment
40%
Size or length of assessment
2400 words
Unit learning outcomes
1.
Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding
•
2.
Understand the strategic context of operations and project management and how
tools, techniques, frameworks and academic models relate to operations and project
management solutions.
Demonstrate the following skills and abilities
•
Analyse the operational and project management requirements of organisations to generate
appropriate and coherent solutions whilst demonstrating the practical application of project
management software to develop a project plan
What am I required to do in this assignment?
Your assessment task is comprised of two main parts.
Part 1: Assessment Checkpoint No 1 (worth 15% of the overall assessment):
Checkpoint Task: During the assessment checkpoint session, students will be presented with three detailed project management simulation
scenarios. They will be required to attend the checkpoint project briefing session to cover the following items:
ABT2020_V1
•
•
•
Overview of the simulated project, objectives, and deliverables.
Presentation of potential challenges and risks in the project.
Introduction to available project management tools and techniques that can be used to address the challenges.
To pass the checkpoint successfully, students must actively participate in the briefing session and submit a brief project plan outlining their
initial approach to tackling the simulation. During the checkpoint session, your tutor will confirm your project management simulation
scenario. Students must present in class (a 5-minute presentation in class) and upload slides using the BREO submission link. The presentation
for Assessment Checkpoint 1 must be done in the third week. So, students shall finalise their selected scenario and start working on their
assessment.
Engagement Requirement:
Students are encouraged to attend and actively participate in the checkpoint briefing session. The specific date for the checkpoint briefing
session will be determined by your tutor and communicated to you during class and through BREO announcements. The checkpoint aims to
ensure active engagement and prepare students for real-world application.
Part 2: Summative final report (weight: 85%)
2.1 Scenario Analysis (Weight: 50%)
Students will be presented with a real-life project scenario, complete with a project brief, objectives, constraints, and stakeholders’ details.
They will be asked to thoroughly analyse the scenario and propose an appropriate project management approach. The proposal should include
the following elements:
•
•
•
•
•
Project scope and deliverables
Stakeholder analysis and engagement plan
Work breakdown structure (WBS)
Project schedule (Gantt chart or other suitable formats)
Risk assessment and mitigation plan
2.2 Project Evaluation and Lessons Learned (Weight: 20%)
In this part of the assessment, you are required to assess the success of the completed project. You are required to critically analyse the
project’s performance against initial objectives and outcomes, identify key lessons learned, and propose evidence-based recommendations
for future improvement.
2.3 Process log (15%)
Make sure to complete the process log documenting the various steps you have taken on your learning journey. Process logs will help you
identify gaps in your learning and seek help where needed. You can find the template for process logs in your BREO shells under the
Assessment & Feedback page. Students must add their completed process log to the appendices of their main report.
You may choose one of the scenarios below. During the assessment checkpoint session, your tutor will confirm your allocated project
management simulation scenario. Your attendance and engagement with the checkpoint activity are compulsory.
Project Management Simulation Scenarios:
Scenario 1: “Communication plan with Stakeholders and IT integration”
Description: To organise a communication plan for the project sponsor to deliver the ensure products supply in three different countries on
AI-driven supply chains. The project aims to address global challenges and foster cooperation between nations. The project uses ERP to ensure
communication, coordination, quality management and networking.
•
•
•
•
Project length: 1 year
Estimated Supply: 100,000 products in 3 countries.
Supply Chain Budget: £8 million
Key Stakeholders: IT Department, Business Units, Government Representatives, Foreign Partners
Challenges:
•
•
•
•
Communication, coordination, and quality management are the key aspects to be linked with the IT system for smooth working
and information dissemination.
Coordinating with foreign partners, supply chain management, key supply chain tools and techniques for different countries as per
entry requirements.
Ensuring smooth logistics for supply, warehouse and safety of the products.
Planning and executing multilingual interpretation food labels and packaging services as per the country’s requirements.
Scenario 2: “Event Planning for an International Conference and IT Integration”
Description: To organise an international summit to bring political leaders, diplomats, and industry experts from various countries. The summit
aims to address global challenges and foster cooperation between nations. The event includes keynote addresses, panel discussions,
workshops, and networking sessions.
•
•
•
•
Summit Dates: 4 days in a prestigious venue
Estimated Attendance: 1,000 delegates from 50 countries
Summit Budget: £8 million
Key Stakeholders: Organizing Committee, IT Department, Business Units, Government Representatives, International Delegates
Challenges:
•
•
•
•
Communication, coordination, and quality management are the key aspects to be linked with the IT system for smooth working
and information dissemination
Coordinating with diplomatic missions and obtaining visas for delegates from countries with strict entry requirements.
Ensuring smooth logistics for travel, accommodation, and security for international delegates.
Planning and executing multilingual interpretation services for participants from different linguistic backgrounds.
Scenario 3: “Potential Stakeholders for a Global Gala Festival ”
Description: Students are assigned to organise a global gala event and propose strategies to manage various categories of stakeholders for a
successful outcome. The project aims to address the communication, coordination and quality management as well as the challenges faced
in ensuring the timely management of the project execution.
•
•
Festival Days: 3 days in a country of your choice
Estimated Attendance: 3000 guests from around the globe
•
•
Festival Budget: £6 million
Key Stakeholders: Organizing Committee, Government Representatives, International guests, IT Business units, stakeholders.
Challenges:
•
•
•
•
•
Project risk impacting the project planning process.
Ensuring smooth logistics, safety and security for customers and tourists.
Planning and executing multilingual interpretation services for participants from different linguistic backgrounds.
Ensuring quality management, waste management and IT system for communication with the event planners and security system.
Balancing the need for minimal disruption to the existing city’s daily routine disruption while executing the festival plan.
Students are expected to analyse, plan, and execute their approved project choice effectively to demonstrate their project management skills
in real-world scenarios.
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
To Pass Assessment 1, you will need to
•
•
Apply project and operation management tools, concepts and techniques to provide an insight into a given context.
Evidence of practical understanding of project planning using project management software.
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
Please make sure to make use of academic skills support services provided to you at the University of Bedfordshire some of which are
listed below:
1. Referencing support
https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/a-guide-to-referencing/
2. Academic study and assessment writing skills:
https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/studyhub
3.
Studiocity: Login in to your account to get writing and referencing feedback in just hours, services available 24/7
https://studiosity.com/connect/partners/the-university-of-bedfordshire/student_home
4. Process logs:
Make sure to complete the process log documenting the various steps you have taken on your learning journey. Process logs will help you
identify gaps in your learning and seek help where needed. You can find the template for process logs in your BREO shells under the
Assessment & Feedback folder.
How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
The assignment is designed to test your understanding of the main tools, techniques and theories discussed in the class.
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.
You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
70%+ (1st
Class)
60-69% (2:1)
50-59% (2:2)
40-49% (3rd
Class)
30-39% (Fail)
0-29% (Fail)
Justifies a choice of
project within a
business area.
Attempts to
formulate a plan by
developing aims and
objectives. Good
presentation
managed in
time. Few citations
Fail to justify a
choice of project
within a business
area. No show of
attempts to
formulate a plan by
developing aims
and objectives.
Appropriate
presentation. Lacks
time management.
Lack of citations
Lack of
understanding of the
project shown. No
clear Aims and
Objectives were
drawn from the
chosen topic.
Inappropriate
presentation.
Moreover, needs
more time
management. No
citations or list of
references were
provided.
Demonstrates
critical analysis and
evaluation of case
studies/evidence,
debates the
implications of the
analysis. Significant
description; Some
gaps in reasoning.
Fail to demonstrate
critical analysis and
evaluation of case
studies/evidence,
debates the
implications of the
analysis. Significant
description; Some
gaps in reasoning.
Absent of critical
analysis and
evaluation of case
studies/evidence,
debates the
implications of the
analysis. Significant
description; Lack of
reasoning.
Threshold
Standard
Checkpoint
No 1 and
Project plan
(15%)
Project
Evaluation &
Lessons
Learned
(20%)
Excellent justification
of a choice of project
within a business
area. Introduction
that frames and
highlights the main
issues. Formulates a
clear plan by
developing aims and
objectives.
Professionally
structured
presentation with
excellent standards
of academic writing.
Sourced throughout
and uses High
quality sources.
Demonstrates an
insightful and critical
analysis and
evaluation of
contemporary
themes supported
by evidence.
Debates the
implications of the
analysis.
The strategic issues
regarding
implementation
issues are rigorously
linked.
Very good
justification of choice
of project within a
business area.
Frames and
highlight the main
issues. Formulates
a clear plan by
developing aims and
objectives. Very
good presentation
managed well in
time.
Clear and concisely
structured
presentation,
sourced throughout
and supported with
good quality sources
Demonstrates an
insightful and critical
analysis and
evaluation of case
studies/evidence,
debates the
implications of the
analysis. The
linkages and rigour
will not be as
explicit. There will
be some omissions
with respect to the
clarity of argument
and some of the
Clearly justifies a
choice of project
within a business
area. Attempts to
frame and identify
some valid and
relevant
issues. Formulates
a reasonable plan
by developing aims
and objectives. Very
good presentation
managed well in
time.
Well-structured
presentation. Good
level of citations
throughout.
Demonstrates a
good critical
analysis and
evaluation of case
studies/evidence,
debates the
implications of the
analysis and
develops a tangible
deliverable. No
great originality or
organisation. There
may be gaps in
issues concerning
scope and
70%+ (1st
Class)
60-69% (2:1)
50-59% (2:2)
40-49% (3rd
Class)
30-39% (Fail)
0-29% (Fail)
Threshold
Standard
Clear evidence of
originality
analysis will have
less strong evidence
of originality.
Project Time
Management
(Project
Schedule and
WBS) (15%)
Professionally
structured WBS with
excellent project
time management.
High quality sources
Clearly and
concisely structured
WBS with good
quality sources and
excellent time
management.
Risk
Assessment
(15%)
Demonstrates a
deep, insightful and
critical analysis of
the selected project
management and
risk assessment
evaluation of
contemporary
themes supported
by evidence.
Demonstrates an
excellent insightful
and critical risk
assessment analysis
and evaluation of
selected project
management case
study supported by
evidence.
Demonstrates a
good critical risk
analysis and
evaluation of
selected case study,
supported by
appropriate
evidence.
Demonstrates a fair
critical risk analysis
and evaluation of
selected case study,
supported by some
appropriate
evidence.
Fails to
demonstrate a good
critical risk analysis
and evaluation of
selected case
study. Lacks good,
supported
evidence.
Absence of critical
risk analysis and
evaluation of
selected case study.
Lacks supported
evidence.
Stakeholder
Analysis
(15%)
Demonstrates a
deep, insightful and
critical stakeholder
analysis of the
selected project
management and
evaluation of
contemporary
themes supported
by evidence.
Demonstrates an
excellent insightful
and critical
stakeholder analysis
and evaluation of
selected project
management case
study supported by
evidence.
Demonstrates a
good critical
stakeholder analysis
and evaluation of
selected case study,
supported by
appropriate
evidence.
Demonstrates a fair
critical stakeholder
analysis and
evaluation of
selected case study,
supported by some
appropriate
evidence.
Fails to
demonstrate a good
critical stakeholder
analysis and
evaluation of
selected case
study. Lacks good,
supported
evidence.
Absence of critical
stakeholder analysis
and evaluation of
selected case study.
Lacks supported
evidence.
Exceptionally •
comprehensive
and detailed
evidence for self
assessment,
assessment
development and
lessons learned,
providing a
thorough account
of the research
and writing
process at each
stage of
development of
the assessment.
Contains a
•
substantial
amount of
information
about self
assessment,
assessment
development and
lessons learned,
capturing key
activities and
stages.
Well organized •
Provides a
moderate level of
detail and
information
about self
assessment,
assessment
development and
lessons learned,
capturing key
activities and
stages.
Shows a
reasonable level •
of organization,
with identifiable
sections or
headings,
allowing for a
general
understanding of
the learning
•
process.
Lacks sufficient
detail and
information
about self
assessment,
assessment
development and
lessons learned,
capturing key
activities and
stages however
with incomplete
evidence.
Poorly organized,
making it
challenging to
navigate and
understand the
chronology and
sequence of
events.
Shows minimal
evidence of
effective learning
An incomplete
and poorly
organised
process log
lacking evidence
for self
assessment,
research or
lessons learned,
providing little
information
about the steps
taken or omitting
crucial stages of
the research
process.
A superficial or
incomplete
process log
lacking self
assessment,
evidence of
research or
lessons learned
providing minimal
information
about the steps
taken or omitting
crucial stages of
the research
process.
Process log –
10%
Thoughtfully
organized with
clear answers to
the questions in
the process log
and wellstructured entries
•
with clear
answers to the
questions in the
process log and
well-structured
entries that
facilitate easy
navigation and
understanding.
relevance and some
reference to
strategic issues but
perhaps not fully or
explicitly set out.
Well-structured
WBS. Good time
management.
Reasonable WBS.
Good time
management with
some lackings.
Lack of WBS. In
appropriate time
management.
Does not show
progression of
the student’s
work. It may also
lack clear
headings or
dates, making it
No proper WBS
and poor time
management.
Does not show
progression of
the student’s
work and
learning. It may
also lack clear
headings or
dates, making it
70%+ (1st
Class)
that facilitate •
easy navigation
and
understanding.
Showcases
exceptional
learning
strategies, such as
use of Study hub
and library
resources as well
as Studiocity.
60-69% (2:1)
Indicates
•
effective learning
strategies
employed by the
student, such as
library resources.
50-59% (2:2)
Demonstrates
some evidence of
effective learning
strategies but
may lack
consistency or
innovation in
their application.
40-49% (3rd
Class)
Threshold
Standard
strategies,
indicating a lack
of engagement or
application of
essential skills.
30-39% (Fail)
0-29% (Fail)
difficult to
understand the
timeline and
sequence of
events.
difficult to
understand the
timeline and
sequence of
events.
Process Log – Self-Assessment
What do you want to achieve in the
assessment
Identify how this assessment can
help with work experience
I feel confident about my writing skills

I feel confident about my research skills

I feel confident about IT Skills

I feel confident about my ability
to understand subject content
What knowledge you need in order to
complete the assessment
What skills do you need in order to
complete the assessment

I feel confident about getting
help from the tutor/UC

I have a very good awareness of
university processes for
assessments

Process Log – Assessment Development
List out the sources that helped with starting your research
for the assessment
Explain how you narrowed down the topics you
discussed in the report and what different dimensions
of the topic have you discussed
State why you have eliminated topics that you found
interesting
How did you derive the conclusions. Did you expect
them at the beginning of the research
Process Log – Review
What did you want to achieve in the
assessment
How did you apply feedback from
checkpoint/tutors
How can you apply the knowledge gained
through this assessment in workplace
How did the assessment help you with
developing research and writing skills
MANAGEMENT
AND
ADMINISTRATION
OF PROJECTS AND
OPERATIONS
BSS056-3 SEM3
Assessment 1 Main Report
Due on 19/07/24 at 10.00 am UK time
UNIT LEARNING OUTCOME
1.
Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding
Understand the strategic context of operations and project management and how tools, techniques,
frameworks and academic models relate to operations and project management solutions.
2.
Demonstrate the following skills and abilities
Analyse the operational and project management requirements of the simulation scenarios to generate
appropriate and coherent solutions whilst demonstrating the practical application of project management.
ASSESSMENT 1
STAGE 1: SCENARIO ANALYSIS
Assessment Checkpoint No. 1 (worth 15% of the overall assessment)
• Checkpoint Task: During the assessment checkpoint session, students will present one of the three Project scenarios as given in
the assessment brief. They will be required to attend the checkpoint project briefing session to cover the following items:
•
An overview of the simulated project, objectives, and deliverables.
•
Presentation of potential challenges and risks in the project.
•
Introduction to available project management tools and techniques that can be used to address the challenges.
•
To pass the checkpoint successfully, students must actively participate in the briefing session and submit a brief project plan
outlining their initial approach to tackling the simulation. During the checkpoint session, your tutor will confirm your project
management simulation scenario. You must submit your in-class (5-minute presentation in the class).
•
Presentation for Assessment Checkpoint 1 must be done in the 3rd week.
ASSESSMENT 1
STAGE 2: SUMMATIVE FINAL REPORT
2.1 Scenario Analysis (Weightage: 50%)
• Students will work on the finalised simulation scenario and will thoroughly analyse the scenario and
propose an appropriate project management approach in the light of theoretical and contextual analysis.
• The proposal should include the following elements:
• Project scope and deliverables
• Stakeholder analysis and engagement plan
• Work breakdown structure (WBS)
• Project schedule (Gantt chart or other suitable formats)
• Risk assessment and mitigation plan
PART 2: SUMMATIVE FINAL REPORT
2.2 Project Evaluation and Lessons Learned (Weightage: 20%)
• In this part of the assessment, you are required to assess the success of the completed project. Students
must analyse the project’s performance against initial objectives and outcomes, identify key lessons
learned, and propose recommendations for future improvement.
2.3 Process Log (Weightage: 15%)
• Make sure to complete the process log documenting the various steps you have taken on your learning
journey. Process logs will help you identify gaps in your learning and seek help where needed.You can
find the template for process logs in your BREO shells under the Assessment & Feedback folder.
KEY CHECKS OF AS1
➢ Word limit is 2400
➢ Please note that the process log will be uploaded in the appendix, so it won’t be a part of the
assessment word count.
➢ Stage 1 slides must be submitted on the BREO link titled AS1 PowerPoint Slides submission link due
on 28/06/24 at 10:00 a.m. UK time by one member of the group.
➢ Students are strongly encouraged to attend and actively engage in the checkpoint briefing session.
Failure to attend may lead to a grade deduction.
➢ The summative final report is an individual report that must be submitted by individual students
on the BREO submission link named AS1 Main Submission link for Individual Reports, which is due
on 19/07/24 at 10.00 a.m. UK time
DO’S
SUBMIT YOUR
STAGE 1 AND
STAGE 2
ASSIGNMENT
BEFORE THE
DEADLINE.
REVIEW YOUR
REPORT BEFORE
SUBMISSION
(MORE THAN ONE
TIME)
YOUR
ASSIGNMENT
SHOULD BE THE
EVIDENCE OF
APPLYING
COURSE
CONCEPTS,
MODELS AND
THEORIES TO THE
PROBLEM SET.
QUALITY
ARGUMENTS,
DISCUSSION AND
RECOMMENDATI
ONS ARE ALSO
NECESSARY FOR
ACHIEVING
GOOD
OUTCOMES IN
THIS ASSESSMENT.
REVIEW THE
ACADEMIC
ENGLISH WRITING
CRITERIA FOR THE
WHOLE
ASSIGNMENT
CONSIDER ALL
THE MARKING
CRITERIA FROM
THE RUBRIC GRID
ON THE
ASSIGNMENT
BRIEF.
CHECK THE
VALIDITY OF
YOUR PASSWORD
AND USERNAME
ON BREO
DO’S
. Submit the right file
· Check the structure and presentation of your reference list
· Use Harvard Anglia Referencing System 2008
. References must include academic sources.
· Check your word limit
· Submit PowerPoint slides for Stage 1 and Word file for Stage 2 submission.
· Check for plagiarism rate. Redo the plagiarised work and resubmit your final work.
. The unit title and code number must be on the assignment top sheet.
. Your cover page must have your full name and ID number.
. The report should have a professional format (e.g., title page, executive summary, table of contents,
headings and sub-headings, introduction and conclusion, reference list, appendices, etc.).
DON’TS
· Submit your assignment at the last minute
· Submit your first draft
· Use any non-academic materials, e.g., Wikis and Investopedia.
· Use any previously submitted materials
· Submit any blank/ empty file
· Use any other referencing system
· Exceed the word limit
· Submit the file with high plagiarism
. Use any AI tools to complete your document, including ChatGPT, Quibolt, Grammarly, etc.
· Take a copy and paste non-academic/academic resources
· Submit pdf file
· Submit your assignment via email.
SADAF TALLIA
UNIT COORDINATOR
SADAF.TALLIA@BEDS.AC.UK
THANKS