Bus470- Applied business project

Please provide detailed Speaker notes on each slide so that I can record this business proposal and submit it.

The purpose of this assignment is to draft an internal business proposal presentation to share with organization personnel you would like to have sponsor or support you in the implementation of the problem solution you have suggested.

Review the stakeholder analysis you completed in Topic 3 to determine the key stakeholders that will make up the audience for this presentation. Focus on identifying decision makers that will have the power and resources to approve the implementation of the solution. These are typically your supervisors and key organization personnel.

Construct a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following. You are required to include speaker notes for each slide.

Problem and related research

Proposed solution and related research

Details for implementing the solution

Details for evaluating the effectiveness of the solution

As part of the presentation, you must include slides that provide text along with visual representations of the data you have collected. The visuals should include the three graphs or charts that you created from the data collected in your research during Topic 2.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

Collapse All
Business Proposal Presentation – Rubric
Problem Summary and Related Research Charts and Graphs
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Problem Summary and Related Research Charts and Graphs
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
The problem summary and related research charts or graphs include thorough
explanation.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
The problem summary and related research charts or graphs are complete and
include relevant explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
The problem summary and related research charts or graphs are complete but lack
explanation.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The problem summary and related research charts or graphs are incomplete or
incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem summary and related research charts or graphs are not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Proposed Solution and Related Research Charts and Graphs
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Proposed Solution and Related Research Charts and Graphs
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
The proposed solution and related research charts or graphs include thorough
explanation.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
The proposed solution and related research charts or graphs are complete and
include relevant explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
The proposed solution and related research charts or graphs are complete but lack
explanation.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The proposed solution and related research charts or graphs are incomplete or
incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The proposed solution and related research charts or graphs are not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Implementing the Proposed Solution
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Implementing the Proposed Solution
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Discussion for implementing the proposed solution is thoroughly explained.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
Discussion for implementing the proposed solution is complete and include
relevant explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
Discussion for implementing the proposed solution is complete but lack
explanation.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The details for implementing the proposed solution are incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion for implementing the proposed solution is not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Proposed Solution
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Proposed Solution
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
Discussion for evaluating effectiveness of the proposed solution is thoroughly
explained.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
Discussion for evaluating effectiveness of the proposed solution is complete and
include relevant explanation.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
Discussion for evaluating effectiveness of the proposed solution is complete but
lack explanation.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
Discussion for evaluating effectiveness of the proposed solution is incomplete or
incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion for evaluating effectiveness of the proposed solution are not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Proposal Presentation Video
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Proposal Presentation Video
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
The proposal presentation video is exemplary, includes extensive details, and is
professional in the presentation of ideas.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
The proposal presentation video is complete, includes relevant details, and is
professional in the presentation of ideas.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
The proposal presentation video is complete but lacks relevant details or
professionalism in the presentation of ideas.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The proposal presentation video is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The proposal presentation video is not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Presentation of Content
15 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. 5: Excellent
15 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to
each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. 4: Good
12.75 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting
information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive
information from reliable sources is included.
3. 3: Satisfactory
11.25 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
9.75 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong
sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little
persuasive information is included, if any. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Layout
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for
headings and text.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting
with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is
difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and
subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with
long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors.
Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice,
etc.)
5. 5: Excellent
7.5 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word
choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,
and scope.
4. 4: Good
6.38 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for
the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.63 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
4.88 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech
appropriately.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer
appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either
does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing
3.75 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
3.75 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
3.19 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
3. 3: Satisfactory
2.81 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
2.44 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Speaker Notes
2.25 points
Criteria Description
Speaker Notes
5. 5: Excellent
2.25 points
Speaker notes are thorough and include substantial explanation and relevant
supporting details.
4. 4: Good
1.91 points
Speaker notes are complete and include explanation and relevant supporting
details.
3. 3: Satisfactory
1.69 points
Speaker notes are included but lack explanation and relevant supporting details.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
1.46 points
Speaker notes are incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Speaker notes are not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Documentation of Sources
1.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
1.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
1.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
1.13 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less than Satisfactory
0.98 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 75 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.