Deliverable 6

https://rasmussenedu.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/ISM6200CBESection01CBEBusin_df5499df-e55c-11ee8d7c91ac0a440c12/Shared%20Documents/General/Recordings/May%206th,%20ISM6200%20Module%206%20and%20Deliverable%206%20Recording.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=r5NKm8
https://rasmussenedu.sharepoint.com/sites/ISM6200CBESection01CBEBusin_df5499df-e55c-11ee-8d7c91ac0a440c12/_layouts/15/download.aspx?UniqueId=1bc3966b%2D3d6f%2D4871%2Db9ed%2Dc6e466
b38d62
Login Jenny.efta@smail.rasmussen.edu
Password Cayden77@ capital C
Deliverable 6 – Risk Mitigation Action Plan
Rubric Details
Maximum Score
4 points
•
Grade for Deliverable 6
100% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
4
B – 3 – Proficiency
3
C – 2 – Competence
2
F – 1 – No Pass
1
I – 0 – Not Submitted
0
•
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Thorough and detailed description of the Internet of things (IoT), its potential applications, and
the IoT ecosystem, using clear examples in a well-crafted plan.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Clear and strong description of the Internet of things (IoT), its potential applications, and the IoT
ecosystem, using some examples.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Adequate description of the Internet of things (IoT), its potential applications, and the IoT
ecosystem.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Unclear or minimal description of the Internet of things (IoT), its potential applications, and the
IoT ecosystem.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
•
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Thorough and detailed discussion of the shutdown and the possible role IoT played in the
closures, using clear examples in a well-crafted plan.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Clear and strong discussion of the shutdown and the possible role IoT played in the closures,
using some examples.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Adequate discussion of the shutdown and the possible role IoT played in the closures; no
examples provided.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Unclear or minimal discussion of the shutdown and the possible role IoT played in the closures.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
•
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Provided exemplary strategies that could be implemented for the Grünheide, Germany
Gigafactory, no examples provided using clear examples in a well-crafted plan.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Provided strong strategies that could be implemented for the Grünheide, Germany Gigafactory,
using some examples.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Provided reasonable strategies that could be implemented for the Grünheide, Germany
Gigafactory; no examples provided.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Unclear or illogical strategies that could be implemented for the Grünheide, Germany
Gigafactory.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
•
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Thorough summary of the ethical and legal impact of analytical implementation, using clear
examples in a well-crafted plan.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Strong summary of the ethical and legal impact of analytical implementation, using some
examples.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Adequate summary of the ethical and legal impact of analytical implementation; no examples
provided.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Unclear or minimal summary of the ethical and legal impact of analytical implementation.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
0
•
Criterion 5
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Used and relied on all credible sources in a well-crafted plan.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Used and relied on mostly credible sources in the plan.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Used and identified some credible sources in the plan.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Failed to use or identify credible sources in the plan.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
0
ISM6200CBE Section 01CBE Business Intelligence and Analytics (11 Weeks) – CBE Online
Course – 2024 Spring Quarter
Deliverable 6 – Risk Mitigation Action Plan
Deliverable 6 – Risk Mitigation Action Plan
Assignment Content
1.
Competency
Identify emerging technologies that impact analytics, business intelligence (BE), and
decision support.
Student Success Criteria
View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded
with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.
Scenario
Case Background:
Nikola Tesla dreamed of a ‘connected world’ in 1926 that Martin Eberhard, Marc
Tarpenning, Ian Wright, JB Straubel, and Elon Musk made a reality in 2003 with the
creation of Tesla Motors. With the vision of producing an entirely electric car, Tesla
disrupted the automotive industry with their innovative thinking. After shifts in
leadership, the departure of founders Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, and
mounting financial troubles in 2009, the company went public in 2010 under the
leadership of Elon Musk.
As the popularity of Tesla grew, the organization announced the building of a ‘super
factory’ in 2014. In what Musk refers to as a Gigafactory, the Sparks, Nevada facility
was built to produce batteries that store gigawatt-hours of capacity. The first
Gigafactory is on track to becoming the world’s largest building by footprint.
In transiting sustainable practices and automation from its automobiles, Tesla took
the same vision and implemented it into the Gigafactory, where they build the
vehicles by automating many processes within the facility. Although automotive
manufacturers have used industrial automation for years, the level to which Tesla
automated its Gigafactory is unprecedented. As Tesla increased automation at its
other facilities to address its growing mass consumer market demand, Tesla
experienced a minor setback in 2017 when its Freemont, California location shut
down twice in two months.
With the efficiencies Tesla experienced through automation, the organization has
reduced the price of its automobiles, further increasing the demand for its electric
vehicles on a global scale. Tesla has opened another Gigafactory in Shanghai, China,
a Solar City Gigafactory in Buffalo, New York, and announced the construction of a
European Gigafactory in Grünheide, Germany. Tesla now has an opportunity to
reflect on the lesson-learned from Sparks, Nevada and Freemont, California, when
developing an automation strategy for these locations.
As the Technology and Innovation Specialist for Tesla, you are working on a followup project for the new European Gigafactory. Your Chief Technology Officer (CIO)
has asked you to review the Freemont shutdowns and create a risk mitigation action
plan for the new European factory. Your action plan is part of a larger risk
mitigation plan and will be used to strategize future planning.
Instructions
Conduct research and the scenario above to create a risk mitigation action plan for
the new plant. Make sure to address the following:
1. Include an introduction to the IoT, application, and ecosystem for Tesla.
2. Discuss the shutdown of the Freemont, California plant. What role did IoT
(automation or mass-automating) have on manufacturing?
3. What strategies could be implemented for the Grünheide, Germany
Gigafactory?
4. Identify ethical or legal risks. How would Tesla create a risk mitigation
strategy to counter these ethical and legal risks?
5. Provide attribution for credible sources needed in completing your plan.
Use the Writing Lab for timely feedback to help you fine-tune your deliverable
before you submit it for grading: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/learningservices
Resources
6. Rasmussen College Writing Guide:
https://guides.rasmussen.edu/writing/professional
7. Grammar Checking – How do I create a Grammarly account?
https://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/32707
8. Discovery: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/discovery
9. Business via ProQuest: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/pqbus
10. APA Guide: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa
11. Grammarly is available to assist you with proofreading your work:
http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/33180