Leveraging Human Capital for Pennymac Financial services

Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have compiled throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Develop a written proposal discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.

How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?

  • Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?
  • How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace?
  • Identify two unique benefits or programs offered by companies to retain and recruit employees. Explain how each would be of advantage over the competition.
  • Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being one of the most important company assets.
  • Cite and reference a minimum of five scholarly sources.
  • 1
    Selection Process
    Interview strategy
    In designing the interview process for PennyMac, a comprehensive and inclusive approach must
    be adopted to bring a diversified pool of competent applicants. The interview strategy will
    consist of various factors such as the time, place, format, and the employees who will be
    involved in the process, as will be discussed below:
    Time and Place: The interviews will be conducted during regular business hours, and keeping in
    mind the convenience of both the hiring team and the candidates, the schedule will be arranged.
    Job interviews will be held on-site at PennyMac’s main office to provide a warm and
    professional setting. A virtual interview option will be offered for individuals unable to attend
    physically.
    Format: The interview will follow a structured procedure to ensure consistency and fairness. All
    individuals will also answer a standard set of questions to provide equal opportunities for each
    applicant. Further, each candidate will undergo a panel interview involving the hiring manager
    and key stakeholders, including a senior financial analyst and a human resources department
    2
    representative. The panel’s approach will generate different opinions and will be based on the
    criteria set in the job description.
    Employees Involved: The panel interviewing format will be a joint effort by the team members.
    The hiring manager, the key decision-maker, provides a strategic perspective on how the
    potential employee fits the organizational goals. The senior financial analyst will be responsible
    for the technical aspects of the job, and the HR representative will make sure that the company
    follows the guidelines and contributes to evaluating cultural fit within the organization.
    3
    Preassessment tools
    1. Technical proficiency tool: The test assesses candidates’ proficiency in the crucial
    technical skills listed in the job description. The main goal is to ensure that candidates
    have the right skills and knowledge to perform well on the job and complete the
    assessment process fairly and objectively (Min et al., 2023). The exam is designed to
    mirror the practical issues and duties integral to the Financial Analyst role at PennyMac
    Financial Services. Candidates’ score on the test directly reflects their competence for the
    role. This is particularly useful at the beginning of the selection process when the hiring
    team can pick out the candidates who have proven they have the required level of
    proficiency (The Wall Street Journal, 2022). The candidates who successfully go through
    the screening will be called for a Technical Proficiency Test as part of the preassessment
    phase of the process.
    2. Cognitive aptitude test: According to Xie et al. (2021), cognitive aptitude tests evaluate
    a candidate’s ability to learn, change, and solve problems. This test assesses the
    candidate’s general cognitive skills, which can be used in different company tasks and
    roles. This will lead to evaluating a wide range of skills that may not be limited to
    technical competency alone (Reynolds et al., 2021). By assessing candidates’ problemsolving, critical thinking, and learning abilities, the company can find those with the
    required cognitive adaptability for a challenging financial environment. It is suitable as it
    would help the management examine candidates capable of solving critical financial
    issues within the organization. The individuals can use the novel information from within
    and outside the company to make crucial financial decisions.
    Situational Questions
    4
    1. Given a sudden market downturn, how would you adjust your financial analysis
    strategies to mitigate potential risks for PennyMac Financial Services?
    2. Explain a situation where you had to work with teams to accomplish a shared financial
    goal. What obstacles did you encounter, and how did you solve them?
    3. How would you use your understanding of industry trends and regulations to help
    PennyMac maintain a competitive edge in the market?
    4. In a fast-paced work environment, how do you prioritize competing demands and ensure
    timely delivery of accurate financial reports?
    Behavioral questions
    1. Tell us about when you identified a financial inefficiency in a previous role. What steps
    did you take to address it, and what impact did your solution have on the organization?
    2. Share an example of a complex financial analysis project you successfully managed.
    How did your analytical skills contribute to the project’s success?
    3. Give an example of a scenario in which you had to explain intricate financial details to
    stakeholders at various organizational levels. In what ways did you modify your message
    to guarantee comprehension?
    4. Have you ever had to meet a tight deadline for a financial report? How did you maintain
    the quality of output?
    Additional consideration
    In addition to the Technical Proficiency Test in Financial Analysis, PennyMac recognizes the
    importance of fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment. To ensure that the selection
    process aligns with the company’s commitment to diversity, an additional consideration will be
    5
    incorporated: a diversity and inclusion assessment. The Diversity and Inclusion Assessment
    insights will complement the technical evaluation, providing a more holistic understanding of
    candidates’ potential contributions to PennyMac Financial Services’ diverse and inclusive
    workplace culture.
    Sample Questions for Diversity and Inclusion Assessment:
    1. How have you actively fostered diversity and inclusion in your previous work
    environments?
    2. Can you share an example of a project where you worked effectively in a diverse team?
    How did the diversity of the team contribute to the project’s success?
    3. Describe a situation where you faced a challenge related to diversity or inclusion. What
    lessons did you learn from the experience?
    4. In what ways do you believe diversity can positively impact the financial industry, and
    how would you contribute to creating an inclusive culture at PennyMac Financial
    Services?
    6
    References
    Min, H. K., Hu, Y., & Ann, S. (2023). Impression management goals and job candidate’s race: A
    test of competing models. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 109,
    103426.
    Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A., & Allen, D. N. (2021). Assessment of intelligence.
    In Mastering modern psychological testing: Theory and Methods (pp. 331-382). Cham:
    Springer International Publishing
    The Wall Street Journal. (2022, May 2). Paid Program: When Recruiting, Focus on Skills.
    Indeed. https://partners.wsj.com/indeed/leading-the-way-on-talent/want-to-hire-betteramid-the-great-realization-focus-on-skills/
    Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., … & Yu, L. F. (2021). A review
    on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 645153.
    PennyMac Financial Services Job Description
    Job Description: Financial Analyst
    Position Summary:
    At PennyMac Financial Services, the Financial Analyst is pivotal in supporting strategic
    decision-making via in-depth financial research, thorough report preparation, and insightful
    recommendations. To make a suggestion or conclusion, financial analysts look at how a firm is
    doing financially in its industry and the economy as a whole (Agyabeng-Mensah et al., 2020). An
    organization’s day-to-day operations rely heavily on financial analysts. At a high level, they
    investigate and analyze financial data to comprehend the company and the market and assess the
    organization’s standing. Maximizing profitability in this role is critical to the long-term health
    and expansion of the company’s finances.
    Key Responsibilities
    1. Perform a comprehensive financial analysis of the company’s income, costs, and
    investments to identify trends, opportunities, and places where PennyMac Financial
    Services needs improvement.
    2. To assist management in budgeting, planning, and decision-making processes that align
    with the aims and objectives of the business and provide accurate and timely financial
    reports, forecasts, and projections.
    3. Examine competition performance, industry standards, and market trends to evaluate
    PennyMac’s place in the market, reduce risks, and spot possible expansion prospects.
    4. Work closely with cross-functional teams to support business activities and projects that
    align with PennyMac’s strategic direction, acquire pertinent financial data, and create
    economic models.
    5. To guarantee efficient financial management and decision-making, keep an eye on critical
    financial measures and KPIs, measure performance against goals, and report to senior
    management regularly with updates and suggestions.
    Required Skills and Qualifications
    1. A bachelor’s degree in an associated discipline, such as finance, accounting, or
    economics. A master’s degree is recommended.
    2. Proven track record in financial services, ideally in mortgage banking or similar fields,
    including financial analysis, reporting, and forecasting.
    3. Advanced knowledge of financial modeling, Microsoft Excel, and financial tools like
    CoreLogic or Black Knight that are often utilized in the mortgage sector.
    4. Strong analytical abilities with the capacity to decipher intricate financial data and
    provide relevant and specific insights into PennyMac’s business strategy and market
    dynamics.
    5. Strong presentation and communication abilities that allow for the efficient dissemination
    of financial data to stakeholders at all organizational levels.
    6. Very accurate, detail-oriented, and capable of meeting deadlines in a fast-paced, dynamic
    workplace.
    7. Aptitude for strategic thinking and problem-solving, promoting innovation and ongoing
    development to ensure PennyMac’s long-term success.
    Additional Information
    This role may sometimes need overtime and flexibility to fulfill project deadlines or
    attend to urgent business demands. Being able to shift gears quickly and efficiently is critical to
    being flexible in the face of unexpected challenges (Grass et al., 2020). As a member of
    PennyMac Financial Services’ financial team, the Financial Analyst works closely with
    colleagues throughout the company and reports directly to the financial manager.
    PennyMac Financial Services welcomes and values all individuals and strives to create a
    diverse and inclusive work environment. Possibilities for professional growth and advancement
    are part of our excellent remuneration packages.
    References
    Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., & Ahenkorah, E. (2020). Exploring financial performance and
    green logistics management practices: examining the mediating influences of market,
    environmental and social performances. Journal of cleaner production, 258, 120613.
    Grass, A., Backmann, J., & Hoegl, M. (2020). From empowerment dynamics to team
    adaptability: Exploring and conceptualizing the continuous agile team innovation
    process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 324-351.
    Enhancing Customer Service Excellence at PennyMac Financial
    Services
    BY: ALLA KHACHATRYAN
    Introduction

    Customer happiness is critical to our business
    as a supplier of financial services.

    The level of customer satisfaction is a good
    indicator of how well your target audience
    receives your product or service.

    According to research, customer retention,
    lifetime value, and brand reputation are
    positively impacted by happy customers
    (Kumar & Rajan, 2020).
    Goals of the Training

    Improving PennyMac Financial Services’
    customer service is the overarching objective
    of this program.

    Staff morale, output, and retention may all
    take a lift when companies invest in their
    professional growth (Nguyen, 2020).

    Customer happiness, loyalty, and retention
    may be achieved by improving customer
    relationships.
    Specific Objectives
    This training exercise has two specific objectives:

    Improve communication skills to ensure
    clarity and empathy in customer interactions.

    Enhance problem-solving abilities to
    efficiently address client inquiries and
    concerns.
    Process/Procedure Changes

    Upon completing the course, staff can communicate with customers more effectively and
    use better problem-solving frameworks in their everyday work.

    They must incorporate the training’s new methods and tactics into their existing
    procedures to do this.

    In order to make sure that customers get correct information and feel heard and
    understood, staff will specifically practice clear and succinct communication.
    Training Strategies

    A training strategy’s principal function is coordinating a company’s many training
    programs with its overarching goals and priorities (Stoltenberg et al., 2021).

    The process begins with a thorough assessment of current staff knowledge and abilities,
    continues with the development of targeted training programs, and culminates in their
    systematic and coordinated rollout.

    Workshops, role-playing, and case studies will all be a part of the training to help
    participants practice and perfect their problem-solving and communication skills.

    Participants will be allowed to participate in practical exercises designed to mimic reallife situations they could face on the job. Employees will gain self-assurance in using
    Expected Performance

    Employees are anticipated to show enhanced communication efficacy after training,
    leading to more precise client interactions and faster problem resolution.

    Better problem-solving abilities will result in faster and more satisfying customer service.

    Customers will have more faith in the company since staff members can explain intricate
    financial details.
    Support and Measurement

    Staff members may rely on PennyMac for
    continuous mentoring, resource access, and
    occasional refresher training.

    All new employees must complete the same
    training to maintain high service standards.

    We will assess the success of the training
    using performance measures like resolution
    times and customer satisfaction surveys.
    Conclusion

    In conclusion, PennyMac Financial Services intends to improve the quality of customer
    service by investing in this training exercise.

    This will ultimately result in higher client happiness and success for the firm.

    I would want to express my gratitude for your involvement in this endeavor. Please
    permit me to collaborate with you to provide excellent service experiences.
    References

    Kumar, V., & Rajan, B. (2020). Customer lifetime value: What, how, and why. In The
    Routledge companion to strategic marketing (pp. 422-448). Routledge.

    Nguyen, C. (2020). The impact of training and development, job satisfaction and job
    performance on young employee retention. Job Satisfaction and Job Performance on
    Young Employee Retention (May 1, 2020).

    Stoltenberg, M., Spence, D., Daubman, B. R., Greaves, N., Edwards, R., Bromfield, B., …
    & Shields, A. E. (2020). The central role of provider training in implementing
    resource‐stratified guidelines for palliative care in low‐income and middle‐income
    countries: Lessons from the Jamaica Cancer Care and Research Institute in the Caribbean
    and Universidad Católica in Latin America. Cancer, 126, 2448-2457.
    HRM-635 Needs Assessment and Job Analysis Matrices
    Definition: A needs assessment is the process organizations use to determine if training is necessary for its employees.
    Needs Assessment Matrix
    Department
    Finance department
    Current Trainings/
    Required Trainings to
    Meet Department or
    Employee Needs
    Advanced Financial
    Modeling Course
    Core Function(s) of
    Department
    List of Jobs or Tasks
    of Department
    Current Department
    or Employee Needs
    Financial Analysis and
    Reporting
    1. Financial Analyst
    Training on Advanced
    Financial Modeling
    Techniques
    2. Accounting Clerk
    Training on Latest
    Accounting Software
    Advanced Accounting
    Software Training
    3. Budgeting Specialist
    Additional Training on
    Budget Management
    Budget Management
    Workshop
    4. Tax Specialist
    Tax Law Seminar
    Update on Tax Laws
    and Regulations
    Customer Service
    department
    Customer Support and
    Satisfaction
    1. Customer Service
    Representative
    Advanced
    Communication Skills
    Training
    © 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Customer Relationship
    Management Course
    2. Complaint Resolution
    Specialist
    Conflict Resolution
    Training
    Conflict Management
    Workshop
    3. Call Center
    Supervisor
    Leadership and Team
    Management Training
    Supervisory Skills
    Development Program
    Job Analysis Matrix: Financial Analyst
    List Tasks, Duties, and Responsibilities
    Conduct financial analysis on company data
    to identify trends and areas for improvement.
    Prepare financial reports and forecasts to
    support decision-making processes.
    Analyze market trends and competitor
    performance to assess market position and
    identify growth opportunities. | – Knowledge
    of industry trends and market dynamics.
    Collaborate with cross-functional teams to
    gather financial data and support business
    initiatives. | – Excellent communication and
    interpersonal skills.
    Monitor key financial metrics and provide
    recommendations to senior management.
    List Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
    Other Core Competencies and Education
    Understanding of financial analysis
    principles.
    Bachelor’s degree in Finance or related field.
    Proficiency in Microsoft Excel and financial
    reporting software.
    Strong attention to detail.
    Knowledge of industry trends and market
    dynamics.
    Ability to think strategically.
    Excellent communication and interpersonal
    skills.
    Project management experience is a plus.
    Analytical and problem-solving skills.
    Ability to work under pressure and meet
    deadlines.
    Collapse All
    Leveraging Human Capital – Rubric
    Tasks and Performance Indicators
    16.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Written proposal includes description of the tasks and performance indicators that
    contribute to the overall employee performance.
    5. Target
    16.5 points
    A comprehensive description of the tasks and performance indicators that
    contribute to the overall employee performance is included.
    4. Acceptable
    14.36 points
    A clear description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the
    overall employee performance is included.
    3. Approaching
    13.04 points
    A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall
    employee performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and
    performance of employees.
    2. Insufficient
    12.21 points
    A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall
    employee performance is included but is incomplete or lacks details.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The written proposal does not include a description of tasks and performance
    indicators.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance
    Criteria Description
    Written proposal includes a description of leveraging employee strengths and skills to
    improve performance.
    5. Target
    16.5 points
    There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills
    to improve performance.
    4. Acceptable
    14.36 points
    There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to
    improve performance.
    3. Approaching
    13.04 points
    There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to
    improve performance.
    2. Insufficient
    12.21 points
    The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths
    and skills but the description is incomplete or lacks details.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    16.5 points
    Strategies to Improve Performance
    16.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Written proposal includes a description of strategies to improve employee
    performance and discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.
    5. Target
    16.5 points
    The written proposal includes a comprehensive description of strategies to improve
    employee performance and thoroughly discusses rewards and incentives for
    performance improvement.
    4. Acceptable
    14.36 points
    The written proposal includes a detailed description of strategies to improve
    employee performance and adequately discusses rewards and incentives for
    performance improvement.
    3. Approaching
    13.04 points
    The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance and
    discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.
    2. Insufficient
    12.21 points
    The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance but
    they are incomplete or lack details.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The written proposal does not include strategies to improve employee
    performance.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive
    16.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Written proposal includes a description of the integration of rewards and incentives to
    recruit and retain employees, including an explanation of how each would be of
    advantage over the competition.
    5. Target
    16.5 points
    The written proposal includes a thorough description of the integration of rewards
    and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain
    employees.
    4. Acceptable
    14.36 points
    The written proposal includes a clear description of the integration of rewards and
    incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain
    employees.
    3. Approaching
    13.04 points
    The written proposal includes an appropriate description of the integration of
    rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and
    retain employees.
    2. Insufficient
    12.21 points
    The written proposal includes a vague description of the integration of rewards and
    incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain
    employees.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The written proposal does not include a description of the integration of rewards
    and incentives to remain competitive.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Culture Within the Organization
    11 points
    Criteria Description
    Written proposal includes a description of the aspired culture within the organization
    relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
    5. Target
    11 points
    There is a well-developed description of the aspired culture within the organization
    relative to the employees being the biggest asset.
    4. Acceptable
    9.57 points
    There is a detailed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative
    to the employees being the biggest asset.
    3. Approaching
    8.69 points
    There is some description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to
    the employees being the biggest asset.
    2. Insufficient
    8.14 points
    The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization
    but is incomplete or lacks details.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the
    organization.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Thesis Development and Purpose
    7.7 points
    Criteria Description
    Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
    5. Target
    7.7 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully
    directed to a specific audience.
    4. Acceptable
    6.7 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
    directed to a specific audience.
    3. Approaching
    6.08 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the
    appropriate audience is demonstrated.
    2. Insufficient
    5.7 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
    weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate
    audience is evident.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Development, Structure, and Conclusion
    8.8 points
    Criteria Description
    Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
    from development.
    5. Target
    8.8 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.
    The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous
    conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
    4. Acceptable
    7.66 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
    of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the
    development of the purpose.
    3. Approaching
    6.95 points
    The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
    each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
    2. Insufficient
    6.51 points
    Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
    inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
    and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections
    between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Evidence
    5.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
    other perspectives.
    5. Target
    5.5 points
    Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives
    are integrated effectively.
    4. Acceptable
    4.79 points
    Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
    3. Approaching
    4.35 points
    Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
    2. Insufficient
    4.07 points
    Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
    integration of other perspectives is present.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
    entirely on the perspective of the writer.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Mechanics of Writing
    5.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
    structure, etc.
    5. Target
    5.5 points
    No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
    structure are used throughout.
    4. Acceptable
    4.79 points
    Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
    structure are used.
    3. Approaching
    4.35 points
    Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
    appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
    2. Insufficient
    4.07 points
    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
    choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
    choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
    Format/Documentation
    5.5 points
    Criteria Description
    Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
    documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
    appropriate to assignment and discipline.
    5. Target
    5.5 points
    No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
    direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
    4. Acceptable
    4.79 points
    Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
    3. Approaching
    4.35 points
    Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
    errors.
    2. Insufficient
    4.07 points
    Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
    in documentation of sources are evident.
    1. Unsatisfactory
    0 points
    Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
    Total 110 points
    © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    Save Time On Research and Writing
    Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
    Get My Paper
    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER