Business Law Question

Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Review Chapter 7 and Chapter 36 of the course textbook.

Review the cases

Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986)

Download Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986)

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

, and

Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006)

Download Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006)

.

  • Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license. Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of the work day.
  • Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the work day.
  • About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior: respondeat superior and negligent hiring.

    Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the following:

    Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring.

    Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case.

    Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring.

    Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior.

    Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case.

    Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds.

    The Negligent Tort Liability paper

    Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to

    APA StyleLinks to an external site.

    as outlined in the Writing Center’s

    APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site.

    .

    Week 2 – Assignment
    Due Monday by 10:59pm
    Points 10
    Submitting an external tool
    Negligent Tort Liability
    [WLOs: 1, 2, 4] [CLOs: 1, 2]
    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,
    Review Chapter 7 and Chapter 36 of the course textbook.
    Review the cases Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653308/download?wrap=1)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653308/download?download_frd=1)
    Minimize File Preview
    Page
    1
    of 4
    ZOOM




    , and Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653314/download?wrap=1)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653314/download?download_frd=1) .
    Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related
    components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company
    vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to
    the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license.
    Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during
    the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to
    job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of
    the work day.
    Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment
    application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any
    traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of
    numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not
    check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was
    not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the
    work day.
    About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a
    company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the
    work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the
    vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended
    and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted
    solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision
    and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior:
    respondeat superior and negligent hiring.
    Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the
    following:
    Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring.
    Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case.
    Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring.
    Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior.
    Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case.
    Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds.
    The Negligent Tort Liability paper
    Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in
    the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) .
    Must include a separate title page with the following:
    Title of paper in bold font
    Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    Student’s name
    Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    Course name and number
    Instructor’s name
    Due date
    Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.
    Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to
    end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) as well as Writing a Thesis
    Statement
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis) , refer to the UAGC Writing
    Center resources.
    Must use at least three credible sources in addition to the course text.
    The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
    (https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a41044d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf)
    table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about
    whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor.
    Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a
    particular assignment.
    Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the UAGC
    Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citingwithin-your-paper) guide.
    Utilize correct APA formatting for legal sources include case law and legislation. See the Citing
    Legal Sources
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/citing-legal-sources) resource from the UAGC
    Library as well as the Citing Legal Materials in APA Style
    (https://library.csustan.edu/apalegal) from California State University, Stanislaus, for assistance.
    Should avoid over-dependence on direct quotes
    (https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Write%20On!%3A%20Avoiding%20Over%20Quoting
    . Direct quotes are a great way to strengthen our assertions and provide support. However, be
    sure to avoid using excessive direct quotes in lieu of original thought. Direct quotes will not
    meet the requirement for analysis, application, and critical thinking. Please ensure to not
    overuse direct quote so that you can avoid losing points for this.
    Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in
    the UAGC Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the UAGC Writing Center
    for specifications.
    Carefully review the Grading Rubric
    (http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/32502/preview) for the criteria that will be used to
    evaluate your assignment.
    Waypoint Assignment Submission
    The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint. Please refer to the
    instructions below to submit your assignment.
    1. Click on the Assignment Submission button below. The Waypoint “Student
    Dashboard” will open in a new browser window.
    2. Browse for your assignment.
    3. Click Upload.
    4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by viewing the appropriate
    week’s assignment tab in Waypoint.
    For more detailed instructions, refer to the Waypoint Tutorial
    (https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358708-3d2b-41a6-a000ff53b3cc3794/1/Waypoint%20Tutorial.pdf) .
    This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window
    Load Week 2 – Assignment in a new window
    Week 2 – Assignment
    Due Monday by 10:59pm
    Points 10
    Submitting an external tool
    Negligent Tort Liability
    [WLOs: 1, 2, 4] [CLOs: 1, 2]
    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,
    Review Chapter 7 and Chapter 36 of the course textbook.
    Review the cases Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc., 496 N.C.2d 1086 (Ill. Ct. App. 1986)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653308/download?wrap=1)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653308/download?download_frd=1) , and
    Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing and Heating, 130 P.3d 1011 (Colo. 2006)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653314/download?wrap=1)
    (https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/132482/files/21653314/download?download_frd=1)
    Minimize File Preview
    Page
    1
    of 14
    ZOOM




    .
    Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related
    components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company
    vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to
    the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license.
    Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during
    the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to
    job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of
    the work day.
    Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment
    application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any
    traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of
    numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not
    check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was
    not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the
    work day.
    About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a
    company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the
    work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the
    vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended
    and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted
    solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision
    and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior:
    respondeat superior and negligent hiring.
    Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the
    following:
    Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring.
    Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case.
    Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring.
    Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior.
    Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case.
    Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds.
    The Negligent Tort Liability paper
    Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    and formatted according to APA Style
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in
    the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft Word
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) .
    Must include a separate title page with the following:
    Title of paper in bold font
    Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    Student’s name
    Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    Course name and number
    Instructor’s name
    Due date
    Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.
    Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to
    end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) as well as Writing a Thesis
    Statement
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-a-thesis) , refer to the UAGC Writing
    Center resources.
    Must use at least three credible sources in addition to the course text.
    The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
    (https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a41044d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf)
    table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about
    whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor.
    Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a
    particular assignment.
    Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the UAGC
    Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citingwithin-your-paper) guide.
    Utilize correct APA formatting for legal sources include case law and legislation. See the Citing
    Legal Sources
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/citing-legal-sources) resource from the UAGC
    Library as well as the Citing Legal Materials in APA Style
    (https://library.csustan.edu/apalegal) from California State University, Stanislaus, for assistance.
    Should avoid over-dependence on direct quotes
    (https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Write%20On!%3A%20Avoiding%20Over%20Quoting
    . Direct quotes are a great way to strengthen our assertions and provide support. However, be
    sure to avoid using excessive direct quotes in lieu of original thought. Direct quotes will not
    meet the requirement for analysis, application, and critical thinking. Please ensure to not
    overuse direct quote so that you can avoid losing points for this.
    Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in
    the UAGC Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List
    (https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the UAGC Writing Center
    for specifications.
    Carefully review the Grading Rubric
    (http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/32502/preview) for the criteria that will be used to
    evaluate your assignment.
    Waypoint Assignment Submission
    The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint. Please refer to the
    instructions below to submit your assignment.
    1. Click on the Assignment Submission button below. The Waypoint “Student
    Dashboard” will open in a new browser window.
    2. Browse for your assignment.
    3. Click Upload.
    4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by viewing the appropriate
    week’s assignment tab in Waypoint.
    For more detailed instructions, refer to the Waypoint Tutorial
    (https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358708-3d2b-41a6-a000ff53b3cc3794/1/Waypoint%20Tutorial.pdf) .
    This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window
    Load Week 2 – Assignment in a new window

    Still stressed from student homework?
    Get quality assistance from academic writers!

    Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER