CC Global Trade Law Case Study

3:01Pulse
Fall 2022 Case Study 2
18
☑
–
Read Only Save a copy to edit.
Save a copy
Fall 2022 – BUS8330 – Global Trade Law
Case Study 2
On January 1st, 2021, Mr. Patino Pascal of Waterloo decided to gift himself a New Year present and purchased a
Toyota Micato SUV from the Excellent Autos car dealership based in Cambridge, Ontario, Canada. Mr. Pascal had
been introduced to the Toyota Micato through an advertisement in a national car magazine in which the
experience of driving the vehicle was described as “almost the same as cruising in an aircraft”. The Micato came
very strong, sturdy, flashy and had every conceivable gadget intended to make for a unique driving experience.
According to Toyota, the Micato SUV’s safety features are second to none. To put some icing on the cake, the
vehicle came with a two-year warranty for any manufacturing defects. Because the Micato has only recently
been introduced to Toyota’s manufacturing line, it was only available at Toyota’s manufacturing plant in Kobe,
Japan. As such, Mr. Pascal’s Micato was imported directly from Japan into Canada by Excellent Motors.
While driving the Micato along the Ontario 401 Highway on June 16th, 2021, Mr. Pascal applied the brakes as
traffic slowed down. But the brake pedal stayed rigid and failed to function regardless of how much pressure
Mr. Pascal applied to it. Mr. Pascal, who had been cruising at a speed of 120 kilometers an hour, lost control of
the vehicle and smashed into a truck ahead of him. Mr. Pascal was seriously injured and had to be airlifted to
hospital. On impact, the driver of the truck ahead of Mr. Pascal when he lost control of the Micato hit their chest
on the steering wheel and suffered serious injuries as well. Both the Micato and the truck were severely
damaged.
In spite of the positive public portrayal of the Micato, Toyota had long known that the SUV had some design
flaws, especially with regard to the braking system. A tab in the system intended to prevent the loosening of a
nut in the system was not fully bent and overtime affected the transmission of braking fluid. Toyota, in fact,
were about to recall all 25 Micato SUV vehicles that were sold at the same time as Mr. Pascal’s.
Answer the following questions. Your answer to each question should not exceed 150 words – (15% of Final
Grade):
1. Mr. Pascal has sued Toyota, accusing the company of negligence in the manufacturing of the Micato SUV.
What must Mr. Pascal prove in order to succeed in such a case? (7.5%).
2. What is the “Neighbour Principle” in product liability claims based on the alleged negligence of the
manufacturer? How does the principle apply in this case? (7.5%).
☺
A”
Print Layout
Read Aloud
Headings