BHA 4004 CU Culture as a Critical Organizational Priority Essay

Part 1:
Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Lea…
BHA4004
Introduction
In this third assignment in the course, you will assume the role of a newly promoted quality
manager at your local hospital. This role requires you to address deficiencies by improving
organizational culture, providing leadership oversight, and cultivating staff relationships
within the organization. While you have many priorities in this new role, one of your first is
to analyze a recent incident that occurred within the organization and to create a
leadership action plan with recommended strategies and tactics to address not just the
specific incident, but to drive safety and quality improvement throughout the organization.
This assignment differs from the first two assignments in that with this, as the quality
manager, your focus is broader. Rather than focusing only on identifying specific actions
the organization can take to remedy a particular incident that occurred, you are
concentrating on what steps you will take as the quality manager to influence the
organization’s leadership to cultivate a fair and just culture. You will determine what
departments, what leaders, and what personnel you will collaborate with to improve
quality for the whole organization. In this type of culture, safety is at the forefront of
everyone’s job and all associates welcome the opportunity to highlight issues—without
fear of reprisal—so that they can be addressed at a systemic level throughout the
organization.
You may find it useful to review the short document Importance and Features of
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) [PDF] Download Importance and Features of
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) [PDF]as you gather your thoughts about the key
elements you want to include in this assignment.
Preparation
To successfully complete this assignment, use the Collaborate on Quality Template
[DOC] Download Collaborate on Quality Template [DOC]to address the following:
•
•
Select one of the three incidents from the Vila Health: Patient Safety simulation.
These are common incidents you are likely to encounter in the health care field.
These included a patient identification error, a medication error, and a
HIPAA/privacy violation. You may select one of the incidents you worked with in
the previous assignments or select another one. Choose one that holds the most
interest for you.
Consider the following analysis questions once you have selected the incident on
which you will focus:
What information do you possess about the issue? (Note: You may
not be able to answer all of these questions; just include the
information you know.) Consider:
▪ Who was involved?
▪ During what process (clinical, communication, or
operational) did the issue occur?
▪ When did the issue occur? During a particular shift? On a
particular day? During peak hours? Under certain clinical
circumstances?
▪ Where did the issue occur?
o What additional data about the incident would you like to collect and
analyze?
o Which best practices were likely avoided that could have contributed
to the issue? (Note: This information will prove useful to you as you
complete your analysis and leadership action plan.)
Consult the readings provided in Week 6.
Review the Collaborate on Quality Template [DOC] Download Collaborate on
Quality Template [DOC], which you will use to complete this assignment. This
document is formatted and has space for completing all components of the
assignment.
o
•
•
Instructions
Write an analysis and leadership action plan for the issue you selected that will enable you
to address the issue on an organization-wide basis. Please make sure to include all of the
following headings and answer all of the questions underneath each heading.
•
•
•
Introduction: Issue Summary
o How would you summarize the key elements of the incident that
occurred?
o What is your goal in addressing the issue?
o Which 2–3 key items will be your focus? For example, you may elect
to focus on nursing staffing levels if being short-staffed in nursing is
contributing to compromises to patient safety.
Culture: Explain what culture is and why it is a critical priority for safety and
quality, providing at least two evidence-based strategies for cultivating a culture
of safety.
o What is culture?
o Why is culture a critical organizational priority for safety and quality?
o What do you know about the existing organizational culture, based on
the knowledge you have about the selected issue?
o What are some of the evidence-based strategies you are considering
that could be employed to cultivate a culture of safety?
IHI Triple Aim: Apply the IHI Triple Aim to develop a health care leadership
strategy that focuses on optimizing health care system performance.
What is the IHI Triple AIM?
How does the IHI Triple Aim apply to this specific incident?
What IHI Triple Aim elements will you incorporate into your
organizational improvement strategy?
Leadership and Collaboration: Propose evidence-based leadership and
collaboration strategies to enlist the aid of key organizational leaders in
establishing a safety and quality culture.
o Which key departments need to be directly involved with the
corrective action process?
o What is your rationale for selecting these departments? For example,
you may want to involve nursing because many of errors involve
nurses and obtaining their buy-in is critical to achieving the
organizational priority.
o Which specific senior leader, front-line staff member, and clinical
expert will you include in your action plan and hold accountable for
implementation?
o What are the implications of not engaging with all departments
toward making safety and quality top of mind?
o How might you involve other departments in addressing the specific
issue and the cultural issue?
o Which specific leaders within the organization could assist you in
addressing this issue and in making patient safety and quality top of
mind throughout the organization? Examples for you to consider
include the chief nursing officer, the chief medical officer, the patient
safety officer, et cetera.
o What role do you expect these leaders to play in addressing the
specific issue and the issue of culture?
o What best practices would you employ to enlist their aid in the
improvement effort?
Leadership Action Plan: Create an evidence-based action plan that includes
leadership strategies to establish a safety and quality culture.
o What are three evidence-based (supported by current literature)
leadership strategies you recommend that would help to solve the
incident that occurred?
o What are three evidence-based best practices you recommend to
address the issue on an organizational level?
Opportunities to Enlist Governing Board: Determine opportunities to enlist the
governing board’s aid in fostering a fair and just culture.
o What role does the organization’s governing board have in terms of
quality and safety in the organization?
o How could you enlist the governing board’s aid in your improvement
initiative?
o What additional information could you provide them to increase their
involvement in the organization’s safety and quality improvement
efforts?
Conclusion
o
o
o
•
•
•
•
o
How will you summarize your analysis of the incident and your
leadership action plan?
In addition, your assignment needs to conform to current APA style and format guidelines.
Do ensure that it is clear, persuasive, concise, organized, and without errors in grammar,
punctuation, and spelling. Do provide citations and title and reference pages in current APA
format. Other leaders in your organization are going to want to know what sources you
relied on to prepare your analysis and action plan.
Note: Remember that health care is an evidence-based field. You will need to cite
a minimum of two credible references to support your analysis and action planning
process.
Please review the Collaborating on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the grading requirements for this assignment.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
•
•
•
•
Template: Use the Collaborate on Quality Template [DOC] Download
Collaborate on Quality Template [DOC]to complete this assignment.
Length: 8–10 double-spaced pages, not including title and reference pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA format: Your submission, including the body, citations, and title and
reference pages need to be in APA format and style guidelines. It does need to be
well written, include the headings specified in the instructions, and address the
questions listed under each heading.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the
following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
•
Competency 4: Apply leadership strategies to quality improvement in a health
care organization.
o Explain what culture is and why it is a critical priority for safety and
quality, providing at least two evidence-based strategies for
cultivating a culture of safety.
o Apply the IHI Triple Aim to develop a health care leadership strategy
that focuses on optimizing health care system performance.
o Propose evidence-based leadership and collaboration strategies to
enlist the aid of key organizational leaders in establishing a safety and
quality culture.
o Create an evidence-based action plan that includes leadership
strategies to establish a safety and quality culture.
Determine opportunities to enlist the governing board’s aid in
fostering a fair and just culture.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with
the expectations for health care professionals.
o Use correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics as expected of an
undergraduate learner.
o Writing adheres to APA formatting rules and APA writing style with
few or minor errors.
o
•
View Rubric
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
Explain what culture is and why it is a critical priority for safety and
quality, providing at least two evidence-based strategies for
cultivating a culture of safety.
view longer description
32 to >27.2 pts
Distinguished
Explains what culture is an
why it is a critical priority f
safety and quality, providin
more than two evidencebased strategies for
cultivating a culture of safe
including clarification of ho
these could be pursued in t
given context.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
Proficient
Explains what culture is an
why it is a critical priority f
safety and quality, providin
at least two evidence-based
strategies for cultivating a
culture of safety.
22.4 to >0 pts
Basic
Attempts to explain what
culture is and why it is a
critical priority for safety a
quality, providing one or tw
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
evidence-based strategies f
cultivating a culture of safe
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not attempt to explain
what culture is and why it i
critical priority for safety a
quality, and does not provi
evidence-based strategies f
cultivating a culture of safe
Apply the IHI Triple Aim to develop a health care leadership strategy
that focuses on optimizing health care system performance.
view longer description
32 to >27.2 pts
Distinguished
Applies the IHI Triple Aim t
develop a health care
leadership strategy that
focuses on optimizing healt
care system performance.
Ensures the narrative
includes multiple examples
specifics, and references to
the professional literature.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
Proficient
Applies the IHI Triple Aim t
develop a health care
leadership strategy that
focuses on optimizing healt
care system performance.
22.4 to >0 pts
Basic
Attempts to apply the IHI
Triple Aim to develop a
health care leadership
strategy that focuses on
optimizing health care
system performance;
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
however, omissions and/or
errors exist.
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not attempt to apply t
IHI Triple Aim to develop a
health care leadership
strategy that focuses on
optimizing health care
system performance.
Propose evidence-based leadership and collaboration strategies to
enlist the aid of key organizational leaders in establishing a safety
and quality culture.
view longer description
32 to >27.2 pts
Distinguished
Proposes multiple evidence
based leadership and
collaboration strategies to
enlist the aid of key
organizational leaders in
establishing a safety and
quality culture. Includes
multiple examples, specific
and references to the
professional literature.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
Proficient
Proposes evidence-based
leadership and collaboratio
strategies to enlist the aid o
key organizational leaders
establishing a safety and
quality culture.
22.4 to >0 pts
Basic
Attempts to propose
evidence-based leadership
and collaboration strategie
to enlist the aid of key
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
organizational leaders in
establishing a safety and
quality culture; however,
strategies are not always
evidence-based or
appropriate. Omissions
and/or errors exist.
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not attempt to propos
evidence-based leadership
and collaboration strategie
to enlist the aid of key
organizational leaders in
establishing a safety and
quality culture.
Create an evidence-based action plan that includes leadership
strategies to establish a safety and quality culture.
view longer description
32 to >27.2 pts
Distinguished
Creates an evidence-based
action plan that includes
multiple leadership
strategies to establish a
safety and quality culture.
Includes multiple examples
specifics, and references to
the professional literature.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
Proficient
Creates an evidence-based
action plan that includes
leadership strategies to
establish a safety and quali
culture.
22.4 to >0 pts
Basic
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
Attempts to create an
evidence-based action plan
that includes leadership
strategies to establish a
safety and quality culture, b
strategies are not always
evidence based or
appropriate. Omissions
and/or errors exist.
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not attempt to create
evidence-based action plan
that includes leadership
strategies to establish a
safety and quality culture.
Determine opportunities to enlist the governing board’s aid in
fostering a fair and just culture.
view longer description
32 to >27.2 pts
Distinguished
Determines multiple
opportunities to enlist the
governing board’s aid in
fostering a fair and just
culture. Includes multiple
examples, specifics, and
references to the professio
literature.
27.2 to >22.4 pts
Proficient
Determines opportunities t
enlist the governing board’
aid in fostering a fair and ju
culture.
22.4 to >0 pts
Basic
Attempts to determine
opportunities to enlist the
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
governing board’s aid in
fostering a fair and just
culture; however, omission
and/or errors exist.
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not attempt to
determine opportunities to
enlist the governing board’
aid in fostering a fair and ju
culture.
Use correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics as expected of an
undergraduate learner.
view longer description
20 to >17 pts
Distinguished
Uses correct grammar,
punctuation, and mechanic
beyond what is expected of
an undergraduate learner.
17 to >14 pts
Proficient
Uses correct grammar,
punctuation, and mechanic
as expected of an
undergraduate learner.
14 to >0 pts
Basic
Uses correct grammar,
punctuation, and mechanic
as expected of an
undergraduate learner, but
with some errors and lapse
0 pts
Non-Performance
Does not use correct
grammar, punctuation, and
mechanics as expected of a
undergraduate learner.
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
[u07a1] Week 7 Assignment: Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis and Leadership Action Plan
Criteria
Ratings
Writing adheres to APA formatting rules and APA writing style with
few or minor errors.
view longer description
20 to >17 pts
Distinguished
Writing is exemplary,
exhibiting strict and nearly
flawless adherence to APA
formatting rules and APA
writing style.
17 to >14 pts
Proficient
Writing adheres to APA
formatting rules and APA
writing style with few or
minor errors.
14 to >0 pts
Basic
Writing reflects inconsisten
use of APA formatting and
APA writing style.
0 pts
Non-Performance
Writing does not adhere to
APA formatting and APA
writing style.
Total Points: 0
1
Template for BHA4004
Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis & Leadership Action Plan
Your Name
Date:
2
Collaborate on Quality: Issue Analysis & Leadership Action Plan
[Provide a brief introduction to this paper. Delete all statements within
brackets, such as this paragraph, and replace with your discussion. Also, before
you begin, review the “Scoring Guide” and understand the difference between
“Distinguished”, “Proficient”, “Basic” and “Non-Performance”. These “Scoring Guides”
are used to grade the assignment. This is why each Template is set up with headings
(below) that correspond with the “Scoring Guides” for this specific assignment. Please
leave the Headings (below) in the paper.]
Culture
[Explain what culture is and why it is a critical priority for safety and quality; what
you know about the existing organizational culture, based on the knowledge you have
about the selected issue; providing at least two evidence-based strategies for
cultivating a culture of safety.]
IHI Triple Aim
[Apply the IHI Triple Aim to develop a health care leadership strategy that
focuses on optimizing health care system performance. Include: What is the IHI Triple
AIM? How does the IHI Triple Aim apply to this specific incident? What IHI Triple Aim
elements will you incorporate into your organizational improvement strategy?]
Leadership & Collaboration Strategies
[Propose evidence-based (requires sources that support the strategies)
leadership and collaboration strategies to enlist the aid of key organizational leaders in
establishing a safety and quality culture. Include: Which key departments need to be
directly involved with the corrective action process? What is your rationale for selecting
3
these departments? For example, you may want to involve nursing because many of
errors involve nurses and obtaining their buy-in is critical to achieving the organizational
priority. Which specific senior leader, front-line staff member, and clinical expert will you
include in your action plan and hold accountable for implementation? What are the
implications of not engaging with all departments toward making safety and quality top
of mind? How might you involve other departments in addressing the specific issue and
the cultural issue? Which specific leaders within the organization could assist you in
addressing this issue and in making patient safety and quality top of mind throughout
the organization? Examples for you to consider include the chief nursing officer, the
chief medical officer, the patient safety officer, et cetera. What role do you expect these
leaders to play in addressing the specific issue and the issue of culture? What best
practices would you employ to enlist their aid in the improvement effort?]
Leadership Action Plan
[Propose an evidence-based (requires sources that support the strategies)
leadership action plan that includes leadership strategies to establish a safety and
quality culture. What are three evidence-based leadership strategies your recommend
that would help to solve the incident that occurred? What are three evidence-based best
practices you recommend to address the issue on an organizational level?]
Opportunities to Enlist Governing Board
[Determine opportunities to enlist the governing board’s aid in fostering a fair and
just culture. Include: What role does the organization’s governing board have in terms of
quality and safety in the organization? How could you enlist the governing board’s aid in
4
your improvement initiative? What additional information could you provide them to
increase their involvement in the organization’s safety and quality improvement efforts?]
Conclusion
[Provide a summary of your discussion.]
5
References
[Lastname, C. (2008). Title of the source without caps except Proper Nouns or: First
word after colon. The Journal or Publication Italicized and Capped, Vol# (Issue#),
Page numbers.
Lastname, O. (2010). Online journal using DOI or digital object identifier. Main Online
Journal Name, Vol#(Issue#), 159-192. doi: 10.1000/182
Lastname, W. (2009). If there is no DOI use the URL of the main website referenced.
Article Without DOI Reference, Vol#(Issue#), 166-212. Retrieved from
http://www.mainwebsite.org
NOTE: The above references are SAMPLES ONLY. For more information and example
related to references, visit Capella’s Writing Center. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE
FOR SUBMITTING APPROPRIATE IN-TEXT AND REFERENCE PAGE
CITATIONS.]
Part 2
BHA4006
Compliance Training
At this point in your academic career, you know that health care is a heavily regulated
industry. While applicable regulations may vary from one organization type to the next, the
typical health care organization must navigate through a wide array of laws, quality
standards, regulations, and ethical considerations as part of day-to-day operations. What
this means is that the staff working in these organizations must also fully understand their
organization’s regulatory environment and their role in regulatory compliance.
Successful compliance depends on how well the staff is trained. Managers need to be able
to teach their staff compliance best practices. The compliance content in the training is one
aspect of the health care manager’s job. The other critical aspect of the job is to be able to
convey the compliance content effectively and efficiently. In today’s environment, it is not
enough to simply place a check mark next to the staff trained item on the manager’s to-do
list. Staff members need to be able to retain the compliance best practices they have
learned and apply them on the job. In successful health care organizations, compliance
training does not just need to be done; it needs to be done effectively and efficiently. This is
no easy task, given the complexity of health care regulations.
In this assignment, you will continue your work on a team-based initiative for Vila Health’s
chief compliance officer. For the purpose of this assignment, you will assume the role of
quality assurance officer in your health care organization. You have been tasked with the
responsibility of developing a presentation that prepares the organization’s department
heads to deliver the compliance training to their staff members.
Preparation
Conduct independent research on these topics:
•
•
Regulations, accreditation requirements, and ethical standards that govern the
health care industry.
Current best practices in compliance training and health care industry-accepted
training programs.
Consult the resources in the weekly readings as a starting point for your research. You may
also want to consult the Health Care Administration Undergraduate Library Research
Guide Links to an external site.for additional guidance on how to conduct scholarly,
professional research.
Instructions
Assume the role of a quality assurance officer at one of Vila Health’s community-based
hospitals. You recently received approval from your organization’s senior leaders to
provide compliance training to all staff members based on the new approach to compliance
your organization has adopted.
Because of the number of staff requiring training, you will not be able to deliver the
compliance training yourself. Instead, your organization’s department heads will conduct
the training for their departments. Your job is to develop a presentation to help the
department heads train their staff on the organization’s new approach to compliance.
You have scheduled a meeting with the department heads to introduce the compliance
training. For most presentations like this, you will get only 3–5 minutes to make your
points, so you must keep it concise. As you are doing your planning for your presentation to
department heads, you have decided that your presentation needs to consist of two parts:
•
•
Part One: Background on Regulation, Accreditation, and Ethics in Health Care.
o This addresses the compliance content department heads need to
cover in their staff training sessions.
Part Two: Compliance Training Effectiveness.
o This addresses how to design and deliver compliance training that
staff members retain and apply on the job.
You have determined you will need 10–12 slides to cover the content you plan to deliver to
the department heads. You have also created an outline of what specifically you need to
include in your presentation. Here is the outline you created:
Part One: Background on Regulation, Accreditation, and
Ethics in Health Care
In seven to eight slides:
•
•
•
•
•
Analyze regulatory, ethical, and accreditation compliance in health care
(one slide).
o Distinguish accreditation from regulations and ethical considerations
in health care.
Highlight the risks and consequences of noncompliance and ethical breaches (1–
2 slides).
Analyze important health care regulations, such as privacy laws, quality
standards, and patient rights (three slides).
Present key ethical considerations all staff must understand (one slide).
Explain how the concept of continuous readiness applies to compliance
(one slide).
Part Two: Compliance Training Effectiveness
In three to four slides:
•
•
•
Explain best practices for training health care staff on compliance (1–2 slides).
Conclude with a final meaningful compliance message, such as a motivational
statement or a quote about compliance (one slide).
Include your reference slide with APA-formatted references (one slide).
See Evidence and APALinks to an external site..
Now that you have your outline in hand, develop your presentation to department heads on
the organization’s new compliance training program that they will be delivering to their
staff members.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
•
•
•
•
Written communication: Your slides need to include bullet points highlighting
the key concepts. Avoid using block paragraphs or pictures only. Make sure your
content is clear, persuasive, well organized, and free of errors in grammar,
punctuation, and spelling.
Title slide: Develop a descriptive title for your presentation of 5–15 words. It
should stir interest yet maintain professional decorum.
Length: 15–20 slides. Slides should be professional and appropriately balance
text and visuals. Avoid making your slides too text heavy. Instead make use of
speaker notes to include additional content.
References and reference slide: Include a minimum of three citations of peerreviewed sources in current APA format on a final reference slide.
Review the Compliance Training Scoring Guide so that you understand how your faculty
member is going to evaluate your work.
Submit your assignment as a PowerPoint presentation. Review the resource, Guidelines for
Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]Links to an external site. for PowerPoint tips.
View Rubric
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
Analyze regulatory, ethical, and accreditation compliance in a health care
setting.
view longer description
15 to >12.75 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes regulator
ethical, and
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
accreditation
compliance in a
health care setting
and cites sources t
support the analys
12.75 to >10.5 pts
PROFICIENT
Analyzes regulator
ethical, and
accreditation
compliance in a
health care setting
10.5 to >0 pts
BASIC
Analyzes regulator
ethical, and
accreditation
compliance in a
health care setting
but the analysis is
incomplete,
inaccurate, or
otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not analyze
regulatory, ethical,
and accreditation
compliance in a
health care setting
Distinguish accreditation from regulations and ethical considerations in
health care.
view longer description
15 to >12.75 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Distinguishes
accreditation from
regulations and
ethical
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
considerations in
health care and cite
sources to support
the assertions.
12.75 to >10.5 pts
PROFICIENT
Distinguishes
accreditation from
regulations and
ethical
considerations in
health care.
10.5 to >0 pts
BASIC
Distinguishes
accreditation from
regulations and
ethical
considerations in
health care, but do
so incompletely or
inaccurately.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not distinguis
accreditation from
regulations and
ethical
considerations in
health care.
Explain the risks and consequences for noncompliance or ethical breaches.
view longer description
14 to >11.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains the risks
and consequences
for noncompliance
ethical breaches an
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
provides examples
possible
consequences.
11.9 to >9.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains the risks
and consequences
for noncompliance
ethical breaches.
9.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Explains the risks
and consequences
for noncompliance
ethical breaches bu
the explanation is
incomplete,
inaccurate, or
otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not explain th
risks and
consequences for
noncompliance or
ethical breaches.
Analyze important health care regulations, compliance requirements, and
laws.
view longer description
14 to >11.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes importan
health care
regulations,
compliance
requirements, and
laws and cites
sources to support
the analysis.
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
11.9 to >9.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Analyzes importan
health care
regulations,
compliance
requirements, and
laws.
9.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Analyzes importan
health care
regulations,
compliance
requirements, and
laws but the analys
is incomplete,
inaccurate, or flaw
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not analyze
important health
care regulations,
compliance
requirements, and
laws.
Explain the concept of continuous readiness.
view longer description
14 to >11.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains the conce
of continuous
readiness and
provides an examp
of how continuous
readiness could be
applied in an
organization.
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
11.9 to >9.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains the conce
of continuous
readiness.
9.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Explains the conce
of continuous
readiness, but the
explanation is
incomplete,
inaccurate, or
otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not explain th
concept of
continuous
readiness.
Explain best practices for training health care staff on compliance.
view longer description
14 to >11.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains best
practices for traini
health care staff on
compliance and cit
sources to support
the best practices.
11.9 to >9.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains best
practices for traini
health care staff on
compliance.
9.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
Explains best
practices for traini
health care staff on
compliance but the
explanation is
incomplete,
inaccurate, or
otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not explain b
practices for traini
health care staff on
compliance.
Develop a clear, persuasive, well-organized, error-free presentation for
department heads that prepares them to conduct compliance training for
their departments.
view longer description
14 to >11.9 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Develops a clear,
persuasive, wellorganized, error-fr
presentation for
department heads
that prepares them
to conduct
compliance trainin
for their
departments, and
cites a source abou
best practices for
adult learning.
11.9 to >9.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Develops a clear,
persuasive, wellorganized, error-fr
presentation for
department heads
Compliance Training
Compliance Training
Criteria
Ratings
that prepares them
to conduct
compliance trainin
for their
departments.
9.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Develops a
presentation for
department heads
that prepares them
to conduct
compliance trainin
for their
departments but th
presentation is not
clear, persuasive,
well organized, or
error free.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not develop a
clear, persuasive,
well-organized,
error-free
presentation for
department heads
that prepares them
to conduct
compliance trainin
for their
departments.
Total Points: 0
Part 3
BHA 4010
Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Introduction
The quantitative method is the original scientific method. Quantitative research methods
can be subdivided by various designs that researchers use to answer their research
questions. In fact, the wording of the research question must match the methodology and
may contain words that indicate the design. Quantitative research identifies
what happened, but not why it happened. It identifies causation or relationships.
The relationships in a quantitative research study are similar to those used for a qualitative
design. There is still a relationship between the theory, problem, purpose, and the research
questions, hypotheses, and design. This week you will continue to expand your
understanding of this framework by analyzing and evaluating research questions and
hypotheses in quantitative studies. You will also learn about various quantitative research
designs that researchers use to answer their research questions.
In addition, you will continue to analyze the interrelated elements of a research study,
making the connection among theory, problem, and purpose, and research questions,
hypotheses, and design.
Summary
For this assignment, you will craft a quantitative research question based on the HAC you
selected for the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assignment, as well as examine
quantitative methodologies and data collection strategies that would enable you to answer
your research question.
There is no length requirement for this assignment. Most submissions that fully address all
scoring guide criteria will be 2–5 pages long.
Instructions
For this assignment build on the work that you did in the Research Problem and Purpose
Statements assignment.
The assignment has two distinct parts.
Part 1: Quantitative Research Question
For this first part of the assignment, you will formulate a research question that is
appropriate for a research project that will use quantitative methodologies. Remember the
HAC that you used in your Research Problem and Purpose Statements
assignment. Additionally, your research question should align with the problem and
purpose statements that you developed at that time.
Keep in mind that a well-written research question should be a single statement.
When examining or creating qualitative research questions, the following checklist may be
useful.
Quantitative Research Question Checklist
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Does the purpose statement fit logically with the problem statement? Does the
purpose statement use similar words to the problem statement, or does it seem
to address a different topic?
Based on the problem statement, do the research questions align with the
method and design of the study? For instance, are words like perception used
that would automatically reject a quantitative study? Reference the research
methodology publication to ensure alignment.
Do questions seek to describe responses to the variables described in the study?
Do the questions include words like compare or correlate that indicate a
quantitative study?
Do the questions include identification of the independent and dependent
variables?
Does the hypothesis fit with the research questions?
Do the questions and hypothesis identify the participants for the research study?
Do the questions and hypothesis specify the participants and the research site?
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria
•
•
Formulate a quantitative research question and associated hypothesis.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the
diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for
health care professionals.
Part 2: Quantitative Methods and Data Collection
For this second part of the assignment, you will draw on your readings about qualitative
methods and data collection to first identify specific quantitative methodologies that will
enable you to answer your research questions. Second, you will discuss specific qualitative
data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate for this purpose. Questions to
consider when looking for strategies and tools include the following:
•
•
•
What is your research question specifically trying to answer?
How does the specific HAC affect the types of tools and strategies that would
work best?
How does the health care setting where the research project will occur affect the
types of tools and strategies that would work best?
This part should also include a review of why it is important to a potential research plan as
a whole to ensure that your data collection plan is relevant to your chosen methodology.
This section should be 2–5 pages long, depending on the level of detail required to fully
present your methodologies and data collection tools and strategies.
Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria
•
•
•
•
Identify relevant quantitative methodologies that will support answering a
research question.
Describe quantitative data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate for
answering a research question.
Explain the importance of methodologically relevant data collection to a
research plan as a whole.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the
diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations
for health care professionals.
Additional Submission Requirements
•
•
•
•
•
Structure: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page.
Length: There is no length requirement for this assignment. Most submissions
that fully address all scoring guide criteria will be 2–5 pages long.
References: Cite at least five current scholarly or professional resources.
Format: Use APA style for references and citations.
o You may wish to refer to the following APA resources to help with
your structure, formatting, and style:
▪ Evidence and APALinks to an external site..
▪ APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]Links to an external site..
Font: Times New Roman font, 12 point, double-spaced for narrative portions
only.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the
following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
•
Competency 1: Explain the different types of health care research
methodologies.
o Identify relevant quantitative methodologies that will support
answering a research question.
o Describe quantitative data collection tools or strategies that are
appropriate for answering a research question.
o Explain the importance of methodologically relevant data collection
to a research plan as a whole.
•
•
Competency 2: Develop a research question based on a hospital-acquired
condition.
o Formulate a quantitative research question and associated
hypothesis.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with
the expectations of health care professionals.
o Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is
consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
View Rubric
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
Formulate a quantitative research question and associated hypothesis.
view longer description
46 to >39.1 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Formulates a
quantitative resear
question and
associated
hypothesis,
providing specific
examples.
39.1 to >32.2 pts
PROFICIENT
Formulates a
quantitative resear
question and
associated
hypothesis.
32.2 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes a
quantitative resear
question and
associated
hypothesis.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
Does not describe a
quantitative resear
question and
associated
hypothesis.
Identify relevant quantitative methodologies that will support answering a
research question.
view longer description
46 to >39.1 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Identifies relevant
quantitative
methodologies tha
will support
answering a resear
question and offers
brief rationale for
why the identified
quantitative
methodologies are
relevant.
39.1 to >32.2 pts
PROFICIENT
Identifies relevant
quantitative
methodologies tha
will support
answering a resear
question.
32.2 to >0 pts
BASIC
Lists quantitative
research
methodologies, but
their relevance to a
specific research
question is incorre
or unclear.
0 pts
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not list
quantitative resear
methodologies.
Describe quantitative data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate
for answering a research question.
view longer description
44 to >37.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Describes
quantitative data
collection tools or
strategies that are
appropriate for
answering a resear
question and offers
brief rationale for
why the data
collection tools or
strategies are
appropriate.
37.4 to >30.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Describes
quantitative data
collection tools or
strategies that are
appropriate for
answering a resear
question.
30.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies
quantitative data
collection tools or
strategies, but thei
relevance for
answering a resear
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
question is unclear
or inappropriate.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not identify
quantitative data
collection tools or
strategies.
Explain the importance of methodologically relevant data collection to a
research plan as a whole.
view longer description
44 to >37.4 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains the
importance of
targeted data
collection to a
research plan as a
whole. Notes areas
related to a researc
question where
targeted data
collection will be
valuable or
potentially
challenging.
37.4 to >30.8 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains the
importance of
methodologically
relevant data
collection to a
research plan as a
whole.
30.8 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes targeted
data collection, but
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
does not offer a ful
or clear explanatio
as to its importanc
to a research plan a
a whole.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not describe
targeted data
collection.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of
the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with
expectations for health care professionals.
view longer description
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Communicates wit
exceptional clarity
a manner that is
scholarly,
professional, and
respectful of the
diversity, dignity,
and integrity of
others and is
consistent with
expectations for
health care
professionals.
17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Communicates in a
manner that is
scholarly,
professional, and
respectful of the
diversity, dignity,
and integrity of
others and is
consistent with
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Week 7 Assignment: Quantitative Research Questions and Methods
Criteria
Ratings
expectations for
health care
professionals.
14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Communicates in a
manner that is
consistent with
expectations for th
health care
profession.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMAN
Does not
communicate in a
manner that is
consistent with
expectations for th
health care
profession.
Total Points: 0