Science Question

BHA4102: Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership ReflectionInstructions
This assignment has two parts.
THIS TEMPLTE IS AN EXAMPLE FOR YOU FOR FOLLOW
Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] Download APA Paper Template [DOCX]to write a 7–
10 page paper that responds to the following:
Part 1: Leadership Self-Reflection
•
•
•
•
Discuss the five leadership domains assessed by the ACHE assessment tool.
Determine strategies to develop your identified strengths and weaknesses for each of
the five domains.
o For each of the five domains, summarize both your strengths and your
weaknesses.
o For each domain, identify at least one resource you can use immediately to
further develop your skills, for a total of five resources.
Describe qualities needed by leaders.
Analyze the qualities of a leader you have and the ones you need to work on developing.
o From your readings and research, define the primary qualities needed by
leaders and apply those qualities to your personal assessment.
o Describe which qualities you possess and which qualities present
opportunities for improvement.
Part 2: Personal Development Plan
1. Create a 1-year personal development plan.
This plan should synthesize your assessment results with your research
completed this week.
o Identify at least three things you would like to work on over the next year
and develop a timeline with specific metrics to measure your progress.
2. Develop a timeline for your personal development plan.
o
One potential way to approach this part is to create a table to break the three goals into
actionable steps after you have identified three things that you would like to work on. Your
table should have the following four columns.
•
•
•
•
The first column should show the overall goals.
The second column should contain all the steps necessary for each goal.
The third column should show how you will measure the progress of each step.
The fourth column should show the deadline for completing the steps.
An example of this table could be like this (your table will include three goals and each goal
can have more than two steps):
Goal
Steps
Work-life
balance.
Measure
Deadline
Leave work by 5 p.m. daily.
Time left daily.
1-1-20XX
Do not check email from
home.
Number of times email is checked from
home.
3-1-20XX
Additional Requirements
•
•
•
•
Length: A minimum of seven double-spaced pages, not including title and reference
pages.
Font and font size: Arial, 12 point.
References: Cite at least three references from peer-reviewed journals, in addition to
your textbook. Refer to the Health Care Administration Undergraduate Program Library
GuideLinks to an external site. for more information.
Format: Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] Download APA Paper Template [DOCX]to
write your paper using current APA style and formatting for the paper as well as for
references and citations. Refer to Evidence and APALinks to an external site. on Campus
for more information. You may use first person for the portions of this paper where it is
appropriate to do so.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the
following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
•
•
Competency 1: Assess one’s leadership style in a professional health care setting.
o Discuss the five leadership domains assessed by the ACHE assessment tool.
o Determine strategies to develop the identified strengths and weaknesses for
each of the five leadership domains.
o Describe qualities needed by leaders.
o Analyze personal leadership qualities and the ones that need development.
o Create a one-year personal development plan.
o Develop a timeline for a personal development plan.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful
of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with the expectations
for health care professionals.
o Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
o Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
View Rubric
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
21 to >17.85 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Discusses the five
leadership domains
assessed by the
ACHE instrument,
summarizing both
strengths and
weaknesses.
17.85 to >14.7 pts
PROFICIENT
Discuss the five leadership domains assessed by the ACHE assessment tool.
view longer description
Discusses the five
leadership domains
assessed by the
ACHE instrument.
14.7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Lists the five
leadership domains
assessed by the
ACHE instrument.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not list the fiv
leadership domains
assessed by the
ACHE instrument.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
21 to >17.85 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains strategies
develop the
identified strengths
and weaknesses for
each of the five
leadership domains
17.85 to >14.7 pts
PROFICIENT
Determine strategies to develop the identified strengths and weaknesses for each of
the five leadership domains.
view longer description
Determines
strategies to develo
the identified
strengths and
weaknesses for eac
of the five leadershi
domains.
14.7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies strategies
to develop the
identified strengths
and weaknesses for
each of the five
leadership domains
but the strategies a
somehow flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
Does not identify
strategies to develo
the identified
strengths and
weaknesses for eac
of the five leadershi
domains.
19.5 to >16.58 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Describes qualities
needed by leaders
and provides
examples.
16.58 to >13.65 pts
PROFICIENT
Describe qualities needed by leaders.
view longer description
Describes qualities
needed by leaders.
13.65 to >0 pts
BASIC
Identifies qualities
needed by leaders.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not identify
qualities needed by
leaders.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
19.5 to >16.58 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Analyzes personal
leadership qualities
and the ones that
need development,
explaining in what
way those qualities
need development.
16.58 to >13.65 pts
PROFICIENT
Analyze personal leadership qualities and the ones that need development.
view longer description
Analyzes personal
leadership qualities
and the ones that
need development.
13.65 to >0 pts
BASIC
Determines person
leadership qualities
and the ones that
need development.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not determine
personal leadership
qualities or the one
needing
development.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
19.5 to >16.58 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Creates a one-year
personal
development plan,
identifying at least
three goals to be
achieved.
16.58 to >13.65 pts
PROFICIENT
Create a one-year personal development plan.
view longer description
Creates a one-year
personal
development plan.
13.65 to >0 pts
BASIC
Creates a one-year
personal
development plan,
but the plan is
missing key elemen
or is otherwise
flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not create a
one-year personal
development plan.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
19.5 to >16.58 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Develops a timeline
for a personal
development plan,
including specific
metrics to measure
progress.
16.58 to >13.65 pts
PROFICIENT
Develop a timeline for a personal development plan.
view longer description
Develops a timeline
for a personal
development plan.
13.65 to >0 pts
BASIC
Outlines a timeline
for a personal
development plan,
but the timeline is
incomplete or
otherwise flawed.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not outline a
timeline for a
personal
development plan.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
15 to >12.75 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Exhibits strict and
nearly flawless
adherence to the
rules of grammar,
usage, and
mechanics.
12.75 to >10.5 pts
PROFICIENT
Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
view longer description
Adheres to the rule
of grammar, usage,
and mechanics.
10.5 to >0 pts
BASIC
Errors in grammar,
usage, and mechani
inhibit readability
and comprehension
and detract from
good scholarship.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not adhere to
the rules of gramma
usage, and
mechanics.
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
15 to >12.75 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Applies APA style
and formatting to
scholarly writing.
Exhibits strict and
nearly flawless
adherence to stylist
conventions,
document structure
and source
attributions.
12.75 to >10.5 pts
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
view longer description
PROFICIENT
Applies APA style
and formatting to
scholarly writing.
10.5 to >0 pts
BASIC
Applies APA style
and formatting to
scholarly writing
incorrectly and/or
inconsistently,
detracting noticeab
from good
scholarship.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
[u02a1] Week 2 Assignment: Personal Leadership Reflection
Criteria
Ratings
Does not apply APA
style and formattin
to scholarly writing
Total Points: 0
Week 2 Assignment: Evolution of the Hospital
Industry – A Compar
Introduction
As a health care administrator, you will often do research on a topic to provide background
information for decision making, committee work, or creating policies. It is often best
practice to use a comparison table to lay out and visualize your research notations. For this
week’s assignment you will complete a comparison table on hospital care across three time
periods and analyze the similarities and differences of the different topics for each of the
time periods in the table. You will summarize key findings for the topics and draw
appropriate conclusions in a 2–3-page paper, with your comparative table in the appendix.
Scenario
Imagine you are a patient with a serious illness in a hospital in the 1800s, in the 1960s, and
today. Think about the room configurations, the skills of the nurses and other staff, the
level and type of care, and how you would pay for the care, both now and in the previous
centuries.
Instructions
Follow the templet expel here as well please!!!
Using the Comparative Analysis Template [DOCX] Download Comparative Analysis
Template [DOCX], write a 2–3 page paper about the similarities and differences in hospital
care from the different time periods (1800s, 1960s, and today), as well as the conclusions
you drew from your analysis. In addition, complete the Comparative Analysis Table:
Hospital Care Evolution in the appendix of the assignment div.
Complete the following:
1. Use your textbook and at least two other resources included in What You Need
to Know for this week or resources you find on your own to research how the
hospital industry has evolved in terms of hospital environment, medical staff
education, level of care in hospitals, and the payment systems. Use the History of
Health Care ResearchLinks to an external site. tab in the Health Care
Administration Undergraduate Library Research GuideLinks to an external
site. to guide your research process.
o You will need to reference a total of three scholarly sources in your
paper.
o Be sure to cite these references within the body of your paper
correctly using APA style citations.
2. Complete the Comparative Analysis Table: Hospital Evolution, located in the
appendix of the assignment div.
o Provide two descriptive changes for each time period under each of
the headings.
o Add bullet points to each cell in the table to document the descriptive
changes that you have found for each topic.
o Document the source where you found the information for each cell in
the table, using APA citation style.
3. Refer to the Comparative Analysis Assignment Exemplar [PDF] Download
Comparative Analysis Assignment Exemplar [PDF]for an example of how
to translate the information from the table into a written paper.
o Note that the assignment exemplar is written about the evolution of
physicians’ practices and not hospital care, which is the topic for this
assignment.
o Do not copy the exemplar text into your paper. You should submit
original written work about the evolution of hospitals in your paper.
4. Write an introduction to the paper.
o Include a brief explanation of the purpose of the paper and main
ideas.
o Reference significant trends that you noticed as appropriate.
5. Write the body of the paper.
o Write the Hospital Care Evolution section in the assignment
div, using the information from the Comparative Analysis Table you
completed.
▪ Describe your findings about each topic in the different
time periods under each subtopic heading.
▪ Explain the trends in hospital environment, medical staff
education, level of care in hospitals, and the payment
systems in a short paragraph (3–4 sentences) for each
topic, using the subheadings provided in the assignment
div.
▪ Cite all references used within the body of your paper
using APA style citations.
o Write the Comparative Analysis section (1–2 paragraphs) in the
assignment div.
▪ Write a brief summary of your comparisons and analysis
about the significance of the key changes from the different
time periods.
▪ Draw conclusions about how the hospital industry has
evolved from the 1800s, to the 1960s, to today and about
the significance of the key milestones from the different
time periods.
▪ Give specific examples of the impact on the quality of
patient care during these time frames.
6. Write a conclusion paragraph where you summarize the main ideas included in
the paper.
o
Explain why it is important to study the history of hospital care for
your profession.
Additional Requirements
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Your paper should be 2–3 pages, in addition to the title page, appendix, and
reference page.
Double space your paper, and use Times New Roman, 12-point font, as indicated
in the assignment div.
Use a minimum of three resources, including your textbook and other course
resources.
Complete all parts of the assignment div, using the headings provided in the div.
Support all points with credible evidence, in the form of APA citations. Refer
to Evidence and APALinks to an external site. in the Capella Writing Center for
help with using APA style.
Include a references page in APA format with appropriate citations.
Complete the Comparative Analysis Table: Hospital Evolution table in the
appendix of the assignment div.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the
following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
•
•
•
Competency 1: Analyze trends in the U.S. health care system from a historical
perspective.
o Compare and contrast the hospital environments of the 1800s, 1960s,
and today.
o Compare and contrast the level of care provided in hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and today.
o Compare and contrast the payment systems in the hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and today.
o Draw conclusions about how the hospital industry has evolved from
the 1800s, to the 1960s, to today.
Competency 3: Analyze the development of medical education in the United
States.
o Compare and contrast the staff education level in hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and today.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others.
o Appropriately addresses all components of the assignment prompt,
using the assignment description to structure text.
o Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
View Rubric
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
Compare and contrast the hospital environments of the 1800s, 1960s, and
today.
view longer description
41.6 to >35.36 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Compares and
contrast the hospita
environments of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today. Gives specific
examples of the
impact on the quali
of patient care duri
these time frames.
35.36 to >29.12 pts
PROFICIENT
Compares and
contrasts the
hospital
environments of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
29.12 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes but does
not compare and
contrast the hospita
environments of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address th
hospital
environments of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
Compare and contrast the staff education level in hospitals of the 1800s,
1960s, and today.
41.6 to >35.36 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
view longer description
Compares and
contrasts the staff
education level in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today. Gives specific
examples of the
impact on the quali
of patient care duri
these time frames.
35.36 to >29.12 pts
PROFICIENT
Compares and
contrasts the staff
education level in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
29.12 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes but does
not compare and
contrast the staff
education level in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address th
staff education leve
in hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
Compare and contrast the level of care provided in hospitals of the 1800s,
1960s, and today.
41.6 to >35.36 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
view longer description
Compares and
contrasts the level o
care provided in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today. Gives specific
examples of the
impact on the quali
of patient care duri
these time frames.
35.36 to >29.12 pts
PROFICIENT
Compares and
contrasts the level o
care provided in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
29.12 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes but does
not compare and
contrast the level of
care provided in
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address th
level of care
provided in hospita
of the 1800s, 1960s
and today.
Compare and contrast the payment systems in the hospitals of the 1800s,
1960s, and today.
41.6 to >35.36 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
view longer description
Compares and
contrasts the
payment systems in
the hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today. Gives specific
examples of the
impact on the quali
of patient care duri
these time frames.
35.36 to >29.12 pts
PROFICIENT
Compares and
contrasts the
payment systems in
the hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
29.12 to >0 pts
BASIC
Describes but does
not compare and
contrast the payme
systems in the
hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address th
payment systems in
the hospitals of the
1800s, 1960s, and
today.
Draw conclusions about how the hospital industry has evolved from the
1800s, to the 1960s, to today.
41.6 to >35.36 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
view longer description
Draws conclusions
about how the
hospital industry ha
evolved from the
1800s, to the 1960s
to today. Supports
conclusions with
several appropriate
and significant
references and
citations from the
professional
literature.
35.36 to >29.12 pts
PROFICIENT
Draws conclusions
about how the
hospital industry ha
evolved from the
1800s, to the 1960s
to today.
29.12 to >0 pts
BASIC
Compares and
contrasts but does
not draw conclusion
about how the
hospital industry ha
evolved from the
1800s, to the 1960s
to today.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address
how the hospital
industry has evolve
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
from the 1800s, to
the 1960s, to today
Appropriately addresses all components of the assignment prompt, using
the assignment description to structure text.
view longer description
26 to >22.1 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Appropriately
addresses all
components of the
assignment prompt
and uses the promp
to guide
organization.
Additionally, shares
information relevan
to all assignment
components at a
level that
communicates clear
meaning.
22.1 to >18.2 pts
PROFICIENT
Appropriately
addresses all
components of the
assignment prompt
using the assignmen
description to
structure text.
18.2 to >0 pts
BASIC
Writing lacks a clea
purpose or message
that inhibits effectiv
communication wit
the intended
audience.
0 pts
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Evolution of the Hospital Industry – A Comparative Analysis
Criteria
Ratings
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not address th
assignment prompt
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
view longer description
Total Points: 0
26 to >22.1 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Exhibits strict and
nearly flawless
adherence to APA
formatting of in-tex
citations and
references.
22.1 to >18.2 pts
PROFICIENT
Applies APA
formatting to in-tex
citations and
references.
18.2 to >0 pts
BASIC
Applies APA
formatting to in-tex
citations and
references
incorrectly and/or
inconsistently,
detracting noticeab
from good
scholarship.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANC
Does not apply APA
formatting to in-tex
citations and
references.