Handgrip Strength and Validation Lab

Writing the lab report:

Create a set of descriptive data using age, sex, weight, BMI, InBody Skeletal Muscle Mass, InBody Dominant arm weight, Grip strength from each device.Format this into Table 1. Participant Characteristics.

Conduct an appropriate test of means with each compared to the Plus+ (gold standard).Report the p-value and provide an interpretation in the Results section.

Calculate MPE and MAPE for TEK and Patterson with the Plus+ (gold standard). Report the values and provide an interpretation in the Results section.

Create a correlation matrix with Plus+, TEK, and Patterson.Format this into Table 2. Pearson’s Coefficient of Correlation for Handgrip Strength Devices.Provide your interpretation in the Results section.

Use simple linear regression to have TEK and Patterson predict Plus+.Be careful which variable you select for y and x.X should be the predictor variable and y should be the variable you are predicting.Write out the equation that you generated.It should be reported as y = intercept + Beta Estimate (X).Graph and interpret the results.

Write research paper manuscript: including the above data using the following headings:

Introduction – Describe in your own words the purpose of the lab and the research question.

Methods – Provide sufficient detail such that someone could replicate the lab and confirm the

results.Include the protocols for handgrip strength and any participant characteristics.

Results – Include the tables and figures described above as well as interpretations.

Discussion – What is the main finding?How does it address the research question?

Height_cm
Weight_kg
Age Sex Handgrip_Position
9522
200
90.7
23
1
4921
177.8
79.379
20
1
5450
160
63
21
4860
162.58
61
TEC_Trial1
3
58
0
3
29
21
0
3
30
4704
170
90.7
20
0
3
40
6101
172.72
74.84
21
0
5
25
508
182.8
69.85
21
0
3
24
500
180
81
21
1
3
54
4801
170.18
63.5
21
0
3
19
2123
157
53
20
0
3
20
9490
168
77
21
0
4
40
6327
157
56
21
0
3
25
2964
170.288
58.513
20
0
3
33
5592
162.58
56.69
21
0
3
17
5703
157.5
64
21
0
2
28
5177
165.1
63.5
21
0
2
40
5821
160
95
21
0
3
36
6134
188
97.52
21
1
3
51
6309
172.72
63.53
21
0
2
35
5134
172.72
63
22
1
3
20
5842
160.02
58.967
21
0
3
26
6264
182.88
93.009
21
1
2
57
5816
165.1
97
26
0
2
28
6185
165.1
56
20
0
3
22.2
9672
159
88
24
0
2
44
1
3
46
9024
Jamar Clifton, NJ
4921
177.8
77
21
1
4
47
8156
195
102
32
1
4
60
5547
167.6
106.82
21
0
3
26
TEC_Trial1 vs. Weight_kg
1
0.9
0.8
TEC_Trial1
0.7
0.6
0.5
TEC_Trial1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.2
TEC_Trial2
TEC_Trial3
TEC_MAX
Patterson_Trial1
Patterson_Trial2
54
48
58
55
50
31
30
31
30
30
32
30
32
26
33
39
43
43
39
32
28
28
28
20
22
27
38
38
38
33
56
65
65
48
50
30
26
30
30
30
19
21
21
15
15
40
40
40
35
28
27
27
27
23
23
32
33
33
27
27
17
16
17
22
18
27
25
28
24
25
40
39
40
39
40
34
34
36
32
33
49
48
51
49
50
35
35
35
37
37
22
24
24
18
18
25
28
28
24
26
57
57
57
55
52
26
24
28
27
27
23
23
23
22
22
35
40
44
42
33
48
65
65
49
52
48
45
48
42
45
55
57
57
55
55
28
28
28
28
26
TEC_Trial1 vs. Weight_kg
#REF!
0.4
0.6
Weight_kg
0.8
1
Patterson_Trial3
Pat_MAX
Plus+_Trial1
Plus+_Trial2
Plus+_Trial3
52
55
44
45
44
30
30
27
26.1
25.5
32
33
26.3
29.6
29.8
35
39
34.2
37.9
34.2
20
22
19.7
24.7
26
39
39
29.9
30.2
36.9
51
51
39.7
38.5
46
25
30
20.6
22.7
20.7
19
19
12.1
13.6
13.9
24
35
36
35.8
35.5
24
24
23.2
22.4
22.5
32
32
25.2
24.4
25
19
22
18.6
14.6
15
27
27
26.5
24.4
25.6
42
42
33
34.2
38.5
33
33
33.3
32.1
30.8
55
55
48.2
45
45.1
37
37
30.5
33.2
27.5
20
20
33
29.8
22.5
22
26
26.9
22.8
21
45
55
42.5
45.3
51.8
25
27
23.4
26.7
25
20
22
22.8
22.8
22.2
40
42
27.4
25.3
25.2
50
52
48
45.7
47.7
42
45
43.9
43.7
43.8
57
57
55.5
56.7
55.2
26
28
29.1
30.7
29.4
Plus+_MAX
45
27
29.8
37.9
26
36.9
46
22.7
13.9
36
23.2
25.2
18.6
26.5
38.5
33.3
48.2
33.2
33
26.9
51.8
26.7
22.8
27.4
48
43.9
56.7
30.7
LAB FORMAT
Cover Page will include
KIN Class Number
Class Title
Title of Lab
(Lab write-up must have a descriptive title)
Name
Concordia University
Start New page
Introduction
Why was the lab done? What is the concept or theory being tested?
You should review relevant literature regarding the concept or theory being tested.
Need to utilize information from the textbook, readings, lecture, and outside sources as relevant. This
is important, and it must be done
Purpose
What is the purpose of the lab test or experience?
How does the test or experience relate back to the theory or concept being explored?
Hypothesis
What do you expect to happen based on theory and previous research?
Need to utilize information from the textbook, readings, lecture, and outside sources as relevant.
Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypotheses should be stated
Procedure
These are step by step instructions on how to do, what is needed to do the experiment.
This section describes in logical order how the lab was done.
This is written in clear and concise language.
If done well, the reader will be able to replicate the lab or experiment based on the description provide.
Results
This section will usually include data Tables and perhaps Graphs.
This section will present the raw data and any statistical calculations that are done.
Discussion
An analysis of the results from the lab is in this section.
Relate the results to back to previous literature and theory from textbook or other sources.
How do the data and results presented reflect or replicate what has previously been reported?
Was the purpose of the lab met and was the hypothesis proven or disproven?