USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Assignment HTML Files/Discussion Assignment 3.html
INSR-6008 Discussion #2
Instructions
Starting at the Fanshawe College website at fanshawe.ca find the page that outlines the emergency preparedness and response planning documents for the College.
Find the Emergency Guidelines document for the London campus.
Find the page that outlines the procedure for a Campus Lockdown for Active Campus Violence (Shelter in Place)
Answer the following questions;
How many steps did it take you to find the document?
How did it make you feel, as a student of Fanshawe College, to know that this type of procedure was in place?
Does it meet the standards, as discussed in your text, for a Business Continuity Management.
Your answers should be submitted to the discussion forum for this week by 11:59 pm on Sunday. You will be marked based on the discussion rubric.
How to Submit your Assignment
Post your summary to Discussion #2 – Emergency Guidelines by Sunday at 11:59 pm
Grading Criteria
Access the Rubric for Online Discussions
Assignment Resources and Links
Documents/Rubric for Online Discussions x
Rubric for Online Discussions / Assignments # ___ Name ___________________________________________ Score: _____________
Outstanding
Good
Fair
Acceptable
Not Completed
Thinking / Reflection
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are logical and supported with evidence. Highly informative and easy to understand. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported. Arguments are informative, complete and understandable. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Somewhat informative and understandable.
Arguments not pertinent. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Not very informative and understandable.
No evidence.
Structure
There is a logical flow to the topics / arguments. Conclusion flows clearly from the arguments presented.
Discussion is fairly well organized. Conclusion flows from the rest of the discussion.
Discussion weakly organized. Conclusion is acceptable.
Discussion is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t flow from the rest of the discussion.
No evidence.
Interest Factor
Language and style are appropriate for intended audience. Main points are memorable. Reader is very engaged. Discussion presents well developed analysis and synthesis. Clearly demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style of discussion appropriate. Reader is engaged. Discussion presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style only fair. Reader is only somewhat engaged. Less-developed analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is abstract and hard to follow.
Language and style are poor. Reader finds it hard to follow. Analysis and synthesis lacking. There is little evidence of critical thinking.
No evidence.
Conclusion
The conclusion is engaging and reflects personal learning.
The conclusion restates the learning.
The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning.
Incomplete and/or unfocused.
Not applicable.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Not applicable.
AssignmentTemplates/Assignment 4.html
INSR-6010 Discussion / Assignment 4
Instructions
Read the article “
Tried and True” and answer the following questions:
In your own words explain the differences between the “rules-based approach”, the “people-based approach” and the “situation-based approach” used in this scenario.
Do you feel that one approach leads to a better outcome? Why or why not?
Submit your answer to the discussion forum by 11:59 pm on Sunday. Your response will be marked based on the discussion rubric.
Read the article ”
Body Language Basics” and answer the following questions:
Explain how you can use a better understanding of body language in your role as an adjuster. Do you feel this can help? Consider ways that it may hinder your relationship with your claimant.
Submit your answer to the discussion forum by 11:59 pm on Sunday. Your response will be marked based on the discussion rubric.
Please note that the average mark of both postings will be the mark allocated for the Online Discussion # 4 for this week. They are not marked as two separate assignments.
How to Submit your Assignment
Post your response to
Discussion / Assignment 4 by 11:59 pm on Sunday of this week.
Grading Criteria
Access the
Rubric for Online Discussions x
Assignment Resources and Links
Direct links to articles above
http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/features/tried-and-true/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/spycatcher/201108/body-language-basics
Documents/Rubric for Online Discussions x
Rubric for Online Discussions / Assignments # ___ Name ___________________________________________ Score: _____________
Outstanding
Good
Fair
Acceptable
Not Completed
Thinking / Reflection
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are logical and supported with evidence. Highly informative and easy to understand. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported. Arguments are informative, complete and understandable. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Somewhat informative and understandable.
Arguments not pertinent. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Not very informative and understandable.
No evidence.
Structure
There is a logical flow to the topics / arguments. Conclusion flows clearly from the arguments presented.
Discussion is fairly well organized. Conclusion flows from the rest of the discussion.
Discussion weakly organized. Conclusion is acceptable.
Discussion is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t flow from the rest of the discussion.
No evidence.
Interest Factor
Language and style are appropriate for intended audience. Main points are memorable. Reader is very engaged. Discussion presents well developed analysis and synthesis. Clearly demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style of discussion appropriate. Reader is engaged. Discussion presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style only fair. Reader is only somewhat engaged. Less-developed analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is abstract and hard to follow.
Language and style are poor. Reader finds it hard to follow. Analysis and synthesis lacking. There is little evidence of critical thinking.
No evidence.
Conclusion
The conclusion is engaging and reflects personal learning.
The conclusion restates the learning.
The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning.
Incomplete and/or unfocused.
Not applicable.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Not applicable.
AssignmentTemplates/Assignment 3.html
INSR-6007 Discussion Assignment 3
Instructions
Read the article “
Municipalities = Liability” and answer the following questions;
Although the article as written in 2001, municipal liability has continued to be an emerging trend. Referring to information contained in this article, and your own research, explain why this is, and in your opinion, where you see the trend going.
List what you believe to be the top five (5) issues facing municipalities in the next few years.
How to Submit your Assignment
Post your answers to
Online Discussion # 2 by 11.59 pm on Sunday
Grading Criteria
Access the
Rubric for Online Discussions x
Assignment Resources and Links
Documents/Municipality = Liability
Documents/Rubric for Online Discussions x
Rubric for Online Discussions / Assignments # ___ Name ___________________________________________ Score: _____________
Outstanding
Good
Fair
Acceptable
Not Completed
Thinking / Reflection
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are logical and supported with evidence. Highly informative and easy to understand. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported. Arguments are informative, complete and understandable. Appropriate vocabulary is used.
Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Somewhat informative and understandable.
Arguments not pertinent. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Not very informative and understandable.
No evidence.
Structure
There is a logical flow to the topics / arguments. Conclusion flows clearly from the arguments presented.
Discussion is fairly well organized. Conclusion flows from the rest of the discussion.
Discussion weakly organized. Conclusion is acceptable.
Discussion is not organized. Conclusion doesn’t flow from the rest of the discussion.
No evidence.
Interest Factor
Language and style are appropriate for intended audience. Main points are memorable. Reader is very engaged. Discussion presents well developed analysis and synthesis. Clearly demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style of discussion appropriate. Reader is engaged. Discussion presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Demonstrates critical thinking.
Language and style only fair. Reader is only somewhat engaged. Less-developed analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is abstract and hard to follow.
Language and style are poor. Reader finds it hard to follow. Analysis and synthesis lacking. There is little evidence of critical thinking.
No evidence.
Conclusion
The conclusion is engaging and reflects personal learning.
The conclusion restates the learning.
The conclusion does not adequately restate the learning.
Incomplete and/or unfocused.
Not applicable.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Not applicable.
