can any of you do both questions perfect within 12 hrs , i am attaching related chapter of the book as well.
Chemistry
252
Problem
Set
2
1. Calculation
of
average
energies
from
partition
functions
Consider
a
system
that
has
only
three
possible
energy
states
with
E
=
0,
E0
and
2E0.
a) Write
a
general
expression
for
the
partition
function
q.
b) From
your
expression
in
(a),
derive
an
expression
for
the
average
energy
E
as
a
function
of
temperature
T.
c) Derive
an
expression
for
the
specific
heat
Cv.
d) Suppose
that
E0
=
100
cm-‐1.
Estimate
the
energy
needed
to
raise
the
temperature
of
the
system
from
300
K
to
400
K
in
units
of
KJ/mol.
2. Specific
heats
of
real
gaseous
molecules
A
review
of
sections
4-‐6
and
4-‐7
of
the
textbook
will
be
useful
in
solving
this
problem.
a) Study
equation
4.39
of
the
text
and
the
resulting
partition
function
derived
for
a
gaseous
diatomic
molecule
in
example
4-‐5
of
the
text.
Use
these
expressions
for
Q(N,V,T)
to
derive
an
expression
for
the
specific
heat.
b) Interpret
each
of
the
terms
in
the
expression
you
derived.
This
is
actually
done
in
the
text
(and
we
reviewed
it
in
class)
so
it
should
be
easy
but
I
thought
it
was
so
important
that
I’d
like
you
to
put
what
they
say
into
your
own
words.
c) Now,
I’d
like
you
to
generalize
the
expression
for
the
specific
heat
Cv
to
be
appropriate
to
a
polyatomic
molecule,
specifically
H2O(g).
Assume
that
we’ll
be
working
in
the
temperature
range
from
300
–
800
K
where
we
can
consider
ourselves
to
be
way
above
the
rotational
temperature
Θrot
so
you
can
just
approximate
the
rotational
contribution
to
specific
heat
to
be
3R/2
per
mole
corresponding
to
R/2
for
each
of
the
three
rotational
degrees
of
freedom.
The
main
modification
you
need
to
make
is
to
consider
that
there
are
4
degrees
of
vibrational
freedom
for
water
(asymmetric
stretch
ħω1
=
3756
cm-‐1,
symmetric
stretch
ħω2
=
3652
cm-‐1,
bending
mode
ħω3
=
1595
cm-‐1
and
another
bending
mode
ħω4
=
1595
cm-‐1).
d) Use
your
expression
from
c)
to
plot
Cv
versus
temperature
over
the
temperature
range
specified
above
(calculating
a
point
every
100
K
should
be
enough).
Compare
your
result
to
experimental
values
from
the
literature.
e) As
is
evident
from
Figure
4.7,
there
is
excellent
agreement
of
calculated
and
measured
specific
heats.
The
text
notes
(page
160)
that
the
agreement
can
be
improved
still
further
if
we
refine
the
harmonic
oscillator
model
to
consider
anharmonicity
–
i.e.
the
fact
that
the
potential
is
not
really
harmonic.
(For
reference,
see
problem
1-‐27
and
1-‐31
of
the
text
on
page
34).
Given
that
accounting
for
anharmonicity
decreases
the
spacings
between
energy
levels
relative
to
what
they
would
have
been
in
a
completely
harmonic
system,
reason
as
to
whether
making
a
correction
for
anharmonicity
would
increase
or
decrease
the
values
of
your
calculated
specific
heat.
Explain
your
reasoning.