USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
You are required to submit a 1–2-page review of a current scholarly article on the current healthcare legislations and its possible effects on the healthcare system. Please try to locate political neutral articles. You will utilize the Article Review Form provided in the Assignment Instruction folder. Article reviews will include the following elements:
1. Author’s proposed purpose/goal of the Article – Provide a brief overview of the article, its intended audience, and its purpose.
2. Analysis of Key Issues – Analyze the article’s key issues discussing their strengths and weaknesses, providing evidence to support your opinions.
3. Conclusions/Findings/Assumption – Discuss the author’s conclusions, findings or assumption as they relate to the current healthcare discussion. Also identify any social or political position the author is promoting.
4. Personal assessment and reflection – Provide several assessments of how the article can be used in support or rejection of current healthcare policy and clearly relates them to biblical principles.
Format the reviews and all references/citations used in your review in APA or AMA style and see the Article Review Grading Rubric for the specific grading criteria.
I need two different assignments for the same instructions. I need 1.5 pages each. The work has to be perfect. No chance of re-submission. Please make sure its an A.
Please go through the Grading Rubic and read all instructions and fill the Article review form. Just leave the Name as blank, all others to be filled.
Remember this is not a news article but some form of research or at least an article from a health-care journal or source. Newspaper, news magazines, or opinionated blogs are not the direction I want you to go. Let’s also deal with health-care policy and its effects on the consumer or government. This should be very easy to find. Follow the instructions and the rubric to assure full points.
|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement |
||||||||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced 92-100% (A) |
Proficient 84-91% (B) |
Developing 1-83% (< C) |
Not present |
|||||
|
Analysis of Key issues 15 points |
15 – 13.5 points Clearly analyzes strengths and weaknesses with plenty of supporting evidence. Key ideas are clearly connected to the chosen article. |
13.4 – 12.6 points Clearly analyzes strengths and weaknesses with some evidence. Key ideas are connected to the chosen article. |
12.5 – 1 points Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses, but no evidence is provided. It is unclear if the key ideas relate to the chosen article. |
0 points Not complete |
|||||
|
Article Conclusions /findings /Assumptions 10 points |
10 – 9 points Conclusions are well-organized, well-written, and explicitly identifies the findings and assumptions. |
8 – 7 Conclusions are organized and well-written, and identify the findings and assumptions. |
6 – 1 Conclusions are not well-organized, but do identify the findings or the assumptions. |
0 points
Not complete |
|||||
|
Personal assessment/ Reflection 10 points |
10 – 9 points
Provides several assessments of how the article can be used in support or rejection of current healthcare policy and clearly relates them to biblical principles. |
8 – 7
Provides some assessments of how the article can be used in support or rejection of current healthcare policy and relates them to biblical principles. |
6 – 1
Provides one assessment of how the article can be used in support or rejection of current healthcare policy, but does not discuss biblical principles. |
||||||
|
Structure 30% |
|||||||||
|
15-13 points Well-written with correct grammar, spelling and formatting. Length requirement is met. Citation of all work is included and in correct APA format. |
12-10 points Well-written with a few grammar, spelling, and/or formatting errors. Length requirement is met. Citation of all work is included and in correct APA format. |
9-1 points Errors in spelling, grammar, or formatting make the paper very difficult to read. Length requirement is met. Citation of all work is not included |
0 points
The paper does not meet length requirement, and/or demonstrates extremely poor grammar, spelling, and/or formatting. No Citation
|
||||||
|
Instructors Comments: |
/50 |
HLTH 556 Article Review Rubric
HLTH 556
Article Review Form
Your Name:
Title of Article:
Author (s):
Source:
Author’s proposed purpose/goal of the Article:
Analysis of Key Issues:
Conclusions/Findings/Assumption:
Personal assessment and reflection:
