Psychology Assignment

1.Adhere to the instructions in the attachment

2.Need within 72 Hours

3. No plagiarism; will be submitted to turnitin

4. only serious inquiries need apply

Assignment

•Choose 4 articles on your paper topic (from the list you submitted or new ones that you found since then)

•The articles must be research studies where data was collected. (Theory pieces are fine for your paper, but not for this assignment.)

◦This assignment is worth 30 points

Summarize the design of each of the articles by answering the following questions using the terminology from your reading ◾Was the study correlational, experimental, or some combination of both?

◾How do you know?

◾Was it done in the laboratory or the field?

◾What conclusions can be drawn from the study?

◾What conclusions cannot be drawn from the study?

◾What are some strengths and limitations of the research design?

◾Name two areas for future research based on the article (either those listed in the paper or your own ideas)

Plagiarism

Three common types of plagiarism you need to be aware of as a student:

•Recycling a paper; “double-dipping”; self-plagiarism: Reusing a paper you have written for a previous course

•Copying directly from a source without proper quotations or paraphrasing: When you try to pass something off as your own work

•Not using proper citations

According to the Academic Integrity and Academic Dishonesty Handbook:

Your paper should have at least 80% of your own original thought, not “borrowed, paraphrased [or] quoted” from material pulled from the Internet, articles, journals, books, etc. Your thoughts, not someone else’s!

Running head: SOCIAL PERCEPTION

1

SOCIAL PERCEPTION 4

Social Perception

Cherod Jones

Florida Tech

Social Perception Research Topic Proposal

Social personal perception is the way a person perceives and understands issues. This is an interesting topic to do research because people are different, and they perceive issues from an array of viewpoints. For my research proposal, the topic I would like to investigate is the determinants of social perception. My main objective is to identify and determine the various factors that determine how people perceive issues. I have seen how people, cultures, nationalities can perceive the same action in different ways, such as kneeling during the National Anthem at professional football games. Upon preliminary research, some literature that I read claimed that both internal and external factors determine a person’s perception. My research shall highlight on pointing out the various internal and external factors, as well as clarifying how these factors shapes and forms the perception that the person shows.

This is an important psychological area of research because it would help to establish a deeper understanding of why people differ and tend to misunderstand each other when it comes to perceiving issues. It is an area of research that can help people understand and embrace each other despite their differences in perception. Moreover, I think most people are unaware of their inherent biases and people tend to retreat to their corners where it is safe. My goal is to get a better understanding and inform the reader to consider another point of view.

References

Aydinli, A., Bender, M., & Chasiotis, A. (2013). Helping and volunteering across cultures: Determinants of prosocial behavior. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(3), 6.

Balcetis, E., & Lassiter, G. D. (Eds.). (2010). Social psychology of visual perception. Psychology Press.

Bodenhausen, G. V. (2010). Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-16.

Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal conservation, 13(5), 458-466.

Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. Handbook of social psychology.

Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological review, 118(2), 247.

Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214-237.

Johnson, K., Lennon, S. J., & Rudd, N. (2014). Dress, body and self: Research in the social psychology of dress. Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), 20.

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (2013). A social psychological analysis. Social psychology of health and illness, 227.

Oveis, C., Horberg, E. J., & Keltner, D. (2010). Compassion, pride, and social intuitions of self-other similarity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(4), 618.

Sherif, M. (2015). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology (Vol. 29). Psychology Press.

Smith, E. R., Mackie, D. M., & Claypool, H. M. (2014). Social psychology. Psychology Press.

Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(2), 281.

Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(8), 383-388.

You, M., & Ju, Y. (2017). A comprehensive examination of the determinants for food risk perception: Focusing on psychometric factors, perceivers’ characteristics, and media use. Health communication, 32(1), 82-91.