This assignment allows you to learn more about one key person in Jewish history and to relate that person to any specific rituals in Judaism today. In doing so, you will also learn how your chosen individual fits into the larger history of the religion.
Part 1
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Common Holy Days in Jewish Religious Traditions Worksheet to help you as you reflect on
Part 2
of this assignment.
Part 2
Write a 750- to 1,250-word paper that includes the following:
- A summary of the life and importance of one key person in ancient Jewish history (chosing either Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, Esther or Ezra will make it the easiest to complete the next two instructions)
- An explanation of one key event in the history of Judaism that is connected to that person
- A description of any rituals, symbols, or sacred texts in Judaism associated with this event or person
- An example of how this person’s story helped to develop the ideas of Jewish ethics
Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines
Title ABC/ 1 23 Version X |
1 |
Common Holy Days in Jewish Religious Traditions REL/134 Version 5 |
University of Phoenix Material
Common Holy Days in Jewish Religious Traditions Worksheet
Complete the template with information from Jewish Holy Days. Identify at least seven Jewish religious holy days and place each holy day in the correct season (time of year) as studied in the course.
APA-formatted citation
APA-formatted citation
December
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
Insert Holy Day
March
September
June
Copyright © XXXX by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016, 2015 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Rubric For The Evaluation Of “History of Judaism” Paper
CRITERIA |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Minimum Points |
SATISFACTORY Medium Points |
EXCEPTIONAL Maximum Points |
CONTENT Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that includes the following: · · · · Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. |
The writer does not demonstrate cursory understanding of subject matter, and the purpose of the paper is not stated. The objective, therefore, is not addressed and supporting materials are not correctly referenced. 0 to 2.4 points |
The writer demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter in that theories are not well connected to a practical experience or appropriate examples, though the attempt to research the topic is evident, and materials are correctly referenced. 2.5 to 5.4 points |
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter by clearly stating the objective of the paper and links theories to practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that is correctly referenced, and this material fulfills the objective of the paper. 5.5 to 7 points |
Comments on Content ? of 7 points |
You have fulfilled all/most/some of the objectives of the assignment with this ___ word paper about _____________. You had a section on … |
||
ORGANIZATION |
Paragraphs do not focus around a central point, and concepts are disjointedly introduced or poorly defended (i.e., stream of consciousness). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. There is no introduction or conclusion. 0 to .5 points |
Topics/content could be organized in a more logical manner. Transitions from one idea to the next are often disconnected and uneven. The introduction does not give clear direction and the conclusion does not communicate what was learned. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Ideas may be overstated, and sentences with limited contribution to the subject are included. .6 to 1 points |
The writer focuses on ideas and concepts within paragraphs, and sentences are well-connected and meaningful. Each topic logically follows the objective. The introduction clearly states the objective or ideas leading to the purpose of the paper, and a conclusion draws the ideas together. The reading audience is correctly identified, demonstrated by appropriate language usage (i.e., avoiding jargon and simplifying complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. 1.1 to 1.5 points |
Comments on Organization ? of 1.5 points |
You do/do not have a clear organizational flow. You do/do not include an introduction and conclusion. You have clear main points… Your paragraph structure was…. |
||
Assistance on Content and Organization |
For additional assistance with elements on content, please navigate to the Center for Writing Excellence > Tutorials and Guides section to review these documents: · http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/688/01/ – Understanding Writing Assignments · Sample Outline · http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/689/01/ – Reverse outlining · Automated Tool for Developing your Thesis Statement · http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/606/01/ – Developing paragraphs |
||
SPELLING, GRAMMAR, FORMAT, & PUNCTUATION
• Paper is double-spaced Title page includes paper title, student name, course, due date, and faculty name. Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page, with little emphasis on correct formatting. |
The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (i.e., conforms to spoken language). Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. The paper does not conform to APA incremental style guidelines. 0 to .5 points |
The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses and/or inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (e.g., evidence of incorrect use of Thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing difficulties with grammar. The paper does not conform completely to APA incremental style guidelines (e.g., margins, font, headings, headers, citations, references, according to the APA Manual). .6 to 1 points |
The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word usage errors. The paper is correctly formatted to APA incremental style guidelines (e.g., margins, font, headings, headers, citations, references, according to the APA Manual). 1.1 to 1.5 points |
Comments on Spelling, Grammar, Format, & Punctuation ? of 1.5 points |
Your mechanics are… You did/did not follow APA guidelines |
||
Assistance on Spelling, Grammar, Format, & Punctuation |
For additional assistance with elements of formatting, style and grammar – please navigate to the Center for Writing Excellence > Tutorials and Guides section to review these documents: · Microsoft® Tips and Tools · Formatting Tables and Figures · Riverpoint Writer · Grammar Guide section on Plagiarism · Reference and Citation Examples · Citation Generator · Microsoft® Word Formatting Tutorial · Title Page Template |
STUDENT’S NAME _____________________________ GRADE ____ out of __10___
ASSIGNMENT: “History of Judaism”