in text citations minimum 2 citations per question 325 words each for a Question
QUESTION 1
Discuss the beneficial applications of toxins, and provide an example of a specific toxin and its application.
QUESTION 2
Identify the five broad categories of toxins, and then provide an example of each that is found in the region where you live.
Question 3
Identify the factors that modify toxicity. Based on these factors, explain how exposure to the same concentration and duration of a toxin will affect a healthy, middle-aged male differently than a middle-aged female who smokes and has a suppressed immune system.
QUESTION 4
Toxicity can manifest in numerous ways. Describe at least four of these ways.
Chapter 3
Toxicity and the Factors That
Modify Toxic Responses
Cellular Basis of Toxicity
• All chemicals have the potential to produce
toxicity.
• Toxicity may be generally defined as any
adverse effect of some aspect of normal
biology that is causally linked to exposure to a
chemical agent.
• This may occur in many forms ranging from
immediate death to subtle changes not
realized for months or years.
Some Manifestations of Toxicity
• Enzyme inhibition (biochemical pathway
interruption)
• Cytotoxicity (cell death)
• Inflammation (local or systemic response)
• Covalent binding (e.g., electrophilic
metabolites to DNA)
Some Manifestations of Toxicity, cont.
• Receptor interaction (modification of normal
effects by interfering with receptor function)
• Necrosis (tissue death)
• Lethal synthesis (toxicant incorporation into a
biochemical pathway)
• Lipid peroxidation (free radical oxidation of
fatty acids leading to cellular injury or death)
Some Manifestations of Toxicity, cont.
• Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions
(e.g., allergens producing sensitization)
• Immunosuppression (increased susceptibility
to biological and chemical agents)
• Neoplasia (formation of tumors)
• Mutagenic (DNA alterations)
Spectrum of Adverse Effects
• Adverse effects may involve different levels in the
body ( for example, macromolecules such as DNA or
specific cells, tissues, and organs)
– cyanide is relatively nonspecific and interrupts
electron transport in the mitochondria of all cells
potentially leading to cytotoxicity and death
– tetrodotoxin is a specific blocker of sodium
channels, especially affecting excitable cells such
as nerve and muscle.
Spectrum of Adverse Effects, cont.
• The level of toxicity depends on the
concentration of the toxicant at the site of
action and is influenced by factors such as
– the rate of absorption
– access to the target cell
– the degree of biotransformation or bioactivation
– the rate of elimination.
Spectrum of Adverse Effects, cont.
• Toxicity is the result of a chemical or its
metabolite interacting with a molecular target
and interfering with critical cellular function.
• Should detoxification fail, dysfunction or injury
may occur.
– Direct injury describes adverse intracellular
activities
– Indirect injury is produced through alteration of
extracellular regulatory mechanisms
Chemicals Can
• Interact with molecular targets specifically or
nonspecifically, through reversible or irreversible
reactions
• Affect the structure of the cellular DNA by binding to it
• Interfere with energy production and the synthesis or
function of proteins.
• Modify the extracellular environment, which in turn
affects metabolic needs and cell activity regulation.
• Carbon monoxide is an excellent example
Spectrum of Adverse Effects, cont.
• Extracellular interactions are referred to as
indirect injuries. These are injuries that arise
from the disruption of the overall processes of
the organism like
– energy production and growth
– electrolyte and acid–base regulation
– waste product removal
– cellular and tissue interactions
Spectrum of Adverse Effects, cont.
• There are a number of outcomes to chemical
injury:
– Cells and tissues repair sufficiently to resume
normal function.
– Incomplete repair is only sufficient to resume
some function.
– Complete death of an organ or the organism
occurs.
– Neoplastic growth occurs, which may result in the
death of the organism.
Cellular Swelling
• A sign of early injury
• Due to disruption of energy-producing
mechanisms
• Is accompanied by disruption of the sodium–
potassium pump in the cellular membrane.
• The resultant intracellular change allows the
influx of sodium and water
• Reversible if the swelling disappears when the
toxicant is removed
Cellular Injury
• Fatty changes more serious form of reversible
cellular injury
• Severe damage results in cell death
– Apoptosis is programmed cell death
– Necrosis is uncontrolled cell death
Cellular Death
• Apoptosis is normal part of cell cycle
– Destroys cell and recycles contents
– Can occur within single cell or noncontiguous cells
• Necrosis is the end stage response to cellular
injury
– Affects contiguous tissues
– Triggers an inflammatory response
Necrosis
• After necrosis the body frequently attempts to
replace the dead tissue.
– If the injury is minimal, function may never
be compromised.
– If the damage is extensive, the body may
not be able to provide enough cells of the
appropriate type to resume normal
function.
Necrosis: Liver
• When complete functional repair cannot be
accomplished by replacement of hepatocytes,
structural repair ensues.
• Cirrhosis, with its extensive loss of
hepatocytes, is characterized by fibrosis
(deposition of collagen) due to structural
repair by fiber-producing cells (fibrocytes).
• The result is scarring and diminished function.
Figure 3-1 Cirrhosis of the liver.
© Sebastian Kaulitzki/ShutterStock, Inc.
Spectrum of Adverse Effects
• Humans cannot avoid contact with toxic compounds;
however, it takes more than contact alone to
produce adverse effects in an organism.
• Toxicity is determined by the chemical and physical
properties of the compound, the absorbed dose, the
method and duration of exposure, the overall health
of the organism exposed, and the ability of the
organism to dispose of the toxicant
• Toxicity and adverse effects are manifested only after
the organism has exhausted its protective
mechanisms.
Figure 3-2 Toxic damage to cells
Adapted from the Toxicology and Environmental Health Information Program of the National Library of Medicine, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Toxic Damage to Cells. http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/toxtutor/Tox3/a32.htm.
Acute vs. chronic effects
• Chemical-induced adverse effects are much
easier to prove when the exposure is acute.
• Carbon monoxide (CO)
– Acute exposure may result in death by
asphyxiation through carboxyhemoglobin
formation
– Chronic exposure is associated with other effects
such as heart or brain toxicity
Factors That Modify Toxicity
• Age
– Fetuses especially vulnerable due to rapid pace of
growth and change
– Elderly vulnerable because of reduced metabolic
capabilities
• Gender
– metabolism
– body fat composition
– body water
– hormones
Factors That Modify Toxicity
• Disease
– Overall health of the individual impacts
metabolic capacity
• Lifestyle and Diet
• Genetics
Toxicogenomics and Its Importance in
Public Health
• Toxicogenomics is a relatively new discipline
devoted to elucidating gene expression in
response to toxicants.
– collection, interpretation, and storage of
information about gene and protein activity in
response to toxic substance exposures
– This is important in further developing public
health risk assessments.
Toxicogenomics
• Combines toxicology with genetic and
molecular profiling technologies
– Transcriptomics
– Proteomics
– Metabolomics
• Attempts to elucidate the molecular
mechanisms evolved in the expression of
toxicity which may help to predict toxicity or
genetic susceptibility to chemical exposures.
IPCS and CSAFs
• In 2001, guidance from the International
Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) called for
the replacement of default uncertainty factors
with chemical specific adjustment factors (CSAFs).
• The magnitude of the CSAFs could be calculated
based on human variability depending on:
– age
– sex
– genetic polymorphisms
IPCS and CSAFs, cont.
• Currently, a default uncertainty factor of 10 is applied
to encompass the range of variability in human
response to toxicants; however, if more specific
values could be developed from genetic variation
studies, the risk assessment process could become
more accurate and reliable in protecting the public’s
health.
• Using CSAFs in place of default uncertainty factors
enhances the risk assessment process by allowing
assessors to make more data-informed biologically
based decisions about the risks associated with a
toxic exposure.