Rewrite Spas paper

please rewrite everything in this paper

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

[Type

t

ext] [Type text] [Type text]

1

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Milestone

4

Milestone 4

Tonimarie Giordano

Southern

N

ew Hampshire University

PSY

5

2

0-

R

esearch & Methods

Method

Participants

The research participants consist of graduate students at Southern New Hampshire University. The sample size of students from Southern New Hampshire University will be at least

7

students from PSY5

10

and/or PSY520; I gathered

15

surveys. The appropriate research methodology for this study would be a survey. A survey is chosen because it is the most convenient way to sample students online. Students naturally cluster in a classroom so by choosing a class to survey this would provide the necessary number of students needed for the research. The data that will be collected will be administered through a survey that the students will complete. This survey will have

11

questions to eng

age

the subjects.

Materials

The materials are a questionnaire, which will include the following; what is your age? What is your gender? What is your race/ethnicity? What is your concentration in psychology? Operationalization of the independent variables; age will be an open-ended question since the population of Southern New Hampshire University students varies in age. As for gender, it will be either

male

or

female

. The race will be split into Cauc

asian

, African American, Hispanic, Asian, and

other

.

F

inally, the question about your concentration in psychology will be either. The dependent variables survey questions will include; how many people suffer from mental illness? This question will have four opitions (1)

1 in 5

(2)

1 in 10

(

3

)

1 in 50

(4) 1 in 100. Following, dependent variables survey questions will include; Do mass murderers have past criminal histories of other crimes? Is mental illness the leading cause of violent crimes? does gender plays a role in mental health and committing mass murders? Does substance abuse combined with a mental illness lead to mass murders? Does being bullied causes someone to commit mass murders? The questions above will be based on the Likert scale and will be answered by using the scale; (1)

strongly

dis

agree

, (2)

disagree

, (3)

somewhat disagree

, (4)

neither agree nor disagree

, (5)

somewhat agree

, (

6

) agree, (7)

strongly agree

. The final two question that will be asked are; In your opinion, what factors in a social environment shape a mass murderer? What do you think mass murderers base their motives on? These you will check one option or all if it applies.

Procedures

The students will be told about the study that is being conducted. There is no penalty for students who do not participate in the study. For those who are will participate they will then click on the link to bring them to the online survey through Qualtrics Survey Software (we used this website to create a survey). They will then follow the directions to complete the survey. Using a website to survey will help protect the identity of the students who participated as well as those who did not participate.

Ethical Concerns

First, issue we have to address is that of consent. I would have to create the consent form and make sure it is written in a language that all can understand; as well as asking for their permission to use the data in the study that is being conducted. After that, I would explain the procedure of the survey and the purpose for why this research is being conducted. They also have to be told that this is a voluntary research project so if they wish to withdraw they can do so at any time during the research.

Another major ethical issue that will come from this research would be whether there is confidentiality. Confidentiality is a big concern because they also may fear that if the information was given to the researcher and the researcher tells other of the results it could affect how they may be treated. So I have to assure the participants that no information will be disclosed and they will remain anonymous. There is a joint contract between the participant and the researcher acts as a legal document. So you the researcher have to ensure them that what you say is going to happen, ends up happening and nothing more in order to achieve ethical procedure.

Data Analysis

Procedure

I will analyze my data in SPSS. First, I will start by inputting my data that I collected in my surveys done by students at Southern New Hampshire University. Following the input of the data that was collected; I will start to run the analysis of my data. Finally, once all, the test are run then I will have to interpret the graphs in my results.

I will start by running a descriptive test on my (age) demographic. With a descriptive test, it will give you the mean of the ages you have surveyed. Following that I will run frequencies test on (gender, race/ethnicity, and major) demographic; this can tell the number of missing values, outliers, and extreme values and central tendency. Next, I ran a test for my dependent variables and my independent variables. Lastly, I will run a t-test; which will compare mean between unrelated variables.

Results

B

elow are some frequency tables. They frequency tables descried specific information worth is the quantity of times the information esteem happens.

6.7

6.7

20.0

3

20.0

20.0

1

6.7

6.7

33.3

1

6.7

6.7

1

6.7

6.7

100.0

100.0

criminalhistory

Frequency

Percent

Valid

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

strongly disagree

1

6.7

disagree 3

20.0

26.7

somewhat disagree

46.7

neither agree nor disagree

53.3

somewhat agree 5

33.3

86.7

agree

9

3.3

strongly agree

100.0

Total

15

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

13.3

13.3

disagree

3

20.0

20.0

33.3

somewhat disagree

1

6.7

6.7

neither agree nor disagree

3

20.0

20.0

somewhat agree

5

33.3

33.3

93.3

agree

1

6.7

6.7

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

violentcrimes

strongley disagree

2

13.3

40.0

60.0

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

neither agree nor disagree

3

20.0

20.0

20.0

somewhat agree

3

20.0

20.0

40.0

agree

60.0

60.0

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

menviolentcrimes

9

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

strongly disagree

2

13.3

13.3

13.3

disagree

46.7

46.7

60.0

somewhat disagree

2

13.3

13.3

neither agree nor disagree

1

6.7

6.7

somewhat agree

3

20.0

20.0

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

alcoholdrugs

7

73.3

80.0

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

strongly disagree

1

6.7

6.7

6.7

disagree

3

20.0

20.0

26.7

somewhat disagree

1

6.7

6.7

33.3

neither agree nor disagree

1

6.7

6.7

40.0

somewhat agree

3

20.0

20.0

60.0

agree

26.7

26.7

86.7

strongly agree

2

13.3

13.3

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

bullied

4

Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics would be running on gender, age and concentration in psychology this will provide an understanding of the sample that the study way conducted on. As for the descriptive statistic that would provide the most information into answering my research question would be the question; does substance abuse combined with a mental illness lead to mass murders and does being bullied causes you to commit mass murders. The reason these will be the most informative because this will show whether people agree or disagree with the statement and whether it supports my hypothesis or not.

14

Descriptive Statistics

N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

age

14

24.00

57.00

35.5714

10.83949

Valid N (listwise)

As seen in Table 1, the variable age ranged from a minimum of 24 years to a maximum of 57 years. The mean age of the students in my sample was 36.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

3

20.0

20.0

20.0

80.0

80.0

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

gender

male
female

12

As seen in Table 2, my sample was split between 80 % females and 20% males.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

73.3

73.3

73.3

2

13.3

13.3

86.7

1

6.7

6.7

93.3

1

6.7

6.7

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

race

caucasian

11

african american

asian
other

As seen in Table 3… Of the 15 people that were surveyed 73% of them where Caucasian while the next largest race was African American 13%, followed by Asian with 7%, other with 7% and Hispanic with 0%.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

6.7

6.7

6.7

4

26.7

26.7

33.3

40.0

40.0

73.3

4

26.7

26.7

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

major

PSY 1

PSY-Forensic Psychology

PSY-IO

6

PSY-Child & Adolescents Dev.

As seen above in Table 4… subjects that were surveyed were all psychology majors but had a number of concentrations 40% had a concentration in I/O, following that 27% with a concentration in forensic psychology and child and adolescent dev. and the other 7% were just psychology majors with no concentration majors.

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

9

60.0

60.0

60.0

4

26.7

26.7

86.7

2

13.3

13.3

100.0

Total

15

100.0

100.0

menatalillness

1 in 5
1 in 10
1 in 50

According to the table above 60% believe that 1 in 5 people suffer from mental illness, 27% believe that 1 in 10 people could suffer from mental illness, following that 13% say that 1 in 50 people could suffer from mental illness.

Statistical Test

factorsenvironment_educatio

1

N

15

15

15

15

factorsenvironment_poorliving

Pearson Correlation

.491

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.063

N

15

15

15

15

factorsenvironment_poverty

Pearson Correlation

.722**

.764**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.002

.001

N

15

15

15

15

factorsenvironment_lackoffriends

Pearson Correlation

-.123

-.262

.185

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.662

.346

.510

N

15

15

15

15

Correlations

factorsenvironment_educatio

factorsenvironment_poorliving

factorsenvironment_poverty

factorsenvironment_lackoffriends

Pearson Correlation

.491

.722**

-.123

Sig.

(2-tailed)

.063

.002

.662

.764**

-.262

.001

.346

.185

.510

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Based on the results from table, there was a significant correlation between education and poverty, r = .72, n = 15, p<.002, two tails. Also there was a significant correlation between poor living and poverty, r = .76, n =15, p<.001, two tails.

Correlations

mt_physicalabuse

Pearson Correlation

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.002

N

15

15

15

15

15

mt_mentalproblems

Pearson Correlation

.732**

1

-.026

.661**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.002

.926

.001

.007

N

15

15

15

15

15

mt_socialproblems

Pearson Correlation

-.026

-.026

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.926

.926

.317

N

15

15

15

15

15

mt_substanceabuse

Pearson Correlation

.472

.756**

.277

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.075

.001

.317

N

15

15

15

15

15

mt_childhood

Pearson Correlation

.661**

.661**

-.277

.500

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.007

.007

.317

.058

N

15

15

15

15

15

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

mt_physicalabuse

mt_mentalproblems

mt_socialproblems

mt_substanceabuse

mt_childhood

.732**

-.026

.472

.661**

.926

.075

.007

.756**

.277

-.277

.317

.500

.058

According the results from table, there was a significant correlation between physical abuse and mental problems, r = .73, n = 15, p<.002, two tails. There was a significant correlation between physical abuse and childhood, r = .66, n =15, p<.007, two tails. Next, we have a significant correlation between mental problems and substance abuse, r = .76, n =15, p<.001, two tails. Lastly, there was a significant correlation between physical abuse and childhood, r = .66, n =15, p<.007, two tails.

1

Model

Summary

Model R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error

of the Estimate

.537a

.289

.004

1.63554

a. Predictors:

(Constant)

, factorsenvironment_lackoffriends, factorsenvironment_educatio, factorsenvironment_poorliving, factorsenvironment_poverty

Model

1

4

Total

14

ANOVAa

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F Sig.

Regression

10.850

2.712

1.014

.445b

Residual

26.750

10

2.675

37.600

a. Dependent Variable: violentcrimes

b. Predictors: (Constant), factorsenvironment_lackoffriends, factorsenvironment_educatio, factorsenvironment_poorliving, factorsenvironment_poverty

Model

Sig.

1

factorsenvironment_educatio

factorsenvironment_poorliving

factorsenvironment_poverty

2.712

factorsenvironment_lackoffriends

1.581

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t
B Std. Error

Beta

(Constant)

4

.250

2.827

1.504

.164

1.250

1.581

.387

.791

.447

-1.750

1.994

-.551

.877

.401

-.250

-.077

-.092

.928

.250

.070

.158

.877
a. Dependent Variable: violentcrimes

The R-squared of this model is .289 and it tells us that there is about 29% of the variance in mental illness being the leading cause of violent crimes is explained by our four predictor variables. This gives you and overall look at how well your model predicts the dependent variable.

The analysis was found to be statistically significant F(4,10) = 1.01, p <.445, indicates that these are no good predictors of mental illness being the leading cause of violent crimes . This multiple regression accounts for 29% of the variability, as indexed by the adjusted R^2 statistic.

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.731a

.534

.275

1.39576

a. Predictors: (Constant), mt_childhood, mt_socialproblems, mt_substanceabuse, mt_physicalabuse, mt_mentalproblems

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

5

Residual

9

Total

37.600

14

a. Dependent Variable: violentcrimes

20.067

4.013

2.060

.163b

17.533

1.948

b. Predictors: (Constant), mt_childhood, mt_socialproblems, mt_substanceabuse, mt_physicalabuse, mt_mentalproblems

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

.387

mt_physicalabuse

.058

mt_mentalproblems

mt_socialproblems

mt_substanceabuse

.000

mt_childhood

a. Dependent Variable: violentcrimes

1.733

1.907

.909

2.583

1.192

.814

2.167

-2.417

1.547

-.762

-1.562

.153

-.167

1.336

-.036

-.125

.903

7.458E-16

1.396

.000

1.000

1.350

1.219

.402

1.108

.297

The R-squared of this model is .534 and it tells us that there is about 53% of the variance in mental illness being the leading cause of violent crimes is explained by our five predictor variables. This gives you and overall look at how well your model predicts the dependent variable.

The analysis was found to be statistically significant F(5,9) = 2.06, p <.163, indicates that these are good predictors of mental illness being the leading cause of violent crimes . This multiple regression accounts for 53% of the variability, as indexed by the adjusted R^2 statistic.

Principles and Standards

My proposed data analysis methods are ethical because according to the APA principles I followed integrity and the respect for people’s rights. The integrity will be ethical because I will be honest and truthful with the results of my study. According to the APA code of ethics, psychologists respect the dignity and worth of all people, and the rights of individuals to privacy, confidentiality, and self-determination. I will be doing this by providing the online survey method to protect the participant’s privacy.

Predictions

All studies have limitations, and mine is no exception. Specifically, I had limitations due to the fact that we could only survey Southern New Hampshire University students and only students that were in PSY510 and/or PSY520study; there is not much diversity in the study so this will also affect the validity. If we were able to ask people outside of Southern New Hampshire population or outside of the two classes I think my results would have been different. My study will also be limited because of the number of surveys that we need for this research were low. A standard that is ethical in my study is privacy and confidentiality that is stated above but doing the online survey. I believe that my results from this study will support my data research; if this is to be true this will support my literature

References

Aitken, L., Oosthuizen, P., Emsley, R., & Seedat, S. (2008). Mass murders: Implications for mental health professionals. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 38(3), 261-9. Retrieved from

http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/docview/196304539?accountid=3783

Auxemery, Y. (2015). The mass murderer history: Modern classifications, sociodemographic and psychopathological characteristics, suicidal dimensions, and media contagion of mass murders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 56, 149-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.09.003

Declercq, F., & Audenaert, K. (2011). A case of mass murder: Personality disorder, psychopathology and violence mode. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 135-143.

Dutton, D. G., White, K. R., & Fogarty, D. (2013). Paranoid thinking in mass shooters. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 548-553.

Levin, J. (2013). Mass Murder in Perspective: Guest Editor’s Introduction. Homicide Studies, 18(1), 3-6.

Lurigio, A. J., & Harris, A.z J. (2009). Mental Illness, Violence, and Risk Assessment: An Evidence-Based Review. Victims & Offenders, 4(4), 341-347. doi:10.1080/15564880903260561

Knoll, James L,I.V., M.D., & Meloy, J. R. (2014). Mass murder and the violent paranoid spectrum. Psychiatric Annals, 44(5), 236-243. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.3928/00485713-20140502-07

Meloy, J. R., Hempel, A. G., Gray, B. T., Mohandie, K., Shiva, A., & Richards, T. C. (2004). A comparative analysis of North American adolescent and adult mass murderers. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 22(3), 291-309. doi:10.1002/bsl.586

Ritchie, G., Weldon, S., Freeman, L., MacPherson, G., & Davies, K. (2011). Outcomes of a drug and alcohol relapse prevention programme in a population of mentally disordered offenders. British Journal Of Forensic Practice, 13(1), 32-43.

Swanson, J.W., Swartz, M.S., Essock, S.M.,Osher, F., Wagner, H.R., Goodman, L.A., el al. (2002). The social-environmental context of violent behavior in persons treated for severe mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1523-1531

https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/workplace-violence

Still stressed from student homework?
Get quality assistance from academic writers!

Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code LAVENDER