USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
1200 words require (exlcluding reference), please refer to attached for more details. Plagiarism free.
The purpose of this assignment is for you to explore the theoretical and practical aspects of the implementation of the supply chain, and discuss whether the principles stated in the article are practical in its implementation.
· Students are expected to exhibit the following competences:
· Knowledge and understanding of key concepts,
· Analysis and level of argument,
· Extent of reading and references used,
· Structure and presentation of the submission, writing style etc.
·
Require supply chain journal, article, book which is less than 5 years from 2013 for reference
Criteria Need
Proficient introduction that states background information, question, topic and all subtopics in proper order. Thesis is clear and arguable statement of position. Paper is well researched in detail with accurate & critical evidence from a variety of sources that is properly cited. Consistent connections made between evidence, subtopics, arguments & showing good analysis. Clear and logical subtopic order that supports the answers with good transitions b/w paragraphs. Good summary of topic, and all subtopics with clear concluding ideas. Paper is clear, with mostly proper grammar, spelling and paragraphing, however, with some minor errors. Consistent & correct format inserted to validate evidence. Proper Harvard format used in alphabetical order with al sources shown and a variety of sources.
www.scmr.com Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w 3
David L. Anderson, Frank F. Britt, and
Donavon J. Favre
When this article was published, David
L. Anderson and Donavon J. Favre were
consultants in Andersen Consulting’s
Strategic Services Logistics Practice.
Frank F. Britt, an alumnus of that
practice, was Vice President of Marketing
and Merchandising at Streamline Inc.
The most requested article in the
10-year history of Supply Chain
Management Review was one that
appeared in our very first issue
in the spring of 1997. Written by
experts from the respected Logistics
practice of Andersen Consulting (now
Accenture), “The
Seven Principles
of Supply Chain Management,”
layed out a clear and compelling
case for excellence in supply chain
management. The insights provided
here remain remarkably fresh ten
years later.
M
anagers increasingly fi nd themselves assigned the
role of the rope in a very real tug of war—pulled
one way by customers’ mounting demands and the
opposite way by the company’s need for growth
and profi tability. Many have discovered that they can keep the
rope from snapping and, in fact, achieve profi table growth by
treating supply chain management as a strategic variable.
These savvy managers recognize two important things. First,
they think about the supply chain as a whole—all the links
involved in managing the fl ow of products, services, and infor-
mation from their suppliers’ suppliers to their customers’ cus-
tomers (that is, channel customers, such as distributors and
retailers). Second, they pursue tangible outcomes—focused on
revenue growth, asset utilization, and cost.
Rejecting the traditional view of a company and its compo-
nent parts as distinct functional entities, these managers realize
that the real measure of success is how well activities coordi-
nate across the supply chain to create value for customers, while
increasing the profi tability of every link in the chain.
Our analysis of initiatives to improve supply chain management
by more than 100 manufacturers, distributors, and retailers shows
many making great progress, while others fail dismally. The suc-
cessful initiatives that have contributed to profi table growth share
several themes. They are typically broad efforts, combining both
strategic and tactical change. They also refl ect a holistic approach,
viewing the supply chain from end to end and orchestrating efforts
so that the whole improvement achieved—in revenue, costs, and
asset utilization—is greater than the sum of its parts.
0 0 0
0
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 00101010100 1010101010101010100101010000101010
101
010
10
10
01
01
01
01
00
10
00
10
0
ANNIVERSARY ISSUE
The Best of Supply Chain Management Review
7
Principles of
Supply Chain
Management
The
VISION EXECUTION PROGRESS FUNDAMENTALS TECHNOLOGY
4 Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w www.scmr.com
Unsuccessful efforts likewise have a consistent profi le.
They tend to be functionally defi ned and narrowly focused,
and they lack sustaining infrastructure. Uncoordinated change
activity erupts in every department and function and puts the
company in grave danger of “dying the death of a thousand
initiatives.” The source of failure is seldom management’s dif-
fi culty identifying what needs fi xing. The issue is determining
how to develop and execute a supply chain transformation
plan that can move multiple, complex operating entities (both
internal and external) in the same direction.
To help managers decide how to proceed, we revisited the
supply chain initiatives undertaken by the most successful
manufacturers and distilled from their experience seven fun-
damental principles of supply chain management.
Principle 1: Segment customers based on the ser-
vice needs of distinct groups and adapt the supply
chain to serve these segments profi tably.
Segmentation has traditionally grouped customers by
industry, product, or trade channel and then taken a one-size-
fi ts-all approach to serving them, averaging costs and profi t-
ability within and across segments. The typical result, as one
manager admits: “We don’t fully understand the relative value
customers place on our service offerings.”
But segmenting customers by their particular needs
equips a company to develop a portfolio of services tailored to
various segments. Surveys, interviews, and industry research
have been the traditional tools for defi ning key segmentation
criteria.
Viewed from the classic perspective, this needs-based
segmentation may produce some odd couples. For the manu-
facturer in Exhibit 1, “innovators” include an industrial dis-
tributor (Grainger), a do-it-yourself retailer (Home Depot),
and a mass merchant (Wal-Mart).
Research also can establish the services valued by all
customers versus those valued only by certain segments.
Then the company should apply a disciplined, cross-func-
tional process to develop a menu of supply chain programs
and create segment-specifi c service packages that combine
basic services for everyone with the services from the menu
that will have the greatest appeal to particular segments. This
does not mean tailoring for the sake of tailoring. The goal is
to fi nd the degree of segmentation and variation needed to
maximize profi tability.
All the segments in Exhibit 1, for example, value consistent
delivery. But those in the lower left quadrant have little inter-
est in the advanced supply chain management programs, such
as customized packaging and advance shipment notifi cation,
that appeal greatly to those in the upper right quadrant.
Of course, customer needs and preferences do not tell
the whole story. The service packages must turn a profi t, and
many companies lack adequate fi nancial understanding of
their customers’ and their own costs to gauge likely profi t-
ability. “We don’t know which customers are most profi table
to serve, which will generate the highest long-term profi tabil-
ity, or which we are most likely to retain,” confessed a lead-
ing industrial manufacturer. This knowledge is essential to
correctly matching accounts with service packages—which
translates into revenues enhanced through some combina-
tion of increases in volume and/or price.
Only by understanding their costs at the activity level
and using that understanding to strengthen fi scal control can
companies profi tably deliver value to customers. One “suc-
cessful” food manufacturer aggressively marketed vendor-
managed inventory to all customer segments and boosted
sales. But subsequent activity-based cost analysis found that
one segment actually lost nine cents a case on an operating
margin basis.
Most companies have a signifi cant untapped opportuni-
ty to better align their investment in a particular customer
relationship with the return that customer generates. To do
so, companies must analyze the profi tability of segments,
plus the costs and benefi ts of alternate service packages, to
ensure a reasonable return on their investment and the most
profi table allocation of resources. To strike and sustain the
appropriate balance between service and profi tability, most
companies will need to set priorities—sequencing the rollout
of tailored programs to capitalize on existing capabilities and
maximize customer impact.
Principle 2: Customize the logistics network to the
service requirements and profi tability of customer
segments.
Companies have traditionally taken a monolithic approach
to logistics network design in organizing their inventory, ware-
house, and transportation activities to meet a single standard.
For some, the logistics network has been designed to meet
the average service requirements of all customers; for oth-
ers, to satisfy the toughest requirements of a single customer
segment.
EXHIBIT 1
Needs-Based Segmentation
S
al
es
a
nd
M
er
ch
an
di
si
ng
N
ee
ds
Order Fulfillment Requirements
High
Low
Low High
Chrysler
Maytag
Westinghouse
Logistics Optimizers
Traditionalists
Source: Andersen Consulting
Auto Zone
Staples
Developing
Grainger
Home Depot
Wal-Mart
Innovators
Small Retail Stores
Small Industrial
Wholesale
Distributors
Seven Principles
www.scmr.com Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w 5
Neither approach can achieve superior asset utilization
or accommodate the segment-specifi c logistics necessary
for excellent supply chain management. In many industries,
especially such commodity industries as fi ne paper, tailoring
distribution assets to meet individual logistics requirements
is a greater source of differentiation for a manufacturer than
the actual products, which are largely undifferentiated.
One paper company found radically different customer
service demands in two key segments—large publishers with
long lead times and small regional printers needing delivery
within 24 hours. To serve both segments well and achieve
profi table growth, the manufacturer designed a multi-level
logistics network with three full-stocking distribution centers
and 46 quick-response cross-docks, stocking only fast-mov-
ing items, located near the regional printers.
Return on assets and revenues improved substantially
thanks to the new inventory deployment strategy, supported
by outsourcing of management of the quick response centers
and the transportation activities.
This example highlights several key characteristics of seg-
ment-specifi c services. The logistics network probably will be
more complex, involving alliances with third-party logistics
providers, and will certainly have to be more fl exible than the
traditional network. As a result, fundamental changes in the
mission, number, location, and ownership structure of ware-
houses are typically necessary. Finally, the network will require
more robust logistics planning enabled by “real-time” decision-
support tools that can handle fl ow-through distribution and
more time-sensitive approaches to managing transportation.
Principle 3: Listen to market signals and align
demand planning accordingly across the supply
chain, ensuring consistent forecasts and optimal
resource allocation.
Forecasting has historically proceeded silo by silo, with
multiple departments independently creating forecasts for
the same products—all using their own assumptions, mea-
sures, and level of detail. Many consult the marketplace only
informally, and few involve their major suppliers in the pro-
cess. The functional orientation of many companies has just
made things worse, allowing sales forecasts to envision grow-
ing demand while manufacturing second-guesses how much
product the market actually wants.
Such independent, self-centered forecasting is incompat-
ible with excellent supply chain management, as one manu-
facturer of photographic imaging found. This manufacturer
nicknamed the warehouse “the accordion” because it had
to cope with a production operation that stuck to a stable
schedule, while the revenue-focused sales force routinely
triggered cyclical demand by offering deep discounts at the
end of each quarter. The manufacturer realized the need to
implement a cross-functional planning process, supported by
demand planning software.
Initial results were dismaying. Sales volume dropped
sharply, as excess inventory had to be consumed by the mar-
ketplace. But today, the company enjoys lower inventory and
warehousing costs and much greater ability to maintain price
levels and limit discounting. Like all the best sales and opera-
tions planning (S&OP), this process recognizes the needs
and objectives of each functional group but bases fi nal opera-
tional decisions on overall profi t potential.
Excellent supply chain management, in fact, calls for
S&OP that transcends company boundaries to involve every
link of the supply chain (from the supplier’s supplier to the
customer’s customer) in developing forecasts collaboratively
and then maintaining the required capacity across the opera-
tions. Channel-wide S&OP can detect early warning signals
of demand lurking in customer promotions, ordering patterns,
and restocking algorithms and takes into account vendor and
carrier capabilities, capacity, and constraints.
Exhibit 2 illustrates the difference that cross supply chain
planning has made for one manufacturer of laboratory prod-
ucts. As shown on the left of this exhibit, uneven distribu-
tor demand unsynchronized with actual end-user demand
made real inventory needs impossible to predict and forced
high inventory levels that still failed to prevent out-of-stocks.
Distributors began sharing information on actual (and fairly
stable) end-user demand with the manufacturer, and the
manufacturer began managing inventory for the distributors.
This coordination of manufacturing scheduling and inven-
tory deployment decisions paid off handsomely, improving fi ll
rates, asset turns, and cost metrics for all concerned.
Principle 4: Differentiate product closer to the
customer and speed conversion across the supply
chain.
Manufacturers have traditionally based production goals
on projections of the demand for fi nished goods and have
stockpiled inventory to offset forecasting errors. These manu-
facturers tend to view lead times in the system as fi xed, with
only a fi nite window of time in which to convert materials
into products that meet customer requirements.
EXHIBIT 2
Market Signals
Source: Andersen Consulting
Manufacturers Distributor
Uneven Distributor Stable End-User Demand
Time
Distributor Demand
Manufacturer Forecast
Time
End User
D
em
an
d
(F
or
ec
as
t)
D
em
an
d
(F
or
ec
as
t)
End-User Demand
New Vendor-Managed
Inventory (VMI) Forecasts
6 Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w www.scmr.com
While even such traditionalists can make progress in
cutting costs through set-up reduction, cellular manufactur-
ing, and just-in-time techniques, great potential remains in
less traditional strategies such as mass customization. For
example, manufacturers striving to meet individual customer
needs effi ciently through strategies such as mass customiza-
tion are discovering the value of postponement. They are
delaying product differentiation to the last possible moment
and thus overcoming the problem described by one manager
of a health and beauty care products warehouse: “With the
proliferation of packaging requirements from major retailers,
our number of SKUs (stock keeping units) has exploded. We
have situations daily where we backorder one retailer, like
Wal-Mart, on an item that is identical to an in-stock item,
except for its packaging. Sometimes we even tear boxes apart
and repackage by hand!”
The hardware manufacturer in Exhibit 3 solved this prob-
lem by determining the point at which a standard bracket
turned into multiple SKUs. This point came when the brack-
et had to be packaged 16 ways to meet particular customer
requirements. The manufacturer further concluded that
overall demand for these brackets is relatively stable and easy
to forecast, while demand for the 16 SKUs is much more
volatile. The solution: make brackets in the factory but pack-
age them at the distribution center, within the customer
order cycle. This strategy improved asset utilization by cut-
ting inventory levels by more than 50 percent.
Realizing that time really is money, many manufacturers
are questioning the conventional wisdom that lead times in
the supply chain are fi xed. They are strengthening their abil-
ity to react to market signals by compressing lead times along
the supply chain, speeding the conversion from raw materials
to fi nished products tailored to customer requirements. This
approach enhances their fl exibility to make product confi gu-
ration decisions much closer to the moment demand occurs.
The key to just-in-time product differentiation is to locate
the leverage point in the manufacturing process where the
product is unalterably confi gured to meet a single require-
ment and to assess options, such a postponement, modular-
ized design, or modifi cation of manufacturing processes, that
can increase fl exibility. In addition, manufacturers must chal-
lenge cycle times: Can the leverage point be pushed closer to
actual demand to maximize the manufacturer’s fl exibility in
responding to emerging customer demand?
Principle 5: Manage sources of supply strategically
to reduce the total cost of owning materials and
services.
Determined to pay as low a price as possible for materials,
manufacturers have not traditionally cultivated warm rela-
tionships with suppliers. In the words of one general man-
ager: “The best approach to supply is to have as many players
as possible fi ghting for their piece of the pie—that’s when
you get the best pricing.”
Excellent supply chain management requires a more
enlightened mindset—recognizing, as a more progres-
sive manufacturer did: “Our supplier’s costs are in effect
our costs. If we force our supplier to provide 90 days of
consigned material when 30 days are suffi cient, the cost
of that inventory will fi nd its way back into the supplier’s
price to us since it increases his cost structure.” While
manufacturers should place high demands on suppliers,
they should also realize that partners must share the goal
of reducing costs across the supply chain in order to lower
prices in the marketplace and enhance margins. The logi-
cal extension of this thinking is gain-sharing arrangements
to reward everyone who contributes to the
greater profi tability.
Some companies are not yet ready for such
progressive thinking because they lack the funda-
mental prerequisite. That is, a sound knowledge
of all their commodity costs, not only for direct
materials but also for maintenance, repair, and
operating supplies, plus the dollars spent on utili-
ties, travel, temps, and virtually everything else.
This fact-based knowledge is the essential foun-
dation for determining the best way of acquiring
every kind of material and service the company
buys.
With their marketplace position and industry
structure in mind, manufacturers can then con-
sider how to approach suppliers—soliciting short-
term competitive bids, entering into long-term
contracts and strategic supplier relationships,
outsourcing, or integrating vertically. Excellent
supply chain management calls for creativity and
fl exibility.
EXHIBIT 3
Packaging Postponement
Procure/Source
Source: Andersen Consulting
Manufacture
Coating
Molding
Subassy
Assemble
Plastic
Postponement Leverage Point
Unit Pack Carton
Level I Level II Level III
Wal-Mart
Target
KMart
Home Depot
Same Base
Product
Card
Same Base
Product
Card
Same Base
Product
Same Base
Product
Colors
Steel
Components
Plastic
Seven Principles
www.scmr.com Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w 7
Principle 6: Develop a supply chain-wide technol-
ogy strategy that supports multiple levels of deci-
sion making and gives a clear view of the fl ow of
products, services, and information.
To sustain reengineered business processes (that at last
abandon the functional orientation of the past), many pro-
gressive companies have been replacing infl exible, poorly inte-
grated systems with enterprise-wide systems. Yet too many of
these companies will fi nd themselves victims of the powerful
new transactional systems they put in place. Unfortunately,
many leading-edge information systems can capture reams
of data but cannot easily translate it into actionable intelli-
gence that can enhance real-world operations. As one logis-
tics manager with a brand-new system said: “I’ve got three
feet of reports with every detail imaginable, but it doesn’t tell
me how to run my business.”
This manager needs to build an information technology sys-
tem that integrates capabilities of three essential kinds. (See
Exhibit 4.) For the short term, the system must be able to han-
dle day-to-day transactions and electronic commerce across the
supply chain and thus help align supply and demand by sharing
information on orders and daily scheduling. From a mid-term
perspective, the system must facilitate planning and decision
making, supporting the demand and shipment planning and
master production scheduling needed to allocate resources effi –
ciently. To add long-term value, the system must enable strate-
gic analysis by providing tools, such as an integrated network
model, that synthesize data for use in high-level “what-if” sce-
nario planning to help managers evaluate plants, distribution
centers, suppliers, and third-party service alternatives.
Despite making huge investments in technology, few
companies are acquiring this full complement of capabilities.
Today’s enterprisewide systems remain enterprise-bound,
unable to share across the supply chain the information that
channel partners must have to achieve mutual success.
Ironically, the information that most companies require
most urgently to enhance supply chain management resides
outside of their own systems, and few companies are adequate-
ly connected to obtain the necessary information. Electronic
connectivity creates opportunities to change the supply chain
fundamentally—from slashing transaction costs through elec-
tronic handling of orders, invoices, and payments to shrinking
inventories through vendor-managed inventory programs.
Principle 7: Adopt channel-spanning performance
measures to gauge collective success in reaching
the end-user effectively and effi ciently.
To answer the question, “How are we doing?” most com-
panies look inward and apply any number of functionally ori-
ented measures. But excellent supply chain managers take a
broader view, adopting measures that apply to every link in the
supply chain and include both service and fi nancial metrics.
First, they measure service in terms of the perfect order—
the order that arrives when promised, complete, priced and
billed correctly, and undamaged. The perfect order not only
spans the supply chain, as a progressive performance mea-
surement should, but also view performance from the proper
perspective, that of the customer.
Second, excellent supply chain managers determine their
true profi tability of service by identifying the actual costs and
revenues of the activities required to serve an account, espe-
cially a key account. For many, this amounts to a revelation,
since traditional cost measures rely on corporate accounting
systems that allocate overhead evenly across accounts. Such
measures do not differentiate, for example, an account that
requires a multi-functional account team, small daily ship-
ments, or special packaging. Traditional accounting tends to
mask the real costs of the supply chain—focusing on cost
type rather than the cost of activities and ignoring the degree
of control anyone has (or lacks) over the cost drivers.
Deriving maximum benefi t from activity-based costing
requires sophisticated information technology, specifi cally a data
warehouse. Because the general ledger organizes data accord-
ing to a chart of accounts, it obscures the information needed
for activity-based costing. By maintaining data in discrete units,
the warehouse provides ready access to this information.
To facilitate channel-spanning performance measure-
ment, many companies are developing common report cards.
These report cards help keep partners working toward the
same goals by building deep understanding of what each
company brings to the partnership and showing how to lever-
age their complementary assets and skills to the alliance’s
greatest advantage. The willingness to ignore traditional com-
pany boundaries in pursuit of such synergies often marks the
fi rst step toward a “pay-for-performance” environment.
Translating Principles into Practice
Companies that have achieved excellence in supply chain
management tend to approach implementation of the guid-
EXHIBIT 4
Key Aspects of Supply Chain Technology Strategy
Source: Andersen Consulting
Supplier Manufacturer Customer
Strategic
Analysis
Planning and
Decision Support
Operations and
Transaction Management
www.scmr.com Te n C l a s s i c s f r o m S u p p l y C h a i n M a n a g e m e n t R e v i e w 8
ing principles with three precepts in mind:
Orchestrate improvement efforts
The complexity of the supply chain can make it diffi cult to
envision the whole, from end to end. But successful supply
chain managers realize the need to invest time and effort up
front in developing this total perspective and using it to inform
a blueprint for change that maps linkages among initiatives
and a well-thought-out implementation sequence. This blue-
print also must coordinate the change initiatives with ongoing
day-to-day operations and must cross company boundaries.
The blueprint requires rigorous assessment of the entire
supply chain—from supplier relationships to internal opera-
tions to the marketplace, including customers, competitors,
and the industry as a whole. Current practices must be ruth-
lessly weighed against best practices to determine the size
of the gap to close. Thorough cost/benefi t analysis lays the
essential foundation for prioritizing and sequencing initia-
tives, establishing capital and people requirements, and get-
ting a complete fi nancial picture of the company’s supply
chain—before, during, and after implementation.
A critical step in the process is setting explicit outcome
targets for revenue growth, asset utilization, and cost reduc-
tion. (See Exhibit 5.) While traditional goals for costs and
assets, especially goals for working capital, remain essential to
success, revenue growth targets may ultimately be even more
important. Initiatives intended only to cut costs and improve
asset utilization have limited success structuring sustainable
win-win relationships among trading partners. Emphasizing
revenue growth can signifi cantly increase the odds that a
supply chain strategy will create, rather than destroy, value.
Remember that Rome wasn’t built in a day
As this list of tasks may suggest, signifi cant enhancement
of supply chain management is a massive undertaking with
profound fi nancial impact on both the balance sheet and
the income statement. Because this effort will not pay off
overnight, management must carefully balance its long-term
promise against more immediate business needs.
Advance planning is again key. Before designing specifi c
initiatives, successful companies typically develop a plan that
specifi es funding, leadership, and expected fi nancial results.
This plan helps to forestall confl icts over priorities and keeps
management focused and committed to realizing the benefi ts.
Recognize the diffi culty of change
Most corporate change programs do a much better job of
designing new operating processes and technology tools than of
fostering appropriate attitudes and behaviors in the people who
are essential to making the change program work. People resist
change, especially in companies with a history of “change-of-
the-month” programs. People in any organization have trouble
coping with the uncertainty of change, especially the real pos-
sibility that their skills will not fi t the new environment.
Implementing the seven principles of supply chain man-
agement will mean signifi cant change for most companies.
The best prescription for ensuring success and minimizing
resistance is extensive, visible participation and communica-
tion by senior executives. This means championing the cause
and removing the managerial obstacles that typically present
the greatest barriers to success, while linking change with
overall business strategy.
Many progressive companies have realized that the tra-
ditionally fragmented responsibility for managing supply
chain activities will no longer do. Some have even elevat-
ed supply chain management to a strategic position and
established a senior executive position such as vice presi-
dent-supply chain (or the equivalent) reporting directly to
the COO or CEO. This role ignores traditional product,
functional, and geographic boundaries that can interfere
with delivering to customers what they want, when and
where they want it.
Reaping the Rewards
The companies mentioned in this article are just a few of
the many that have enhanced both customer satisfaction
and profi tability by strengthening management of the supply
chain. While these companies have pursued various initia-
tives, all have realized the need to integrate activities across
the supply chain. Doing so has improved asset utilization,
reduced cost, and created price advantages that help attract
and retain customers—and thus enhance revenue. ���
Revenue
GrowthSeven Principles
Asset
Utilization
Cost
Reduction
EXHIBIT 5
Relationship Between Supply Chain
Principles and Financial Outcomes
1. Segment Customer
Based on Needs
2. Customize Logistics Network
3. Listen to Market Signals
And Plan Accordingly
4. Differentiate Products
Closer to Customers
5. Source Strategically
6. Develop Supply Chain
Technology Strategy*
7. Adopt Channel-
Spanning Measures
High
* Information technology provides the infrastructure required to capture benefits
across the supply chain
Source: Andersen Consulting
Medium Low
Seven Principles
