FOR KIM WOODS ONLY

Ms Woods

This is a second assignment that is due can you assist. The requirement is to conduct a risk assessment using the attached excel worksheet. Thanks

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////Instructions///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

For this exercise, assume you are the new director of campus security for a major public university. Using the attached Excel worksheet, conduct a risk assessment of the facility based on the part of the country you reside in and submit your completed document. The spreadsheet is user-friendly and will automatically calculate the scores that you enter for each of the risk factors.

(Example: western Missouri would have a high risk for tornado activity, moderate risk of earthquake due to the New Madrid fault line and no risk of a tsunami.)

Please see attached spreadsheet

>Introduction

Facility Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis

: Likelihood of event occuring

and

Facility Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis

This document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not a

Mitigation: Assuming event has occurred, assess preparedness and response

substitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program. Individuals or

resources

organizations using this tool are solely responsible for any hazard assessment and

Issues to consider for response (Preparedness, Internal & External

INSTRUCTIONS:

Response) include, but are not limited to:

Time to marshal an on-scene response

Evaluate potential for event and response among the following categories using

Scope of response capability

the hazard specific scale. Assume each event incident occurs at the worst

Historical evaluation of response success

possible time (e.g. during peak patient loads).

Issues to consider for Preparedness include, but are not limited to:

Please note specific score criteria on each work sheet to ensure accurate recording.

Status of current plans

Frequency of drills

Probability

Training status

Insurance

Issues to consider for probability include, but are not limited to:

Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/services

Known risk

Historical data

Facility/Regional/Manufacturer/vendor statistics

Issues to consider for Internal Response include, but are not limited to:

Types of supplies on hand/will they meet need?

Impact: Assuming event has occurred, assess impact

Volume of supplies on hand/will they meet need?

Staff availability

Issues to consider for human impact include, but are not limited to:

Coordination with Medical Office Building’s

Potential for staff death or injury

Availability of back-up systems

Potential for patient death or injury

Internal resources ability to withstand disasters/survivability

Issues to consider for property impact include, but are not limited to:

Issues to consider for External Response include, but are not limited to:

Cost to replace

Types of agreements with community agencies/drills?

Cost to set up temporary replacement

Coordination with local and state agencies

Cost to repair

Coordination with proximal health care facilities

Time to recover

Coordination with treatment specific facilities

Community resources

Issues to consider for business impact include, but are not limited to:

Business interruption

Complete all worksheets incl

Natural

Technological

Human

Hazmat

Employees unable to report to work

The summary section will automatically provide your specific and overall

Customers unable to reach facility

relative threat.

Company in violation of contractual agreements

Imposition of fines and penalties or legal costs

Interruption of critical supplies

Interruption of product distribution

Reputation and public image

Financial impact/burden

Instructions and cell formulates modified by M. Bernard 9/22/1

&LSample Hazards Vulnerability Analysis

Natural Hazards

EVENT

0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

3 3 3 3 1 1 1

2 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 2 2 2 1 1 1

1 1 1 2 1 1 2

2 2 2 3 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

1 2 0 0 1 1 1

1 1 0 1 1 1 1 9%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11%

1 1 2 2 1 1 1 15%

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

1 2 0 3 2 2 2

SCORE

1.06

0.81 0.81

HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

NATURALLY OCCURRING

EVENT

SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE – MITIGATION)

PROBABILITY

HUMAN IMPACT

PROPERTY IMPACT

BUSINESS IMPACT

PREPAREDNESS

INTERNAL RESPONSE

EXTERNAL RESPONSE

RISK

Likelihood this will occur

Possibility of death or injury

Physical losses and damages

Interruption of services

Pre-Planning

Time, effectiveness, resources

Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies

Relative threat*

SCORE

0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High

0= N/A 1 = High 2=Moderate 3 = Low

0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none

0 –

Hurricane

Tornado

Severe Thunderstorm

22%

Snow Fall

50%

Blizzard

15%

Ice Storm

48%

Earthquake

Tidal Wave

Temperature Extremes

Drought

Flood, External

Wild Fire

Landslide

Dam Inundation

Volcano

Epidemic

20%

AVERAGE

1.06

0.81

1.19

0.88

*Threat increases with percentage.

RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY

0.17

0.35

0.31

Technological Hazards

HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE – MITIGATION)

EVENT PROBABILITY HUMAN IMPACT PROPERTY IMPACT BUSINESS IMPACT

INTERNAL RESPONSE EXTERNAL RESPONSE RISK

Likelihood this will occur Possibility of death or injury Physical losses and damages

Relative threat*

SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High

0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High

0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none

1 0 0 2 1 2 2

1 0 0 2 1 2 1 11%

1 1 1 3 2 2 2 20%

1 0 1 3 1 2 2

1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9%

1 1 1 2 1 1 2 15%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11%

1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7%

1 2 2 2 1 2 2 20%

1 1 1 2 2 1 1 15%

1 0 0 2 1 1 2 11%

1 0 1 2 1 2 2 15%

1 2 3 3 1 1 1 20%

1 1 2 2 2 1 1 17%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11%

1 1 2 2 1 2 1 17%

1 2 3 3 1 1 1 20%

AVERAGE SCORE

1.18

1.41 15%

*Threat increases with percentage.
17 RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY

TECHNOLOGIC EVENTS
		PREPARED-NESS
		Interuption of services		Preplanning			Time, effectivness, resouces	Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies
		0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High		0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none			0 – 100%
Transportation Failure	13%
Fuel Shortage
Natural Gas Failure
Water Failure					17%
Sewer Failure
Steam Failure
Fire Alarm Failure
Communications Failure
Medical Gas Failure
Medical Vacuum Failure
HVAC Failure
Information Systems Failure
Fire, Internal
Flood, Internal
Hazmat Exposure, Internal
Supply Shortage
Structural Damage
	1.00	0.76	1.18		2.00		1.41
135		0.15		0.33		0.44

&LTMC-LW Hazard Vulnerablity Analysis&Ras of 7-06

Human Hazards

HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE – MITIGATION)
EVENT PROBABILITY HUMAN IMPACT PROPERTY IMPACT BUSINESS IMPACT PREPARED-NESS INTERNAL RESPONSE EXTERNAL RESPONSE RISK
Likelihood this will occur Possibility of death or injury Physical losses and damages Interuption of services Preplanning Time, effectivness, resouces Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies Relative threat*
SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none 0 – 100%

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 22%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11%

2 3 0 2 2 2 1

1 2 1 3 1 1 1 17%

1 2 2 2 1 1 3 20%

1 1 1 1 3 3 3 22%

2 2 1 1 1 1 3

1 1 2 2 1 1 1 15%

AVERAGE

1.25 1.75

1.50

22%

*Threat increases with percentage.

10 RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY

HUMAN RELATED EVENTS
Terrorism, Biological
VIP Situation
Infant Abduction	37%
Hostage Situation
Civil Disturbance
Labor Action
Forensic Admission	33%
Bomb Threat
	1.25		1.75		1.50	1.88
77		0.22		0.42		0.53

&LTMC-LWHazard Vulnerablity Analysis&Ras of 7-06

Hazardous Materials

HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

SEVERITY = (MAGNITUDE – MITIGATION)
EVENT PROBABILITY HUMAN IMPACT PROPERTY IMPACT BUSINESS IMPACT PREPARED-NESS INTERNAL RESPONSE EXTERNAL RESPONSE RISK

Likelihood this will occur Possibility of death or injury Physical losses and damages Interuption of services Preplanning Time, effectivness, resouces Community/ Mutual Aid staff and supplies Relative threat*
SCORE 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = Low 2 = Moderate 3 = High 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none 0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none

0 – 100%

1 1 0 3 2 2 1 17%

1 2 1 2 2 2 1

1 1 1 2 2 2 1 17%

1 1 2 2 1 1 1 15%

3 1 3 3 2 2 1

1 1 2 2 3 3 1 22%

1 2 1 2 3 3 1 22%

1 2 1 2 2 3 1 20%

AVERAGE

2.00

1.00

*Threat increases with percentage.

11 RISK = PROBABILITY * SEVERITY

EVENTS INVOLVING HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
0 = N/A 1 = High 2 = Moderate 3 = Low or none
Mass Casualty Hazmat Incident (From historic events at your Hospital with >= 5 victims)
Small Casualty Hazmat Incident (From historic events at your Hospital with < 5 victims)	19%
Chemical Exposure, External
Small-Medium Sized Internal Spill
Large Internal Spill
Terrorism, Chemical	67%
Radiologic Exposure, Internal
Radiologic Exposure, External
Terrorism, Radiologic
1.22	1.33	1.44	2.22	2.11	24%
91		0.23		0.41		0.56

&LTMC-LWHazard Vulnerablity Analysis&Ras of 7-06

Summary

Natural Technological Human Hazmat

Probability 0.35 0.33 0.42 0.41

0.31 0.44 0.53 0.56 0.33

0.17 0.15 0.22 0.23

SUMMARY OF FACILITY HAZARDS ANALYSIS
		Total for Facility
0.34
Severity
Hazard Specific Relative Risk:	0.11
This document is a sample Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool. It is not asubstitute for a comprehensive emergency preparedness program.
Individuals or organizations using this tool are solely responsible for any hazard assessment and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

&LTMC – LW Hazard Vulnerablity Analysis&Ras of 7-06

Summary

Natural Natural
Technological Technological
Human Human
Hazmat Hazmat

Probability
Severity
Relative Threat to Facility
Hazard Specific Risk to Facility
0.3541666667
0.3090277778
0.3333333333
0.4411764706
0.4166666667
0.5347222222
0.4074074074
0.5617283951

Total for Facility Total for Facility Total for Facility

Probability
Severity
Relative Risk
Probability and Severity of Hazards to Facility
0.3395061728
0.329218107
0.1117715795

Turn in your highest-quality paper
Get a qualified writer to help you with

“ FOR KIM WOODS ONLY ”

Get high-quality paper

NEW! AI matching with writer

Still stressed with your coursework?

Get quality coursework help from an expert!

Order now