3. Suppose that there are 2,000 units of a non-renewable resource available over two
periods. Demand in each period is given by P = 4,000 – Q. Marginal Cost is a
constant $200 in each period. The discount rate is 10 percent.
a. What is the dynamically efficient allocation of the 2,000 units of the
resource, and what will be the price of the resource in each period?
b. Suppose that the basic setup of the problem remains the same, except that
now the discount rate rises to 25 percent. Re-compute the dynamically
efficient allocation of the 2,000 units of the resource including the price
each period.
c. On one graph illustrate your answers to parts (a) and (b).
d. On your graph from part (c) show the marginal user cost of the resource
explaining what this means and why it differs as the discount rate changes.
4. The marginal abatement cost curves for two air pollutant sources affecting a
single receptor are: MAC1 = $0.3A1 and MAC2 = $0.5A2. Their respective
transfer coefficients are a1 = 1.5 and a2 = 1. With no control they would emit 20
units of emissions each. The ambient standard at the receptor is 12 ppm.
a. If we were simply trying to reduce emissions to 12ppm combined, what
would be the cost effective abatement levels for each firm and what would
be the efficient tax/MAC/permit price?
b. If an ambient permit system (1 permits = rights to impact the ambient
quality at the receptor by 1 ppm) were established, what would be the
equilibrium permit price and how much abatement would each firm do?