USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Case Study
Analysis
Paper (20 pts)
The case study for this assignment is on Page 55 of your textbook, “HR in the DaimlerChrysler merger”. Please read the case carefully
and
you may use additional information through your own research for analysis. For your Analysis Paper, please address the following four items:
1.
1. Provide the basic information about the DaimlerChrysler company. How does the history of Daimler and Chrysler affect the state of the merged company?
2.
2. Explain the results of the DaimlerChrysler’s human resource strategies or methodologies.
3.
3. Evaluate the impact of organizational change, employee rewards, conflicts, and other issues that were important to DaimlerChrysler.
4.
4. Make recommendations for change if you were in charge of HRM for DaimlerChrysler.
Your paper should be 8 to 10 pages in length (double space) not counting the Title and References page. The in-text citations and references should be in APA format. The font you use should be Times New Roman, black, 12pt.
Your Case Study Analysis Paper will be graded based on the following rubric (20 pts):
|
Excellent (5 points) |
Good (4 points) |
Average (3 points) |
Unsatisfactory (1 – 0 point) |
|
|
Content and Research |
Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topics and issues. Clearly addressed all four items.
The paper is written through thorough research and understanding of the international human resource management challenges. |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the topics and issues. Some concepts require minor clarification. Addressed three out of four items.
The paper demonstrates research of the information but requires further explanation.
|
Demonstrates some understanding of the topics and issues. Some concepts are confusing. Addressed two out of four items.
The paper demonstrates some research of the information but lacks in explanation. |
Paper is clearly lacking in understanding of the topics and issues. Addressed only one or none item.
The research and refinement for the paper are inadequate. |
| Analysis |
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified. Supports opinions with strong arguments and evidence. Presents a balanced and critical view. Interpretations are reasonable and objective.
|
All issues have been analyzed but some need clarifications. Some opinions need stronger support of arguments and evidence. |
Not all issues are analyzed. Several opinions need stronger support of arguments and evidence. |
Analysis and arguments are inadequate. |
|
Recommendations |
Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the readings.
|
Presents good recommendations but some need further clarification. |
Presents good recommendations but some are either too vague or unrealistic.
|
Recommendations are either too vague or unrealistic, or no recommendations at all. |
|
Mechanics |
There are no grammatical or spelling errors. All format requirements are followed.
|
There are less than two grammatical, spellings, or format errors. |
There are three to five grammatical, spellings, or format errors. |
There are more than five grammatical, spellings, or format errors.
|
|
APA Style |
Paper follows all the guidelines of APA 6th edition
|
There are less than two APA errors in in-text citations or references. |
There are three to five APA errors in in-text citation or references. |
There are more than five APA errors in in-text citations and references.
|
