lantomore
hi am sorry for the delay…the job was technical and have been researching on it.
Neuroscience3600 Problem Set 4
Please write neatly and give complete, but concise, answers. Point credit for each problem shown to
the left (total of 20 pts).
1. (6 pts) What’s the difference between an EPSP and an action potential? Compare and contrast
these two potentials. Consider the ions involved, types of channels, duration, amplitude,
triggering events, and mechanisms of depolarization.
2. (1 pt) Do EPSPs show an after-hyperpolarization? Why or why not?
3. (0.5 pt) True of False: The key determinant of whether a synapse is excitatory or inhibitory is
the identity of the neurotransmitter. Briefly explain your answer.
4. (3 pts) Measurements used to determine the reversal potential of a particular
synapse are shown below. Separate experiments confirm that changing Cl- and
Ca
2
+ concentrations have no effect on these results.
a) Plot the results on the I-V plot at right (approximate values are sufficient) and
identify the reversal potential.
Reverse potential is The point at which the I/V curve crosses the X-axis .-50mV
b) What can you say about the relative contribution of each permeant ion to
the reversal potential? Explain your reasoning.
Reverse potential is contributed by the four principle ion; potassium, sodium,
chloride and calcium. However conductance by calcium is slow and considered only it
plays a significant role. Relative contribution of the permeant ions to reverse potential
is dependent to their relative permeability and conductance ratios.
Potassium ions: PK (relative permeability of potassium) is set at 1.0. There are more
K
+
leak channels than any other type of channel. Actually this accounts 67%of the
current to reverse potential..
Sodium ion: PNa (relative permeability of sodium)is 0.04 compared to K+.Accounts to
3% of the current. Sodium equilibrium potential is +60Mv this is away from reverse
potential and membrane resting potential. Sodium channel are fewer than that of
potassium
Chloride: PCl is 0.45 (relative permeability of chloride ions) this translates to 30% of
the current. Again, its equilibrium potential is close to reverse potential.
c) Describe a manipulation that would shift the reversal potential downward to around 0 mV.
Tetraethylammonium+(TEA) is an ion that blocks K+but not Na+channels.this can bring
reverse potential to 0 M.Ths. increases the firing level of excitable cell
4-aminopyridine used to alleviate multiple sclerosis bringing down reverse potential to 0Mv
through increasing neuronal and axonal excitability!
5. (1 pt) The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and striatum both receive a dopaminergic
projection from the ventral tegmental area (VTA). You hypothesize that the same VTA
cells that innervate the mPFC also send a parallel projection (also called a collateral axon)
to the striatum. The alternative hypothesis is that there are separate sub-populations in
VTA, with one group of cells projecting solely to mPFC and a separate group projecting to
NA. How would you test to discriminate between these two hypotheses?
Differential test
Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates decision making. mPFC in support of hippocampus is
selectively involved in the retrieval of remote long-term memory. On other hand,
The striatum is thought to play a crucial role in value-based decision making.
I would carry animal studies; by injecting animals general dopamine antagonist and other as control
inject normal saline. Then subject the two groups to test of memory (conditional reflexes i.e. Pavlov’s
experiment) and reward and punishment experiments to test valued based decision.
Deductions: if animals can’t recall Pavlov’s ring bell, shown by salivation and at the same time not be
able to avoid or do certain action that will attract punishment or reward, then it is hypothetical that
both medial prefrontal cortex and striatum are innervated by parallel projection from ventral tegmental
area. If one functions of striatum are spared (ability distinguish a reward and punishment) then it
means that sub population of cell in VTA is specific for innervation of striatum.
6. (1 pt) The following electron micrograph shows a close-up of an axon (A) and
two dendrites, labeled D1 and D2. Is there anything unusual about these
dendrites vis-à-vis their ability to communicate? If so, what? Describe any
evidence you use to reach your conclusion.
Yes they have unusual; Cluster of polyribosomes is invariably present in the two dendritic points. The
axon is short and thin thus nerve signal can’t be efficiently to nearby cells. This could be as result of
degeneration and aging
These observations show that the fundamental differences in form and in the distribution of ribosomes
between axons and dendrites that is not similar to normal distribution in normal nerve cells
7. (1.5) Describe three mechanisms whereby an drug or toxin can enhance neurotransmission. For
each mechanism, cite a specific example (the drug and the affected neurotransmitter) and
briefly describe its mechanism of action.
8. (3 pts) The membrane potential, Em, of a post-synaptic cell can be calculated from the
following equation:
where grest is the leakage current which maintains the resting potential, Erest is the normal resting
potential, gE is the conductance due to excitatory post-synaptic channels (e.g., AMPA channels),
ErevE is the reversal potential for the excitatory channels, gI is the conductance due to inhibitory
post-synaptic channels (e.g., GABA channels) and ErevI is the reversal potential for the
inhibitory channels (this equation comes from the equivalence circuit discussed in Lecture 13
& 14, slide 21). Assume grest = 1 milliSiemens, Erest = -65 mV, ErevE = -10 mV, ErevI = -70 mV.
a) If gE at the peak of the EPSP is 2 milliSiemens, what is the height of the EPSP
without an IPSP (i.e., what is the change in potential from resting)? +36.3mV
b) If gI at the peak of the IPSP is 1 milliSiemens, what is the change in potential
from resting?
+23.3mV
c) What is the sum of the peak IPSP voltage change and the peak EPSP voltage
change?
+59.5mV
d) What is the net change in synaptic potential when an EPSP and IPSP occur
simultaneously?
134.6mV
Why is your answer different from the simple sum of potentials in part c?
Normally, in body EPSP and IPSP don’t occur separately and independently. These two take
place together and you can’t separate them. This explain why the net change is different
when each is determined separately as opposed to when are occurring together
Neuroscience 3600 Problem Set 4
9. (1 pt) A cell receives two synaptic inputs at adjacent locations on a dendritic branch. Each
synapse, when activated by a single pre-synaptic spike, produces a depolarizing EPSP. From
resting potential, these EPSPs create a peak voltage change of +18 mV. If the resting potential is
-80 mV and threshold for spike generation is -40 mV, can these two synapses ever cause a spike
in the post-synaptic cell? Explain.
10. (2 pts) The left two columns in the figure below (Fig 5.20 from your book) show ion
flow and net current during an EPSP at different clamp voltages in an ACh channel
that is equally permeable to both Na+ and K+. Now, assume that Na+ concentration
inside is equal to the outside Na+ concentration. In the right two columns, show ion
flow and net current during an EPSP under these new conditions.
Page | 3
3K
+
3K+
3K+
3K+