I have started this paper. I need well written suggestions – please read the attached requirements before responding. Thank you very much
Recruitment Strategies: Internal vs. External
Running head: RECRUITMENT STRATEGIES: INTERNAL VS EXTERNAL
1
RECRUITMENT STRATEGIES: INTERNAL VS EXTERNAL
2
Recruitment Strategies: Internal vs. External
Recruitment strategies must be tied into the workforce planning process, tying recruiting efforts to the strategic plan, working with managers to develop job requirements, establishing and advertising budget, determining to use internal or external sources to fill the positions.
The first issue to consider is that of locating the best qualified candidates to fill the positions. A number of factors relates to the characteristics of each position: a view of the labor market depending upon specific job requirements; where one searches for candidates depends upon the availability of the specific skills, knowledge, abilities (KSAs) in the various labor markets; and the costs of recruiting the right candidate. The company must choose the method of recruitment internal or external.
A number of advantages to filling jobs internally or promoting from within include: management has an opportunity to evaluate in-house candidates to determine the employees’ suitability for advancement; the possibility of future promotion can encourage employees to maintain a high-level of performance and providing advancement opportunities to employees communicates the company values and rewards employee contributions.
Advantages to recruit externally bring new ideas into the company, revitalizes operations; cost-effective to hire individuals with highly specialized skills than it is to develop employees within the company. Looking outside the company to fill positions provide opportunities to increase the diversity of the company. Disadvantages to recruiting outside the organization will affect the motivation and loyalty of current employees; it is difficult for the company to know how someone from the outside will fit into the company’s culture.
This paper will research if an organization’s strategy to externally recruit demonstrates that external candidates tend to be superior to internal candidates.
Week 2 – Case 1
TANGLEWOOD CASE 1 | Possible | Earned | Comments | Actual | |||||||||||||||||||
Introduction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussed case and scenario, which effectively introduced case. | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Effectively discussed Tanglewood’s business strategy and goals, which supported their decisions throughout the paper. | 2 | 0 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statement Validation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Addressed the 1 | 3 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1. Acquire or develop talent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Hire or outsource | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3. External or internal hiring | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Core or flexible workforce | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Hire or retain | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6. National or global | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Attract or relocate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Overstaff or understaff | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Short- or long-term focus | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Person job or person organization match | |||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Specific or general KSAO | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12. Exceptional or acceptable workforce quality | |||||||||||||||||||||||
13. Active or passive diversity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Summarized paper with a well thought out conclusion. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Organization & Cohesiveness of Work | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper was organized with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation; was easy to read and understand; and was graduate-level writing. Followed APA or MLA formatting standards. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 100 | ERROR:#REF! |
Week 4 – Case 3
TANGLEWOOD CASE 3 | ||||||
Development of Recruitment Guide | ||||||
Presented a fully-developed recruitment guide. | ||||||
Evaluated the various methods of recruiting for open or targeted. | 20 | |||||
Thoroughly reviewed how each method fares in terms of yields and costs. | ||||||
Effectively assessed Northern Oregon’s suggestion for other divisions. | ||||||
Identified and reviewed appropriate employee performance measures and addressed management concerns for these measures. | ||||||
Provided viable proposals for targeted, realistic, and branded recruiting messages for Tanglewood’s customer store associate positions, including review of traditional arguments for and against realistic recruiting policies. | ||||||
Conclusion, Organization, & Cohesiveness of Work | ||||||
Summarized paper with a well thought out conclusion. Paper was organized with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation; was easy to read and understand; and was graduate-level writing. Followed APA or MLA formatting standards. | ||||||
120 | 25 |
Week 7 –
Course Project
Title Page | ||
Title page provided, which included title of course paper, student name, email address, school name, instructor’s name, date of submittal, and Course ID # HR594. | ||
Thoroughly introduced/described the selected strategic staffing topic and rationale. Provided background/facts to clearly review the issues. | ||
Problem | ||
Identified and clearly stated the issues or problems. Assessment included an in-depth review, which identified the real problem(s). Combined or separated issues accordingly. Problem statement was short and concise. Specified point of view when identifying the problem. | 30 | |
Topical Area | ||
Connected problem to strategic staffing topical area. Included synthesis of at least four scholarly, professional studies, or articles that were relevant to inquiry. | 60 | |
Causes | ||
Identified and described causes, which directly related to the problem/issue. Applied concepts and models from the text, class discussions, and literature review. Discussed concepts, ideas, or insights that substantiated the staffing problem core issue(s). Supported analysis with research. | ||
Solutions | ||
Suggested potential organizational consequences over the next year, two years, or more if no action taken. Provided recommendations and proposed at least two action steps that leveraged the organization towards a more desirable state. Thoroughly described action plan, including by whom, with whom, and in what sequence. Included substantive reflective statement about how assignment influenced personal, academic, and professional leadership and managerial development. |
40 | |
Reflection | ||
Used at least eight scholarly resources (not including textbook). | 15 | |
References | ||
Properly cited sources both in text and in a reference list following APA or MLA formatting standards. | ||
240 |