USA: +1(669)289-8683 
Sign in
Examine workflow processes in your place of employment for areas that may need improvement.
- Explore the literature for a technology that could be utilized to improve that workflow process.
When introducing workflow redesign or a new technology there are many steps to consider.
- Who does this impact?
- What are the costs?
- How do we know it is successful?
For this assignment create a PowerPoint presentation using the waterfall or agile method for a workflow redesign in your project.
Requirements
- 10-12 slide presentation not including title or reference slides.
- Discuss design from start to finish (for instance…)
- What is your workflow redesign or technology being implemented? Why is it needed?
- What are the costs, risks, benefits?
- How will the optimal redesign be chosen and created?
- How will it be implemented and by who?
- How will you know if your redesign is successful? How long until you know?
- What maintenance is needed (guidelines updated, new software etc)?
- Include at least 3 recent peer-reviewed journal articles to support your proposed workflow redesign.
Graduate Assignment Rubric – 150 Points (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
Addresses all components of the assignment.
40 to >37.9 pts
Advanced
Comprehensively addresses all components of the assignment.
37.9 to >31.9 pts
Competent
Addresses all or most components of the assignment adequately and/or components are not addressed or not addressed comprehensively.
31.9 to >0.0 pts
Emerging
Addresses all or most components of the assignment but not adequately and/or components are not addressed.
0 pts
Incomplete
Missing or Assignment was not submitted and/or not submitted on time
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport and Evidence
Uses evidence to support main tenets, points, or arguments presented in the assignment.
40 to >37.9 pts
Advanced
Uses comprehensive, appropriate evidence to support the main tenets of the assignment.
37.9 to >31.9 pts
Competent
Uses adequate but minimal evidence to support the main tenets of the assignment and/or the evidence cited is weak, unrelated, or does not support the part of the assignment in which is it cited.
31.9 to >0.0 pts
Emerging
Does not adequately use appropriate evidence to support the main tenets of the assignment.
0 pts
Incomplete
Missing or Assignment was not submitted and/or not submitted on time
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Coherence
Uses a logical progression of ideas and presents a clear articulation of main tenets. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
Written coherently, using APA format or another
format as required.
35 to >33.25 pts
Advanced
Clear, logical, coherently written and appropriately formatted
33.25 to >28.0 pts
Competent
Assignment has some organizational, writing, and/or APA problems which distract from its flow and understandability.
28 to >0.0 pts
Emerging
Assignment has many organizational, writing, and/or APA problems which distract from its flow and understandability.
0 pts
Incomplete
Missing or Assignment was not submitted and/or not submitted on time
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCumulative Impression
The assignment, as a whole, is scholarly, compelling, and impressive.
35 to >33.25 pts
Advanced
The assignment as whole reflects graduate level scholarship. It is compelling, impressive, and contributes to expansion of knowledge.
33.25 to >28.0 pts
Competent
The assignment as whole is adequate as graduate level scholarship but needs polishing. It does not reflect a clear contribution to expansion of knowledge.
28 to >0.0 pts
Emerging
The assignment is unclear or inadequately structured with multiple content, organizational, writing, or APA problems.
0 pts
Incomplete
Missing or Assignment was not submitted and/or not submitted on time
35 pts
Total Points: 150
Previous
Next
